Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16156#discussion_r90968974
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetFilterSuite.scala
---
@@ -578,4 +578,66 @@ class
Github user mallman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15998
I suspect this is a spurious, unrelated test failure. Can we get a rebuild,
please?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16156#discussion_r90968652
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetFilterSuite.scala
---
@@ -578,4 +578,66 @@ class
Github user xwu0226 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16156#discussion_r90968718
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetFilterSuite.scala
---
@@ -578,4 +578,66 @@ class
Github user xwu0226 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16156#discussion_r90968659
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetFilterSuite.scala
---
@@ -578,4 +578,66 @@ class
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16156#discussion_r90968590
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetFilterSuite.scala
---
@@ -578,4 +578,66 @@ class
Github user xwu0226 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16156#discussion_r90968586
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/SpecificParquetRecordReaderBase.java
---
@@ -107,7 +107,16 @@ public
GitHub user michalsenkyr opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16157
[SPARK-18723][DOC] Expanded programming guide information on wholeTexâ¦
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add additional information to wholeTextFiles in the
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16152
cc @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16149#discussion_r90968163
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/GeneralizedLinearRegression.scala
---
@@ -479,7 +479,12 @@ object GeneralizedLinearRegression
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16156#discussion_r90968113
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/SpecificParquetRecordReaderBase.java
---
@@ -107,7 +107,16 @@ public
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16151
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16151
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69681/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16151
**[Test build #69681 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69681/consoleFull)**
for PR 16151 at commit
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16090
Filed
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18725
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18726
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15998
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69683/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15998
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15998
**[Test build #69683 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69683/consoleFull)**
for PR 15998 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16131#discussion_r90966317
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/GeneralizedLinearRegression.scala
---
@@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ object GeneralizedLinearRegression
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16152
+1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15722
**[Test build #69689 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69689/consoleFull)**
for PR 15722 at commit
Github user actuaryzhang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16131#discussion_r90965352
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/GeneralizedLinearRegression.scala
---
@@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ object
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15722
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user xwu0226 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16156
@gatorsmile @liancheng Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16156
**[Test build #69688 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69688/consoleFull)**
for PR 16156 at commit
GitHub user xwu0226 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16156
[SPARK-18539][SQL]: tolerate pushed-down filter on non-existing parquet
columns
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When `spark.sql.parquet.filterPushdown` is on,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16152
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69680/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16152
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16152
**[Test build #69680 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69680/consoleFull)**
for PR 16152 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16068
**[Test build #69687 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69687/consoleFull)**
for PR 16068 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16155
**[Test build #69686 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69686/consoleFull)**
for PR 16155 at commit
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16155
[SPARK-18722][SS]Move no data rate limit from StreamExecution to
ProgressReporter
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Move no data rate limit from StreamExecution to
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16131#discussion_r90956362
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/GeneralizedLinearRegression.scala
---
@@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ object GeneralizedLinearRegression
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16053
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69685/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16053
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16053
**[Test build #69685 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69685/consoleFull)**
for PR 16053 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16137
It is good to start small, but not all small changes are worthwhile. It
would be better to focus on fixing actual problems like a typo or missing doc.
You can then expand to improve / fix docs
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16053
**[Test build #69685 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69685/consoleFull)**
for PR 16053 at commit
Github user actuaryzhang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16131#discussion_r90955908
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/GeneralizedLinearRegression.scala
---
@@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ object
Github user Mironor commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16137
Hi @srowen , it's quite hard to directly jump on something like
"refactoring core scheduling logic", I thought fixing small things would be a
good start. To make it simple I limited all the changes
Github user mengxr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16154
@shivaram Let's wait Jenkins first:) I'm not sure it will pass.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user marmbrus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16138
This will be very convenient! Looking forward to the whole patch. For SQL
I think you should look at
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16130
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16068
LGTM except one comment on test cases.
