Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16383#discussion_r93724428
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/interfaces.scala
---
@@ -505,19 +511,18 @@ abstract class
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16383#discussion_r93724370
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/interfaces.scala
---
@@ -471,23 +471,29 @@ abstract class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16294
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16371
@hvanhovell Got it. Thanks for review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15212#discussion_r93726194
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/ChiSqSelector.scala ---
@@ -255,19 +288,22 @@ class ChiSqSelector @Since("2.1.0") ()
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15212#discussion_r93725579
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/ChiSqSelector.scala ---
@@ -92,8 +92,36 @@ private[feature] trait ChiSqSelectorParams extends
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15212#discussion_r93726073
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/ChiSqSelector.scala ---
@@ -171,11 +171,14 @@ object ChiSqSelectorModel extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16228
**[Test build #70533 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70533/testReport)**
for PR 16228 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16368
I kept getting error with the merge script - not sure if it went through.
we are likely having some sync issue with github?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16119
@vijoshi do you mind updating your PR according to the dicussion? i.e.
simplify the fix and test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user lirui-intel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12775
Not sure if my patch makes the tests unstable. But I can't figure out why.
@kayousterhout @mridulm any ideas?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909#discussion_r93726522
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
---
@@ -56,33 +58,100 @@ case class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386
**[Test build #70531 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70531/testReport)**
for PR 16386 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70531/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15666
**[Test build #70534 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70534/testReport)**
for PR 15666 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16312
ah, thank you @shivaram. sorry I couldn't get around to investigate earlier.
@yanboliang It looks like that is the design in the trait BaseReadWrite
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386
> the corrupt column will contain the filename instead of the literal JSON
if there is a parsing failure
I am worried of changing the behaviour. I understand why it had to be here
as
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15212
**[Test build #70536 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70536/testReport)**
for PR 15212 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15212
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70536/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15996
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15996
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70532/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15996
**[Test build #70532 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70532/testReport)**
for PR 15996 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909#discussion_r93732043
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
---
@@ -56,33 +58,100 @@ case class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16387
**[Test build #70538 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70538/testReport)**
for PR 16387 at commit
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16387
[SPARK-18986][Core] ExternalAppendOnlyMap shouldn't fail when forced to
spill before calling its iterator
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386#discussion_r93733483
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JsonFileFormat.scala
---
@@ -36,29 +31,31 @@ import
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15666
**[Test build #70534 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70534/testReport)**
for PR 15666 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16337
**[Test build #70535 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70535/testReport)**
for PR 16337 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16294
**[Test build #70530 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70530/testReport)**
for PR 16294 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16294
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70530/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14627
@rxin, it does not fix any bug but just gets rid of duplicated logics. I
will try to open a separate JIRA in this case in the future to prevent
confusion. Thank you/
---
If your project is
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16383#discussion_r93725196
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/TypedAggregateExpression.scala
---
@@ -143,15 +197,96 @@ case class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16337
**[Test build #70535 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70535/testReport)**
for PR 16337 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16337
Retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16368
Merging this into master, branch-2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16312
I looked at this more closely and I think I found the problem - Not sure
its easy to fix though.
What I traced here is:
- When we call sparkR.session.stop and sparkR.session the same JVM
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15212
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15666
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16337
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70535/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16337
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909
**[Test build #70540 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70540/testReport)**
for PR 13909 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15666
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70534/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16323#discussion_r93726972
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/Statistics.scala
---
@@ -41,13 +41,13 @@ import
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16228
**[Test build #70533 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70533/testReport)**
for PR 16228 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16228
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70533/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16228
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70537/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14452
**[Test build #70541 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70541/testReport)**
for PR 14452 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16361
it seems to that the grouping key alias is only used for execution(logical
Aggregate node doesn't need grouping expression to be named), can we just alias
them with k1,k2, ... with avoid this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15996
**[Test build #70532 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70532/testReport)**
for PR 15996 at commit
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15212#discussion_r93726203
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/ChiSqSelector.scala ---
@@ -255,19 +288,22 @@ class ChiSqSelector @Since("2.1.0") ()
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15212#discussion_r93726092
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/ChiSqSelector.scala ---
@@ -245,6 +264,20 @@ class ChiSqSelector @Since("2.1.0") () extends
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15212#discussion_r93725098
--- Diff: docs/ml-features.md ---
@@ -1423,12 +1423,12 @@ for more details on the API.
`ChiSqSelector` stands for Chi-Squared feature selection. It
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15212#discussion_r93725546
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/ChiSqSelector.scala ---
@@ -92,8 +92,36 @@ private[feature] trait ChiSqSelectorParams extends
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15212#discussion_r93725173
--- Diff: docs/ml-features.md ---
@@ -1423,12 +1423,12 @@ for more details on the API.
