Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1238#issuecomment-49223292
QA tests have started for PR 1238. This patch merges cleanly. View
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16745/consoleFull
---
If
Github user srowen closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1393
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
GitHub user 24601 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1446
Added t2 instance types
New t2 instance types require HVM amis, bailout assumption of pvm
causes failures when using t2 instance types.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by run
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1446#issuecomment-49225163
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1409#issuecomment-49227548
Okay I'm going to merge this into master and 1.0. We can cut a new patch
release shortly for this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
GitHub user sryza opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1447
SPARK-2519 part 2. Remove pattern matching on Tuple2 in critical section...
...s of CoGroupedRDD and PairRDDFunctions
This also removes an unnecessary tuple creation in cogroup.
You can merge
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1446#discussion_r15027927
--- Diff: ec2/spark_ec2.py ---
@@ -240,7 +240,10 @@ def get_spark_ami(opts):
"r3.xlarge": "hvm",
"r3.2xlarge": "hvm",
Github user CodingCat commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1313#issuecomment-49227891
en...that makes sense
actually we can get the situation about locality in the taskSet easily
through myLocalityLevels, which is calculated when a new execut
GitHub user concretevitamin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1448
[SPARK-2531] [SQL] Make BroadcastNestedLoopJoin take into account a
BuildSide
JIRA ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-2531
You can merge this pull request into a Git reposi
Github user concretevitamin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1448#issuecomment-49227975
Jenkins, this is okay to test.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project doe
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1409
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1336#issuecomment-49227999
I have updated the screenshot. Anything else?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1443#discussion_r15028096
--- Diff: docs/spark-standalone.md ---
@@ -157,6 +157,20 @@ SPARK_MASTER_OPTS supports the following system
properties:
Property NameDefaultMeanin
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1262#issuecomment-49228272
Yeah I think @rxin is going to change this so that we index on both the
stage and attempt. Also, we'll need to extend the listener interface to give
both the attempt and
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1405#issuecomment-49228359
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled a
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1405
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user concretevitamin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1436#issuecomment-49228593
Hey @chenghao-intel -- can you create a JIRA ticket for this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitH
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1336#issuecomment-49228680
Looks good, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
Github user dorx commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1367#discussion_r15028681
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/correlation/SpearmansCorrelation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache S
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1336#issuecomment-49230195
Hey actually - could this differentiate between the case where the event
log was not enabled (and give a message like "Application did not enable event
logging") and a c
Github user dorx commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1367#discussion_r15030155
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/correlation/SpearmansCorrelation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache S
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1238#issuecomment-49233766
QA results for PR 1238:- This patch PASSES unit tests.- This patch
merges cleanly- This patch adds no public classesFor more
information see test
ouptut:https://amplab.c
Github user mridulm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1313#issuecomment-49234491
Thinking about this more, if I am not wrong, current scheduler can cause
suboptimal schedules when there are multiple tasksetmanagers. Particularly
relevant to grap
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1440#issuecomment-49238579
QA tests have started for PR 1440. This patch merges cleanly. View
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16749/consoleFull
---
If
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1367#discussion_r15033041
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/correlation/Correlation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user dorx commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1367#discussion_r15033178
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/correlation/Correlation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software F
Github user concretevitamin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1448#issuecomment-49239568
Jenkins, test this please...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user CodingCat commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1313#issuecomment-49239705
@mridulm due to the delay scheduling, this situation has been mitigated in
the case that the TaskSetManager originally contains all levels and becomes
RACK_LOCAL/ANY-on
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1448#issuecomment-49239764
QA tests have started for PR 1448. This patch merges cleanly. View
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16750/consoleFull
---
If
Github user dorx commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1367#discussion_r15033708
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/correlation/SpearmansCorrelation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache S
GitHub user pbailis opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1449
Async in progress
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/pbailis/spark async-in-progress
Alternatively you can review and apply these
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1449#issuecomment-49241621
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user markhamstra commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1449#issuecomment-49241702
Please create a JIRA issue and a description for this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as we
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1450
[SPARK-2534] Avoid pulling in the entire RDD in groupByKey.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/rxin/spark agg-closure
Alternatively y
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1449#issuecomment-49242538
Do you mind adding some description to the PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1450#issuecomment-49242499
Jenkins, why are you so slow
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user pbailis closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1449
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user pbailis commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1449#issuecomment-49242578
Sorry, this PR was for a private branch.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
GitHub user ueshin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1451
[SPARK-2535][SQL] Add StringComparison case to NullPropagation.
`StringComparison` expressions including `null` literal cases could be
added to `NullPropagation`.
You can merge this pull request int
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1451#issuecomment-49243557
QA tests have started for PR 1451. This patch merges cleanly. View
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16752/consoleFull
---
If
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1452
[SPARK-2521] Broadcast RDD object once per TaskSet (instead of sending it
for every task).
This should substantially reduces task size for large jobs (with large
closures). It should improve task disp
Github user aarondav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1452#discussion_r15035365
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
@@ -1195,21 +1195,28 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag](
/**
* Return whether
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1452#discussion_r15035409
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
@@ -1195,21 +1195,28 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag](
/**
* Return whether this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1452#issuecomment-49243895
QA tests have started for PR 1452. This patch merges cleanly. View
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16753/consoleFull
---
If
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1440#discussion_r15035454
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveCompatibilitySuite.scala
---
@@ -93,6 +93,10 @@ class HiveCompatibilitySuite exte
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1440#discussion_r15035556
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveCompatibilitySuite.scala
---
@@ -93,6 +93,10 @@ class HiveCompatibilitySuite exte
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1367#discussion_r15036312
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/correlation/Correlation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1440#issuecomment-49245732
QA results for PR 1440:- This patch PASSES unit tests.- This patch
merges cleanly- This patch adds no public classesFor more
information see test
ouptut:https://amplab.c
Github user dorx commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1367#discussion_r15036448
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/correlation/Correlation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software F
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1436#issuecomment-49246024
Jira Ticket are created: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-2540
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply app
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1436#issuecomment-49246071
QA tests have started for PR 1436. This patch merges cleanly. View
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16754/consoleFull
---
If
Github user aarondav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1452#discussion_r15036617
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
@@ -1195,21 +1195,28 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag](
/**
* Return whether
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1367#discussion_r15036690
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/correlation/SpearmansCorrelation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
GitHub user mengxr opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1453
[SPARK-2433][MLLIB] fix NaiveBayesModel.predict
This is the same as https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/463 , which I
forgot to merge into branch-0.9.
You can merge this pull request into a Git rep
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1440#discussion_r15036800
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveCompatibilitySuite.scala
---
@@ -93,6 +93,10 @@ class HiveCompatibilitySuite extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1448#issuecomment-49246618
QA results for PR 1448:- This patch PASSES unit tests.- This patch
merges cleanly- This patch adds no public classesFor more
information see test
ouptut:https://amplab.c
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1452#discussion_r15036841
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
@@ -1195,21 +1195,28 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag](
/**
* Return whether this
Github user dorx commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1367#discussion_r15036918
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/correlation/SpearmansCorrelation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache S
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1447#discussion_r15037091
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/PairRDDFunctions.scala
---
@@ -216,17 +216,17 @@ class PairRDDFunctions[K, V](self: RDD[(K, V)])
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1447#discussion_r15037098
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/PairRDDFunctions.scala
---
@@ -216,17 +216,17 @@ class PairRDDFunctions[K, V](self: RDD[(K, V)])
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1447#discussion_r15037121
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/PairRDDFunctions.scala
---
@@ -413,11 +413,11 @@ class PairRDDFunctions[K, V](self: RDD[(K, V)])
* par
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1447#discussion_r15037123
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/PairRDDFunctions.scala
---
@@ -430,11 +430,11 @@ class PairRDDFunctions[K, V](self: RDD[(K, V)])
*/
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1447#discussion_r15037134
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/PairRDDFunctions.scala
---
@@ -571,12 +571,7 @@ class PairRDDFunctions[K, V](self: RDD[(K, V)])
thr
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1447#discussion_r15037164
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/PairRDDFunctions.scala
---
@@ -712,8 +701,8 @@ class PairRDDFunctions[K, V](self: RDD[(K, V)])
va
Github user lirui-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1212#issuecomment-49248835
Thanks everybody :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user sryza commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1447#discussion_r15037689
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/PairRDDFunctions.scala
---
@@ -712,8 +701,8 @@ class PairRDDFunctions[K, V](self: RDD[(K, V)])
v
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1453#issuecomment-49249163
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user lianhuiwang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1443#issuecomment-49249536
@pwendell thanks. i address your comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1443#issuecomment-49249565
QA tests have started for PR 1443. This patch merges cleanly. View
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16757/consoleFull
---
If
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1451#issuecomment-49249573
QA results for PR 1451:- This patch PASSES unit tests.- This patch
merges cleanly- This patch adds no public classesFor more
information see test
ouptut:https://amplab.c
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1453#issuecomment-49249934
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user aarondav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1447#discussion_r15038052
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/PairRDDFunctions.scala
---
@@ -216,17 +216,17 @@ class PairRDDFunctions[K, V](self: RDD[(K, V)])
Github user 24601 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1446#discussion_r15038068
--- Diff: ec2/spark_ec2.py ---
@@ -240,7 +240,10 @@ def get_spark_ami(opts):
"r3.xlarge": "hvm",
"r3.2xlarge": "hvm",
"
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1453#issuecomment-49250079
QA tests have started for PR 1453. This patch merges cleanly. View
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16758/consoleFull
---
If
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1336#issuecomment-49250081
QA tests have started for PR 1336. This patch merges cleanly. View
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16759/consoleFull
---
If
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/735#issuecomment-49250226
Jenkins, retest this please. @koertkuipers mind creating a JIRA for this
(we're trying to track all changes now). I can merge this in once we have an
issue for it.
