Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3939#issuecomment-69270641
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3960#issuecomment-69272469
[Test build #25277 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25277/consoleFull)
for PR 3960 at commit
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2634#discussion_r22693139
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/metrics/FastEuclideanOps.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2634#discussion_r22693112
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/metrics/FastEuclideanOps.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3431#issuecomment-69279963
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3431#issuecomment-69279959
[Test build #25279 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25279/consoleFull)
for PR 3431 at commit
Github user liyezhang556520 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3824#issuecomment-69280380
@andrewor14 , I received an email of your comment about creating other PRs
to fix this issue for other older branches, but not found on this page. I think
you
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3939
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user WangTaoTheTonic commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3557#issuecomment-69282649
@vanzin
Note what I note :-)
Note: In test cases I didn't use SparkConf.setAppName in application code.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3431#discussion_r22697822
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/ddl.scala ---
@@ -83,10 +118,73 @@ private[sql] class DDLParser extends
StandardTokenParsers
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3638#issuecomment-69282680
[Test build #25281 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25281/consoleFull)
for PR 3638 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3638#issuecomment-69282684
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user etrain commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3637#discussion_r22693295
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -80,69 +50,157 @@ class LogisticRegression extends
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3638#discussion_r22693876
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -456,10 +459,18 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3431#issuecomment-69275198
[Test build #25279 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25279/consoleFull)
for PR 3431 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3872#issuecomment-69278134
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3872#issuecomment-69278128
[Test build #25276 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25276/consoleFull)
for PR 3872 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3961#issuecomment-69279153
[Test build #25280 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25280/consoleFull)
for PR 3961 at commit
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3638#issuecomment-69279237
Ah never mind, I found the abort
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3961#issuecomment-69279159
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3939#issuecomment-69281768
The wiki location seems fine. Maybe others disagree.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3607#issuecomment-69286150
[Test build #25284 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25284/consoleFull)
for PR 3607 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3607#issuecomment-69286154
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3823#issuecomment-69287254
[Test build #25286 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25286/consoleFull)
for PR 3823 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3823#issuecomment-69287260
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user nchammas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3939#issuecomment-69287974
Okie doke, thank you @andrewor14.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user wangxiaojing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2765#issuecomment-69288062
@tdas rebase the latest master and update.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SaintBacchus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2874#issuecomment-69289017
@andrewor14 I had explained why it can not use `Long` instead of `Int`. Not
only the `Range` but also the `Partition` only can be appropriate with `Int`,
and can't
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3962#issuecomment-69289902
[Test build #25291 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25291/consoleFull)
for PR 3962 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3962#issuecomment-69289908
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2982#discussion_r22691343
--- Diff: yarn/pom.xml ---
@@ -131,13 +131,6 @@
skiptrue/skip
/configuration
/plugin
- plugin
-
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3940#issuecomment-69270182
@mengxr I think so, it's better to back port that into 1.1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user coderxiang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3720#discussion_r22692999
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALS.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,964 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user etrain commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3637#discussion_r22692953
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/Classifier.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,198 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2634#issuecomment-69272196
@derrickburns I like the improvements implemented in this PR. But as
@srowen mentioned, we have to resolve conflicts with the master branch before
we can merge any PR. I
GitHub user yhuai opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3960
[WIP][SPARK-4912][SQL] Persistent tables for the Spark SQL data sources api
This one subsumes #3752. It current contains changes made in #3431. Will
clean it up once #3431 is in.
You can merge this
Github user etrain commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3637#discussion_r22693428
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/ProbabilisticClassifier.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user etrain commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3637#discussion_r22693403
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -80,69 +50,157 @@ class LogisticRegression extends
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3638#discussion_r22693927
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -456,10 +459,18 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3960#issuecomment-69276273
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3960#issuecomment-69276271
[Test build #25277 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25277/consoleFull)
for PR 3960 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3939#issuecomment-69277310
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3939#issuecomment-69277301
[Test build #25275 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25275/consoleFull)
for PR 3939 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3921#discussion_r22695485
--- Diff: sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveQl.scala ---
@@ -520,6 +520,7 @@
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3431#issuecomment-69280879
[Test build #25283 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25283/consoleFull)
for PR 3431 at commit
Github user WangTaoTheTonic commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3607#discussion_r22697617
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ClientArguments.scala ---
@@ -87,6 +92,21 @@ private[spark] class ClientArguments(args:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3962#issuecomment-69285225
[Test build #25290 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25290/consoleFull)
for PR 3962 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3962#issuecomment-69285227
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3607#issuecomment-69286990
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3607#issuecomment-69286987
[Test build #25285 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25285/consoleFull)
for PR 3607 at commit
Github user guowei2 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3921#issuecomment-69290028
i think i should remove the test case for `stored as parquet ` only can
pass in hive-0.13
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3949#issuecomment-69290026
@jkbradley Thanks. The unit test is added.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3958#issuecomment-69267461
[Test build #25272 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25272/consoleFull)
for PR 3958 at commit
Github user coderxiang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3720#discussion_r22692604