cc @hvanhovell @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16130
Didn't merge to 2.0 (forgot I changed these docs in 2.1).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16068#discussion_r90953581
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveUDFSuite.scala
---
@@ -487,6 +488,43 @@ class HiveUDFSuite extends QueryTest
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16130
And 2.0 too, since it's relevant there.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16130
Merging to master / 2.1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16154
Thanks @mengxr for the change. Taking a look now
cc @felixcheung @falaki
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user koertkuipers commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16143
thanks for getting this fixed so fast
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16154
**[Test build #69684 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69684/consoleFull)**
for PR 16154 at commit
GitHub user mengxr opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16154
[SPARK-17822] Make JVMObjectTracker a member variable of RBackend
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
* This PR changes `JVMObjectTracker` from `object` to `class` and let
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16068
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69676/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16068
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16068
**[Test build #69676 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69676/consoleFull)**
for PR 16068 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16137#discussion_r90948903
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -276,13 +279,17 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends Logging
{
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16137#discussion_r90948767
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -224,8 +224,8 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends Logging {
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16137#discussion_r90948858
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -276,13 +279,17 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends Logging
{
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16137#discussion_r90949013
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -461,11 +478,12 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends Logging
{
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16137#discussion_r90948705
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -119,22 +119,22 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends Logging
{
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16137#discussion_r90948641
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -119,22 +119,22 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends Logging
{
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16120#discussion_r90948431
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/basicLogicalOperators.scala
---
@@ -93,13 +93,13 @@ case class
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16120#discussion_r90947415
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/basicLogicalOperators.scala
---
@@ -93,13 +93,13 @@ case class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16103
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69677/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16103
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16103
**[Test build #69677 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69677/consoleFull)**
for PR 16103 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15998
**[Test build #69683 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69683/consoleFull)**
for PR 15998 at commit
Github user mallman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15998
@gatorsmile I've applied your patch and reverted the change I made in the
previous commit to workaround that defect. The failed test now passes for me.
Let's see what Jenkins says.
---
If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16153
**[Test build #69682 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69682/consoleFull)**
for PR 16153 at commit
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16153
[SPARK-18694][SS] Add StreamingQuery.explain and exception to Python and
fix StreamingQueryException (branch 2.1)
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Backport #16125 to
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16140
_shrug_ It seems pretty unrelated to SparkSession. I get that it's a
convenience method but something Spark really needs to expose as an API method?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16125
Merged to master, but 2.1 failed due to mima exclude conflict. can you make
another PR for 2.1 @zsxwing thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16131#discussion_r90944278
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/GeneralizedLinearRegression.scala
---
@@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ object GeneralizedLinearRegression
Github user mallman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15998
> #15998 (comment) found a bug. If this PR will not be merged to Spark 2.1
branch, I think we need to submit a separate PR for resolving the bug.
I would like to get this patch into Spark
Github user mallman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15998
@gatorsmile I can't find your commit:
```
[msa@ip-10-0-8-34 spark-master]$ git fetch origin
remote: Counting objects: 114, done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (53/53), done.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16150
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16150
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69678/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16150
**[Test build #69678 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69678/consoleFull)**
for PR 16150 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16144#discussion_r90939466
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/InternalRow.scala ---
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ import
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15998
@mallman ,
https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f4c48e1d61dc4d1fc581b78dd9e5c948965acad5
might be what @cloud-fan wants.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16143
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16125
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16151
**[Test build #69681 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69681/consoleFull)**
for PR 16151 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16144#discussion_r90939139
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends Logging {
Github user nchammas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16151
@srowen - OK, I elaborated a bit based on the snippet you posted. Feel free
to nitpick on the wording. Would be happy to tweak further.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16151
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16125
Merging this to master and 2.1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16147
It sounds like some of the failures aren't just due to tests, but due to
some functionality that doesn't work on Windows? or do I misundesrtand it?
It still may be the right thing to do to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16151
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69679/
Test PASSed.
---
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16152
[SPARK-18720] [SQL] [MINOR] Code Refactoring of withColumn
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Our existing withColumn for adding metadata can simply use the existing
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16151
**[Test build #69679 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69679/consoleFull)**
for PR 16151 at commit
Github user nchammas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16151
@srowen - Good call. Will elaborate a bit based on what you posted.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15992
@uncleGen could you close this one, please? The current workaround in
#15992 looks enough. You can create a new one if you have a better solution for
Java APIs.
---
If your project is set up for
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16143
LGTM - merging to master/2.1. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15998
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15998#issuecomment-264761754 found a
bug. If this PR will not be merged to Spark 2.1 branch, I think we need to
submit a separate PR for resolving the bug.
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16145#discussion_r90936511
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ShuffledRowRDD.scala ---
@@ -117,7 +113,7 @@ class CoalescedPartitioner(val parent:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16152
**[Test build #69680 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69680/consoleFull)**
for PR 16152 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16128#discussion_r90934943
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/OffsetSeqLogSuite.scala
---
@@ -60,4 +60,39 @@ class OffsetSeqLogSuite extends
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16148#discussion_r90934508
--- Diff: examples/src/main/r/ml/ml.R ---
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+#
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16148#discussion_r90934363
--- Diff: examples/src/main/r/ml/lda.R ---
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+#
301 - 400 of 511 matches
Mail list logo
