Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15644
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15644
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69004/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15970
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69003/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15970
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15644
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69005/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15644
**[Test build #69004 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69004/consoleFull)**
for PR 15644 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15644
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15970
**[Test build #69003 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69003/consoleFull)**
for PR 15970 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15975#discussion_r89181212
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/jdbc/JDBCSuite.scala
---
@@ -404,6 +425,7 @@ class JDBCSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15820
> @zsxwing should the title include SPARK-18529 per your comment on the
JIRA?
Thanks for pointing out. Updated.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15644
**[Test build #69005 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69005/consoleFull)**
for PR 15644 at commit
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15874#discussion_r89180705
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinHashLSH.scala
---
@@ -31,36 +31,38 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.types.StructType
/**
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15959#discussion_r89180234
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/Statistics.scala
---
@@ -58,60 +61,164 @@ case class Statistics(
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15966
**[Test build #69019 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69019/consoleFull)**
for PR 15966 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15976
cc @yhuai @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105
Ping for @srowen / @rxin / @squito updated with the latest changes in the
`SparkContext`. The issue is tagged for 2.1.0 and I know were cutting an RC
soon so if there is anything I should to try
Github user mallman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15978
This patch resolves the performance problem I was seeing. Thank you!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15976#discussion_r89178617
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/ObjectHashAggregateSuite.scala
---
@@ -325,70 +320,67 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15976
**[Test build #69016 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69016/consoleFull)**
for PR 15976 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105
**[Test build #69018 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69018/consoleFull)**
for PR 11105 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15896
**[Test build #69017 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69017/consoleFull)**
for PR 15896 at commit
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15977#discussion_r89178225
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/expressions.scala
---
@@ -114,10 +114,14 @@ object ReorderAssociativeOperator
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15966
Great! Thank you for #15975.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15896
**[Test build #69014 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69014/consoleFull)**
for PR 15896 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541
**[Test build #69015 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69015/consoleFull)**
for PR 15541 at commit
Github user brkyvz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15896
Hey @andrewor14 ! I went with your way. @hvanhovell can you take a quick
look please? I would really like this to be available in Spark 2.1 (even though
it is a new API)
---
If your project is set
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15896
**[Test build #69013 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69013/consoleFull)**
for PR 15896 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15976
The last build failure was caused by a logical conflict with #15703. We
don't really have any aggregate functions that don't support partial
aggregation now after merging #15703, while the
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004#discussion_r89176373
--- Diff: pom.xml ---
@@ -2558,6 +2660,26 @@
+
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15926
**[Test build #69011 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69011/consoleFull)**
for PR 15926 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15874
**[Test build #69012 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69012/consoleFull)**
for PR 15874 at commit
Github user Yunni commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15874#discussion_r89175604
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/BucketedRandomProjectionLSHSuite.scala
---
@@ -43,70 +43,73 @@ class RandomProjectionSuite
Github user Yunni commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15874#discussion_r89175438
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/LSH.scala ---
@@ -155,8 +148,30 @@ private[ml] abstract class LSHModel[T <: LSHModel[T]]
}
Github user Yunni commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15874#discussion_r89175473
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/LSH.scala ---
@@ -155,8 +148,30 @@ private[ml] abstract class LSHModel[T <: LSHModel[T]]
}
Github user Yunni commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15874#discussion_r89175497
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinHashLSH.scala
---
@@ -31,36 +31,38 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.types.StructType
/**
Github user NathanHowell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15813
Any thoughts on modifying `JsonToStruct` to support arrays (and options),
then parsing could be something like:
```
dataset.select(
Column(Inline(
JsonToValue(
Github user Yunni commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15874#discussion_r89175448
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/LSH.scala ---
@@ -155,8 +148,30 @@ private[ml] abstract class LSHModel[T <: LSHModel[T]]
}
Github user Yunni commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15874#discussion_r89175401
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinHashLSH.scala
---
@@ -31,36 +31,38 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.types.StructType
/**
Github user kapilsingh5050 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15620
I did not want to run tests using ./dev/run-tests on my machine because
it'll take hours. I ran the mllib module tests using "mvn test" which worked
fine on my machine. What could be the
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15926#discussion_r89174072
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/MetastoreDataSourcesSuite.scala
---
@@ -413,6 +413,40 @@ class MetastoreDataSourcesSuite
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15951
**[Test build #69010 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69010/consoleFull)**
for PR 15951 at commit
Github user mallman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15978
I'll give this patch a try. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505#discussion_r89166735
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManagerSuite.scala ---
@@ -592,47 +579,6 @@ class TaskSetManagerSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15936
**[Test build #69009 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69009/consoleFull)**
for PR 15936 at commit
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505#discussion_r89167206
--- Diff:
mesos/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosFineGrainedSchedulerBackendSuite.scala
---
@@ -345,7 +374,17 @@ class
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505#discussion_r89166210
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskDescription.scala ---
@@ -17,27 +17,178 @@
package org.apache.spark.scheduler
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505#discussion_r89166493
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImplSuite.scala ---
@@ -139,29 +139,6 @@ class TaskSchedulerImplSuite extends
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505#discussion_r89166279
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskDescription.scala ---
@@ -17,27 +17,178 @@
package org.apache.spark.scheduler
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15936