---
Github user aarondav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1450#discussion_r15038170
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/PairRDDFunctions.scala
---
@@ -361,11 +361,11 @@ class PairRDDFunctions[K, V](self: RDD[(K, V)])
Github user tsudukim commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1341#issuecomment-49250255
Looks good, but this patch seems to includes some unrelated diffs to
SPARK-2481.
* conf/spark-env.sh.template
* docs/spark-standalone.md
* sbin/spark-config.s
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1440#discussion_r15038187
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveCompatibilitySuite.scala
---
@@ -93,6 +93,10 @@ class HiveCompatibilitySuite exte
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/735#issuecomment-49250323
QA tests have started for PR 735. This patch merges cleanly. View
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16760/consoleFull
---
If y
Github user aarondav commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1446#issuecomment-49250359
Adding the commit to the branch made it already update this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1450#discussion_r15038311
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/PairRDDFunctions.scala
---
@@ -361,11 +361,11 @@ class PairRDDFunctions[K, V](self: RDD[(K, V)])
// g
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1447#discussion_r15038340
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/PairRDDFunctions.scala
---
@@ -216,17 +216,17 @@ class PairRDDFunctions[K, V](self: RDD[(K, V)])
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/931#issuecomment-49251303
@pwendell @xiajunluan I think I'm going to send a new PR based on this
because I want to use some of the changes to ExternalAppendOnlyMap in
sort-based shuffle. I also noti
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/931#discussion_r15038532
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/OrderedRDDFunctions.scala ---
@@ -56,15 +62,56 @@ class OrderedRDDFunctions[K : Ordering : ClassTag,
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1453#issuecomment-49251472
QA results for PR 1453:- This patch PASSES unit tests.- This patch
merges cleanly- This patch adds no public classesFor more
information see test
ouptut:https://amplab.c
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1450#issuecomment-49251632
Pushed a new version.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1436#issuecomment-49251619
QA results for PR 1436:- This patch PASSES unit tests.- This patch
merges cleanly- This patch adds no public classesFor more
information see test
ouptut:https://amplab.c
Github user koertkuipers commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/735#issuecomment-49251684
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-2543
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Apache Spark QA
wrote:
> QA tests have started for PR 735.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1450#issuecomment-49251845
QA tests have started for PR 1450. This patch merges cleanly. View
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16762/consoleFull
---
If
GitHub user lirui-intel opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1454
SPARK-2277: clear host->rack info properly
Hi @mridulm, I just think of this issue of
[#1212](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1212): I added FakeRackUtil to
hold the host -> rack mapping.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1454#issuecomment-49252730
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1425#issuecomment-49252992
QA tests have started for PR 1425. This patch merges cleanly. View
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16763/consoleFull
---
If
Github user dbtsai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1425#issuecomment-49253108
@mengxr and @srowen What do you think `assert((0.0001 !~== 0.0) +-
1E-5)`? We have `~==` and `~==` which will have the error message in the latest
commit from my co-work
Github user mengxr closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1453
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1453#issuecomment-49254135
Merged into branch-0.9.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1443#issuecomment-49254241
QA results for PR 1443:- This patch PASSES unit tests.- This patch
merges cleanly- This patch adds no public classesFor more
information see test
ouptut:https://amplab.c
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/931#issuecomment-49254607
Hey, so I rebased this PR and made it mergeable in my own branch,
https://github.com/mateiz/spark/tree/spark-931. However, in doing this I
realized that there might be some
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1210#issuecomment-49254626
@jerryshao after looking more at #931, I'd actually like to hold off on
merging that the way it's set up, so would you mind updating this now? I can
merge this as is (with
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1336#issuecomment-49254656
QA results for PR 1336:- This patch PASSES unit tests.- This patch
merges cleanly- This patch adds no public classesFor more
information see test
ouptut:https://amplab.c
201 - 300 of 360 matches
Mail list logo
