Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16089
**[Test build #69457 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69457/consoleFull)**
for PR 16089 at commit
[`56667bd`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16089
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16089
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69457/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15620#discussion_r90399036
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/CodeGenerationSuite.scala
---
@@ -97,6 +97,38 @@ class CodeGenerationSuite
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16000
**[Test build #69458 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69458/consoleFull)**
for PR 16000 at commit
[`651dc67`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16000
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69458/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16000
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16093
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fea
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16093#discussion_r90400227
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/CountMinSketchAgg.scala
---
@@ -75,13 +73,13 @@ case class Count
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15915
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69461/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15915
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16086#discussion_r90402700
--- Diff: sql/core/pom.xml ---
@@ -92,6 +92,11 @@
${fasterxml.jackson.version}
+ com.ibm.icu
--- End diff --
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16071
LGTM, merging to master/2.1!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16071
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15915
**[Test build #69460 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69460/consoleFull)**
for PR 15915 at commit
[`fffd5f5`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15915
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15915
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69460/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16089#discussion_r90408942
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/CodecStreams.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Sof
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16089#discussion_r90409094
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/CodecStreams.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Sof
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16089#discussion_r90409064
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/CodecStreams.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Sof
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16089#discussion_r90409731
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVRelation.scala
---
@@ -245,24 +230,12 @@ private[csv] class CsvOutputWriter
Github user kapilsingh5050 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15620#discussion_r90409976
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/conditionalExpressions.scala
---
@@ -64,19 +64,74 @@ case class If(pr
Github user kapilsingh5050 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15620#discussion_r90410001
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/CodeGenerationSuite.scala
---
@@ -97,6 +97,38 @@ class CodeGeneration
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16092
Hm, is this really necessary? I know it's just a move but for 2-3 modules,
does it matter enough?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitH
Github user AnthonyTruchet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16037
Scala style checks fixed, and spurious cast removed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16037
**[Test build #69466 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69466/consoleFull)**
for PR 16037 at commit
[`0ce8c64`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user tnachen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16092
Changed suggested by @rxin
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wis
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16098
[WIP][SPARK-18672][CORE] Close recordwriter in SparkHadoopMapReduceWriter
before committing
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It seems some APIs such as `PairRDDFunct
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16093
**[Test build #69464 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69464/consoleFull)**
for PR 16093 at commit
[`b2985c4`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16093
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69464/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16098
Build started: [CORE] `org.apache.spark.JavaAPISuite`
[](https
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16093
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16098
**[Test build #69467 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69467/consoleFull)**
for PR 16098 at commit
[`7d76472`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16098
I see, so the writer should be closed before committing?
Can the writer be closed before aborting too?
In that case, maybe it's cleaner to use nested try-finally? an inner
try-finally ma
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16093
**[Test build #3449 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3449/consoleFull)**
for PR 16093 at commit
[`b2985c4`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16095
Merging in master/branch-2.1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wis
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16080
**[Test build #69465 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69465/consoleFull)**
for PR 16080 at commit
[`5ee6489`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16098
Yes, it seems so because the output seems written in temp dir first and
then it is being renamed as the task is committed. Yes, let me try to neat up
as possible as I can.
