Github user zhzhan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17180
The test failure us caused by call method on the map after
`destructiveIterator()` has been called.
It is illegal by the definition.
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18723
IIUC, this PR avoid data copy for consolidation in
`netty.buffer.CompositeByteBuf.consolidateIfNeeded`. I think that it is
reasonable.
I have two questions to understand this change.
1.
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18723#discussion_r129211296
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/io/ChunkedByteBuffer.scala ---
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ private[spark] class ChunkedByteBuffer(var chunks:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18388
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18388
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79923/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18388
**[Test build #79923 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79923/testReport)**
for PR 18388 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18540#discussion_r129209847
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/windowExpressions.scala
---
@@ -43,58 +42,54 @@ case class
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18722#discussion_r129209256
--- Diff: docs/quick-start.md ---
@@ -421,16 +421,15 @@ $ YOUR_SPARK_HOME/bin/spark-submit \
Lines with a: 46, Lines with b: 23
{%
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18722#discussion_r129209310
--- Diff: docs/quick-start.md ---
@@ -421,16 +421,15 @@ $ YOUR_SPARK_HOME/bin/spark-submit \
Lines with a: 46, Lines with b: 23
{%
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18722#discussion_r129209368
--- Diff: docs/quick-start.md ---
@@ -421,16 +421,15 @@ $ YOUR_SPARK_HOME/bin/spark-submit \
Lines with a: 46, Lines with b: 23
{%
Github user lizhaoch commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18722
OKï¼I have done
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18721
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18721
thanks, merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16365
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79921/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16365
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16365
**[Test build #79921 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79921/testReport)**
for PR 16365 at commit
Github user caneGuy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18723
Can anyone help verify this?Thank too much.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18388
**[Test build #79923 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79923/testReport)**
for PR 18388 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18641
ping @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user debugger87 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18649
cc @davies
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18664
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18664
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79922/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18664
**[Test build #79922 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79922/testReport)**
for PR 18664 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18696
@srowen want to take a look?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user heary-cao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18726
@srowen ,
Well.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18706
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18706
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79917/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18706
**[Test build #79917 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79917/testReport)**
for PR 18706 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18722#discussion_r129189476
--- Diff: docs/quick-start.md ---
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ As an example, we'll create a simple Spark application,
`SimpleApp.py`:
from pyspark.sql
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18729
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user JohnHBrock commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18729
This contribution is my original work and I license the work to the project
under the projectâs open source license.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
GitHub user JohnHBrock opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18729
[SPARK-21526] [MLlib] Add support to ML LogisticRegression for setting
initial model
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
* Change ML LogisticRegression setInitialModel
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17180
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17180
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79918/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17180
**[Test build #79918 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79918/testReport)**
for PR 17180 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18717#discussion_r129185097
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/QueryTest.scala ---
@@ -226,6 +216,21 @@ abstract class QueryTest extends PlanTest {
}
Github user hhbyyh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18313
Current implementation of `CrossValidator` (with or without this PR)
