Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16108#discussion_r90562475
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/StreamingQueryListenerSuite.scala
---
@@ -191,6 +192,50 @@ class StreamingQueryListenerSuite
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16094
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16094
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69517/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16094
**[Test build #69517 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69517/consoleFull)**
for PR 16094 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16111
**[Test build #69518 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69518/consoleFull)**
for PR 16111 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16104
Will review this PR tonight. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16111
[SPARK-18538] [SQL] [Backport-2.1] Fix Concurrent Table Fetching Using
DataFrameReader JDBC APIs
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is to backport
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15863
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69498/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15863
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16107
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69502/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15863
**[Test build #69498 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69498/consoleFull)**
for PR 15863 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16107
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16107
**[Test build #69502 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69502/consoleFull)**
for PR 16107 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15998
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15998
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69501/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15998
**[Test build #69501 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69501/consoleFull)**
for PR 15998 at commit
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15821
Hi @wesm and @icexelloss , that sounds good on our end. @yinxusen has been
working on validating some basic conversion so far, but everything is still
very preliminary so it would be great to
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13147#discussion_r90560927
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/planning/QueryPlanner.scala
---
@@ -27,6 +27,14 @@ import
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16094
**[Test build #69517 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69517/consoleFull)**
for PR 16094 at commit
Github user foxish commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16092
The test failure appears to be an unrelated flake.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user marmbrus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16094
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16092
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69499/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16092
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16092
**[Test build #69499 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69499/consoleFull)**
for PR 16092 at commit
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16061
At the risk of redundant announcements, I am going to present this
spark-on-kube topic at the [Kubernetes
SIG-Apps](https://github.com/kubernetes/community/tree/master/sig-apps) next
Monday
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16080
The
[`alterTable`](https://github.com/cloud-fan/spark/blob/5ee6489cdd1c22a1071c4fb6c7e4c4af126c9d50/sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveExternalCatalog.scala#L533)
API in
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16061
Since we have at least four people with interest in working on the code, I
have a workflow proposal, which is that we all submit candidate updates to
#16061 in the form of PRs against
Github user nsyca commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16046
Thank you. I was reading the test log just to see if my code might cause
the failure. It does not look like it does.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16046
**[Test build #69515 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69515/consoleFull)**
for PR 16046 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16043
**[Test build #69516 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69516/consoleFull)**
for PR 16043 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16046
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16084
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16084
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69496/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16046
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16046
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69500/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16084
**[Test build #69496 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69496/consoleFull)**
for PR 16084 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16046
**[Test build #69500 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69500/consoleFull)**
for PR 16046 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16110
**[Test build #69513 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69513/consoleFull)**
for PR 16110 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16090
**[Test build #69514 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69514/consoleFull)**
for PR 16090 at commit
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16090#discussion_r90555068
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/DDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -565,7 +571,8 @@ class DDLSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16090#discussion_r90554917
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/createDataSourceTables.scala
---
@@ -58,13 +58,20 @@ case class
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16110
cc @cloud-fan @hvanhovell
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16110
[SPARK-18674][SQL][Follow-Up] improve the error message of using join
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Added a test case for using joins with nested fields.
###
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16108
**[Test build #69512 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69512/consoleFull)**
for PR 16108 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16106
**[Test build #69511 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69511/consoleFull)**
for PR 16106 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16104
Last time,
```
[info] - set hive.metastore.warehouse.dir *** FAILED *** (5 minutes, 0
seconds)
```
At this time,
```
[info] - SPARK-18360: default table path of tables
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16104
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16104
**[Test build #69503 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69503/consoleFull)**
for PR 16104 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16043
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69510/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16043
**[Test build #69510 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69510/consoleFull)**
for PR 16043 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16043
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16043
**[Test build #69510 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69510/consoleFull)**
for PR 16043 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16106
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16106
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69497/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16106
**[Test build #69497 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69497/consoleFull)**
for PR 16106 at commit
Github user foxish commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16092
@JoshRosen Thanks for reviewing.