add to whitelist
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15936
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15936
It should pick it up automatically.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user nsyca commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15936
Should I say `retest this please` to kick off the regression test?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15968#discussion_r89164848
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -322,7 +322,26 @@ class SparkSqlAstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15956
@cloud-fan I cannot merge this to 2.0. Can you make a backport if we need
one?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15956
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15956
LGTM - merging to master/2.0. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15644
**[Test build #69008 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69008/consoleFull)**
for PR 15644 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15968
**[Test build #69007 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69007/consoleFull)**
for PR 15968 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15957
CC @jkbradley per your message today in case this should really be in for
2.1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15644#discussion_r89163640
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImplSuite.scala ---
@@ -282,6 +316,211 @@ class TaskSchedulerImplSuite extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15956
**[Test build #69002 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69002/consoleFull)**
for PR 15956 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15956
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69002/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15956
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user nsyca commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15936#discussion_r89159852
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/CheckAnalysis.scala
---
@@ -117,19 +117,36 @@ trait CheckAnalysis extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15967
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69001/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15967
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15967
**[Test build #69001 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69001/consoleFull)**
for PR 15967 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15979
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user nsyca commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15936#discussion_r89158982
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/CheckAnalysis.scala
---
@@ -117,19 +117,36 @@ trait CheckAnalysis extends
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15968#discussion_r89158685
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/antlr4/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/SqlBase.g4 ---
@@ -71,11 +71,7 @@ statement
| createTableHeader
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15936#discussion_r89156723
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/CheckAnalysis.scala
---
@@ -117,19 +117,36 @@ trait CheckAnalysis extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15979
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69000/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15979
**[Test build #69000 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69000/consoleFull)**
for PR 15979 at commit
Github user nsyca commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15936#discussion_r89155790
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/CheckAnalysis.scala
---
@@ -117,19 +117,36 @@ trait CheckAnalysis extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15644
**[Test build #69006 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69006/consoleFull)**
for PR 15644 at commit
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15644#discussion_r89152929
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImplSuite.scala ---
@@ -282,6 +316,211 @@ class TaskSchedulerImplSuite extends
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15644#discussion_r89152684
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImplSuite.scala ---
@@ -282,6 +316,211 @@ class TaskSchedulerImplSuite extends
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15977#discussion_r89152336
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JDBCRDD.scala
---
@@ -120,7 +120,13 @@ object JDBCRDD extends Logging
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15644
The final commit
(https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15644/commits/4a91e5fc0a64cfe740530fbeddf3722d2006bd10)
just changes whether the iterations are inside or outside of the test so you
can
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15936#discussion_r89151615
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/CheckAnalysis.scala
---
@@ -117,19 +117,36 @@ trait CheckAnalysis extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15644
**[Test build #69005 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69005/consoleFull)**
for PR 15644 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15644
**[Test build #69004 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69004/consoleFull)**
for PR 15644 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15970
**[Test build #69003 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69003/consoleFull)**
for PR 15970 at commit
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15644#discussion_r89146230
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImplSuite.scala ---
@@ -282,6 +316,211 @@ class TaskSchedulerImplSuite extends
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15644#discussion_r89144137
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImplSuite.scala ---
@@ -282,6 +316,211 @@ class TaskSchedulerImplSuite extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15977
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15977
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68998/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user mpjlu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15212
hi @yanboliang , @srowen @jkbradley , I have updated this PR, thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15977
**[Test build #68998 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68998/consoleFull)**
for PR 15977 at commit
Github user ZakariaHili commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15965
@srowen, Ok I found it
I fixed
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004#discussion_r89133451
--- Diff: docs/cloud-integration.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,953 @@
+---
+layout: global
+displayTitle: Integration with Cloud Infrastructures
+title:
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004#discussion_r89134807
--- Diff: pom.xml ---
@@ -2558,6 +2660,26 @@
+
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004#discussion_r89132111
--- Diff:
cloud/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/cloud/AzureInstantiationSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+/*
--- End diff --
What are these
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004#discussion_r89134487
--- Diff: docs/cloud-integration.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,953 @@
+---
+layout: global
+displayTitle: Integration with Cloud Infrastructures
+title:
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004#discussion_r89133827
--- Diff: docs/cloud-integration.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,953 @@
+---
+layout: global
+displayTitle: Integration with Cloud Infrastructures
+title:
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004#discussion_r89134682
--- Diff: docs/storage-openstack-swift.md ---
@@ -19,41 +19,32 @@ Although not mandatory, it is recommended to configure
the proxy server of Swift
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004#discussion_r89133312
--- Diff: docs/cloud-integration.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,953 @@
+---
+layout: global
+displayTitle: Integration with Cloud Infrastructures
+title:
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004#discussion_r89132623
--- Diff: cloud/pom.xml ---
@@ -0,0 +1,158 @@
+
+
+http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0;
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15956
**[Test build #69002 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69002/consoleFull)**
for PR 15956 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15956
LGTM pending Jenkins
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
401 - 500 of 638 matches
Mail list logo
