Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22288#discussion_r228609147
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImplSuite.scala ---
@@ -503,6 +507,181 @@ class TaskSchedulerImplSuite extends
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22288#discussion_r228605235
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -415,9 +420,54 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22288#discussion_r228609353
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImplSuite.scala ---
@@ -503,6 +507,181 @@ class TaskSchedulerImplSuite extends
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22288#discussion_r228606711
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImplSuite.scala ---
@@ -503,6 +507,181 @@ class TaskSchedulerImplSuite extends
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22288#discussion_r228604552
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -415,9 +420,54 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22288#discussion_r228604322
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -415,9 +420,54 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22830
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user shaneknapp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22854
let's not merge until this build passes:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/sknapp-testing-spark-branch-2.4-test-maven-hadoop-2.7/12/
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22830
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98088/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user dilipbiswal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22809
@cloud-fan @mgaido91 I have incorporated the comments. Could we please
check if things look okay now ?
---
-
To
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22830
**[Test build #98088 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98088/testReport)**
for PR 22830 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22820
Kubernetes integration test starting
URL:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/4545/
---
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22853#discussion_r228608016
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWindowFramesSuite.scala
---
@@ -267,6 +267,25 @@ class DataFrameWindowFramesSuite extends
Github user shaneknapp commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22854#discussion_r228607477
--- Diff: build/mvn ---
@@ -163,8 +163,14 @@ export MAVEN_OPTS=${MAVEN_OPTS:-"$_COMPILE_JVM_OPTS"}
echo "Using \`mvn\` from path: $MVN_BIN"
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22854#discussion_r228606581
--- Diff: build/mvn ---
@@ -163,8 +163,14 @@ export MAVEN_OPTS=${MAVEN_OPTS:-"$_COMPILE_JVM_OPTS"}
echo "Using \`mvn\` from path: $MVN_BIN"
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22029
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98089/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user ifilonenko commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22624#discussion_r228605725
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/k8s/security/KubernetesHadoopDelegationTokenManager.scala
---
@@
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22029
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22029
**[Test build #98089 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98089/testReport)**
for PR 22029 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22823#discussion_r228605621
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/benchmark/BenchmarkWideTable.scala
---
@@ -1,52 +0,0 @@
-/*
- * Licensed to
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22820
**[Test build #98102 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98102/testReport)**
for PR 22820 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22754#discussion_r228601036
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/util/collection/unsafe/sort/UnsafeSorterSpillWriter.java
---
@@ -62,6 +62,8 @@ public UnsafeSorterSpillWriter(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22815
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user gengliangwang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22847#discussion_r228600757
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -812,6 +812,17 @@ object SQLConf {
.intConf
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22815
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22854
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22854
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19045
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22854
Probably unnecessary to change the timeout, but LGTM.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19045
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19045
Kubernetes integration test status success
URL:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/4542/
---
Github user koeninger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22824
@arunmahadevan I think this is clear, even if it is redundant.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user shaneknapp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22854
`mvn clean package` script logic worked!
```
[INFO]
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
[INFO]
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22852
I'm fine with this, although I wonder if having a stronger wording about
Spark standalone just not being secure would be better. Even if you enable
auth, everybody needs to know the same auth
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22847#discussion_r228598058
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -812,6 +812,17 @@ object SQLConf {
.intConf
Github user shaneknapp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22854
here's the test build run that's actually testing the changes to mvn:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/sknapp-testing-spark-branch-2.4-test-maven-hadoop-2.7/12/
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19045
Kubernetes integration test starting
URL:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/4542/
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22824
**[Test build #98101 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98101/testReport)**
for PR 22824 at commit
Github user koeninger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22824
jenkins, ok to test
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22815
**[Test build #98100 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98100/testReport)**
for PR 22815 at commit
Github user huaxingao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22295
Thank you very much for your help! ! @holdenk @HyukjinKwon
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22295
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22854
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22815#discussion_r228594291
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLContext.scala ---
@@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.util.ExecutionListenerManager
*
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22854
**[Test build #98099 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98099/testReport)**
for PR 22854 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22854
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21588
Does this upgrade Hive for execution or also for metastore? Spark supports
virtually all Hive metastore versions out there, and a lot of deployments do
run different versions of Spark against the same
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22295
Merged to master for 3.0. Thanks for fixing this @huaxingao :)
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user shaneknapp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22854
test this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22854
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98094/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22854
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19045
**[Test build #98098 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98098/testReport)**
for PR 19045 at commit
Github user ashashwat commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20503
@holdenk I am on it.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user shaneknapp commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22854#discussion_r228591941
--- Diff: build/mvn ---
@@ -163,8 +163,19 @@ export MAVEN_OPTS=${MAVEN_OPTS:-"$_COMPILE_JVM_OPTS"}
echo "Using \`mvn\` from path: $MVN_BIN"
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15670
**[Test build #98097 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98097/consoleFull)**
for PR 15670 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22425
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22425
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18339
Since @HyukjinKwon's concerns for this PR have been addressed if @parente
can update this to master would be lovely to get this in for 3+ since I'm
working on some multi-language pipeline stuff
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15670
Jenkins ok to test. @inpefess if you can update this PR to master now is a
great time to get this in since the next release after 2.4 is going to be 3 so
it's easier to change formats and stuff.