---
If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16080
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69465/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16098
(cc @mridulm as well who I guess is interested in this issue.)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project doe
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16080
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16095
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16086#discussion_r90415866
--- Diff: sql/core/pom.xml ---
@@ -92,6 +92,11 @@
${fasterxml.jackson.version}
+ com.ibm.icu
--- End diff --
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16037
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69466/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16037
**[Test build #69466 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69466/consoleFull)**
for PR 16037 at commit
[`0ce8c64`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16037
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780
**[Test build #69468 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69468/consoleFull)**
for PR 15780 at commit
[`737b21f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user AnthonyTruchet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16037
This seems very related to the change. I know nothing wrt the way PySpark
interfaces Python and Scala and I'm surprised that changing an internal f the
Scala lib causes this ? Ready to learn
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16037#discussion_r90421008
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/optimization/LBFGS.scala ---
@@ -241,16 +241,27 @@ object LBFGS extends Logging {
val bcW = d
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16037
**[Test build #69469 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69469/consoleFull)**
for PR 16037 at commit
[`ec183a2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user AnthonyTruchet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16037#discussion_r90422375
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/optimization/LBFGS.scala ---
@@ -241,16 +241,27 @@ object LBFGS extends Logging {
val
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16037
**[Test build #69470 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69470/consoleFull)**
for PR 16037 at commit
[`9b30c5c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16037
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16037
**[Test build #69469 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69469/consoleFull)**
for PR 16037 at commit
[`ec183a2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16037
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69469/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16037
**[Test build #69470 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69470/consoleFull)**
for PR 16037 at commit
[`9b30c5c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16037
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16037
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69470/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16093
**[Test build #3449 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3449/consoleFull)**
for PR 16093 at commit
[`b2985c4`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15994
**[Test build #69471 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69471/consoleFull)**
for PR 15994 at commit
[`7e799fc`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
GitHub user cenyuhai opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16099
[SPARK-18665][SQL] set statement state to error after user canceled job
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
set statement state to error after user canceled job
You can m
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16099
**[Test build #69472 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69472/consoleFull)**
for PR 16099 at commit
[`e3a9b08`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16098
**[Test build #69467 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69467/consoleFull)**
for PR 16098 at commit
[`7d76472`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16098
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16098
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69467/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780#discussion_r90437003
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/objects/objects.scala
---
@@ -171,15 +171,17 @@ case class StaticInvoke(
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780
looks pretty good, left 2 minor comments, thanks for working on it!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780
**[Test build #69468 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69468/consoleFull)**
for PR 15780 at commit
[`737b21f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69468/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16099
**[Test build #69472 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69472/consoleFull)**
for PR 16099 at commit
[`e3a9b08`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16099
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69472/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16099
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16089
I was going to say, hm, are we sure we want to reimplement / go around the
Hadoop support for this? but in practice it looks like it actually simplifies
some things. At the moment I can't think of an
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15480#discussion_r90441646
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/GenerateOrdering.scala
---
@@ -118,7 +118,42 @@ object GenerateOrd
Github user AnthonyTruchet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16037
@MLnick there it is all tests passing :-)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16079
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780
**[Test build #69473 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69473/consoleFull)**
for PR 15780 at commit
[`c925666`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16079
Merged to master/2.1. This doesn't actually affect earlier versions because
it seems to be introduced by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11653
I didn't realize the 'local' would have thi
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16098
**[Test build #69474 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69474/consoleFull)**
for PR 16098 at commit
[`3a66a74`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780#discussion_r90446944
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/objects/objects.scala
---
@@ -171,15 +171,18 @@ case class StaticInvoke(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16098
**[Test build #69475 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69475/consoleFull)**
for PR 16098 at commit
[`66ff918`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780
LGTM except a very minor style comment.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enab
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16098
Build started: [CORE] `org.apache.spark.JavaAPISuite`
[](https
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780#discussion_r90447908
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/ScalaReflection.scala
---
@@ -498,7 +498,8 @@ object ScalaReflection extends ScalaReflect
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780#discussion_r90447815
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/JavaTypeInference.scala
---
@@ -396,12 +396,14 @@ object JavaTypeInference {
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16056
I will update the comment again after #15780 is merged.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16086#discussion_r90448773
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -236,6 +238,37 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
}
}
+
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15843
**[Test build #69476 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69476/consoleFull)**
for PR 15843 at commit
[`37e83e8`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16086#discussion_r90449169
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -236,6 +238,37 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
}
}
+
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15219
**[Test build #69477 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69477/consoleFull)**
for PR 15219 at commit
[`e6f5a4e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16086#discussion_r90451294
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -275,36 +308,43 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
val numCols = schema.fie
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16086#discussion_r90451485
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -275,36 +308,43 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
val numCols = schema.fiel
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15219
**[Test build #69478 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69478/consoleFull)**
for PR 15219 at commit
[`a4beed2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15219
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69477/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15219
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15219
**[Test build #69477 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69477/consoleFull)**
for PR 15219 at commit
[`e6f5a4e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16086#discussion_r90452307
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -275,36 +308,43 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
val numCols = schema.fie
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15219
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69478/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15219
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
1 - 100 of 686 matches
Mail list logo
