Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18951
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80705/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18951
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18951
**[Test build #80705 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80705/testReport)**
for PR 18951 at commit
[`ac7f0d4`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18926
I don't think this suggestion / discussion blocks this PR for few days.
Let's go as is and make a followup as another improvement if anyone feels so. I
will review that at my best.
---
If your
Github user justinuang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009
That would be incredible. Launching a new jvm and loading all of hadoop
takes about 4 seconds extra each time, versus reusing the launcher jvm, which
is really significant for us since we launch
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18951
**[Test build #80705 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80705/testReport)**
for PR 18951 at commit
[`ac7f0d4`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/ac
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646
**[Test build #80706 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80706/testReport)**
for PR 12646 at commit
[`5e155bd`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5e
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18951
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15770
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15770
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80704/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15770
**[Test build #80704 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80704/testReport)**
for PR 15770 at commit
[`006dad3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15770
**[Test build #80704 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80704/testReport)**
for PR 15770 at commit
[`006dad3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/00
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18952
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18952
Thanks! Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and w
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18907
I'll send new PRs for 2.2 and 2.1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18947
Thanks @gatorsmile @dongjoon-hyun
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled a
Github user viirya closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18947
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18810
**[Test build #80703 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80703/testReport)**
for PR 18810 at commit
[`44ce894`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/44
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18810
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17373#discussion_r133324363
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/ann/Layer.scala ---
@@ -527,9 +550,21 @@ private[ml] class FeedForwardModel private(
overri
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17373#discussion_r133322927
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/MultilayerPerceptronClassifierSuite.scala
---
@@ -82,6 +83,49 @@ class MultilayerPercep
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17373#discussion_r133323889
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/ann/Layer.scala ---
@@ -374,6 +380,22 @@ private[ann] trait TopologyModel extends Serializable {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15770
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15770
**[Test build #80702 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80702/testReport)**
for PR 15770 at commit
[`de7c878`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15770
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80702/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user dhruve commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18950#discussion_r133321125
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ExecutorAllocationManager.scala ---
@@ -602,6 +604,21 @@ private[spark] class ExecutorAllocationManager(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18887
**[Test build #80701 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80701/testReport)**
for PR 18887 at commit
[`519dab0`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/51
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15770
**[Test build #80702 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80702/testReport)**
for PR 15770 at commit
[`de7c878`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/de
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18887#discussion_r133319377
--- Diff: docs/monitoring.md ---
@@ -220,6 +220,13 @@ The history server can be configured as follows:
Number of threads that will be used by histo
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18887#discussion_r133318822
--- Diff: scalastyle-config.xml ---
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ This file is divided into 3 sections:
-
+
--- End diff --
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18855#discussion_r133317789
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/DiskStoreSuite.scala
---
@@ -92,6 +92,45 @@ class DiskStoreSuite extends SparkFunSuite {
asse
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18855#discussion_r133317809
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/DiskStoreSuite.scala
---
@@ -92,6 +92,45 @@ class DiskStoreSuite extends SparkFunSuite {
asse
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18855#discussion_r133318267
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/DiskStoreSuite.scala
---
@@ -92,6 +92,45 @@ class DiskStoreSuite extends SparkFunSuite {
asse
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18488
**[Test build #80700 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80700/testReport)**
for PR 18488 at commit
[`fbdc599`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/fb
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18855
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80697/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18855
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18488
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes s
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18855
**[Test build #80697 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80697/testReport)**
for PR 18855 at commit
[`8be899f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18887#discussion_r133316362
--- Diff: scalastyle-config.xml ---
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ This file is divided into 3 sections:
-
+
--- End diff --
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18940
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18940
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80696/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18940
**[Test build #80696 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80696/testReport)**
for PR 18940 at commit
[`8826ca3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15770
retest please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, o
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18950#discussion_r133311545
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ExecutorAllocationManager.scala ---
@@ -602,6 +604,21 @@ private[spark] class ExecutorAllocationManager(
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18950#discussion_r133311882
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -454,64 +477,68 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
}
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15770
Jenkins, retest please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wis
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15770
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80699/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15770
**[Test build #80699 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80699/testReport)**
for PR 15770 at commit
[`4c5fe72`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15770
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15770
**[Test build #80699 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80699/testReport)**
for PR 15770 at commit
[`4c5fe72`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4c
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15770
weird. Local style test passed. Anyway, I changed the order as required by
Jenkins.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as we
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15770
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15770
**[Test build #80698 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80698/testReport)**
for PR 15770 at commit
[`6f22e97`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15770
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80698/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15770
**[Test build #80698 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80698/testReport)**
for PR 15770 at commit
[`6f22e97`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6f
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18941
Can you write a proper PR title? It doesn't say what the change is about -
nor is it a complete sentence.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18943
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user MrBago commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18896
@jkbradley please take a look when you get a chance.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user MrBago commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18896#discussion_r133301688
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -1392,6 +1415,61 @@ class LogisticRegressionSuite
Github user ajbozarth commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18941#discussion_r133301952
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/UIUtils.scala ---
@@ -161,6 +161,7 @@ private[spark] object UIUtils extends Logging {
def co
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18943
I'm going to push this to avoid having to re-test it before pushing later
after more commits are checked in; I tested on the top of master now and there
are no new files that need fixing.
