Github user lianhuiwang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3061#issuecomment-68059363
OK. I will close this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user lianhuiwang closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3061
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3061#discussion_r22244632
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/network/nio/NioBlockTransferService.scala
---
@@ -39,6 +41,10 @@ final class NioBlockTransferService(conf:
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3061#discussion_r22244663
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/network/nio/NioBlockTransferService.scala
---
@@ -121,8 +132,34 @@ final class
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3061#discussion_r22244677
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/network/nio/NioBlockTransferService.scala
---
@@ -121,8 +132,34 @@ final class
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3061#discussion_r22244702
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/network/nio/NioBlockTransferService.scala
---
@@ -121,8 +132,34 @@ final class
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3061#discussion_r22244710
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/network/nio/NioBlockTransferService.scala
---
@@ -96,6 +102,11 @@ final class NioBlockTransferService(conf:
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3061#discussion_r22244771
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/network/nio/NioBlockTransferService.scala
---
@@ -121,8 +132,34 @@ final class
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3061#discussion_r22244783
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/network/nio/NioBlockTransferService.scala
---
@@ -121,8 +132,34 @@ final class
Github user lianhuiwang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3061#discussion_r22245434
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/network/nio/NioBlockTransferService.scala
---
@@ -39,6 +41,10 @@ final class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3061#issuecomment-68024341
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user lianhuiwang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3061#discussion_r22245488
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/network/nio/NioBlockTransferService.scala
---
@@ -121,8 +132,34 @@ final class
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3061#issuecomment-68024339
[Test build #24757 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24757/consoleFull)
for PR 3061 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3061#issuecomment-68024263
[Test build #24757 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24757/consoleFull)
for PR 3061 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3061#issuecomment-68026214
Actually let's close this one. We have already implemented the same
functionality in Netty.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
GitHub user lianhuiwang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3061
[SPARK-4195][Core]retry to fetch blocks's result when fetchfailed's reason
is connection timeout
when there are many executors in a application(example:1000),Connection
timeout often occure.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3061#issuecomment-61406820
[Test build #22761 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22761/consoleFull)
for PR 3061 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3061#issuecomment-61406896
[Test build #22761 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22761/consoleFull)
for PR 3061 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3061#issuecomment-61406898
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3061#issuecomment-61421370
@aarondav we should incorporate this into the new transport thing
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
20 matches
Mail list logo