Updated. PTAL.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16105
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16105
Thanks. Merging to master, 2.1 and 2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15863
The only failure seems to be irrelevant.
```
Had test failures in pyspark.streaming.tests with pypy; see logs.
```
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15863
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69493/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15863
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15863
**[Test build #69493 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69493/consoleFull)**
for PR 15863 at commit
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15237#discussion_r90543844
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/PoolSuite.scala ---
@@ -20,15 +20,21 @@ package org.apache.spark.scheduler
import
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15237#discussion_r90548446
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/SchedulableBuilder.scala ---
@@ -102,38 +105,55 @@ private[spark] class FairSchedulableBuilder(val
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15237#discussion_r90548133
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/SchedulableBuilder.scala ---
@@ -102,38 +105,55 @@ private[spark] class FairSchedulableBuilder(val
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15237#discussion_r90544307
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/PoolSuite.scala ---
@@ -20,15 +20,21 @@ package org.apache.spark.scheduler
import
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15237#discussion_r90547665
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/SchedulableBuilder.scala ---
@@ -102,38 +105,55 @@ private[spark] class FairSchedulableBuilder(val
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15237#discussion_r90548835
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/PoolSuite.scala ---
@@ -178,4 +177,36 @@ class PoolSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15237#discussion_r90543989
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/PoolSuite.scala ---
@@ -74,30 +79,24 @@ class PoolSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
LocalSparkContext
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16108#discussion_r90548402
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/StreamingQueryListenerSuite.scala
---
@@ -191,6 +192,48 @@ class StreamingQueryListenerSuite
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16108#discussion_r90548243
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/StreamingQueryListenerSuite.scala
---
@@ -191,6 +192,48 @@ class StreamingQueryListenerSuite
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16108#discussion_r90547917
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -218,7 +223,15 @@ class StreamExecution(
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16108#discussion_r90547116
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -603,6 +603,13 @@ object SQLConf {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16043
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69509/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16043
**[Test build #69509 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69509/consoleFull)**
for PR 16043 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15863
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69494/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16108#discussion_r90547085
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -603,6 +603,13 @@ object SQLConf {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16043
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15863
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15863
**[Test build #69494 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69494/consoleFull)**
for PR 15863 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16043
**[Test build #69509 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69509/consoleFull)**
for PR 16043 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16105
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16109
**[Test build #69508 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69508/consoleFull)**
for PR 16109 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16109
**[Test build #3452 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3452/consoleFull)**
for PR 16109 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16109
**[Test build #3451 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3451/consoleFull)**
for PR 16109 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16109
**[Test build #3453 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3453/consoleFull)**
for PR 16109 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16109
**[Test build #3450 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3450/consoleFull)**
for PR 16109 at commit
Github user zsxwing closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16048
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16109#discussion_r90545011
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaTestUtils.scala
---
@@ -331,7 +351,7 @@ class KafkaTestUtils extends
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16109#discussion_r90544901
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaTestUtils.scala
---
@@ -286,36 +286,56 @@ class KafkaTestUtils extends
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16109#discussion_r90544756
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSource.scala
---
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ private[kafka010] case class
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16109
[SPARK-18588][Tests]Fix flaky test:
KafkaSourceStressForDontFailOnDataLossSuite
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fixed the following failures:
```
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15219
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15219
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69492/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15795
+1 for consolidating the examples. The boilerplate of creating a dataset
and setting algorithm parameters takes up most of the example. I would create
1 example per algorithm which does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16043
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16043
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69507/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16043
**[Test build #69507 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69507/consoleFull)**
for PR 16043 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15219
**[Test build #69492 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69492/consoleFull)**
for PR 15219 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16100#discussion_r90543899
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/joinTypes.scala
---
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ case class NaturalJoin(tpe: JoinType)
301 - 400 of 686 matches
Mail list logo
