[GitHub] [spark] cloud-fan commented on issue #26127: [SPARK-29348][SQL] Add observable Metrics for Streaming queries

cloud-fan commented on issue #26127: [SPARK-29348][SQL] Add observable Metrics for Streaming queries URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26127#issuecomment-561045758 retest this please This is an automated message from

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26644: [SPARK-30004][SQL] Allow merge UserDefinedType into a native DataType

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26644: [SPARK-30004][SQL] Allow merge UserDefinedType into a native DataType URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26644#issuecomment-561045154 Merged build finished. Test PASSed.

[GitHub] [spark] cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres

cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26412#discussion_r353027110 ## File path:

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26644: [SPARK-30004][SQL] Allow merge UserDefinedType into a native DataType

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26644: [SPARK-30004][SQL] Allow merge UserDefinedType into a native DataType URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26644#issuecomment-561045161 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26644: [SPARK-30004][SQL] Allow merge UserDefinedType into a native DataType

AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26644: [SPARK-30004][SQL] Allow merge UserDefinedType into a native DataType URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26644#issuecomment-561045154 Merged build finished. Test PASSed. This

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26644: [SPARK-30004][SQL] Allow merge UserDefinedType into a native DataType

AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26644: [SPARK-30004][SQL] Allow merge UserDefinedType into a native DataType URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26644#issuecomment-561045161 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):

[GitHub] [spark] cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres

cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26412#discussion_r353026693 ## File path:

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on issue #26644: [SPARK-30004][SQL] Allow merge UserDefinedType into a native DataType

SparkQA commented on issue #26644: [SPARK-30004][SQL] Allow merge UserDefinedType into a native DataType URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26644#issuecomment-561044614 **[Test build #114757 has

[GitHub] [spark] Fokko commented on a change in pull request #26644: [SPARK-30004][SQL] Allow merge UserDefinedType into a native DataType

Fokko commented on a change in pull request #26644: [SPARK-30004][SQL] Allow merge UserDefinedType into a native DataType URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26644#discussion_r353026018 ## File path: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/UserDefinedTypeSuite.scala

[GitHub] [spark] cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26684: [SPARK-30001][SQL] ResolveRelations should handle both V1 and V2 tables.

cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26684: [SPARK-30001][SQL] ResolveRelations should handle both V1 and V2 tables. URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26684#discussion_r353025715 ## File path:

[GitHub] [spark] cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26684: [SPARK-30001][SQL] ResolveRelations should handle both V1 and V2 tables.

cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26684: [SPARK-30001][SQL] ResolveRelations should handle both V1 and V2 tables. URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26684#discussion_r353025223 ## File path:

[GitHub] [spark] cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26684: [SPARK-30001][SQL] ResolveRelations should handle both V1 and V2 tables.

cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26684: [SPARK-30001][SQL] ResolveRelations should handle both V1 and V2 tables. URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26684#discussion_r353024107 ## File path:

[GitHub] [spark] cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26684: [SPARK-30001][SQL] ResolveRelations should handle both V1 and V2 tables.

cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26684: [SPARK-30001][SQL] ResolveRelations should handle both V1 and V2 tables. URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26684#discussion_r353024107 ## File path:

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on issue #26692: [SPARK-30060][CORE] Rename metrics enable/disable configs

SparkQA commented on issue #26692: [SPARK-30060][CORE] Rename metrics enable/disable configs URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26692#issuecomment-561042469 **[Test build #114756 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/114756/testReport)**

[GitHub] [spark] cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26684: [SPARK-30001][SQL] ResolveRelations should handle both V1 and V2 tables.

cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26684: [SPARK-30001][SQL] ResolveRelations should handle both V1 and V2 tables. URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26684#discussion_r353023465 ## File path:

[GitHub] [spark] cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26684: [SPARK-30001][SQL] ResolveRelations should handle both V1 and V2 tables.

cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26684: [SPARK-30001][SQL] ResolveRelations should handle both V1 and V2 tables. URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26684#discussion_r353023298 ## File path:

[GitHub] [spark] cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26684: [SPARK-30001][SQL] ResolveRelations should handle both V1 and V2 tables.

cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26684: [SPARK-30001][SQL] ResolveRelations should handle both V1 and V2 tables. URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26684#discussion_r353022551 ## File path:

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26692: [SPARK-30060][CORE] Rename metrics enable/disable configs

AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26692: [SPARK-30060][CORE] Rename metrics enable/disable configs URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26692#issuecomment-561040751 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26692: [SPARK-30060][CORE] Rename metrics enable/disable configs

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26692: [SPARK-30060][CORE] Rename metrics enable/disable configs URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26692#issuecomment-561040751 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26692: [SPARK-30060][CORE] Rename metrics enable/disable configs

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26692: [SPARK-30060][CORE] Rename metrics enable/disable configs URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26692#issuecomment-561040741 Merged build finished. Test PASSed. This is an

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26692: [SPARK-30060][CORE] Rename metrics enable/disable configs

AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26692: [SPARK-30060][CORE] Rename metrics enable/disable configs URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26692#issuecomment-561040741 Merged build finished. Test PASSed. This is an

[GitHub] [spark] cloud-fan commented on issue #26696: [WIP][SPARK-18886][CORE] Only reset scheduling delay timer if allocated slots are fully utilized

cloud-fan commented on issue #26696: [WIP][SPARK-18886][CORE] Only reset scheduling delay timer if allocated slots are fully utilized URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26696#issuecomment-561039532 Sufficient discussions are needed for this problem. AFAIK, the issue of delay

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26743: Merge pull request #1 from apache/master

AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26743: Merge pull request #1 from apache/master URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26743#issuecomment-561038373 Can one of the admins verify this patch? This is an automated message

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26743: Merge pull request #1 from apache/master

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26743: Merge pull request #1 from apache/master URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26743#issuecomment-561038024 Can one of the admins verify this patch? This is an automated

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26743: Merge pull request #1 from apache/master

AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26743: Merge pull request #1 from apache/master URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26743#issuecomment-561038024 Can one of the admins verify this patch? This is an automated message

[GitHub] [spark] yakoterry opened a new pull request #26743: Merge pull request #1 from apache/master

yakoterry opened a new pull request #26743: Merge pull request #1 from apache/master URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26743 merge with pull request ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? ### Why are the changes needed? ###

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26656: [SPARK-27986][SQL] Support ANSI SQL filter clause for aggregate expression

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26656: [SPARK-27986][SQL] Support ANSI SQL filter clause for aggregate expression URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26656#issuecomment-561035308 Merged build finished. Test PASSed.

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26656: [SPARK-27986][SQL] Support ANSI SQL filter clause for aggregate expression

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26656: [SPARK-27986][SQL] Support ANSI SQL filter clause for aggregate expression URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26656#issuecomment-561035319 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26656: [SPARK-27986][SQL] Support ANSI SQL filter clause for aggregate expression

AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26656: [SPARK-27986][SQL] Support ANSI SQL filter clause for aggregate expression URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26656#issuecomment-561035308 Merged build finished. Test PASSed.

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26656: [SPARK-27986][SQL] Support ANSI SQL filter clause for aggregate expression

AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26656: [SPARK-27986][SQL] Support ANSI SQL filter clause for aggregate expression URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26656#issuecomment-561035319 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA removed a comment on issue #26656: [SPARK-27986][SQL] Support ANSI SQL filter clause for aggregate expression

SparkQA removed a comment on issue #26656: [SPARK-27986][SQL] Support ANSI SQL filter clause for aggregate expression URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26656#issuecomment-560981466 **[Test build #114752 has

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on issue #26656: [SPARK-27986][SQL] Support ANSI SQL filter clause for aggregate expression

SparkQA commented on issue #26656: [SPARK-27986][SQL] Support ANSI SQL filter clause for aggregate expression URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26656#issuecomment-561034860 **[Test build #114752 has

[GitHub] [spark] dongjoon-hyun commented on a change in pull request #26738: [SPARK-30082][SQL] Do not replace Zeros when replacing NaNs

dongjoon-hyun commented on a change in pull request #26738: [SPARK-30082][SQL] Do not replace Zeros when replacing NaNs URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26738#discussion_r353013375 ## File path: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameNaFunctions.scala

