Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20035
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19984
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20019#discussion_r158201087
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWindowFramesSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,381 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20019#discussion_r158200860
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWindowFramesSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,381 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19591#discussion_r158200059
--- Diff:
launcher/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/launcher/ChildProcAppHandle.java ---
@@ -171,10 +90,11 @@ void monitorChild() {
}
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19591#discussion_r158200163
--- Diff:
launcher/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/launcher/InProcessAppHandle.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19591#discussion_r158201743
--- Diff:
launcher/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/launcher/LauncherServer.java ---
@@ -210,8 +209,13 @@ int getPort() {
* Removes the client handle
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20019
also cc @gatorsmile whom I believe should be interested to look at this.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20041
**[Test build #85239 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85239/testReport)**
for PR 20041 at commit
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19884#discussion_r158205751
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/tests.py ---
@@ -3356,6 +3356,7 @@ def test_schema_conversion_roundtrip(self):
self.assertEquals(self.schema,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20043
**[Test build #85231 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85231/testReport)**
for PR 20043 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20043
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85231/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20043
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20023
I think that we should be careful on suddenly changing behavior.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19981
**[Test build #85227 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85227/testReport)**
for PR 19981 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19981
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19981
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85227/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19977
**[Test build #85235 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85235/testReport)**
for PR 19977 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20040
**[Test build #4020 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/4020/testReport)**
for PR 20040 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20020#discussion_r158203446
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/DataWritingCommand.scala
---
@@ -20,30 +20,32 @@ package
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19946#discussion_r158202645
--- Diff: docs/running-on-yarn.md ---
@@ -18,7 +18,8 @@ Spark application's configuration (driver, executors, and
the AM when running in
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20043
**[Test build #85234 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85234/testReport)**
for PR 20043 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20020
> since now we let inserting commands have a child, it makes sense to wrap
the child with AnalysisBarrier, to avoid re-analyzing them.
It makes sense to me too.
---
Github user gengliangwang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20020#discussion_r158200471
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/DataWritingCommand.scala
---
@@ -20,30 +20,32 @@ package
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19591#discussion_r158201527
--- Diff:
launcher/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/launcher/LauncherServer.java ---
@@ -260,24 +264,30 @@ private long getConnectionTimeout() {
}
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19591#discussion_r158200240
--- Diff:
launcher/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/launcher/InProcessAppHandle.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19591#discussion_r158198274
--- Diff:
launcher/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/launcher/InProcessAppHandle.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19591#discussion_r158201917
--- Diff:
launcher/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/launcher/package-info.java ---
@@ -49,6 +49,15 @@
*
*
*
+ * Applications can also
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20026
**[Test build #85228 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85228/testReport)**
for PR 20026 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20026
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85228/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20026
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20020#discussion_r158197728
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/DataWritingCommand.scala
---
@@ -20,30 +20,32 @@ package
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20020#discussion_r158198595
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/DataWritingCommand.scala
---
@@ -20,30 +20,32 @@ package
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20020#discussion_r158198250
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/commands.scala
---
@@ -87,6 +87,51 @@ case class ExecutedCommandExec(cmd:
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20020#discussion_r158198088
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/commands.scala
---
@@ -87,6 +87,51 @@ case class ExecutedCommandExec(cmd:
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20020#discussion_r158199084
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/DataWritingCommand.scala
---
@@ -20,30 +20,32 @@ package
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19984
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85230/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19984
**[Test build #85230 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85230/testReport)**
for PR 19984 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19981
**[Test build #85238 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85238/testReport)**
for PR 19981 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20042
**[Test build #4021 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/4021/testReport)**
for PR 20042 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19218
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19218
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85173/
Test PASSed.
