Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16672
Could you please add the test cases for the scenarios (of non pre existing
location) you explained above? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16832
**[Test build #72750 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72750/testReport)**
for PR 16832 at commit
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
ok thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16892
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16892
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72744/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16892
**[Test build #72744 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72744/testReport)**
for PR 16892 at commit
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r100682019
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,623 @@
+/*
+
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16228#discussion_r100681997
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/JoinEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,314 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16895
**[Test build #72749 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72749/testReport)**
for PR 16895 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16724
> sortWithinPartitions("userId", "timestamp") doesn't it make the userId
continuous?
Oh, yes. I miss looking...
So you recommend that we only optimize this case to preserve the sort
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16724
`sortWithinPartitions("userId", "timestamp")` doesn't it make the `userId`
continuous?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15125
**[Test build #72748 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72748/testReport)**
for PR 15125 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16891#discussion_r100681839
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/jdbc/JDBCWriteSuite.scala ---
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ class JDBCWriteSuite extends SharedSQLContext with
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16891#discussion_r100681828
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/CaseInsensitiveMap.scala
---
@@ -23,16 +23,30 @@ package
Github user dding3 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15125
Thank you guys for reviewing the code. I have updated it based on the
comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16891#discussion_r100681778
--- Diff:
external/docker-integration-tests/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/jdbc/OracleIntegrationSuite.scala
---
@@ -149,4 +155,29 @@ class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16891#discussion_r100681762
--- Diff:
external/docker-integration-tests/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/jdbc/OracleIntegrationSuite.scala
---
@@ -149,4 +155,29 @@ class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16891#discussion_r100681754
--- Diff:
external/docker-integration-tests/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/jdbc/OracleIntegrationSuite.scala
---
@@ -62,6 +62,12 @@ class
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16882#discussion_r100681737
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ object TypeCoercion {
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16878#discussion_r100681712
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVSuite.scala
---
@@ -187,15 +187,18 @@ class CSVSuite extends
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16878#discussion_r100681701
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVSuite.scala
---
@@ -213,27 +216,33 @@ class CSVSuite extends
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16878#discussion_r100681692
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVSuite.scala
---
@@ -187,15 +187,18 @@ class CSVSuite extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16895
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72747/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16895
**[Test build #72747 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72747/testReport)**
for PR 16895 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16878#discussion_r100681642
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -425,7 +425,9 @@ class SparkSqlAstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16895
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16724
> Just realized df.repartition($"userId").sortWithinPartitions("userId",
"timestamp") will produce a result set as we expected, can we optimize this
case?
I may not understand you
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16895
**[Test build #72747 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72747/testReport)**
for PR 16895 at commit
Github user JasonMWhite commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16896#discussion_r100681604
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/tests.py ---
@@ -1435,6 +1435,12 @@ def test_time_with_timezone(self):
self.assertEqual(now, now1)
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16895
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16895#discussion_r100681579
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/TestJsonData.scala
---
@@ -231,4 +231,10 @@ private[json] trait
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16895#discussion_r100681578
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JsonSuite.scala
---
@@ -1364,9 +1364,9 @@ class JsonSuite extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16672
**[Test build #72746 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72746/testReport)**
for PR 16672 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16895#discussion_r100681568
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/TestJsonData.scala
---
@@ -231,4 +231,10 @@ private[json] trait
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16895#discussion_r100681550
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameReader.scala ---
@@ -328,18 +329,34 @@ class DataFrameReader private[sql](sparkSession:
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16672
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16724
> oh good catch. Then it seems like
df.repartition($"userId").sortWithinPartitions("timestamp") won't produce a
result set as we expected.
