Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10630#issuecomment-169926993
**[Test build #49008 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49008/consoleFull)**
for PR 10630 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10630#issuecomment-169927020
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10660#discussion_r49165377
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/antlr3/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/FromClauseParser.g
---
@@ -151,8 +151,8 @@ fromSource
@after {
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10630#issuecomment-169927573
Both failure are not related to this PR. They are caused by the test case
`randomSplit on reordered partitions` in
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10626.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10663#issuecomment-169928271
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10661#issuecomment-169928431
**[Test build #49010 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49010/consoleFull)**
for PR 10661 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10649#issuecomment-169928634
**[Test build #49005 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49005/consoleFull)**
for PR 10649 at commit
Github user sameeragarwal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10626#issuecomment-169929536
@gatorsmile it seems like your PR is changing the behavior of SQL intersect
that this test relies on. I can take a closer look at the PR but if you think
this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10630#issuecomment-169931210
**[Test build #49012 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49012/consoleFull)**
for PR 10630 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10626#issuecomment-169931662
It is best for us to use local collection's intersect rather than relying
on dataframe's.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user jerryshao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10657#issuecomment-169934023
LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user sameeragarwal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10626#issuecomment-169935761
@gatorsmile I pulled your changes and verified that the new intersect
implementation fails even when there is a deterministic sampling operator in
the plan,
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10630#issuecomment-169936735
**[Test build #49012 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49012/consoleFull)**
for PR 10630 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10630#issuecomment-169936845
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10630#issuecomment-169936843
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user sarutak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10643#issuecomment-169936503
Yes I'll do it. Should I fix the style issues in this change?
I was going to fix in another PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10643#issuecomment-169938070
Another PR is fine. I'm going to merge this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10577#discussion_r49168326
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/HiveTypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -200,41 +200,62 @@ object HiveTypeCoercion {
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10643
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user yanboliang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10664
[SPARK-10386] [MLlib] Model import/export for PrefixSpan
```PrefixSpanModel``` supports ```save/load```.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10577#discussion_r49168529
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/HiveTypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -200,41 +200,62 @@ object HiveTypeCoercion {
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10577#discussion_r49168686
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/HiveTypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -200,41 +200,62 @@ object HiveTypeCoercion {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10660#issuecomment-169940382
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10660#issuecomment-169940381
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10660#issuecomment-169943071
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10660#issuecomment-169943074
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
GitHub user mwws opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10662
[SPARK-12710][SQL]Create local CoGroup operator
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/mwws/spark LocalNode-CoGroup
Alternatively you
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10630#issuecomment-169927019
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10659#issuecomment-169927053
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10659#issuecomment-169927052
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user yoshidakuy opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10663
[SPARK-1270ï¼][UI] Sorting task error in Stages Page when yarn mode.
If sort column contains slash(e.g. "Executor ID / Host") when yarn
mode,sort fail with following message.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10649#issuecomment-169928804
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10649#issuecomment-169928806
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10626#issuecomment-169928530
I might not pick up your latest code changes. Let me merge the code. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user sarutak commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10663#discussion_r49166120
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/jobs/StagePage.scala ---
@@ -100,7 +101,19 @@ private[ui] class StagePage(parent: StagesTab) extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10662#issuecomment-169929038
**[Test build #49011 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49011/consoleFull)**
for PR 10662 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10643#issuecomment-169930643
OK this looks good. Would you have time to fix the issues too?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user sarutak commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10663#discussion_r49167186
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/jobs/StagePage.scala ---
@@ -100,7 +101,19 @@ private[ui] class StagePage(parent: StagesTab) extends
Github user sarutak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10663#issuecomment-169934471
ok to test.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user sarutak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10663#issuecomment-169934802
@yoshidakuy Does this issue affect both `yarn-client` and `yarn-cluster`
right?
Also, could you show the screen shot after applying this patch.
