Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13324
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13324
**[Test build #65537 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65537/consoleFull)**
for PR 13324 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15131
**[Test build #65540 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65540/consoleFull)**
for PR 15131 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15093
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15093
Merging to master, and to 2.0 to match the parent JIRA, even though this is
probably less important, yet still a clean small win
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15131
**[Test build #65539 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65539/consoleFull)**
for PR 15131 at commit
GitHub user yanboliang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15131
[SPARK-17577][SparkR] SparkR support add files to Spark job and get by
executors
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Scala/Python users can add files to Spark job by submit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15093
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65534/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15093
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15093
**[Test build #65534 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65534/consoleFull)**
for PR 15093 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15073
**[Test build #65538 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65538/consoleFull)**
for PR 15073 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14971#discussion_r79286533
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/HiveClientImpl.scala
---
@@ -378,6 +380,47 @@ private[hive] class HiveClientImpl(
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15073#discussion_r79286493
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -316,6 +316,9 @@ class SparkSqlAstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14981
CC @rxin I think the direct but slightly hacky way to just address this
issue is to modify `release-build.sh` around here ...
```
# Remove any extra files generated during install
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13324
**[Test build #65537 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65537/consoleFull)**
for PR 13324 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15130
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15130
Merged to master/2.0 because it's trivial
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15084
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15084
Merged to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15093
**[Test build #65536 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65536/consoleFull)**
for PR 15093 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15093
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15099#discussion_r79285998
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/CatalogImpl.scala ---
@@ -284,8 +284,12 @@ class CatalogImpl(sparkSession: SparkSession)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15093
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65535/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15093
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15093
**[Test build #65535 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65535/consoleFull)**
for PR 15093 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15129
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65532/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15129
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15129
**[Test build #65532 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65532/consoleFull)**
for PR 15129 at commit
Github user jiangxb1987 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14862
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15093
**[Test build #65535 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65535/consoleFull)**
for PR 15093 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15093
**[Test build #65534 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65534/consoleFull)**
for PR 15093 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15130
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15130
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65533/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15130
**[Test build #65533 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65533/consoleFull)**
for PR 15130 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15084
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15130
OK, but this doesn't need a JIRA.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15130
**[Test build #65533 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65533/consoleFull)**
for PR 15130 at commit
GitHub user phalodi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15130
remove extra table tags in configuration document
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Remove extra table tags in configurations document.
## How was this
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14858#discussion_r79282998
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/QuantileDiscretizer.scala ---
@@ -109,7 +114,7 @@ final class QuantileDiscretizer @Since("1.6.0")
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15129
**[Test build #65532 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65532/consoleFull)**
for PR 15129 at commit
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15129
[SPARK-17546] [DEPLOY] start-* scripts should use hostname -f
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Call `hostname -f` to get fully qualified host name
## How was
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14762#discussion_r79282710
--- Diff:
common/unsafe/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/array/ByteArrayMethods.java
---
@@ -40,24 +41,41 @@ public static int
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14817
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15105
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15105
Merged to master/2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15093#discussion_r79282293
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1657,21 +1657,12 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15093#discussion_r79282245
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1657,21 +1657,12 @@ class Analyzer(
//
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15117
Sure, I just merged it to 2.0 and resolved the conflict because that was
straightforward here.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15128
Need more thinking about this. Close this now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user viirya closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15128
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15121
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14975
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15121
Merged to master/2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14975
Merged to master/2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15099#discussion_r79281773
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/CatalogImpl.scala ---
@@ -284,8 +284,12 @@ class CatalogImpl(sparkSession: SparkSession)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15128
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65531/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15128
**[Test build #65531 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65531/consoleFull)**
for PR 15128 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15128
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15073#discussion_r79281497
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -316,6 +316,9 @@ class SparkSqlAstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14971#discussion_r79281449
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/HiveClientImpl.scala
---
@@ -378,6 +380,47 @@ private[hive] class HiveClientImpl(
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14971#discussion_r79281395
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/HiveClientImpl.scala
---
@@ -378,6 +380,47 @@ private[hive] class HiveClientImpl(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14975
**[Test build #3278 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3278/consoleFull)**
for PR 14975 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15054#discussion_r79281274
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/tables.scala ---
@@ -65,7 +64,11 @@ case class CreateTableLikeCommand(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15128
**[Test build #65531 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65531/consoleFull)**
for PR 15128 at commit
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15128
[SPARK-17574][Core] Cache ShuffleExchange RDD when the exchange is reused
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We have the rule `ReuseExchange` to reuse exchange in the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14971
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65529/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14971
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14971
**[Test build #65529 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65529/consoleFull)**
for PR 14971 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15126
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15067
**[Test build #3276 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3276/consoleFull)**
for PR 15067 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15126
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65527/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15126
**[Test build #65527 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65527/consoleFull)**
for PR 15126 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15127
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15127
**[Test build #65530 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65530/consoleFull)**
for PR 15127 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15127
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65530/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15126
**[Test build #3277 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3277/consoleFull)**
for PR 15126 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15126
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15126
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65528/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15126
**[Test build #65528 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65528/consoleFull)**
for PR 15126 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14971
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65526/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14971
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14971
**[Test build #65526 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65526/consoleFull)**
for PR 14971 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65524/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105
**[Test build #65524 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65524/consoleFull)**
for PR 11105 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15067
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65525/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15067
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15067
**[Test build #65525 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65525/consoleFull)**
for PR 15067 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14975
**[Test build #3278 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3278/consoleFull)**
for PR 14975 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15126
@petermaxlee why are we not making this change in
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15067 ? looks like you forked someone
else's PR while it was active.
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15027
**[Test build #3275 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3275/consoleFull)**
for PR 15027 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15127
**[Test build #65530 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65530/consoleFull)**
for PR 15127 at commit
Github user petermaxlee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15127
cc @tdas @zsxwing
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
GitHub user petermaxlee opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15127
[SPARK-17571][SQL] AssertOnQuery.condition should always return Boolean
value
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
AssertOnQuery has two apply constructor: one that accepts
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14971
**[Test build #65529 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65529/consoleFull)**
for PR 14971 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15126
**[Test build #65528 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65528/consoleFull)**
for PR 15126 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15126
**[Test build #3277 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3277/consoleFull)**
for PR 15126 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15126
**[Test build #65527 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65527/consoleFull)**
for PR 15126 at commit
GitHub user petermaxlee opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15126
[SPARK-17513][SQL] Make StreamExecution garbage-collect its metadata
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR modifies StreamExecution such that it discards metadata for
Github user petermaxlee commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15067#discussion_r79278249
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/StreamingQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -125,6 +125,32 @@ class StreamingQuerySuite extends
101 - 200 of 217 matches
Mail list logo
