Github user moutai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16903
Thanks,
Yes I think the rest of the messages look fine on this file.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16981#discussion_r101909847
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/json/JacksonUtils.scala
---
@@ -55,4 +60,26 @@ object JacksonUtils {
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16981#discussion_r101909916
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/jsonExpressions.scala
---
@@ -482,6 +482,15 @@ case class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16944
**[Test build #73123 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73123/testReport)**
for PR 16944 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16981#discussion_r101909598
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/json/JacksonUtils.scala
---
@@ -55,4 +60,26 @@ object JacksonUtils {
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16981#discussion_r101909627
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/json/JacksonUtils.scala
---
@@ -55,4 +60,26 @@ object JacksonUtils {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16985
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73121/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16985
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16985
**[Test build #73121 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73121/testReport)**
for PR 16985 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16928#discussion_r101910249
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVFileFormat.scala
---
@@ -101,6 +101,11 @@ class CSVFileFormat
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395
**[Test build #73116 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73116/testReport)**
for PR 16395 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16978
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16978
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73115/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395
**[Test build #73118 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73118/testReport)**
for PR 16395 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16985
**[Test build #73119 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73119/testReport)**
for PR 16985 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16979
**[Test build #73117 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73117/testReport)**
for PR 16979 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16985
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73119/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16985
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987
**[Test build #73124 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73124/testReport)**
for PR 16987 at commit
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16988
[SPARK-19658] [SQL] Set NumPartitions of RepartitionByExpression In Analyzer
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, if `NumPartitions` is not set in
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16933#discussion_r101911156
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/CollapseRepartitionSuite.scala
---
@@ -43,15 +55,44 @@ class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16985#discussion_r101905768
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/SortMergeJoinExec.scala
---
@@ -33,8 +33,8 @@ import
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16979
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73117/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395
**[Test build #73118 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73118/testReport)**
for PR 16395 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73118/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16979
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user lw-lin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987
[WIP][SPARK-][SS] FileSource read from FileSink
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
## How was this patch tested?
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16978
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16985
**[Test build #73121 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73121/testReport)**
for PR 16985 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16978
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73120/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16978
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user budde commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16944#discussion_r101908105
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveSchemaInferenceSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,192 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16979
**[Test build #73117 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73117/testReport)**
for PR 16979 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16979
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user tejasapatil commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16985
@hvanhovell : This is as per our discussion in the jira :
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-19122
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16978
**[Test build #73122 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73122/testReport)**
for PR 16978 at commit
Github user budde commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16944#discussion_r101908155
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveSchemaInferenceSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,192 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16938
@gatorsmile I have test all the cases above updated. The result shows that
spark for datasource table with HiveExternalCatalog and InMemoryCatatlog
have the same actions.
spark for hive
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16978
**[Test build #73120 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73120/testReport)**
for PR 16978 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16985
**[Test build #73119 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73119/testReport)**
for PR 16985 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16978
**[Test build #73122 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73122/testReport)**
for PR 16978 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16978
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16978
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73122/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16978
**[Test build #73115 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73115/testReport)**
for PR 16978 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395
**[Test build #73116 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73116/testReport)**
for PR 16395 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73116/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16944
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73123/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16944
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16981
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16981
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73099/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16979
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73101/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16979
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16981
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16898#discussion_r101887954
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileFormatWriter.scala
---
@@ -119,23 +130,45 @@ object FileFormatWriter
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16944#discussion_r101888190
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveSchemaInferenceSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,192 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16944#discussion_r101888278
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveSchemaInferenceSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,192 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16981
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73102/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16964#discussion_r101891096
--- Diff:
common/network-common/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/network/util/TransportFrameDecoderSuite.java
---
@@ -153,7 +148,7 @@ public void
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16871
@ericl @vanzin see https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16983
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16983
**[Test build #73104 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73104/testReport)**
for PR 16983 at commit
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16983
[SPARK-19550][BUILD][WIP] Addendum: select Java 1.7 for scalac 2.10, still
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Go back to selecting source/target 1.7 for Scala 2.10 builds,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16976
**[Test build #73105 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73105/testReport)**
for PR 16976 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16898#discussion_r101888508
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileFormatWriter.scala
---
@@ -119,23 +130,45 @@ object FileFormatWriter
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16968#discussion_r101890081
--- Diff: docs/ml-classification-regression.md ---
@@ -363,6 +363,44 @@ Refer to the [R API docs](api/R/spark.mlp.html) for
more details.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16903
**[Test build #3579 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3579/testReport)**
for PR 16903 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16898#discussion_r101888059
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileFormatWriter.scala
---
@@ -287,31 +320,16 @@ object FileFormatWriter
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16898#discussion_r101888000
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileFormatWriter.scala
---
@@ -108,9 +107,21 @@ object FileFormatWriter
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16981
**[Test build #73102 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73102/testReport)**
for PR 16981 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16981
**[Test build #73102 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73102/testReport)**
for PR 16981 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16903
**[Test build #3579 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3579/testReport)**
for PR 16903 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16964
**[Test build #73103 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73103/testReport)**
for PR 16964 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16981#discussion_r101891903
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/json/JacksonUtils.scala
---
@@ -55,4 +62,32 @@ object JacksonUtils {
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16981#discussion_r101891758
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/json/JacksonUtils.scala
---
@@ -18,7 +18,14 @@
package
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16981#discussion_r101891914
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/JsonFunctionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -174,4 +174,44 @@ class JsonFunctionsSuite extends QueryTest
Github user lins05 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16984
cc @srowen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
GitHub user lins05 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16984
[SPARK-19550] Follow-up: fixed a typo that fails the
dev/make-distribution.sh script.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fixed a typo in `dev/make-distribution.sh` script
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16983
**[Test build #73104 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73104/testReport)**
for PR 16983 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16983
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73104/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16983
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16983
This change does avoid the error at
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16871#issuecomment-280791684 when I run
the same commands that the Jenkins job does
```
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16981
**[Test build #73107 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73107/testReport)**
for PR 16981 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16928#discussion_r101894380
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVFileFormat.scala
---
@@ -101,6 +101,12 @@ class CSVFileFormat
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16928#discussion_r101894427
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/UnivocityParser.scala
---
@@ -222,12 +250,6 @@ private[csv] class
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16928#discussion_r101894565
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVOptions.scala
---
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ import
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620
Thanks all for the work on this! I've merged this into master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16928#discussion_r101894462
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/UnivocityParser.scala
---
@@ -45,24 +46,35 @@ private[csv] class
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16928#discussion_r101894442
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/UnivocityParser.scala
---
@@ -173,25 +185,41 @@ private[csv] class
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16928#discussion_r101894489
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/UnivocityParser.scala
---
@@ -45,24 +46,35 @@ private[csv] class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16984
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16984
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73106/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16984
**[Test build #73106 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73106/testReport)**
for PR 16984 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16982
**[Test build #73108 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73108/testReport)**
for PR 16982 at commit
Github user paberline commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8384
Closing as requested due to this feature being too narrow a use case for
core Spark.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user paberline closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8384
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16981
@HyukjinKwon Thanks! I'll check.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user lins05 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16984
That's how the shell's "default value" works. FYI
http://www.tldp.org/LDP/abs/html/parameter-substitution.html
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16984
**[Test build #73106 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73106/testReport)**
for PR 16984 at commit
1 - 100 of 166 matches
Mail list logo
