Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17222
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17222
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79202/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18541
**[Test build #79213 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79213/testReport)**
for PR 18541 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18503
**[Test build #79214 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79214/testReport)**
for PR 18503 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18539
**[Test build #79208 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79208/testReport)**
for PR 18539 at commit
Github user ouyangxiaochen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17681#discussion_r125563990
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalogSuite.scala
---
@@ -1316,8 +1316,10 @@ abstract class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18416
**[Test build #79186 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79186/testReport)**
for PR 18416 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18455#discussion_r125567839
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -2616,4 +2616,27 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends QueryTest with
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18516
**[Test build #79193 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79193/testReport)**
for PR 18516 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17865
**[Test build #79189 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79189/testReport)**
for PR 17865 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16422
**[Test build #79197 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79197/testReport)**
for PR 16422 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13873
**[Test build #79198 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79198/testReport)**
for PR 13873 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13873#discussion_r125567841
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/encoders/RowEncoder.scala
---
@@ -132,8 +132,16 @@ object RowEncoder {
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17865
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18536#discussion_r125578355
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SparkSession.scala
---
@@ -912,21 +912,16 @@ object SparkSession {
// No active
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18537#discussion_r125578393
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALSSuite.scala ---
@@ -777,15 +778,34 @@ class ALSSuite
}
}
-class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18527
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18527
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79204/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18527
**[Test build #79204 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79204/testReport)**
for PR 18527 at commit
GitHub user jiangxb1987 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18540
[SPARK-19451][SQL] rangeBetween method should accept Long value as boundary
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Long values can be passed to `rangeBetween` as range
Github user heary-cao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18537#discussion_r125596464
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALSSuite.scala ---
@@ -777,15 +778,34 @@ class ALSSuite
}
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18536
**[Test build #79206 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79206/testReport)**
for PR 18536 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17865
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17865
**[Test build #79207 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79207/testReport)**
for PR 17865 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17865
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79207/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18539
Seems OK, are there other sinks that could use a more useful toString?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user facaiy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18523
I don't know how to write an unit test for the pr? Is it necessary?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user heary-cao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18537#discussion_r125592889
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALSSuite.scala ---
@@ -777,15 +778,34 @@ class ALSSuite
}
}
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13873
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18460
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18511
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18465
@felixcheung and @shivaram, do you guys see it sounds okay to go through
the checklist I used before for the current state? (of course, not asking a
sing-off but just a rough judgement)
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17681
**[Test build #79205 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79205/testReport)**
for PR 17681 at commit
GitHub user jinxing64 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18541
[SPARK-21315][SQL]Skip some spill files when generateIterator(startIndex)
in ExternalAppendOnlyUnsafeRowArray.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In current
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18516
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18516
**[Test build #79209 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79209/testReport)**
for PR 18516 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18516
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79209/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18540
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18540
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79210/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18460
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79201/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18416
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user heary-cao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18537#discussion_r125595778
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALSSuite.scala ---
@@ -777,15 +778,34 @@ class ALSSuite
}
}
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18416
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79200/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18460
**[Test build #79201 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79201/testReport)**
for PR 18460 at commit
Github user bOOm-X commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18253
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13873
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79212/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13873
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13873
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79203/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13873
**[Test build #79203 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79203/testReport)**
for PR 13873 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13873
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16422
**[Test build #79211 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79211/testReport)**
for PR 16422 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18540
**[Test build #79210 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79210/testReport)**
for PR 18540 at commit
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16422
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13873
**[Test build #79212 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79212/testReport)**
for PR 13873 at commit
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18534
LGTM, merged into master. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user bOOm-X commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18253
@cloud-fan Yes it is !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16422
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79211/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16422
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18516
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18516
**[Test build #79209 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79209/testReport)**
for PR 18516 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18537#discussion_r125597428
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALSSuite.scala ---
@@ -777,15 +778,34 @@ class ALSSuite
}
}
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17681
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17681
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79205/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18539
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18539
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79208/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18534
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18539
I think that `ConsoleSink` was the only one with this mysterious name. We
could however have another JIRA to _somehow_ unify how options are printed out
for sources and sinks. I don't think
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17758
**[Test build #79215 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79215/testReport)**
for PR 17758 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13873
**[Test build #79212 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79212/testReport)**
for PR 13873 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18465
@felixcheung, it looks the codes below:
```R
for(i in 0:1) {
p <- parallel:::mcfork()
if (inherits(p, "masterProcess")) {
stop("unexpected failure")
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18416
**[Test build #79200 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79200/testReport)**
for PR 18416 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18537#discussion_r125595331
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALSSuite.scala ---
@@ -777,15 +778,34 @@ class ALSSuite
}
}
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18536
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79206/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18465
Also, just checked via manually calling `stop()` as end-to-end tests after
building it.
```
df <- createDataFrame(list(list(1L, 1, "1", 0.1)), c("a", "b", "c", "d"))
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18536
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18540#discussion_r125603187
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWindowFunctionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -151,6 +151,48 @@ class DataFrameWindowFunctionsSuite
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18540#discussion_r125602833
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/window/WindowExec.scala
---
@@ -109,46 +109,54 @@ case class WindowExec(
*
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18540#discussion_r125602934
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/expressions/WindowSpec.scala ---
@@ -174,28 +191,22 @@ class WindowSpec private[sql](
*/
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18540#discussion_r125599886
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/windowExpressions.scala
---
@@ -106,173 +105,161 @@ case class
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18540#discussion_r125598577
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/windowExpressions.scala
---
@@ -43,57 +42,57 @@ case class
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18537
I think it would be great if we have some output (or a small assert) that
we could make sure if ithis PR fixes the issue, e.g. listing the
folder.Meanwhile, let me double check to help by
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17222
**[Test build #79202 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79202/testReport)**
for PR 17222 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16422
**[Test build #79211 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79211/testReport)**
for PR 16422 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18537#discussion_r125620580
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALSSuite.scala ---
@@ -777,15 +778,34 @@ class ALSSuite
}
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18540
**[Test build #79210 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79210/testReport)**
for PR 18540 at commit
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18529
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18416
**[Test build #79184 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79184/testReport)**
for PR 18416 at commit
Github user heary-cao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18174
thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18529
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17758#discussion_r125564439
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/DataSource.scala
---
@@ -304,7 +329,13 @@ case class DataSource(
Github user ouyangxiaochen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17681#discussion_r125564468
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/functions.scala
---
@@ -46,26 +46,47 @@ case class CreateFunctionCommand(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17681
**[Test build #79194 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79194/testReport)**
for PR 17681 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13873
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16422
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18174
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18174
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79195/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18533
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79188/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16422
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79197/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17681
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18460
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
1 - 100 of 581 matches
Mail list logo
