Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16349
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16349
Merging in master/branch-2.1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16378
I've also cherry picked this into branch-2.1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16382
**[Test build #70511 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70511/testReport)**
for PR 16382 at commit
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16380#discussion_r93577731
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/ShuffleBlockFetcherIterator.scala
---
@@ -315,6 +315,10 @@ final class ShuffleBlockFetcherIterator(
GitHub user jerryshao opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16382
[SPARK-18975][Core] Add an API to remove SparkListener
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In current Spark we could add customized SparkListener through
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16378
LGTM, merging to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16378
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16119#discussion_r93576154
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/context.py ---
@@ -72,8 +72,13 @@ def __init__(self, sparkContext, sparkSession=None,
jsqlContext=None):
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16119#discussion_r93575937
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/tests.py ---
@@ -1851,6 +1851,71 @@ def test_hivecontext(self):
self.assertIn("default", out.decode('utf-8'))
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16381
Note that this is code from the initial Spark SQL commit!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16381
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70509/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16381
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16381
**[Test build #70509 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70509/testReport)**
for PR 16381 at commit
Github user hhbyyh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15211
Thanks a lot for the review. @jkbradley
About the class name. AFAIK, typically "linear SVM" and "general SVM" use
different algorithms for implementations. Just like the difference between
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16380
**[Test build #70510 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70510/testReport)**
for PR 16380 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16380
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16380
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70508/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16380
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16380
**[Test build #70508 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70508/testReport)**
for PR 16380 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16380#discussion_r93570841
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/ShuffleBlockFetcherIterator.scala
---
@@ -315,6 +315,10 @@ final class ShuffleBlockFetcherIterator(
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16380#discussion_r93570750
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/ShuffleBlockFetcherIterator.scala
---
@@ -315,6 +315,10 @@ final class ShuffleBlockFetcherIterator(
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16322
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16322
Thanks! Merging to master and 2.1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16253
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16253
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70506/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16253
**[Test build #70506 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70506/testReport)**
for PR 16253 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16323
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16323
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70505/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16323
**[Test build #70505 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70505/testReport)**
for PR 16323 at commit
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16053#discussion_r93568327
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskDescription.scala ---
@@ -17,27 +17,123 @@
package org.apache.spark.scheduler
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16053#discussion_r93567628
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskDescription.scala ---
@@ -17,27 +17,123 @@
package org.apache.spark.scheduler
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16053#discussion_r93567927
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskDescription.scala ---
@@ -17,27 +17,123 @@
package org.apache.spark.scheduler
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16053#discussion_r93568599
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskDescription.scala ---
@@ -17,27 +17,123 @@
package org.apache.spark.scheduler
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16053#discussion_r93568367
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskDescription.scala ---
@@ -17,27 +17,123 @@
package org.apache.spark.scheduler
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13599
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13599
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70503/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13599
**[Test build #70503 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70503/testReport)**
for PR 13599 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16371
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16371
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70504/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16371
**[Test build #70504 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70504/testReport)**
for PR 16371 at commit
Github user gatorsmile closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16372
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16372
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16380
LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16322
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70502/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16322
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user actuaryzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16344
@srowen @yanboliang Thanks much for the feedback. I now have a better
understanding of the code and the issue. I have made new commits reflecting
your suggestions. The major changes are
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16322
**[Test build #70502 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70502/testReport)**
for PR 16322 at commit
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16380#discussion_r93566371
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/ShuffleBlockFetcherIterator.scala
---
@@ -315,6 +315,10 @@ final class ShuffleBlockFetcherIterator(
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16380#discussion_r93566199
--- Diff:
common/network-common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/server/TransportChannelHandler.java
---
@@ -88,29 +88,29 @@ public void
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70501/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user sitalkedia commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16291
@markhamstra, @vanzin thanks for your comments!
