Github user rdblue commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21305
@cloud-fan, I've added a suite for the `DataType.canWrite`. I still need to
add tests for the analyzer rule to make sure it catches any problems and so to
validate that AppendData's `resolved` check.
Github user rdblue commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21305#discussion_r207752632
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/types/DataType.scala ---
@@ -336,4 +337,97 @@ object DataType {
case (fromDataType, toD
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21305
**[Test build #94256 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94256/testReport)**
for PR 21305 at commit
[`ae0d242`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/ae
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22004#discussion_r207752563
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGSchedulerSuite.scala ---
@@ -2369,39 +2369,12 @@ class DAGSchedulerSuite extends SparkFunSuite wi
Github user ajacques commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21889
Alright to make sure we're all on the same page, it sounds like we're ready
to merge this PR pending:
* Successful build by Jenkins
* Any PR comments from a maintainer
This feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21913
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94248/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21913
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21913
**[Test build #94248 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94248/testReport)**
for PR 21913 at commit
[`610154c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user skonto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22004#discussion_r207752019
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGSchedulerSuite.scala ---
@@ -2583,4 +2556,32 @@ object DAGSchedulerSuite {
def makeB
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22004
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22004
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/1825/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22004
**[Test build #94255 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94255/testReport)**
for PR 22004 at commit
[`626e7bd`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/62
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22004
[SPARK-25029][TESTS] Scala 2.12 issues: TaskNotSerializable and Janino "Two
non-abstract methods ..." errors
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fixes for test issues that a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21898
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21898
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94247/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21898
**[Test build #94247 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94247/testReport)**
for PR 21898 at commit
[`ab49fed`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22002
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22002
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94253/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22002
**[Test build #94253 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94253/testReport)**
for PR 22002 at commit
[`784a626`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22003
**[Test build #94254 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94254/testReport)**
for PR 22003 at commit
[`a801498`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a8
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22003
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/1824/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22003
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22003
[SPARK-25019][BUILD] Fix orc dependency to use the same exclusion rules
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
During upgrading Apache ORC to 1.5.2
([SPARK-24576](https:
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21923#discussion_r207749332
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/config/package.scala ---
@@ -567,4 +567,15 @@ package object config {
.intConf
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22002
**[Test build #94253 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94253/testReport)**
for PR 22002 at commit
[`784a626`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/78
Github user MaxGekk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22002
jenkins, retest this, please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21889
**[Test build #94252 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94252/testReport)**
for PR 21889 at commit
[`8d7f4bc`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8d
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22002
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22002
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94250/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22002
**[Test build #94250 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94250/testReport)**
for PR 22002 at commit
[`784a626`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21977
**[Test build #94251 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94251/testReport)**
for PR 21977 at commit
[`a5a788b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a5
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21977
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21977
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/1823/
Github user rdblue commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21977#discussion_r207747975
--- Diff: python/pyspark/worker.py ---
@@ -259,6 +260,26 @@ def main(infile, outfile):
"PYSPARK_DRIVER_PYTHON are correctly
Github user mallman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21889
> @mallman Is it related to this revert in ParquetReadSupport.scala? I
re-added this logic and all 32 tests in ParquetSchemaPruningSuite passed.
Yes. That's what we need to work on in the ne
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22002
**[Test build #94250 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94250/testReport)**
for PR 22002 at commit
[`784a626`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/78
Github user skonto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18784
@rxin I will update the PR.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: re
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22002
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94249/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22002
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22002
**[Test build #94249 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94249/testReport)**
for PR 22002 at commit
[`24808b2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22002
**[Test build #94249 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94249/testReport)**
for PR 22002 at commit
[`24808b2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/24
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22002
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22002
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17185
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94244/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17185
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user MaxGekk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22002
@maropu Please, have a look at the PR.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17185
**[Test build #94244 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94244/testReport)**
for PR 17185 at commit
[`065687f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
GitHub user MaxGekk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22002
[FOLLOW-UP][SPARK-23772][SQL] Provide an option to ignore column of all
null values or empty array during JSON schema inference
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The `dro
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21984#discussion_r207746389
--- Diff:
external/avro/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/avro/AvroDeserializer.scala
---
@@ -100,6 +103,8 @@ class AvroDeserializer(rootAvroType: Schema,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22001
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94245/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22001
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22001
**[Test build #94245 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94245/testReport)**
for PR 22001 at commit
[`5253005`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21956
Would it be possible to address the following parts for `can ...`, `could
...`, `may ...`, and `will ...`, too?
