Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10506
**[Test build #73740 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73740/testReport)**
for PR 10506 at commit
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16971#discussion_r103872828
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/ApproximatePercentile.scala
---
@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ object
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17034
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17122#discussion_r103878480
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/WholeStageCodegenExec.scala
---
@@ -206,6 +206,18 @@ trait CodegenSupport extends
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16610#discussion_r103879881
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -91,15 +91,22 @@ object functions {
* @group normal_funcs
*
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16610#discussion_r103879925
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -91,15 +91,22 @@ object functions {
* @group normal_funcs
*
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16910
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user windpiger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16910#discussion_r103880490
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveDDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -1588,6 +1590,153 @@ class HiveDDLSuite
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17034
**[Test build #73743 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73743/testReport)**
for PR 17034 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17034
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17034
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73743/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16610#discussion_r103885180
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -91,15 +91,22 @@ object functions {
* @group normal_funcs
*
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17134#discussion_r103886215
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -1337,6 +1337,32 @@ test_that("column functions", {
df <- createDataFrame(data.frame(x
GitHub user darionyaphet opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17135
SPARK-19794 Release HDFS Client after read/write checkpoint
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Close HDFS client and streams after reading and writing from HDFS .
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17134
**[Test build #73751 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73751/testReport)**
for PR 17134 at commit
Github user GavinGavinNo1 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12054
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16971
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17122
**[Test build #73745 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73745/testReport)**
for PR 17122 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17128
merged to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17128
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16954
**[Test build #73750 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73750/testReport)**
for PR 16954 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17133
**[Test build #73749 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73749/testReport)**
for PR 17133 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17135
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17116
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73728/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17034
**[Test build #73743 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73743/testReport)**
for PR 17034 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16971
**[Test build #73744 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73744/testReport)**
for PR 16971 at commit
Github user dilipbiswal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16954
@gatorsmile Thank you. I have addressed the comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16954#discussion_r103881081
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1172,20 +1226,11 @@ class Analyzer(
}
GitHub user jinxing64 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17133
[SPARK-19793] Use clock.getTimeMillis when mark task as finished in
TaskSetManager.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
TaskSetManager is now using
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17097
**[Test build #73741 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73741/testReport)**
for PR 17097 at commit
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10506
Ping @zsxwing , hopes you're the right person to review this very old PR,
the issue still exists in the latest master, can you please take a review,
thanks a lot.
---
If your project is set up
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10506
**[Test build #73742 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73742/testReport)**
for PR 10506 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17097
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16954
**[Test build #73746 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73746/testReport)**
for PR 16954 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16910
**[Test build #73747 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73747/testReport)**
for PR 16910 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16954
**[Test build #73748 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73748/testReport)**
for PR 16954 at commit
Github user jinxing64 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17133
I found this when do https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17112, which is
for measuring the approach I proposed in
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16867.
---
If your project is set up for
GitHub user felixcheung opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17134
[SPARK-19795][SPARKR] add column functions to_json, from_json
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add column functions: to_json, from_json, and tests covering error
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17081
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73733/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17122
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17122
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16971
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17097
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73736/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17131
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17122
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17034
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16910
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17116
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17122
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16971
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73739/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17097
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17122
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73737/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17131
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73732/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17122
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73734/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16910
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73735/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17034
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73738/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17081
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17122
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73730/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16610#discussion_r103888025
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -91,15 +91,22 @@ object functions {
* @group normal_funcs
*
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11601
jenkins retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16610#discussion_r103891461
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -99,6 +99,8 @@ object functions {
* The passed in object is returned
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17125#discussion_r103891636
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/views.scala ---
@@ -128,6 +129,15 @@ case class CreateViewCommand(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17097
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73741/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17097
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17001
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73755/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17001
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17001
**[Test build #73755 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73755/testReport)**
for PR 17001 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16854#discussion_r103894945
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/UnivocityParser.scala
---
@@ -344,4 +346,36 @@ private[csv] object
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17059
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16910
**[Test build #73747 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73747/testReport)**
for PR 16910 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16971
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16971
**[Test build #73744 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73744/testReport)**
for PR 16971 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16971
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73744/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16910
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73747/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16910
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10506
**[Test build #73740 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73740/testReport)**
for PR 10506 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17122
**[Test build #73745 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73745/testReport)**
for PR 17122 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16954
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73750/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17034
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16854
**[Test build #73756 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73756/testReport)**
for PR 16854 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17135#discussion_r103907445
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/ReliableCheckpointRDD.scala ---
@@ -279,8 +287,13 @@ private[spark] object ReliableCheckpointRDD extends
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17135
I get the idea, but I'm not sure any of these are valid
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17135#discussion_r103907416
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/ReliableCheckpointRDD.scala ---
@@ -216,6 +221,8 @@ private[spark] object ReliableCheckpointRDD extends
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17135#discussion_r103907312
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/ReliableCheckpointRDD.scala ---
@@ -181,21 +181,26 @@ private[spark] object ReliableCheckpointRDD extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11601
**[Test build #73753 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73753/testReport)**
for PR 11601 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17131
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17001
**[Test build #73755 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73755/testReport)**
for PR 17001 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16610
**[Test build #73757 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73757/testReport)**
for PR 16610 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17097
**[Test build #73741 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73741/testReport)**
for PR 17097 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16854#discussion_r103895193
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/UnivocityParser.scala
---
@@ -344,4 +346,36 @@ private[csv] object
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10506
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73740/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10506
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17122
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73745/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user datumbox commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17059
@MLnick @srowen @imatiach-msft Thank you for your comments and for helping
making this improvement robust.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11601
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11601
**[Test build #73753 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73753/testReport)**
for PR 11601 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17122
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17095
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user steveloughran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17080
@srowen dont worry, been tracking this: I filed the JIRA. Core code is good
(i.e. property/env var names).
One thing to bear in mind, the existing code propagates the env vars even
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17095
**[Test build #73760 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73760/testReport)**
for PR 17095 at commit
1 - 100 of 671 matches
Mail list logo