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26696: [WIP][SPARK-18886][CORE] Only reset scheduling delay timer if allocated slots are fully utilized

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26696: [WIP][SPARK-18886][CORE] Only reset scheduling delay timer if allocated slots are fully utilized URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26696#issuecomment-561030004 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26696: [WIP][SPARK-18886][CORE] Only reset scheduling delay timer if allocated slots are fully utilized

AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26696: [WIP][SPARK-18886][CORE] Only reset scheduling delay timer if allocated slots are fully utilized URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26696#issuecomment-561030004 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26696: [WIP][SPARK-18886][CORE] Only reset scheduling delay timer if allocated slots are fully utilized

AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26696: [WIP][SPARK-18886][CORE] Only reset scheduling delay timer if allocated slots are fully utilized URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26696#issuecomment-561029996 Merged build finished. Test PASSed.

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26696: [WIP][SPARK-18886][CORE] Only reset scheduling delay timer if allocated slots are fully utilized

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26696: [WIP][SPARK-18886][CORE] Only reset scheduling delay timer if allocated slots are fully utilized URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26696#issuecomment-561029996 Merged build finished. Test PASSed.

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on issue #26696: [WIP][SPARK-18886][CORE] Only reset scheduling delay timer if allocated slots are fully utilized

SparkQA commented on issue #26696: [WIP][SPARK-18886][CORE] Only reset scheduling delay timer if allocated slots are fully utilized URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26696#issuecomment-561029642 **[Test build #114755 has

[GitHub] [spark] cloud-fan commented on issue #26696: [WIP][SPARK-18886][CORE] Only reset scheduling delay timer if allocated slots are fully utilized

cloud-fan commented on issue #26696: [WIP][SPARK-18886][CORE] Only reset scheduling delay timer if allocated slots are fully utilized URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26696#issuecomment-561029067 ok to test This is

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26696: [WIP][SPARK-18886][CORE] Only reset scheduling delay timer if allocated slots are fully utilized

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26696: [WIP][SPARK-18886][CORE] Only reset scheduling delay timer if allocated slots are fully utilized URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26696#issuecomment-559284127 Can one of the admins verify this patch?

[GitHub] [spark] cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26738: [SPARK-30082][SQL] Do not replace Zeros when replacing NaNs

cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26738: [SPARK-30082][SQL] Do not replace Zeros when replacing NaNs URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26738#discussion_r353008601 ## File path: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameNaFunctions.scala

[GitHub] [spark] bmarcott commented on issue #26633: [SPARK-29994][CORE] Add WILDCARD task location

bmarcott commented on issue #26633: [SPARK-29994][CORE] Add WILDCARD task location URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26633#issuecomment-561027490 Could someone help review my proposed solution for

[GitHub] [spark] yaooqinn commented on a change in pull request #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres

yaooqinn commented on a change in pull request #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26412#discussion_r353007005 ## File path:

[GitHub] [spark] yaooqinn commented on a change in pull request #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres

yaooqinn commented on a change in pull request #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26412#discussion_r353006365 ## File path:

[GitHub] [spark] cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres

cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26412#discussion_r353005949 ## File path:

[GitHub] [spark] yaooqinn commented on a change in pull request #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres

yaooqinn commented on a change in pull request #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26412#discussion_r353005158 ## File path:

[GitHub] [spark] dongjoon-hyun edited a comment on issue #26742: [SPARK-30051][BUILD] Clean up hadoop-3.2 dependency

dongjoon-hyun edited a comment on issue #26742: [SPARK-30051][BUILD] Clean up hadoop-3.2 dependency URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26742#issuecomment-561022246 `spark-core` already embeds the required `jetty` libraries into `spark-core_2.13_*.jar`, and these files are not used

[GitHub] [spark] dongjoon-hyun edited a comment on issue #26742: [SPARK-30051][BUILD] Clean up hadoop-3.2 dependency

dongjoon-hyun edited a comment on issue #26742: [SPARK-30051][BUILD] Clean up hadoop-3.2 dependency URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26742#issuecomment-561022246 `spark-core` already embeds the required `jetty` libraries into `spark-core_2.13_*.jar`, and this is not used even in

[GitHub] [spark] dongjoon-hyun commented on issue #26742: [SPARK-30051][BUILD] Clean up hadoop-3.2 dependency

dongjoon-hyun commented on issue #26742: [SPARK-30051][BUILD] Clean up hadoop-3.2 dependency URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26742#issuecomment-561023253 If I misunderstand something, I'll close this PR~ Please let me know.

