Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1055#discussion_r13739286
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/predicates.scala
---
@@ -202,3 +201,78 @@ case class If(predicate:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1072
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/964#issuecomment-45980206
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1074#issuecomment-45980616
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1074#issuecomment-45980618
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/15752/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user vrilleup commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/964#issuecomment-45981092
@rezazadeh Thank you for the comments! I added another method with the
original method as you suggested.
@mengxr I have tested it with real matrices. Here are
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1050#issuecomment-45981311
Build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1050#issuecomment-45981303
Build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user colorant commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/916#issuecomment-45981871
@dorx Do you think this works for extreme large data set with really small
sample size? e.g. n = 1.0x10^11 while sample = 1 ? in that case, the final
adjusted fraction
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1071#issuecomment-45981900
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1071#issuecomment-45981906
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user ScrapCodes commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1050#issuecomment-45982040
Hey @andrewor14, I sort of avoided EOF blocks for nested ifs, since that
can look a bit less nicer because of no indentation.
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user joyyoj commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/807#discussion_r13740432
--- Diff:
external/flume/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/flume/EventTransformer.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/964#issuecomment-45982605
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/15753/
---
If your project
Github user joyyoj commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/807#discussion_r13740434
--- Diff:
external/flume/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/flume/EventTransformer.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user joyyoj commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/807#discussion_r13740438
--- Diff:
external/flume/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/flume/EventTransformer.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/964#issuecomment-45982604
Merged build finished. All automated tests passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user li-zhihui commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/900#discussion_r13740596
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -48,6 +48,10 @@ class
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1071#discussion_r13740605
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SchemaRDDLike.scala
---
@@ -48,7 +49,17 @@ private[sql] trait SchemaRDDLike {
*/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/969#issuecomment-45983110
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/969#issuecomment-45983120
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user sryza commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/900#discussion_r13740722
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -48,6 +48,10 @@ class
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1071#discussion_r13740823
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/commands.scala ---
@@ -22,45 +22,69 @@ import org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD
import
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1071#issuecomment-45983713
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1071#issuecomment-45983726
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user nishkamravi2 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1000#issuecomment-45983893
@rxin does this look ok?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1000#issuecomment-45983980
LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1000#issuecomment-45983988
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1000#issuecomment-45984049
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1000#issuecomment-45984058
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user rahulsinghaliitd commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1067#discussion_r13741193
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/metrics/sink/CsvSink.scala
---
@@ -53,11 +53,14 @@ private[spark] class CsvSink(val property:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1051#issuecomment-45985416
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1051#issuecomment-45985401
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1050#issuecomment-45986611
Build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1050#issuecomment-45986612
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/15754/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/969#issuecomment-45987365
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/15756/
---
If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/969#issuecomment-45987363
Merged build finished. All automated tests passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1071#issuecomment-45987364
Merged build finished. All automated tests passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1000#issuecomment-45989954
Merged build finished. All automated tests passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1071#issuecomment-45989960
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/15757/
---
If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1051#issuecomment-45989955
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1051#issuecomment-45989958
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/15759/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1000#issuecomment-45989959
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/15758/
---
If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1071#issuecomment-45989953
Merged build finished. All automated tests passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/964#discussion_r13742986
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/EigenValueDecomposition.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/964#discussion_r13742980
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/EigenValueDecomposition.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/964#discussion_r13742995
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/distributed/RowMatrix.scala
---
@@ -201,6 +202,31 @@ class RowMatrix(
}
/**
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/964#discussion_r13743003
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/distributed/RowMatrix.scala
---
@@ -201,6 +202,31 @@ class RowMatrix(
}
/**
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/964#discussion_r13742972
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/EigenValueDecomposition.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/964#discussion_r13742973
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/EigenValueDecomposition.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/964#discussion_r13743001
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/distributed/RowMatrix.scala
---
@@ -201,6 +202,31 @@ class RowMatrix(
}
/**
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/964#discussion_r13742975
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/EigenValueDecomposition.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/964#discussion_r13742981
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/EigenValueDecomposition.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/964#discussion_r13742970
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/EigenValueDecomposition.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/964#discussion_r13742971
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/EigenValueDecomposition.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/964#discussion_r13742989
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/distributed/RowMatrix.scala
---
@@ -201,6 +202,31 @@ class RowMatrix(
}
/**
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/964#discussion_r13742968
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/EigenValueDecomposition.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/964#discussion_r13742976
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/EigenValueDecomposition.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/964#issuecomment-45990973
@vrilleup This implementation looks good to me and thanks for the
experiments! Besides the inline comments, we should think when to switch from
ARPACK to dense SVD. ARPACK
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/916#issuecomment-45992111
@colorant Tried the following with the new implementation:
~~~
val rdd = sc.parallelize(0 until 10, 1).flatMap(i =
Iterator.fill(10)(0)) // 10^10
GitHub user mengxr opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1075
[HOTFIX] add math3 version to pom
Passed `mvn package`.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/mengxr/spark takeSample-fix
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1075
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user EugenCepoi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/997#issuecomment-45997041
Thx for the comments. Updated the PR based on them.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
GitHub user rahulsinghaliitd opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1076
SPARK-2134: Report metrics before application finishes
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/Guavus/spark SPARK-2134
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1076#issuecomment-46001763
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user huitseeker commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1069#issuecomment-46002024
@witgo @pwendell @srowen Correct : adding `-language:postfixOps` to your
`scalac` line (`scalacOptions` for sbt) will remove the warning.