`JavaSparkContextSuite.scala`
```
/**
* Java apps can uses both Jav
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21913
**[Test build #94248 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94248/testReport)**
for PR 21913 at commit
[`610154c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/61
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22001#discussion_r207745122
--- Diff:
resource-managers/mesos/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosFineGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -453,4 +453,8 @
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22001#discussion_r207745108
--- Diff:
resource-managers/mesos/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosFineGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -453,4 +453,8 @
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22001#discussion_r207745157
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -496,6 +496,12 @@ class CoarseGrainedSchedu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21909
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21909
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94243/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21909
**[Test build #94243 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94243/testReport)**
for PR 21909 at commit
[`3f8fc5e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21898#discussion_r207744998
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -566,6 +579,9 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
if (
Github user ajacques commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21889
@mallman Is it related to [this revert in
ParquetReadSupport](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21889/commits/0312a5188f0d6c9fc5304195dbdc703bf0aa3fb7#diff-245e70c1f41e353e34cf29bd00fd9029L86).
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21913
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94246/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21913
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21913
**[Test build #94246 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94246/testReport)**
for PR 21913 at commit
[`cf48d8d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21898
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94241/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21898
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21898
**[Test build #94241 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94241/testReport)**
for PR 21898 at commit
[`a8fa8db`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21898
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/1822/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21898
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21898
**[Test build #94247 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94247/testReport)**
for PR 21898 at commit
[`ab49fed`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/ab
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21898#discussion_r207744089
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -566,6 +579,9 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21898#discussion_r207744005
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -566,6 +579,9 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
if (
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21221
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94240/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21221
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21898
`
if (barrierCoordinator != null) {
barrierCoordinator.stop()
}
`
Seems the above statement caused test cases in `SparkSubmitSuite` timeout,
though they actually
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21221
**[Test build #94240 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94240/testReport)**
for PR 21221 at commit
[`a0eed11`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21898#discussion_r207743879
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/config/package.scala ---
@@ -567,4 +567,14 @@ package object config {
.intConf
.
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21898#discussion_r207743781
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/BarrierTaskContext.scala ---
@@ -80,7 +101,45 @@ class BarrierTaskContext(
@Experimental
@Since("2
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21898#discussion_r207743563
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/BarrierCoordinator.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,230 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21898#discussion_r207743465
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/BarrierCoordinator.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,230 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21898#discussion_r207743456
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/BarrierCoordinator.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,230 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21898#discussion_r207743412
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/BarrierCoordinator.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,230 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21913
**[Test build #94246 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94246/testReport)**
for PR 21913 at commit
[`cf48d8d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/cf
Github user MaxGekk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21913
jenkins, retest this, please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20838
**[Test build #94238 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94238/testReport)**
for PR 20838 at commit
[`e41a8cc`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20838
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94238/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20838
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21999
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94239/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21999
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21999
**[Test build #94239 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94239/testReport)**
for PR 21999 at commit
[`93b6358`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21898
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94237/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21898
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21898
**[Test build #94237 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94237/testReport)**
for PR 21898 at commit
[`8e888b5`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22001
**[Test build #94245 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94245/testReport)**
for PR 22001 at commit
[`5253005`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/52
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22001
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22001
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/1821/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17185
**[Test build #94244 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94244/testReport)**
for PR 17185 at commit
[`065687f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/06
GitHub user jiangxb1987 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22001
[SPARK-24819][CORE] Fail fast when no enough slots to launch the barrier
stage on job submitted
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We shall check whether the barrier s
Github user dilipbiswal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17185
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: review
101 - 200 of 255 matches
Mail list logo