[GitHub] [spark] dongjoon-hyun commented on issue #26742: [SPARK-30051][BUILD] Clean up hadoop-3.2 dependency

dongjoon-hyun commented on issue #26742: [SPARK-30051][BUILD] Clean up hadoop-3.2 dependency URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26742#issuecomment-561022246 `spark-core` already embeds the required `jetty` libraries into `spark-core_2.13_*.jar`, and this is not used for even in our

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26702: [SPARK-30070][SQL] Support ANSI datetimes predicate - overlaps

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26702: [SPARK-30070][SQL] Support ANSI datetimes predicate - overlaps URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26702#issuecomment-561020932 Merged build finished. Test PASSed. This

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26702: [SPARK-30070][SQL] Support ANSI datetimes predicate - overlaps

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26702: [SPARK-30070][SQL] Support ANSI datetimes predicate - overlaps URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26702#issuecomment-561020937 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26702: [SPARK-30070][SQL] Support ANSI datetimes predicate - overlaps

AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26702: [SPARK-30070][SQL] Support ANSI datetimes predicate - overlaps URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26702#issuecomment-561020937 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26702: [SPARK-30070][SQL] Support ANSI datetimes predicate - overlaps

AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26702: [SPARK-30070][SQL] Support ANSI datetimes predicate - overlaps URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26702#issuecomment-561020932 Merged build finished. Test PASSed. This is an

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on issue #26702: [SPARK-30070][SQL] Support ANSI datetimes predicate - overlaps

SparkQA commented on issue #26702: [SPARK-30070][SQL] Support ANSI datetimes predicate - overlaps URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26702#issuecomment-561020469 **[Test build #114750 has

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA removed a comment on issue #26702: [SPARK-30070][SQL] Support ANSI datetimes predicate - overlaps

SparkQA removed a comment on issue #26702: [SPARK-30070][SQL] Support ANSI datetimes predicate - overlaps URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26702#issuecomment-560970222 **[Test build #114750 has

[GitHub] [spark] cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26716: [SPARK-30083][SQL] visitArithmeticUnary should wrap PLUS case with UnaryPositive for type checking

cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26716: [SPARK-30083][SQL] visitArithmeticUnary should wrap PLUS case with UnaryPositive for type checking URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26716#discussion_r35386 ## File path:

[GitHub] [spark] cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26716: [SPARK-30083][SQL] visitArithmeticUnary should wrap PLUS case with UnaryPositive for type checking

cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26716: [SPARK-30083][SQL] visitArithmeticUnary should wrap PLUS case with UnaryPositive for type checking URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26716#discussion_r352999849 ## File path: docs/sql-migration-guide.md ## @@

[GitHub] [spark] cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres

cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26412#discussion_r352998689 ## File path:

[GitHub] [spark] cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres

cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26412#discussion_r352998814 ## File path:

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26412#issuecomment-561012407 Test FAILed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26716: [SPARK-30083][SQL] visitArithmeticUnary should wrap PLUS case with UnaryPositive for type checking

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26716: [SPARK-30083][SQL] visitArithmeticUnary should wrap PLUS case with UnaryPositive for type checking URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26716#issuecomment-561012558 Merged build finished. Test PASSed.