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALS.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,964 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2634#discussion_r22693062
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/package.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,145 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user etrain commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3637#discussion_r22693073
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/Classifier.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,198 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user etrain commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3637#discussion_r22693524
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/param/sharedParams.scala
---
@@ -17,6 +17,10 @@
package org.apache.spark.ml.param
+/*
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3638#discussion_r22693713
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -249,13 +250,12 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3638#discussion_r22693694
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -266,8 +266,21 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
Github user mccheah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3638#discussion_r22695144
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -865,26 +865,6 @@ class DAGScheduler(
}
if
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3638#discussion_r22695628
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -266,8 +266,21 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3638#discussion_r22696100
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -209,6 +210,42 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3638#issuecomment-69278693
@mccheah @JoshRosen high level question. So what happens now when a task is
not serializable? Before it would throw a loud exception and fail the task, but
now we
Github user loachli commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1290#issuecomment-69278665
Hi jkbradley:
Could you tell the jira number related to ânew spark.ml package and
its design docâ
å件人: jkbradley
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3638#discussion_r22696128
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -251,23 +288,8 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3824#issuecomment-69280965
Yes that would be great. It seems that not all of the changes in this PR
are applicable there, however.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3607#discussion_r22697722
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/YarnClientSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -68,8 +68,6 @@ private[spark] class
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3607#issuecomment-69282417
[Test build #25285 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25285/consoleFull)
for PR 3607 at commit
Github user liyezhang556520 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3824#issuecomment-69283439
ok, I'll make new PRs for those old branches 1.0, 1.1, and 1.2.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3783#issuecomment-69284237
Can you explain how (1) is related to SPARK-4951? It seems to me that (2)
is sufficient in triggering the issue.
The original implementation will mark an
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3431#issuecomment-69285760
[Test build #25283 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25283/consoleFull)
for PR 3431 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3431#issuecomment-69285764
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2982#issuecomment-69269314
[Test build #25273 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25273/consoleFull)
for PR 2982 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3959#issuecomment-69270938
[Test build #25274 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25274/consoleFull)
for PR 3959 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3939#issuecomment-69270905
[Test build #25275 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25275/consoleFull)
for PR 3939 at commit
Github user mccheah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3638#discussion_r22694937
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/TaskNotSerializableException.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3638#discussion_r22694961
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -865,26 +865,6 @@ class DAGScheduler(
}
if
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3921#discussion_r22695098
--- Diff: sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveQl.scala ---
@@ -520,6 +520,7 @@
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3921#discussion_r22695310
--- Diff: sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveQl.scala ---
@@ -520,6 +520,7 @@
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3959#issuecomment-69277801
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3959#issuecomment-69277796
[Test build #25274 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25274/consoleFull)
for PR 3959 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3960#issuecomment-69280036
[Test build #25282 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25282/consoleFull)
for PR 3960 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3607#issuecomment-69281668
[Test build #25284 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25284/consoleFull)
for PR 3607 at commit
Github user WangTaoTheTonic commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3607#discussion_r22697386
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/YarnClientSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -68,8 +68,6 @@ private[spark] class
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3939#issuecomment-69281611
Ok LGTM I'm merging this into master thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user YanTangZhai opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3963
[SPARK-5163] [CORE] Load properties from configuration file for example
spark-defaults.conf when creating SparkConf object
I create and run a Spark program which does not use SparkSubmit.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3431#issuecomment-69288718
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3431#issuecomment-69288714
[Test build #25287 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25287/consoleFull)
for PR 3431 at commit
Github user guowei2 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3921#discussion_r22700232
--- Diff: sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveQl.scala ---
@@ -520,6 +520,7 @@
Github user jongyoul commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3897#issuecomment-69289262
@JoshRosen @tgravescs @andrewor14 Could anyone review this PR? That makes
mesos codes clean
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user Lewuathe commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3933#issuecomment-69273220
@mengxr @srowen Thank you for reviewing. I agree to the reason why `pr`
method is also reasonable in terms of drawing curve. I'll keep it as-is.
But anyway I want
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3638#discussion_r22694007
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/NotSerializableFakeTask.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3638#discussion_r22693981
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDDSuite.scala ---
@@ -887,6 +891,23 @@ class RDDSuite extends FunSuite with
SharedSparkContext {
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3638#discussion_r22693969
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDDSuite.scala ---
@@ -887,6 +891,23 @@ class RDDSuite extends FunSuite with
SharedSparkContext {
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3638#discussion_r22694761
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -266,8 +266,21 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3638#discussion_r22694839
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/TaskNotSerializableException.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user mccheah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3638#discussion_r22694827
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -266,8 +266,21 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3638#issuecomment-69277042
[Test build #25281 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25281/consoleFull)
for PR 3638 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3961#issuecomment-69277048
[Test build #25280 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25280/consoleFull)
for PR 3961 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3921#discussion_r22695453
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -68,6 +68,17 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends QueryTest {
1 - 100 of 735 matches
Mail list logo
