[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-12-04 Thread holdenk
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-162099720 So I changed this a bit @dbtsai (mostly just avoid wrapping the call in one place) - let me know what you think. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-12-01 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-161096854 **[Test build #46983 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46983/consoleFull)** for PR 9524 at commit

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-12-01 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-161097041 Merged build finished. Test PASSed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-12-01 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-161097044 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-12-01 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-161085782 **[Test build #46983 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46983/consoleFull)** for PR 9524 at commit

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-12-01 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-161030561 **[Test build #46966 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46966/consoleFull)** for PR 9524 at commit

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-12-01 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-161031415 Test FAILed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-12-01 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-161031411 Merged build finished. Test FAILed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-12-01 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-161031402 **[Test build #46966 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46966/consoleFull)** for PR 9524 at commit

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-25 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-159577543 **[Test build #46677 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46677/consoleFull)** for PR 9524 at commit

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-25 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-159577586 Merged build finished. Test FAILed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-25 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-159577588 Test FAILed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-24 Thread dbtsai
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#discussion_r45806031 --- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/Split.scala --- @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ final class CategoricalSplit private[ml] ( /** * If

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-24 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-159522953 **[Test build #46677 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46677/consoleFull)** for PR 9524 at commit

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-24 Thread holdenk
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#discussion_r45781057 --- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/Split.scala --- @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ final class CategoricalSplit private[ml] ( /** * If

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-23 Thread dbtsai
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#discussion_r45668718 --- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/codeGenerator.scala --- @@ -0,0 +1,157 @@ +/* + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-23 Thread holdenk
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#discussion_r45668650 --- Diff: mllib/pom.xml --- @@ -125,6 +125,10 @@ org.apache.spark spark-test-tags_${scala.binary.version} + +

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-23 Thread dbtsai
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#discussion_r45669138 --- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/codeGenerator.scala --- @@ -0,0 +1,157 @@ +/* + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-23 Thread dbtsai
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#discussion_r45669679 --- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/Split.scala --- @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ final class CategoricalSplit private[ml] ( /** * If

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-23 Thread dbtsai
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#discussion_r45668289 --- Diff: mllib/pom.xml --- @@ -125,6 +125,10 @@ org.apache.spark spark-test-tags_${scala.binary.version} + +

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-23 Thread dbtsai
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#discussion_r45669204 --- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/codeGenerator.scala --- @@ -0,0 +1,157 @@ +/* + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-20 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-158359278 Merged build finished. Test PASSed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-20 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-158346630 **[Test build #46411 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46411/consoleFull)** for PR 9524 at commit

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-20 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-158358994 **[Test build #46411 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46411/consoleFull)** for PR 9524 at commit

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-20 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-158359281 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-20 Thread holdenk
GitHub user holdenk reopened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524 [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt This PR adds code gen for GBT in ML. It does this using quasi quotes since they give nice compile time type messages. The API could also use some

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-20 Thread holdenk
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-158343945 @dbtsai : I've fixed the issue with generating large trees (depth > 10) that I found while doing the performance testing. --- If your project is set up for it, you can

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-17 Thread dbtsai
Github user dbtsai commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-157306569 @holdenk Ping me when you address the issue and reopen it. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-16 Thread rxin
Github user rxin commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-157281355 Mind closing and reopening when it is ready? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-16 Thread holdenk
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-157281738 Sure thing. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-16 Thread holdenk
Github user holdenk closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-07 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154672307 **[Test build #45278 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45278/consoleFull)** for PR 9524 at commit

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-07 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154672657 Merged build finished. Test FAILed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-07 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154738601 Merged build started. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-07 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154738590 Merged build triggered. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-07 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154748281 **[Test build #45289 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45289/consoleFull)** for PR 9524 at commit

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-07 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154748475 Merged build finished. Test FAILed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-07 Thread holdenk
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154738488 jenkins, retest this please --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-07 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154738716 **[Test build #45289 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45289/consoleFull)** for PR 9524 at commit

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-07 Thread holdenk
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154775878 I think the mesos test failure was unrelated, jenkins retest this please. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-07 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154775922 Merged build triggered. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-07 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154775926 Merged build started. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-07 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154776182 **[Test build #45297 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45297/consoleFull)** for PR 9524 at commit

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-07 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154776724 Merged build triggered. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-07 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154776726 Merged build started. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-07 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154776803 **[Test build #45298 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45298/consoleFull)** for PR 9524 at commit

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-07 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154773216 Merged build started. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-07 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154773212 Merged build triggered. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-07 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154773299 **[Test build #45294 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45294/consoleFull)** for PR 9524 at commit

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-07 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154775823 Merged build finished. Test FAILed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-07 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154775811 **[Test build #45294 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45294/consoleFull)** for PR 9524 at commit

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-07 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154778091 **[Test build #45298 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45298/consoleFull)** for PR 9524 at commit

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-07 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154778100 Merged build finished. Test PASSed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-07 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154780369 Merged build finished. Test PASSed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-07 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154780356 **[Test build #45297 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45297/consoleFull)** for PR 9524 at commit

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-06 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154567482 Merged build finished. Test FAILed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-06 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154564354 Merged build triggered. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-06 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154564403 Merged build started. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-06 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154567471 **[Test build #45264 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45264/consoleFull)** for PR 9524 at commit

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-06 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154566863 **[Test build #45264 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45264/consoleFull)** for PR 9524 at commit

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-06 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154651583 **[Test build #45278 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45278/consoleFull)** for PR 9524 at commit

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-06 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154650846 Merged build started. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-06 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154650835 Merged build triggered. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-06 Thread rxin
Github user rxin commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154505864 Please don't use macros and quasiquotes. They are slow and not IDE friendly. We replaced them with Janino in SQL. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-06 Thread holdenk
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154510939 @rxin Ok I'll update this to use Janino although I'll miss my compile time type checking I figured I'd probably have to do that. In the meantime does the API look like

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-06 Thread rxin
Github user rxin commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154511927 there isn't really compile time type checking -- it just has syntax checking to ensure it's a valid tree... --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-06 Thread holdenk
GitHub user holdenk opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524 [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt This PR adds code gen for GBT in ML. It does this using quasi quotes since they give nice compile time type messages. The API could also use some

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-06 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154495912 Build started sha1 is merged. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-06 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154495806 Build triggered. sha1 is merged. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-06 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154497567 **[Test build #45231 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45231/consoleFull)** for PR 9524 at commit

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-06 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154522152 **[Test build #45231 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45231/consoleFull)** for PR 9524 at commit

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-06 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154522232 Build finished. 6703 tests run, 0 skipped, 1 failed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-06 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154522235 Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45231/ ---

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-06 Thread holdenk
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154513243 ah ok - well less of a loss then. I'll switch it around of course. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-10387][ML][WIP] Add code gen for gbt

2015-11-06 Thread holdenk
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154547057 streaming test failure seems unrelated but won't retrigger since need to rewrite the codegen anyways. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email