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26716: [SPARK-30083][SQL] visitArithmeticUnary should wrap PLUS case with UnaryPositive for type checking

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26716: [SPARK-30083][SQL] visitArithmeticUnary should wrap PLUS case with UnaryPositive for type checking URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26716#issuecomment-561012567 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres

AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26412#issuecomment-561012407 Test FAILed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26716: [SPARK-30083][SQL] visitArithmeticUnary should wrap PLUS case with UnaryPositive for type checking

AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26716: [SPARK-30083][SQL] visitArithmeticUnary should wrap PLUS case with UnaryPositive for type checking URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26716#issuecomment-561012558 Merged build finished. Test PASSed.

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26412#issuecomment-561012395 Merged build finished. Test FAILed.

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA removed a comment on issue #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres

SparkQA removed a comment on issue #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26412#issuecomment-561007606 **[Test build #114754 has

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on issue #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres

SparkQA commented on issue #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26412#issuecomment-561012362 **[Test build #114754 has

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26716: [SPARK-30083][SQL] visitArithmeticUnary should wrap PLUS case with UnaryPositive for type checking

AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26716: [SPARK-30083][SQL] visitArithmeticUnary should wrap PLUS case with UnaryPositive for type checking URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26716#issuecomment-561012567 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres

AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26412#issuecomment-561012395 Merged build finished. Test FAILed.

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA removed a comment on issue #26716: [SPARK-30083][SQL] visitArithmeticUnary should wrap PLUS case with UnaryPositive for type checking

SparkQA removed a comment on issue #26716: [SPARK-30083][SQL] visitArithmeticUnary should wrap PLUS case with UnaryPositive for type checking URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26716#issuecomment-560963260 **[Test build #114749 has

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on issue #26716: [SPARK-30083][SQL] visitArithmeticUnary should wrap PLUS case with UnaryPositive for type checking

SparkQA commented on issue #26716: [SPARK-30083][SQL] visitArithmeticUnary should wrap PLUS case with UnaryPositive for type checking URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26716#issuecomment-561012104 **[Test build #114749 has

[GitHub] [spark] dongjoon-hyun commented on a change in pull request #26738: [SPARK-30082][SQL] Do not replace Zeros when replacing NaNs

dongjoon-hyun commented on a change in pull request #26738: [SPARK-30082][SQL] Do not replace Zeros when replacing NaNs URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26738#discussion_r352996206 ## File path: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameNaFunctions.scala

[GitHub] [spark] iRakson commented on a change in pull request #26467: [SPARK-29477]Improve tooltip for Streaming tab

iRakson commented on a change in pull request #26467: [SPARK-29477]Improve tooltip for Streaming tab URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26467#discussion_r352995040 ## File path: streaming/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/UISeleniumSuite.scala ## @@ -162,7

[GitHub] [spark] gengliangwang commented on a change in pull request #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres

gengliangwang commented on a change in pull request #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26412#discussion_r352993670 ## File path:

[GitHub] [spark] cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26741: [SPARK-30104][SQL] Fix catalog resolution for 'global_temp'

cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26741: [SPARK-30104][SQL] Fix catalog resolution for 'global_temp' URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26741#discussion_r352993187 ## File path: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/connector/DataSourceV2SQLSuite.scala

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26412#issuecomment-561007875 Merged build finished. Test PASSed.

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26412#issuecomment-561007881 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres

AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26412#issuecomment-561007875 Merged build finished. Test PASSed.

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres

AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26412#issuecomment-561007881 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on issue #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres

SparkQA commented on issue #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26412#issuecomment-561007606 **[Test build #114754 has

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26434: [SPARK-29544] [SQL] optimize skewed partition based on data size

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26434: [SPARK-29544] [SQL] optimize skewed partition based on data size URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26434#issuecomment-561004901 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26434: [SPARK-29544] [SQL] optimize skewed partition based on data size

AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26434: [SPARK-29544] [SQL] optimize skewed partition based on data size URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26434#issuecomment-561004901 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26434: [SPARK-29544] [SQL] optimize skewed partition based on data size

AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26434: [SPARK-29544] [SQL] optimize skewed partition based on data size URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26434#issuecomment-561004893 Merged build finished. Test PASSed. This is an

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26434: [SPARK-29544] [SQL] optimize skewed partition based on data size

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26434: [SPARK-29544] [SQL] optimize skewed partition based on data size URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26434#issuecomment-561004893 Merged build finished. Test PASSed.