Me
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18952
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80695/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18952
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18874
@srowen you have a good point about a case that becomes worse after this
change. Still I think this change is better on balance.
btw, there are more even more odd cases with dynamic allocati
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18952
**[Test build #80695 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80695/testReport)**
for PR 18952 at commit
[`34f7623`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18519#discussion_r133294684
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -95,6 +99,12 @@ class CoarseGrainedSchedulerBack
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18519#discussion_r133290641
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -95,6 +99,12 @@ class CoarseGrainedSchedulerBack
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18519#discussion_r133290499
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -95,6 +99,12 @@ class CoarseGrainedSchedulerBack
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18943
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80692/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18943
**[Test build #80692 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80692/testReport)**
for PR 18943 at commit
[`b1e49fa`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18943
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18942
You can patch it to your forked version.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user poplav commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18942
Was this working in 2.0 in the first place? I want to get this into 2.1.1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proj
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18855
**[Test build #80697 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80697/testReport)**
for PR 18855 at commit
[`8be899f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8b
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18942
@poplav This is not a regression from 2.0, right?
Since we might not release 2.1.2, this PR might not be merged to upstream
after a discussion with @zsxwing Maybe you can patch it in you
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18940
**[Test build #80696 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80696/testReport)**
for PR 18940 at commit
[`8826ca3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/88
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15770#discussion_r133271527
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/PowerIterationClustering.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,213 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apa
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18849
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80694/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18849
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18849
**[Test build #80694 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80694/testReport)**
for PR 18849 at commit
[`4a05b55`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18940
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80691/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18940
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18940
**[Test build #80691 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80691/testReport)**
for PR 18940 at commit
[`e9afdf7`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18930#discussion_r133270299
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JsonSuite.scala
---
@@ -2034,4 +2034,25 @@ class JsonSuite extends Que
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18930#discussion_r133269222
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JsonSuite.scala
---
@@ -2034,4 +2034,25 @@ class JsonSuite extends Que
Github user redsanket commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18940
Thanks @vanzin @kiszk will do, makes sense to me now
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18787
Yes, I agree with changing the interfaces as you suggest @cloud-fan , is
there currently a JIRA open for that? I'm ok with holding off if it's planned
to be soon, but I would like to get starte
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18952#discussion_r133268435
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/expressions/UserDefinedFunction.scala
---
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ case class UserDefinedFunction protecte
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15770#discussion_r133267575
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/PowerIterationClustering.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,213 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apa
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18877
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18877
Alright, merging this to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18940
If you're removing a public config, you should at least add it to
`SparkConf.deprecatedConfigs`. It would be nice, but not required, to have some
kind of mapping of the old value to the new (in which
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18592
gentle ping @gatorsmile
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user dhruve commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18950
@kayousterhout @squito Can you review this PR ? Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18641
ping @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18952
**[Test build #80695 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80695/testReport)**
for PR 18952 at commit
[`34f7623`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/34
GitHub user jiangxb1987 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18952
[MINOR] Fix a typo in the method name `UserDefinedFunction.asNonNullabe`
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The method name `asNonNullabe` should be `asNonNullable`.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18918
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80693/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18918
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
101 - 200 of 486 matches
Mail list logo