Just realized
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
@windpiger Could you please resolve conflicts? Looks good to me. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787#discussion_r100681309
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/VersionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -649,6 +648,16 @@ class VersionsSuite extends QueryTest
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16724
@cloud-fan OK. I see. If we don't want to add implicit penalty into the
existing API, the only way I can think now, is a config to preserve the sort
order. This config can be in `SQLConf`, or we can
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787#discussion_r100681187
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/VersionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -649,6 +648,16 @@ class VersionsSuite extends QueryTest
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787#discussion_r100681160
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/VersionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -570,7 +570,6 @@ class VersionsSuite extends QueryTest
Github user gatorsmile closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16894
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16868
**[Test build #72745 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72745/testReport)**
for PR 16868 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16870#discussion_r100680992
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtils.scala
---
@@ -95,9 +95,10 @@ object DateTimeUtils {
sdf
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16868
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16894
thanks, merging to 2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16896#discussion_r100680863
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/tests.py ---
@@ -1435,6 +1435,12 @@ def test_time_with_timezone(self):
self.assertEqual(now, now1)
Github user dding3 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15125#discussion_r100680651
--- Diff: graphx/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/graphx/Pregel.scala ---
@@ -123,16 +127,25 @@ object Pregel extends Logging {
s" but got
Github user dding3 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15125#discussion_r100680648
--- Diff: graphx/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/graphx/Pregel.scala ---
@@ -123,16 +127,25 @@ object Pregel extends Logging {
s" but got
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16896#discussion_r100680623
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/tests.py ---
@@ -1435,6 +1435,12 @@ def test_time_with_timezone(self):
self.assertEqual(now, now1)
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16896
Retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16892
**[Test build #72744 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72744/testReport)**
for PR 16892 at commit
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16892
Jenkins retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16894
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72743/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16894
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16894
**[Test build #72743 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72743/consoleFull)**
for PR 16894 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16228#discussion_r100679282
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/JoinEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,314 @@
+/*
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r100679242
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,623 @@
+/*
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16724
If we admit that preserving the sort order is not guaranteed by the API,
then the change in this PR is not reasonable, as it has performance penalty.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386#discussion_r100679183
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JsonSuite.scala
---
@@ -1764,4 +1769,117 @@ class JsonSuite extends
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386#discussion_r100679101
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/json/JacksonParser.scala
---
@@ -394,36 +447,32 @@ class JacksonParser(
}
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386#discussion_r100678935
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/json/JacksonParser.scala
---
@@ -48,69 +47,110 @@ class JacksonParser(
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16777#discussion_r100678810
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercionSuite.scala
---
@@ -379,6 +380,75 @@ class TypeCoercionSuite
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16777#discussion_r100678782
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercionSuite.scala
---
@@ -379,6 +380,75 @@ class TypeCoercionSuite
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16777#discussion_r100678739
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercionSuite.scala
---
@@ -379,6 +380,75 @@ class TypeCoercionSuite
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16674#discussion_r100678180
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveSQLViewSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,154 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16674#discussion_r100678170
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SQLViewSuite.scala ---
@@ -452,311 +542,96 @@ class SQLViewSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16674#discussion_r100678107
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -617,13 +617,17 @@ class Analyzer(
private
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16894
**[Test build #72743 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72743/consoleFull)**
for PR 16894 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16894
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16896
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user JasonMWhite opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16896
[SPARK-19561][Python] cast TimestampType.toInternal output to long
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Cast the output of `TimestampType.toInternal` to long to allow
Github user CodingCat commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16697
@mridulm what I thought is that logging the events which are sampled
from the timeline may not provide meaningful info to the user
the current implementation will clean the events queue
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16674
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16674
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72742/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16674
**[Test build #72742 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72742/testReport)**
for PR 16674 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16895
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user pjfanning commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16854#discussion_r100674503
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameReader.scala ---
@@ -361,6 +362,41 @@ class DataFrameReader private[sql](sparkSession:
GitHub user pjfanning opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16895
[SPARK-15615][SQL] Add an API to load DataFrame from Dataset[String]
storing JSON
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
SPARK-15615 proposes replacing the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16674
**[Test build #72742 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72742/testReport)**
for PR 16674 at commit
Github user markhamstra commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620
Thanks for all the investigation and the write up, @kayousterhout This
makes good sense to me, and should take us a long way toward both fixing the
immediate bug and improving the code. We
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16674#discussion_r100672477
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SQLViewSuite.scala ---
@@ -398,26 +472,6 @@ class SQLViewSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16674#discussion_r100672397
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -624,6 +624,9 @@ class Analyzer(
} catch
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16674#discussion_r100671808
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveSQLViewSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,154 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16871#discussion_r100671366
--- Diff: project/SparkBuild.scala ---
@@ -765,16 +750,6 @@ object CopyDependencies {
}
-object Java8TestSettings {
- import
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16777
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72741/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16777
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16777
**[Test build #72741 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72741/testReport)**
for PR 16777 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16777
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16777
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72740/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16777
**[Test build #72740 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72740/testReport)**
for PR 16777 at commit
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16674#discussion_r100670964
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SQLViewSuite.scala ---
@@ -452,311 +542,96 @@ class SQLViewSuite extends QueryTest
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16674#discussion_r100670864
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SQLViewSuite.scala ---
@@ -452,311 +542,96 @@ class SQLViewSuite extends QueryTest
Github user pjfanning commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16854#discussion_r100670326
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameReader.scala ---
@@ -361,6 +362,41 @@ class DataFrameReader private[sql](sparkSession:
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16824
Just back from Spark Summit East, I'll try and take a look soon :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15945
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15945
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72739/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15945
**[Test build #72739 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72739/testReport)**
for PR 15945 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16882
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72737/
Test PASSed.
---
101 - 200 of 248 matches
Mail list logo