>> so it is entirely possible. for example, for one ListenerEventExecutor
to process a task end event for a particular task before another
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
**[Test build #70501 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70501/testReport)**
for PR 15505 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16366
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user actuaryzhang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16344#discussion_r93565567
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/GeneralizedLinearRegression.scala
---
@@ -303,14 +341,15 @@ object
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16370
LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user actuaryzhang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16344#discussion_r93565335
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/GeneralizedLinearRegression.scala
---
@@ -64,6 +64,27 @@ private[regression] trait
Github user sitalkedia closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12436
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user sitalkedia commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12436
@kayousterhout - Thanks for taking a look at the PR. Currently I don't
have time to work on it. I will close the PR and open a new PR with issues
addressed.
---
If your project is set up for
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16381
**[Test build #70509 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70509/testReport)**
for PR 16381 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16381
Please also merge this into branch-2.1 to minimize backport conflicts ...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16381#discussion_r93564401
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/partitioning.scala
---
@@ -1,49 +0,0 @@
-/*
- * Licensed to the
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16381
[SPARK-18973][SQL] Remove SortPartitions and RedistributeData
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
SortPartitions and RedistributeData logical operators are not actually used
and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16380
**[Test build #70508 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70508/testReport)**
for PR 16380 at commit
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16380
[SPARK-18972][Core]Fix the netty thread names for RPC
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Right now the name of threads created by Netty for Spark RPC are
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70507/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
**[Test build #70507 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70507/testReport)**
for PR 15505 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16294
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70500/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16294
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16294
**[Test build #70500 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70500/testReport)**
for PR 16294 at commit
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16053
I think the code change in core/ looks pretty good to me. Is there someone
who can look at the mesos changes ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16053
@kayousterhout it shows there are some conflicts ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
**[Test build #70507 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70507/testReport)**
for PR 15505 at commit
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16053
I fixed all of the issues mentioned with the commits I pushed a few days
ago, in case anyone was waiting for that and didn't notice!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user witgo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
@kayousterhout @squito
I think Kay's approach is a good idea.
We can first merging #16053, SPARK-18890 related code(including
multi-threaded serialization TaskDescription) to stay in the
Github user xuanyuanking commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16350
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user xuanyuanking closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16350
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16379#discussion_r93560851
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/PullOutNondeterministicSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16378
cc @cloud-fan too
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16253
**[Test build #70506 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70506/testReport)**
for PR 16253 at commit
Github user saturday-shi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16253#discussion_r93560749
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/status/api/v1/streaming/api.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16323
Updated. Please review @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16323
**[Test build #70505 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70505/testReport)**
for PR 16323 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16371
**[Test build #70504 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70504/testReport)**
for PR 16371 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13599
**[Test build #70503 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70503/testReport)**
for PR 13599 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16322
**[Test build #70502 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70502/testReport)**
for PR 16322 at commit
Github user witgo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505#discussion_r93558564
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/local/LocalSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -59,6 +62,12 @@ private[spark] class LocalEndpoint(
Github user witgo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505#discussion_r93558472
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskDescription.scala ---
@@ -17,27 +17,179 @@
package org.apache.spark.scheduler
Github user witgo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505#discussion_r93558527
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskDescription.scala ---
@@ -17,27 +17,179 @@
package org.apache.spark.scheduler
Github user witgo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505#discussion_r93558450
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -993,6 +993,12 @@ class DAGScheduler(
Github user witgo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505#discussion_r93558431
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/Executor.scala ---
@@ -232,6 +225,13 @@ private[spark] class Executor(
}
Github user witgo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505#discussion_r93558401
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/Executor.scala ---
@@ -136,14 +136,10 @@ private[spark] class Executor(
startDriverHeartbeater()
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
**[Test build #70501 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70501/testReport)**
for PR 15505 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16119#discussion_r93556600
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/context.py ---
@@ -72,8 +72,13 @@ def __init__(self, sparkContext, sparkSession=None,
jsqlContext=None):
self._sc =
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16294
**[Test build #70500 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70500/testReport)**
for PR 16294 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16119#discussion_r93556537
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/context.py ---
@@ -72,8 +72,13 @@ def __init__(self, sparkContext, sparkSession=None,
jsqlContext=None):
self._sc =
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16378
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70497/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16378
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
1 - 100 of 432 matches
Mail list logo