`ChiSqSelector` stands for Chi-Squared feature selection. It
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15212#discussion_r93726320
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/ChiSqSelectorSuite.scala ---
@@ -27,61 +27,240 @@ class ChiSqSelectorSuite extends
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15212#discussion_r93726048
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/ChiSqSelector.scala ---
@@ -111,11 +139,14 @@ private[feature] trait ChiSqSelectorParams
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15212#discussion_r93725408
--- Diff: docs/mllib-feature-extraction.md ---
@@ -227,11 +227,13 @@ both speed and statistical learning behavior.
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15212#discussion_r93726001
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/ChiSqSelector.scala ---
@@ -92,8 +92,36 @@ private[feature] trait ChiSqSelectorParams extends
Github user mridulm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16291
I agree with @markhamstra and @vanzin - having ability to tag listeners
into groups (default = spark listener group) and preserving current
synchronized behavior within group would be ensure
Github user felixcheung closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16384
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15996
LGTM. Can you update the comment to address my last comment
(https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15996#discussion_r93730700)?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15996#discussion_r93730700
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/test/DataFrameReaderWriterSuite.scala
---
@@ -643,6 +644,14 @@ class DataFrameReaderWriterSuite
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16368
Hmm looks like this is merged but not reflected on github ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386#discussion_r93732800
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JsonDataSource.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,204 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16368
ah, it was merged https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=spark.git
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15211
**[Test build #70539 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70539/testReport)**
for PR 15211 at commit
Github user kevinyu98 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16337
I just run build/sbt "test-only org.apache.spark.sql.streaming.StreamSuite"
on my local machine, also the whole sql suite, it works fine. Can you re-run
the test? Thanks
---
If your project is
Github user mariusvniekerk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15666#discussion_r93730314
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/TestUtils.scala ---
@@ -164,6 +164,27 @@ private[spark] object TestUtils {
Github user hhbyyh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15211#discussion_r93731229
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LinearSVC.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,525 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15212
**[Test build #70536 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70536/testReport)**
for PR 15212 at commit
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386#discussion_r93731259
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/readwriter.py ---
@@ -155,21 +155,24 @@ def load(self, path=None, format=None, schema=None,
**options):
return
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909
**[Test build #70537 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70537/testReport)**
for PR 13909 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15996
ah
https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9a1ad71db44558bb6eb380dc23a1a1abbc2f3e98
failed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16232
ping @davies
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
GitHub user NathanHowell opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386
[SPARK-18352][SQL] Support parsing multiline json files
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
If a new option `wholeFile` is set to `true` the JSON reader will parse
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386
**[Test build #70531 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70531/testReport)**
for PR 16386 at commit
Github user NathanHowell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386
Hello recent JacksonGenerator.scala commiters, please take a look.
cc/ @rxin @hvanhovell @clockfly @hyukjinkwon @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16323#discussion_r93726768
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/interface.scala
---
@@ -237,6 +239,38 @@ case class CatalogTable(
}
Github user mariusvniekerk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15666#discussion_r93729928
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/TestUtils.scala ---
@@ -164,6 +164,27 @@ private[spark] object TestUtils {
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16387#discussion_r93732158
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/collection/ExternalAppendOnlyMap.scala
---
@@ -192,12 +193,16 @@ class ExternalAppendOnlyMap[K, V, C](
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909
**[Test build #70537 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70537/testReport)**
for PR 13909 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15211
**[Test build #70539 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70539/testReport)**
for PR 15211 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15211
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15211
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70539/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user hhbyyh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15211
I've sent a new update addressing most of the comments. The only exception
is about `SetWeightCol` in `LinearSVCModel`. cc @jkbradley.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14452
Revisit this by rebasing with master.
BTW, in 500+ LOC changes, actually there are 200+ LOC changes are test
cases.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909#discussion_r93721954
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
---
@@ -56,33 +58,100 @@ case class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15996#discussion_r93722074
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -364,48 +366,162 @@ final class DataFrameWriter[T] private[sql](ds:
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16294#discussion_r93722076
--- Diff: docs/structured-streaming-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -1493,13 +1493,13 @@ SparkSession spark = ...
spark.streams.addListener(new
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16294
**[Test build #70530 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70530/testReport)**
for PR 16294 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16294
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16294
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70529/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15996#discussion_r93722231
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -364,48 +366,162 @@ final class DataFrameWriter[T] private[sql](ds:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16294
**[Test build #70529 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70529/testReport)**
for PR 16294 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15996#discussion_r93722277
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -363,48 +365,125 @@ final class DataFrameWriter[T] private[sql](ds:
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15996#discussion_r93722334
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/createDataSourceTables.scala
---
@@ -140,153 +140,55 @@ case class
1 - 100 of 338 matches
Mail list logo