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA removed a comment on issue #26434: [SPARK-29544] [SQL] optimize skewed partition based on data size

SparkQA removed a comment on issue #26434: [SPARK-29544] [SQL] optimize skewed partition based on data size URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26434#issuecomment-560975134 **[Test build #114751 has

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on issue #26434: [SPARK-29544] [SQL] optimize skewed partition based on data size

SparkQA commented on issue #26434: [SPARK-29544] [SQL] optimize skewed partition based on data size URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26434#issuecomment-561004374 **[Test build #114751 has

[GitHub] [spark] srowen commented on issue #26742: [SPARK-30051][BUILD] Clean up hadoop-3.2 dependency

srowen commented on issue #26742: [SPARK-30051][BUILD] Clean up hadoop-3.2 dependency URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26742#issuecomment-561002412 What's the logic here -- it's not actually needed at compile time because?

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26738: [SPARK-30082][SQL] Do not replace Zeros when replacing NaNs

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26738: [SPARK-30082][SQL] Do not replace Zeros when replacing NaNs URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26738#issuecomment-560999453 Merged build finished. Test PASSed. This is

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26738: [SPARK-30082][SQL] Do not replace Zeros when replacing NaNs

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26738: [SPARK-30082][SQL] Do not replace Zeros when replacing NaNs URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26738#issuecomment-560999461 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26738: [SPARK-30082][SQL] Do not replace Zeros when replacing NaNs

AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26738: [SPARK-30082][SQL] Do not replace Zeros when replacing NaNs URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26738#issuecomment-560999461 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26738: [SPARK-30082][SQL] Do not replace Zeros when replacing NaNs

AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26738: [SPARK-30082][SQL] Do not replace Zeros when replacing NaNs URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26738#issuecomment-560999453 Merged build finished. Test PASSed. This is an

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on issue #26738: [SPARK-30082][SQL] Do not replace Zeros when replacing NaNs

SparkQA commented on issue #26738: [SPARK-30082][SQL] Do not replace Zeros when replacing NaNs URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26738#issuecomment-560999147 **[Test build #114753 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/114753/testReport)**

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26684: [SPARK-30001][SQL] ResolveRelations should handle both V1 and V2 tables.

AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26684: [SPARK-30001][SQL] ResolveRelations should handle both V1 and V2 tables. URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26684#issuecomment-560999052 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26684: [SPARK-30001][SQL] ResolveRelations should handle both V1 and V2 tables.

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26684: [SPARK-30001][SQL] ResolveRelations should handle both V1 and V2 tables. URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26684#issuecomment-560999052 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26684: [SPARK-30001][SQL] ResolveRelations should handle both V1 and V2 tables.

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26684: [SPARK-30001][SQL] ResolveRelations should handle both V1 and V2 tables. URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26684#issuecomment-560999045 Merged build finished. Test PASSed.

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26684: [SPARK-30001][SQL] ResolveRelations should handle both V1 and V2 tables.

AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26684: [SPARK-30001][SQL] ResolveRelations should handle both V1 and V2 tables. URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26684#issuecomment-560999045 Merged build finished. Test PASSed.

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA removed a comment on issue #26684: [SPARK-30001][SQL] ResolveRelations should handle both V1 and V2 tables.

SparkQA removed a comment on issue #26684: [SPARK-30001][SQL] ResolveRelations should handle both V1 and V2 tables. URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26684#issuecomment-560950068 **[Test build #114747 has

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on issue #26684: [SPARK-30001][SQL] ResolveRelations should handle both V1 and V2 tables.

SparkQA commented on issue #26684: [SPARK-30001][SQL] ResolveRelations should handle both V1 and V2 tables. URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26684#issuecomment-560998658 **[Test build #114747 has

[GitHub] [spark] dongjoon-hyun commented on issue #26738: [SPARK-30082][SQL] Do not replace Zeros when replacing NaNs

dongjoon-hyun commented on issue #26738: [SPARK-30082][SQL] Do not replace Zeros when replacing NaNs URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26738#issuecomment-560998290 ok to test This is an automated message from the

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >