Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1661#discussion_r15627250
--- Diff:
sql/hive-thriftserver/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/thriftserver/SparkSQLCLIDriver.scala
---
@@ -288,33 +288,36 @@ private[hive]
GitHub user witgo opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1683
SPARK-2766: ScalaReflectionSuite throw an llegalArgumentException in JDK 6
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/witgo/spark
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1598#issuecomment-50716626
Sure, sounds good.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1624#discussion_r15627450
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/regression.py ---
@@ -109,18 +109,45 @@ class
LinearRegressionModel(LinearRegressionModelBase):
True
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1624#discussion_r15627458
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/regression.py ---
@@ -109,18 +109,45 @@ class
LinearRegressionModel(LinearRegressionModelBase):
True
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1624#discussion_r15627471
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/regression.py ---
@@ -109,18 +109,45 @@ class
LinearRegressionModel(LinearRegressionModelBase):
True
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1624#discussion_r15627468
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/regression.py ---
@@ -109,18 +109,45 @@ class
LinearRegressionModel(LinearRegressionModelBase):
True
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1624#discussion_r15627480
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/regression.py ---
@@ -109,18 +109,45 @@ class
LinearRegressionModel(LinearRegressionModelBase):
True
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1147#issuecomment-50716934
QA tests have started for PR 1147. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17560/consoleFull
---
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1673#issuecomment-50716977
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1639
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1673#discussion_r15627517
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/mllib/DecisionTreeRunner.scala
---
@@ -69,25 +73,32 @@ object DecisionTreeRunner {
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1673#discussion_r15627507
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/mllib/DecisionTreeRunner.scala
---
@@ -69,25 +73,32 @@ object DecisionTreeRunner {
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1673#discussion_r15627514
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/mllib/DecisionTreeRunner.scala
---
@@ -69,25 +73,32 @@ object DecisionTreeRunner {
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1673#discussion_r15627527
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/mllib/DecisionTreeRunner.scala
---
@@ -100,16 +111,57 @@ object DecisionTreeRunner {
}
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1673#discussion_r15627524
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/mllib/DecisionTreeRunner.scala
---
@@ -100,16 +111,57 @@ object DecisionTreeRunner {
}
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1661#discussion_r15627597
--- Diff:
sql/hive-thriftserver/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/thriftserver/SparkSQLCLIDriver.scala
---
@@ -288,33 +288,36 @@ private[hive]
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1673#discussion_r15627594
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/mllib/DecisionTreeRunner.scala
---
@@ -100,16 +111,57 @@ object DecisionTreeRunner {
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1681#issuecomment-50717598
QA tests have started for PR 1681. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17562/consoleFull
---
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1598#issuecomment-50717628
This feature will slow down normal access (by attribute or position), so I
did not put it in. User still can use position to access the field with special
names (such as
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1598#issuecomment-50717656
QA tests have started for PR 1598. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17563/consoleFull
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1671#issuecomment-50718111
QA results for PR 1671:br- This patch FAILED unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds the following public classes
(experimental):brclass
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1256#issuecomment-50718143
QA results for PR 1256:br- This patch FAILED unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds the following public classes
(experimental):brclass
Github user ScrapCodes commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1649#issuecomment-50718152
Hey Anand,
This looks like a very nice effort !, It would be very convenient if you
can break this pull request into smaller subtasks.
For example
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1635#issuecomment-50718130
QA results for PR 1635:br- This patch FAILED unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1678#issuecomment-50718100
QA results for PR 1678:br- This patch FAILED unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user aarondav commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1678#issuecomment-50718425
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1673#discussion_r15627787
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/mllib/DecisionTreeRunner.scala
---
@@ -100,16 +111,57 @@ object DecisionTreeRunner {
}
Github user witgo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1256#issuecomment-50718557
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1673#discussion_r15627842
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/mllib/DecisionTreeRunner.scala
---
@@ -100,16 +111,57 @@ object DecisionTreeRunner {
}
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1643#issuecomment-50718757
Good question, it's dangerous to mix threads and fork(), it may be cause
dead lock in child process. But in this case, because of GIL, then fork()
happens, monitor thread
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1678#issuecomment-50718818
QA tests have started for PR 1678. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17565/consoleFull
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1256#issuecomment-50718809
QA tests have started for PR 1256. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17564/consoleFull
---
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1643#issuecomment-50718956
I will wait for your patch, and think about using PIDs.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1673#discussion_r15627893
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/mllib/DecisionTreeRunner.scala
---
@@ -48,11 +50,13 @@ object DecisionTreeRunner {
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1673#discussion_r15627927
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/tree/DecisionTree.scala ---
@@ -598,9 +598,12 @@ object DecisionTree extends Serializable with Logging {
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/666#issuecomment-50719523
Close this issue.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user techaddict closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/666
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user avati commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1649#issuecomment-50720340
I will split this up into multiple PRs.
I will start with a small pull request for akka upgrade to 2.3. However as
Sean mentioned, I guess we are stuck on the
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1673#discussion_r15628159
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/tree/DecisionTree.scala ---
@@ -612,27 +615,31 @@ object DecisionTree extends Serializable with Logging
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1615#issuecomment-50720702
@rxin @javadba - I believe this is covered already in the maven docs:
http://spark.apache.org/docs/latest/building-with-maven.html#spark-tests-in-maven
---
If
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1673#discussion_r15628197
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/tree/DecisionTree.scala ---
@@ -815,20 +822,10 @@ object DecisionTree extends Serializable with Logging
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1615#issuecomment-50720880
maybe it would make sense to just enhance the existing section and clearly
show that you need to run mvn package and then mvn test with a similar code
block to the one
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1680#discussion_r15628219
--- Diff: python/pyspark/daemon.py ---
@@ -176,13 +120,30 @@ def handle_sigchld(*args):
try:
while not should_exit():
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1661#discussion_r15628242
--- Diff:
sql/hive-thriftserver/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/thriftserver/SparkSQLCLIDriver.scala
---
@@ -288,33 +288,36 @@ private[hive]
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1673#discussion_r15628238
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/tree/DecisionTree.scala ---
@@ -845,33 +842,15 @@ object DecisionTree extends Serializable with Logging
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1661#issuecomment-50721059
LGTM except some styling issues. Thanks for working on this!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1680#discussion_r15628262
--- Diff: python/pyspark/daemon.py ---
@@ -176,13 +120,30 @@ def handle_sigchld(*args):
try:
while not should_exit():
Github user freeman-lab commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1361#discussion_r15628281
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/regression/StreamingRegression.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1681#issuecomment-50721262
LGTM, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1680#issuecomment-50721351
Why we had multiple listen process before? How about the performance of
fork() in EC2? I met that fork() will take 200ms in Xen VM.
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user freeman-lab commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1361#discussion_r15628342
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/regression/StreamingLinearRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user freeman-lab commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1361#discussion_r15628354
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/regression/StreamingLinearRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user jey commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1680#issuecomment-50721572
I agree with this design; the preforking was basically vestigial and should
have been removed. I'll review this PR later this week.
