Github user wangmiao1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17640#discussion_r113972686
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/serialize.R ---
@@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ writeObject <- function(con, object, writeType = TRUE) {
Date = writeDate(con, object)
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17711#discussion_r113972077
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/antlr4/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/SqlBase.g4 ---
@@ -547,6 +547,10 @@ valueExpression
| left=valueExpr
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004#discussion_r113971968
--- Diff: docs/cloud-integration.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,512 @@
+---
+layout: global
+displayTitle: Integration with Cloud Infrastructures
+t
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17800#discussion_r113971640
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JdbcUtils.scala
---
@@ -653,7 +653,13 @@ object JdbcUtils extends Logg
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17804
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17804
**[Test build #76275 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76275/testReport)**
for PR 17804 at commit
[`4ad21fe`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17804
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76275/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004#discussion_r113970275
--- Diff: docs/cloud-integration.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,512 @@
+---
+layout: global
+displayTitle: Integration with Cloud Infrastructures
+t
Github user markgrover commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17790
Thanks for the review!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishe
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004#discussion_r113969133
--- Diff: docs/cloud-integration.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,512 @@
+---
+layout: global
+displayTitle: Integration with Cloud Infrastructures
+t
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17803
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17803
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76269/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17803
**[Test build #76269 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76269/testReport)**
for PR 17803 at commit
[`bd3de24`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17785
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17785
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76270/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user brkyvz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17804
LGTM!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the featu
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17785
**[Test build #76270 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76270/testReport)**
for PR 17785 at commit
[`e9d672a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004#discussion_r113967945
--- Diff: docs/cloud-integration.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,512 @@
+---
+layout: global
+displayTitle: Integration with Cloud Infrastructures
+t
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17804
**[Test build #76275 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76275/testReport)**
for PR 17804 at commit
[`4ad21fe`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4a
Github user anabranch commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17804#discussion_r113966339
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSinkSuite.scala
---
@@ -108,6 +111,22 @@ class KafkaSinkSuite extends
Github user anabranch commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17804#discussion_r113966362
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSinkSuite.scala
---
@@ -108,6 +111,22 @@ class KafkaSinkSuite extends
Github user anabranch commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17804#discussion_r113966304
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSinkSuite.scala
---
@@ -108,6 +111,22 @@ class KafkaSinkSuite extends
Github user anabranch commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17804#discussion_r113966089
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSinkSuite.scala
---
@@ -26,13 +26,16 @@ import org.scalatest.time.Spa
Github user anabranch commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17804#discussion_r113966069
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSinkSuite.scala
---
@@ -26,13 +26,16 @@ import org.scalatest.time.Spa
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17804#discussion_r113965109
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSinkSuite.scala
---
@@ -108,6 +111,22 @@ class KafkaSinkSuite extends St
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17804#discussion_r113965237
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSinkSuite.scala
---
@@ -108,6 +111,22 @@ class KafkaSinkSuite extends St
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17804#discussion_r113965269
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSinkSuite.scala
---
@@ -108,6 +111,22 @@ class KafkaSinkSuite extends St
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17804#discussion_r113965053
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSinkSuite.scala
---
@@ -26,13 +26,16 @@ import org.scalatest.time.SpanSu
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17804#discussion_r113965033
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSinkSuite.scala
---
@@ -26,13 +26,16 @@ import org.scalatest.time.SpanSu
Github user anabranch commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17804
yeah it's broken in both, only visible in 1. Not sure if that needs to be
in 2 PRs.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user brkyvz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17804
@hvanhovell We need this fix in master as well. It somehow works magically
in master, but is broken for sure in 2.1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
re
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17804
@anabranch can you open this against branch-2.1 instead of master?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user ash211 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17680
Any further thoughts on this? It was quite surprising for one of our users
so I wanted to make sure it was fixed in a future Apache release
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to th
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004#discussion_r113962864
--- Diff: docs/cloud-integration.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,512 @@
+---
+layout: global
+displayTitle: Integration with Cloud Infrastructures
+t
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009
**[Test build #76274 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76274/testReport)**
for PR 15009 at commit
[`7ee465f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17802
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17802
**[Test build #76273 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76273/testReport)**
for PR 17802 at commit
[`affcbc0`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17802
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76273/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17802
**[Test build #76273 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76273/testReport)**
for PR 17802 at commit
[`affcbc0`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/af
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17802
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17802#discussion_r113957644
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/CatalogImpl.scala ---
@@ -420,6 +422,18 @@ class CatalogImpl(sparkSession: SparkSession)
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17802#discussion_r113957718
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/CatalogImpl.scala ---
@@ -420,6 +422,18 @@ class CatalogImpl(sparkSession: SparkSession)
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17802#discussion_r113957314
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/CatalogImpl.scala ---
@@ -420,6 +422,18 @@ class CatalogImpl(sparkSession: SparkSession)
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17802#discussion_r113957208
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalog/Catalog.scala ---
@@ -477,6 +477,18 @@ abstract class Catalog {
def cacheTable(tabl
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17802#discussion_r113957106
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalog/Catalog.scala ---
@@ -477,6 +477,18 @@ abstract class Catalog {
def cacheTable(tabl
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17804
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17804
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76272/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17804
**[Test build #76272 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76272/testReport)**
for PR 17804 at commit
[`77e25f1`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17804
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17804
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76271/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17804
**[Test build #76271 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76271/testReport)**
for PR 17804 at commit
[`05f17c6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76268/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435
**[Test build #76268 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76268/testReport)**
for PR 15435 at commit
[`527b0eb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004#discussion_r113950929
--- Diff: docs/cloud-integration.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,512 @@
+---
+layout: global
+displayTitle: Integration with Cloud Infrastructures
+t
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004#discussion_r113950943
--- Diff: docs/cloud-integration.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,512 @@
+---
+layout: global
+displayTitle: Integration with Cloud Infrastructures
+t
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004#discussion_r113950840
--- Diff: docs/cloud-integration.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,512 @@
+---
+layout: global
+displayTitle: Integration with Cloud Infrastructures
+t
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435#discussion_r113950702
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -1231,6 +1295,109 @@ class BinaryLogisticRegressionSummary
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17804
**[Test build #76272 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76272/testReport)**
for PR 17804 at commit
[`77e25f1`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/77
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17790
LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the featu
Github user anabranch commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17804
cc @brkyvz this should be good to go.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17804
**[Test build #76271 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76271/testReport)**
for PR 17804 at commit
[`05f17c6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/05
GitHub user anabranch opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17804
[SPARK-20496][SS] Bug in KafkaWriter Looks at Unanalyzed Plans
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We didn't enforce analyzed plans in Spark 2.1 when writing out to Kafka.