**NEVER** holds all the trained models in the driver memory at the same time.
It collects models sequentially and allows GC to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18728
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user hhbyyh closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18313
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18728
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79920/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18728
**[Test build #79920 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79920/testReport)**
for PR 18728 at commit
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18664
Thanks @ueshin and @icexelloss. I like `SQLConf.SESSION_LOCAL_TIMEZONE`
also, but it ended up being pretty messy trying to fit the `SQLConf` into these
static functions - if there is an easier
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18664
**[Test build #79922 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79922/testReport)**
for PR 18664 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16158
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16158
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79919/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16158
**[Test build #79919 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79919/testReport)**
for PR 16158 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18727
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79916/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18727
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18727
**[Test build #79916 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79916/testReport)**
for PR 18727 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16365
**[Test build #79921 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79921/testReport)**
for PR 16365 at commit
Github user ArtRand commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18519
@vanzin all green, ready for a check.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18519
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79914/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18519
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18519
**[Test build #79914 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79914/testReport)**
for PR 18519 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18727
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18727
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79915/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18313#discussion_r129178830
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tuning/CrossValidator.scala ---
@@ -113,15 +122,28 @@ class CrossValidator @Since("1.2.0")
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18727
**[Test build #79915 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79915/testReport)**
for PR 18727 at commit
Github user yssharma commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18071
Thanks @budde @srowen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18728
**[Test build #79920 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79920/testReport)**
for PR 18728 at commit
Github user skonto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18098#discussion_r129176526
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/config/package.scala ---
@@ -72,6 +72,10 @@ package object config {
private[spark] val
GitHub user hhbyyh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18728
[SPARK-21524] [ML] fix temp dir
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-21524
ValidatorParamsSuiteHelpers.testFileMove() is
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17419#discussion_r129173570
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/stat/Summarizer.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,799 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16158
**[Test build #79919 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79919/testReport)**
for PR 16158 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17180
**[Test build #79918 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79918/testReport)**
for PR 17180 at commit
Github user zhzhan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17180
per review comments, release the longArray on destructive iterator creation.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18706
+1 pending jenkins.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18706#discussion_r129164949
--- Diff:
common/network-shuffle/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/sasl/ShuffleSecretManager.java
---
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ public void registerApp(String
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18706
**[Test build #79917 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79917/testReport)**
for PR 18706 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18706#discussion_r129161633
--- Diff:
common/network-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/yarn/YarnShuffleService.java
---
@@ -243,7 +243,6 @@ public void
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18706#discussion_r129159285
--- Diff:
common/network-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/yarn/YarnShuffleService.java
---
@@ -243,7 +243,6 @@ public void
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18706#discussion_r129157052
--- Diff:
common/network-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/yarn/YarnShuffleService.java
---
@@ -243,7 +243,6 @@ public void
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18696
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79913/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18696
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18696
**[Test build #79913 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79913/testReport)**
for PR 18696 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18706
@zsxwing @tgravescs
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18727
**[Test build #79916 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79916/testReport)**
for PR 18727 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18727
**[Test build #79915 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79915/testReport)**
for PR 18727 at commit
GitHub user vanzin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18727
[SPARK-21522][core] Fix flakiness in LauncherServerSuite.
Handle the case where the server closes the socket before the full message
has been written by the client.
You can merge this pull
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18519
**[Test build #79914 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79914/testReport)**
for PR 18519 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18721
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18721
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79912/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18721
**[Test build #79912 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79912/testReport)**
for PR 18721 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18708
> If you are sure that it breaks the other user cases,
For one, `--jars file:/tmp/jars/*` will break with your change, since globs
won't be resolved for `file` URLs.
---
If your project
Github user devaraj-kavali commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18708
Thanks @vanzin for checking this.
```
Then shouldn't the fix be in the code that transforms the URI list into an
argument for -classpath?
I'm pretty sure the code you're
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18714
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79911/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18714
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18714
**[Test build #79911 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79911/testReport)**
for PR 18714 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18714
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18714
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79910/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18714
**[Test build #79910 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79910/testReport)**
for PR 18714 at commit
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18313#discussion_r129122995
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tuning/CrossValidator.scala ---
@@ -113,15 +122,28 @@ class CrossValidator @Since("1.2.0")
Github user hhbyyh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12533
Thanks for the attention @MLnick. I'm closing most of my stale PRs. For
this one, I found all of the transformers in the PR already have `
transformSchema(dataset.schema, logging = true)`,
Github user aokolnychyi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18692
@gatorsmile thanks for the input. Let me check that I understood everything
correctly. So, I keep it as a separate rule that is applied only if constraint
propagation enabled. Inside the rule,
Github user icexelloss commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18664
Excited to see this being worked on.
> SQLConf.SESSION_LOCAL_TIMEZONE
I like this the best. This presents timestamp in local time which is
compatible with the existing `toPandas()`
Github user ArtRand commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18519
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18722#discussion_r129117923
--- Diff: docs/quick-start.md ---
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ As an example, we'll create a simple Spark application,
`SimpleApp.py`:
from pyspark.sql
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12533
Hey @hhbyyh sorry for the lack of review. However, I think this is quite
important. There are many instances where the schema validation is not
necessarily checked, and many instances where it is
Github user hhbyyh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12037
Closing stale PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user hhbyyh closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12037
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
1 - 100 of 215 matches
Mail list logo