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20503
Jenkins ok to test.
Gentle ping again to @ashashwat - are you still interested in this PR?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22425
**[Test build #98096 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98096/testReport)**
for PR 22425 at commit
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22425
I think the scaladoc error is unrelated, jenkins retest this please.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15496
While you update to master i might include in the docstring that the
similar funcitonality in densevector is done with manual delegation in
`_delegate`.
---
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15496
Jenkins Ok to test
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15496
Sorry for letting this slide for so long. This looks really close, I think
now that we don't have append I don't have the concerns with the copy any more.
Can you update this to master and we can
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22854#discussion_r228588061
--- Diff: build/mvn ---
@@ -163,8 +163,19 @@ export MAVEN_OPTS=${MAVEN_OPTS:-"$_COMPILE_JVM_OPTS"}
echo "Using \`mvn\` from path: $MVN_BIN"
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22775
Actually this is not that hard. The conflict comes from the fact that in
2.4 `schema_of_json` doesn't take `option` parameter.
I've fixed the conflict and pushed to 2.4. You can take a
Github user shaneknapp commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22854#discussion_r228584294
--- Diff: build/mvn ---
@@ -163,8 +163,19 @@ export MAVEN_OPTS=${MAVEN_OPTS:-"$_COMPILE_JVM_OPTS"}
echo "Using \`mvn\` from path: $MVN_BIN"
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21654
**[Test build #98095 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98095/testReport)**
for PR 21654 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22854
**[Test build #98094 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98094/testReport)**
for PR 22854 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22854#discussion_r228583684
--- Diff: build/mvn ---
@@ -163,8 +163,19 @@ export MAVEN_OPTS=${MAVEN_OPTS:-"$_COMPILE_JVM_OPTS"}
echo "Using \`mvn\` from path: $MVN_BIN" 1>&2
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22854
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21654
hey @kokes this is out of sync with master, can you merge in the latest
master? I'm going to follow up on the dev@ list for the plan which @HyukjinKwon
wants to see (please feel free to join in
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22854
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21654
Jenkins, ok to test.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user arunmahadevan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22598#discussion_r228583252
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/security/KafkaDelegationTokenProvider.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
GitHub user shaneknapp opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22854
[SPARK-25854] fix mvn to not always exit 1
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
the final line in the mvn helper script in build/ attempts to shut down the
zinc server.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22853
**[Test build #98093 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98093/testReport)**
for PR 22853 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22853
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22853
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22838
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98085/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22838
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user bdrillard commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21348#discussion_r228577979
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/objects/objects.scala
---
@@ -1799,3 +1805,65 @@ case class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22838
**[Test build #98085 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98085/testReport)**
for PR 22838 at commit
GitHub user jiangxb1987 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22853
[SPARK-25845][SQL] Fix MatchError for calendar interval type in range frame
left boundary
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
WindowSpecDefinition checks start < last,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22850
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22850
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98087/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user gatorsmile closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22827
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22850
**[Test build #98087 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98087/testReport)**
for PR 22850 at commit
Github user soenkeliebau commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22598#discussion_r228576259
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/security/KafkaDelegationTokenProvider.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user bdrillard commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21348
Hi @xuanyuanking, if you'd like to take on the work to fold my prior work
in databricks/spark-avro#217 into Spark, that sounds good to me. Please do
include me in pull-requests on this topic. Our
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22802
OK, that's pretty trivial, but I agree. Any other instances of this type of
thing?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user xuanyuanking commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21348
The jira SPARK-25789 guide me here, thanks for @bdrillard your great job,
we also meet the requirement on supporting dataset of avro during Structure
Streaming. I'm adapting your code in
Github user xuanyuanking commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21348#discussion_r228563440
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/objects/objects.scala
---
@@ -1799,3 +1805,65 @@ case class
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22843
I personally am OK with removing anything deprecated before 2.4. Even
things deprecated in 2.4 are technically fair game. If any of these were
deprecated pretty recently, might be debatable, but I
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22764
I think it can target for 3.0. since 2.4 will be released soon and this PR
looks a little complex and need take some time to check carefully.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22848
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22848
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22848
**[Test build #98092 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98092/testReport)**
for PR 22848 at commit
Github user gengliangwang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22848#discussion_r228559067
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ui/SQLListener.scala ---
@@ -89,12 +89,12 @@ private class LongLongTupleConverter
201 - 300 of 485 matches
Mail list logo