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17459
@johnc1231 Thanks for updating this. I'll review it in the weekend.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project doe
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17785
**[Test build #76270 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76270/testReport)**
for PR 17785 at commit
[`e9d672a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e9
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17801#discussion_r113937642
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -2657,22 +2661,27 @@ object functions {
/**
* Converts
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17803
**[Test build #76269 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76269/testReport)**
for PR 17803 at commit
[`bd3de24`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/bd
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17803#discussion_r113934080
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/GroupStateTimeout.java
---
@@ -37,7 +37,9 @@
* `map/flatMapGroupsWithState` by c
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17803
[SPARK-20523][BUILD] Clean up build warnings for 2.2.0 release
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix build warnings primarily related to Breeze 0.13 operator changes,
"Pro
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435
`update v7` fix previous `LogisticRegressionSuite` conflicts and `fix nits`
commit for some nits update.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply a
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17785#discussion_r113932971
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/api/r/SQLUtils.scala
---
@@ -92,48 +93,8 @@ private[sql] object SQLUtils extends Logging {
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17714
I guess I am not used to this code path. Git blame says @tnachen changed
the codes lately.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17702
Not sure. Probably, @cloud-fan or @gatorsmile ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user zero323 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17783#discussion_r113927479
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/column.R ---
@@ -302,3 +301,65 @@ setMethod("otherwise",
jc <- callJMethod(x@jc, "otherwise", value)
colu
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435
**[Test build #76268 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76268/testReport)**
for PR 15435 at commit
[`527b0eb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/52
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17801
Are the errors (that led to `fails to generate documentation`) after my
change? Look very weird to me.
```
[error]
/home/jenkins/workspace/SparkPullRequestBuilder/core/target/jav
Github user davireis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12614
Just weighting in the motivations:
https://0xdata.atlassian.net/browse/SW-224
http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/spark-ml-Why-is-private-class-ColumnPruner-td168
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17800
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17800
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76265/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17800
**[Test build #76265 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76265/testReport)**
for PR 17800 at commit
[`ad38533`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17793
You have some javadoc errors . See the full log
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17795
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76262/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17795
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17795
**[Test build #76262 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76262/testReport)**
for PR 17795 at commit
[`3fdba11`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user danielyli commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17793
How do I fix the âfails to generate documentationâ error?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does n
Github user danielyli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17793#discussion_r113894646
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALS.scala
---
@@ -791,32 +813,43 @@ object ALS extends DefaultParamsReadable[ALS] with
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17801
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76267/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17801
**[Test build #76267 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76267/testReport)**
for PR 17801 at commit
[`c3cc96b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17801
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17736
Btw, I think the rules in `unescapeSQLString` are also inconsistent too.
`\u` and `\000` don't follow others.
I think we should fix this inconsistency between 1.6 and 2.0 if there is no
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17801
**[Test build #76267 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76267/testReport)**
for PR 17801 at commit
[`c3cc96b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c3
Github user mpjlu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17742
Thanks @MLnick. Please go ahead for ML API optimization.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user phatak-dev commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17799
Opened new one #17802 with cleaner commit history.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17802
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
GitHub user phatak-dev opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17802
[SPARK-20495][SQL][CORE]Add StorageLevel to cacheTable API
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently cacheTable API only supports MEMORY_AND_DISK. This PR adds
additional
Github user 10110346 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17796
ok, thanks for review it@srowen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled a
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17798
**[Test build #3680 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3680/testReport)**
for PR 17798 at commit
[`b32b753`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user phatak-dev closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17799
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17801#discussion_r113879810
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -2487,19 +2487,21 @@ object functions {
*/
def current_timestamp(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17798
**[Test build #3680 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3680/testReport)**
for PR 17798 at commit
[`b32b753`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
201 - 300 of 349 matches
Mail list logo