---
If your project is set
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/969#issuecomment-46002435
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/969#issuecomment-46002447
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1069#issuecomment-46002724
Yes, but then what warnings is this resolving?
I understand one compiler flag is shorter than imports. I also understand
that these language features are
Github user huitseeker commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1069#issuecomment-46004365
It resolves the warning the following warning, which occurs in different
(but easy-to-reach) contexts depending on whether you are running with the
`-language` option
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1069#issuecomment-46004821
Yes, I understand that, but these warnings are already suppressed with
imports, and the advertised change here is to resolve warnings. It just
exchanges mechanisms for
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/981#issuecomment-46004992
Build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/981#issuecomment-46005001
Build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/981#issuecomment-46005097
Build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/981#issuecomment-46005098
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/15761/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/969#issuecomment-46005347
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/969#issuecomment-46005348
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/15760/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user huitseeker commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1069#issuecomment-46006160
Fair enough. I just meant to provide context.
Note that [this
commit](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/41c4a33105c74417192925db355019ba1badeab2)
has
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1069#issuecomment-46006402
I'm more concerned with consistency than anything. We shouldn't do it both
ways, and I don't think that compiler arg should have been added. A compiler
flag is not a bad
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/981#issuecomment-46006821
Build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/981#issuecomment-46006828
Build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user darabos commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/981#issuecomment-46007190
Thanks for the feedback! I've added JSON (de)serialization code for the new
field. Patched in your change (thanks!). And added one more line to the top of
the stack
Github user tgravescs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1072#issuecomment-46008503
@marmbrus @liancheng I think this broke branch-1.0 from building:
Error I am seeing:
[INFO] Compiling 5 Scala sources
Github user tgravescs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/969#issuecomment-46009163
Can you please be more specific on your description of this problem? Does
it only occur in yarn cluster mode (or is it both cluster and client mode)?
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/969#discussion_r13749661
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmitArguments.scala ---
@@ -131,6 +132,13 @@ private[spark] class SparkSubmitArguments(args:
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/900#discussion_r13749934
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -48,6 +48,10 @@ class
Github user witgo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/969#issuecomment-46011803
@tgravescs This problem only found in the yarn cluster mode.
In the yarn client mode. [YarnClientSchedulerBackend.scala#L64](
Github user rahulsinghaliitd commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1076#discussion_r13750359
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/master/Master.scala
---
@@ -154,6 +154,8 @@ private[spark] class Master(
}
Github user witgo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/969#discussion_r13750513
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmitArguments.scala ---
@@ -131,6 +132,13 @@ private[spark] class SparkSubmitArguments(args:
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/894#discussion_r13751088
--- Diff:
yarn/alpha/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnAllocationHandler.scala
---
@@ -88,6 +88,18 @@ private[yarn] class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/981#issuecomment-46015458
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/15762/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/981#issuecomment-46015455
Build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/969#issuecomment-46018045
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/969#issuecomment-46018031
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user witgo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/894#discussion_r13752934
--- Diff:
yarn/alpha/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnAllocationHandler.scala
---
@@ -88,6 +88,18 @@ private[yarn] class YarnAllocationHandler(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/894#issuecomment-46022353
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/894#issuecomment-46022380
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/969#issuecomment-46023406
Merged build finished. All automated tests passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/969#issuecomment-46023409
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/15763/
---
If your project
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/969#discussion_r13755838
--- Diff:
yarn/common/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ClientArguments.scala
---
@@ -45,6 +44,14 @@ class ClientArguments(val args:
1 - 100 of 245 matches
Mail list logo
