Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-170757463
Let's close the limit push down pull requests. We will need to design this
more properly because it is expensive to push down large limits.
---
If your project is set up
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-170757733
Sure, let me close it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user gatorsmile closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167954886
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167954987
**[Test build #48461 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48461/consoleFull)**
for PR 10451 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167954885
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167972021
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167971953
**[Test build #48465 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48465/consoleFull)**
for PR 10451 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167972019
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167955427
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167955424
**[Test build #48461 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48461/consoleFull)**
for PR 10451 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167955428
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167957490
**[Test build #48465 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48465/consoleFull)**
for PR 10451 at commit
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#discussion_r48558035
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -153,6 +153,17 @@ object SetOperationPushDown extends
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167845210
Thanks for working on this. I think its getting pretty close. A few minor
cleanups that might be nice:
- I think we should consider pulling all the Limit rules
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167902518
After rethinking the `Limit` push-down rules, we are unable to push Limit
through any operator that could change the values or the number of rows. Thus,
so far, the
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#discussion_r48581020
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -80,6 +81,33 @@ abstract class Optimizer extends
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#discussion_r48578529
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -69,6 +73,33 @@ object DefaultOptimizer extends
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#discussion_r48581249
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/LogicalPlan.scala
---
@@ -91,6 +91,11 @@ abstract class LogicalPlan
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#discussion_r48582039
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -80,6 +81,33 @@ abstract class Optimizer extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167916894
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167916892
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167899814
**[Test build #48431 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48431/consoleFull)**
for PR 10451 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#discussion_r48579121
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -69,6 +73,33 @@ object DefaultOptimizer extends
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#discussion_r48580661
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -80,6 +81,33 @@ abstract class Optimizer extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167916591
**[Test build #48435 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48435/consoleFull)**
for PR 10451 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167900829
**[Test build #48433 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48433/consoleFull)**
for PR 10451 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#discussion_r48579360
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -153,6 +153,17 @@ object SetOperationPushDown
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167903020
**[Test build #48435 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48435/consoleFull)**
for PR 10451 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#discussion_r48581133
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -80,6 +81,33 @@ abstract class Optimizer extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167932525
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167932503
**[Test build #48433 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48433/consoleFull)**
for PR 10451 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167932524
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167931936
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167931892
**[Test build #48431 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48431/consoleFull)**
for PR 10451 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167931938
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167954060
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167954059
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167952117
The latest version covers both cases:
1) If the children' `maxRows` has a smaller number, add the extra limit.
2) If the children' `maxRows` is `None`, add
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#discussion_r48590465
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/LogicalPlan.scala
---
@@ -91,6 +91,11 @@ abstract class LogicalPlan
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167742397
**[Test build #48400 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48400/consoleFull)**
for PR 10451 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167742459
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167742457
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#discussion_r48517911
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -153,6 +153,15 @@ object SetOperationPushDown
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#discussion_r48518043
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -153,6 +153,15 @@ object SetOperationPushDown
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#discussion_r48518201
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -153,6 +153,15 @@ object SetOperationPushDown extends
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#discussion_r48518190
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -153,6 +153,15 @@ object SetOperationPushDown extends
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#discussion_r48518228
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/LogicalPlan.scala
---
@@ -91,6 +91,11 @@ abstract class LogicalPlan
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167700694
> add a comment and explain the current solution. In the future, if we add
such an operator, we can change the current way and fix the issue? (Already
added a comment
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#discussion_r48518442
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/LogicalPlan.scala
---
@@ -91,6 +91,11 @@ abstract class LogicalPlan
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#discussion_r48501449
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/basicOperators.scala
---
@@ -448,7 +448,21 @@ case class Pivot(
}
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#discussion_r48501690
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/basicOperators.scala
---
@@ -448,7 +448,21 @@ case class Pivot(
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#discussion_r48523071
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/LogicalPlan.scala
---
@@ -91,6 +91,11 @@ abstract class LogicalPlan
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167677723
**[Test build #48379 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48379/consoleFull)**
for PR 10451 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167678849
A few updates are done, but I am not sure if the changes are appropriate.
1. `limit` is already used in
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#discussion_r48512926
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/LogicalPlan.scala
---
@@ -91,6 +91,11 @@ abstract class LogicalPlan
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167679998
**[Test build #48380 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48380/consoleFull)**
for PR 10451 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#discussion_r48513000
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/LogicalPlan.scala
---
@@ -91,6 +91,11 @@ abstract class LogicalPlan
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167688592
**[Test build #48379 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48379/consoleFull)**
for PR 10451 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167688631
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167688630
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167689297
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167689296
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167689240
**[Test build #48380 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48380/consoleFull)**
for PR 10451 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167729202
**[Test build #48400 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48400/consoleFull)**
for PR 10451 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167213191
**[Test build #48322 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48322/consoleFull)**
for PR 10451 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167213359
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167213357
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#discussion_r48441937
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -153,6 +153,16 @@ object SetOperationPushDown
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#discussion_r48441867
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -153,6 +153,16 @@ object SetOperationPushDown
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#discussion_r48432615
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -153,6 +153,15 @@ object SetOperationPushDown
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#discussion_r48432925
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -153,6 +153,15 @@ object SetOperationPushDown
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167203391
**[Test build #48320 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48320/consoleFull)**
for PR 10451 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167203394
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167203393
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167203168
**[Test build #48320 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48320/consoleFull)**
for PR 10451 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167202389
@cloud-fan Just added a quick fix by introducing a stop flag to avoid
adding extra `Limit` in the subsequent iteration, but I am not sure if my way
is good.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167205352
**[Test build #48322 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48322/consoleFull)**
for PR 10451 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167067050
**[Test build #48299 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48299/consoleFull)**
for PR 10451 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167079554
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167079556
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167079472
**[Test build #48299 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48299/consoleFull)**
for PR 10451 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-166963932
**[Test build #48248 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48248/consoleFull)**
for PR 10451 at commit
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451
[SPARK-12503] [SQL] Pushing Limit Through Union
"Rule that applies to a Limit on top of a Union. The original Limit won't
go away after applying this rule, but additional Limit nodes will be
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167013142
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167013085
**[Test build #48261 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48261/consoleFull)**
for PR 10451 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167013143
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#discussion_r48391800
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -153,6 +153,15 @@ object SetOperationPushDown
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#discussion_r48392104
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -153,6 +153,15 @@ object SetOperationPushDown
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-166980946
@marmbrus @rxin Could you check if this is an appropriate improvement for
Spark too?
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-166980561
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-166980563
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167005403
**[Test build #48261 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48261/consoleFull)**
for PR 10451 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-166980458
**[Test build #48248 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48248/consoleFull)**
for PR 10451 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#discussion_r48377323
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -153,6 +153,15 @@ object SetOperationPushDown
95 matches
Mail list logo