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1669#issuecomment-50721673
QA results for PR 1669:br- This patch FAILED unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user freeman-lab commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1361#discussion_r15628373
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/regression/StreamingRegression.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user freeman-lab commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1361#discussion_r15628387
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/regression/StreamingRegression.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user freeman-lab commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1361#discussion_r15628405
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/regression/StreamingRegression.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user freeman-lab commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1361#discussion_r15628426
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/regression/StreamingLinearRegression.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1673#discussion_r15628435
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/tree/model/Node.scala
---
@@ -91,4 +91,59 @@ class Node (
}
}
}
+
+
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1673#discussion_r15628444
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/tree/model/Node.scala
---
@@ -91,4 +91,59 @@ class Node (
}
}
}
+
+
Github user freeman-lab commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1361#discussion_r15628448
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/regression/StreamingRegression.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1681#discussion_r15628468
--- Diff: docs/sql-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -769,3 +769,15 @@ To start the Spark SQL CLI, run the following in the
Spark directory:
Configuration of
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1673#discussion_r15628483
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/tree/model/Node.scala
---
@@ -91,4 +91,59 @@ class Node (
}
}
}
+
+
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1673#discussion_r15628492
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/tree/model/Node.scala
---
@@ -91,4 +91,59 @@ class Node (
}
}
}
+
+
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1681#discussion_r15628521
--- Diff: docs/sql-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -769,3 +769,15 @@ To start the Spark SQL CLI, run the following in the
Spark directory:
Configuration of
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1673#discussion_r15628533
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/tree/model/Node.scala
---
@@ -91,4 +91,59 @@ class Node (
}
}
}
+
+
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1592#issuecomment-50722408
@staple Could you hold it one more days until we merge the changes in #1598
about serialization between Java and Python?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1681#issuecomment-50722530
QA tests have started for PR 1681. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17567/consoleFull
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1644
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1673#discussion_r15628610
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/tree/DecisionTreeSuite.scala ---
@@ -31,6 +30,18 @@ import
Github user staple commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1592#issuecomment-50722658
Sure, no problem.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1673#discussion_r15628659
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/tree/DecisionTreeSuite.scala ---
@@ -602,12 +609,78 @@ class DecisionTreeSuite extends FunSuite with
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1681#issuecomment-50723566
QA results for PR 1681:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1598#issuecomment-50723544
Ah okay, then I'm fine leaving that out.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user CrazyJvm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1681#issuecomment-50723525
thanks @pwendell , already fixed according to your suggestions.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1578#discussion_r15628876
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockFetcherIterator.scala ---
@@ -199,15 +199,22 @@ object BlockFetcherIterator {
// Get
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1678#issuecomment-50724029
QA results for PR 1678:br- This patch FAILED unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1671#issuecomment-50724374
QA tests have started for PR 1671. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17569/consoleFull
---
GitHub user li-zhihui opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1684
Fix conflict between code and doc in YarnClientSchedulerBackend.scala
Doc say: system properties override environment variables.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1684#issuecomment-50725105
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1256#issuecomment-50725686
QA results for PR 1256:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds the following public classes
(experimental):brclass
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1147#issuecomment-50725881
QA results for PR 1147:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds the following public classes
(experimental):brtrait
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1241#issuecomment-50725957
@colorant thanks for doing this, but we should probably wait to merge it
until after 1.1, since it doesn't add critical fixes for 1.1. I'll take a look
at it after I'm
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1671#discussion_r15629090
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/IDF.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,194 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1598#issuecomment-50726056
QA results for PR 1598:br- This patch FAILED unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds the following public classes
(experimental):brclass
Github user scwf commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1661#discussion_r15629155
--- Diff:
sql/hive-thriftserver/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/thriftserver/SparkSQLCLIDriver.scala
---
@@ -288,33 +288,36 @@ private[hive] class
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1671#discussion_r15629148
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/HashingTF.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1671#issuecomment-50726519
Looks good to me API-wise, though I haven't checked the math in detail.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1076#discussion_r15629314
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/master/Master.scala
---
@@ -154,6 +154,8 @@ private[spark] class Master(
}
override
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1076#issuecomment-50726663
Jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1076#issuecomment-50726957
QA tests have started for PR 1076. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17570/consoleFull
---
Github user tnachen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1622#issuecomment-50728294
@pwendell I wonder how do I get reviews on patches?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
GitHub user avati opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1685
[SPARK-1812] akka 2.3.4
Upgrade to akka 2.3.4
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/avati/spark SPARK-1812-akka-2.3
Alternatively you
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1685#issuecomment-50728629
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1681#issuecomment-50728800
QA results for PR 1681:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1636#issuecomment-50729675
@chutium Michael is right, `NullableColumnBuilderSuite` doesn't call
`ColumnBuilder.apply`, thus it always passes. But adding `TIMESTAMP` still
makes sense. Actually,
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1671#issuecomment-50729982
QA results for PR 1671:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds the following public classes
(experimental):brclass
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1671#issuecomment-50730369
QA tests have started for PR 1671. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17571/consoleFull
---
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1671#discussion_r15630475
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/HashingTF.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
1 - 100 of 566 matches
Mail list logo