---
If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10663#issuecomment-169937600
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10663#issuecomment-169937602
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10663#issuecomment-169937305
**[Test build #49013 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49013/consoleFull)**
for PR 10663 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10663#issuecomment-169937595
**[Test build #49013 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49013/consoleFull)**
for PR 10663 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10577#discussion_r49168792
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/HiveTypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -200,41 +200,62 @@ object HiveTypeCoercion {
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10660#issuecomment-169942793
**[Test build #49009 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49009/consoleFull)**
for PR 10660 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10664#issuecomment-169942726
**[Test build #49015 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49015/consoleFull)**
for PR 10664 at commit
GitHub user mwws opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10661
[SPARK-12709][SQL]Create local Except operator
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/mwws/spark LocalNode-Except
Alternatively you can
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10659#issuecomment-169926956
**[Test build #49006 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49006/consoleFull)**
for PR 10659 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10520#discussion_r49219243
--- Diff: sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveShim.scala
---
@@ -125,6 +125,12 @@ private[hive] object HiveShim {
// for
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10630#issuecomment-170082147
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user tedyu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10605#discussion_r49219913
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/Window.scala ---
@@ -307,27 +314,63 @@ case class Window(
// Collect all the
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10568#issuecomment-170085558
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user sureshthalamati commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10452#issuecomment-170095510
Thanks for merging this to 2.0, Michael , I will create PR against 1.6
branch.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user BryanCutler commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10654#issuecomment-170095605
No problem! Thanks @zsxwing
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10649#issuecomment-170097654
**[Test build #49022 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49022/consoleFull)**
for PR 10649 at commit
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10639#discussion_r49226861
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/optim/GLMFamilies.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,129 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10274#issuecomment-170090232
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user BryanCutler commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10654#issuecomment-170093754
Yeah, that variable is no longer needed - I already removed it. Did you
mean `@volatile private var markedForStopped`? That one is still used to
trigger the
Github user sarutak commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10663#discussion_r49225126
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/jobs/StagePage.scala ---
@@ -100,7 +101,20 @@ private[ui] class StagePage(parent: StagesTab) extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10577#issuecomment-170098200
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10577#issuecomment-170098199
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10029#discussion_r49217415
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/Covariance.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,212 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10029#discussion_r49217997
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/Covariance.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,212 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10654#issuecomment-170085232
You can also remove `@volatile private var stopped = false`, right?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10654#issuecomment-170094361
Oh, sorry. Didn't notice that you already removed it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10651#issuecomment-170094787
LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10541#discussion_r49225349
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/SQLBuilder.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,244 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10649#issuecomment-170070628
**[Test build #49022 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49022/consoleFull)**
for PR 10649 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10660
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10570
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user zsxwing closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10656
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10660#issuecomment-170072949
Merging this into master, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10570#issuecomment-170072468
Merged to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10620#discussion_r49215653
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/antlr3/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/ExpressionParser.g
---
@@ -223,7 +223,12 @@ precedenceUnaryPrefixExpression
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10577#issuecomment-170070656
**[Test build #49021 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49021/consoleFull)**
for PR 10577 at commit
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10620#discussion_r49216358
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -936,6 +936,35 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends QueryTest
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10630#issuecomment-170081871
**[Test build #49020 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49020/consoleFull)**
for PR 10630 at commit
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10630#discussion_r49227379
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -388,57 +441,14 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10029#discussion_r49216499
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -309,6 +309,46 @@ object functions extends LegacyFunctions {
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10029#discussion_r49217078
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/Covariance.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,212 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10029#discussion_r49217495
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/Covariance.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,212 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10029#discussion_r49217530
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/Covariance.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,212 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10568#issuecomment-170089997
**[Test build #49024 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49024/consoleFull)**
for PR 10568 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10274#issuecomment-170090236
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10663#discussion_r49223834
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/jobs/StagePage.scala ---
@@ -100,7 +101,20 @@ private[ui] class StagePage(parent: StagesTab) extends
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10654#issuecomment-170095377
LGTM. Merging to master. Thanks, @BryanCutler
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10541#issuecomment-170096777
Let's also create a jira for supporting persisted data source tables.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10577#issuecomment-170097898
**[Test build #49021 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49021/consoleFull)**
for PR 10577 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10649#issuecomment-170097979
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10649#issuecomment-170097976
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10541#discussion_r49229231
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -63,7 +63,9 @@ abstract class Optimizer extends
Github user udoklein closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10642
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user udoklein commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10642#issuecomment-170105923
Fixed it as suggested.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10648#issuecomment-170112745
**[Test build #49025 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49025/consoleFull)**
for PR 10648 at commit
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10294#issuecomment-170112625
Is there any feature / perf improvement / etc., in 0.9 that makes this
upgrade worth the update?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
GitHub user robert-dodier opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10666
[SPARK-6332] [MLlib] compute calibration curve for binary classifiers
This PR is a revised, updated version of the previous ([PR
#5025](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5025)), which was
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10635#issuecomment-170122685
I could be missing something, but it seems like since you had to manually
exclude things here to make it compile, users are going to run into problems.
Can you
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10513#issuecomment-170126258
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10513#issuecomment-170126255
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
1 - 100 of 349 matches
Mail list logo