---
GitHub user kiszk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20035
Enable to execute generated code of function in Generator
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR enables to execute generated code of `Explode`, PosExplode`,
`Inline`,
Github user shaneknapp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19884
alright https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18754 should now be unblocked.
let me know if there's anything else that needs to happen.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20002
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19975
Thank you so much, @zsxwing and @brkyvz
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19946
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19946
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85179/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user shaneknapp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19884
@HyukjinKwon @wesm @BryanCutler
alright. here's my plan for right now:
* python 3.4.5 -- upgrade pyarrow --> 0.8.0 (confirmed working on my
staging environment)
what i'm
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20035
**[Test build #85189 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85189/testReport)**
for PR 20035 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20035
**[Test build #85191 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85191/testReport)**
for PR 20035 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20008
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20008
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85187/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user mgaido91 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20021
Honestly, I liked very much doing the test only for testing and not
throwing an exception in production. IMHO it is an overkill to throw an
exception in production and in the remote case that we
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20032#discussion_r158064721
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/k8s/KubernetesClusterSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -217,7
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20033
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20020#discussion_r158018917
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/DataWritingCommand.scala
---
@@ -57,4 +45,8 @@ trait DataWritingCommand extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20030
**[Test build #85188 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85188/testReport)**
for PR 20030 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20008
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20008
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85186/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user gaborgsomogyi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19035#discussion_r158047414
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/InsertIntoHiveTable.scala
---
@@ -435,6 +435,18 @@ case class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19218
**[Test build #85173 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85173/testReport)**
for PR 19218 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19946
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20020
since now we let inserting commands have a child, it makes sense to wrap
the child with `AnalysisBarrier`, to avoid re-analyzing them. also cc @viirya
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20008
**[Test build #85186 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85186/testReport)**
for PR 20008 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20030
This is a lot of code for what sounds like a small win; what is the
performance gain? you can already do this with windowing right?
---
Github user wangyum commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20008#discussion_r158016336
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/windowExpressions.scala
---
@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ case class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20034
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20020#discussion_r158025766
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/DataWritingCommand.scala
---
@@ -20,30 +20,18 @@ package
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20019
**[Test build #85190 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85190/testReport)**
for PR 20019 at commit
Github user gaborgsomogyi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20019
@smurakozi nice catch, added them. Additionally found a nit.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20035#discussion_r158029035
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/generators.scala
---
@@ -214,11 +214,15 @@ case class Stack(children:
Github user shaneknapp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19884
we should be good to go:
```$ pssh -h jenkins_workers.txt -t 0 "export
PATH=/home/anaconda/envs/py3k/bin$PATH; pip install pyarrow==0.8.0"
[1] 05:55:00 [SUCCESS]
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20002
**[Test build #85192 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85192/testReport)**
for PR 20002 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20002
**[Test build #85192 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85192/testReport)**
for PR 20002 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20002
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85192/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20020
**[Test build #85193 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85193/testReport)**
for PR 20020 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20008
**[Test build #85187 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85187/testReport)**
for PR 20008 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17425
@gatorsmile I have the same question. Which operation in Generator is bad?
All of them, or only one?
---
-
To unsubscribe,
Github user squito closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19250
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19811#discussion_r158060614
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/regexpExpressions.scala
---
@@ -112,15 +112,15 @@ case class Like(left:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20035
**[Test build #85194 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85194/testReport)**
for PR 20035 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19946
**[Test build #85178 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85178/testReport)**
for PR 19946 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19946
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85178/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19946
**[Test build #85179 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85179/testReport)**
for PR 19946 at commit
Github user superbobry commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19992#discussion_r158028287
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/JsonProtocol.scala ---
@@ -444,12 +444,15 @@ private[spark] object JsonProtocol {
("Disk
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19977
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85182/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20002
Jenkins, test this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19977
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19977
**[Test build #85182 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85182/testReport)**
for PR 19977 at commit
Github user gaborgsomogyi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19035#discussion_r158050733
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/InsertIntoHiveTable.scala
---
@@ -435,6 +435,18 @@ case class
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20035
This PR comes from [this
discussion](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19811#discussion_r157408061).
---
-
To unsubscribe,
Github user shaneknapp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19884
test this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user bdrillard commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20010#discussion_r158081192
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -158,11 +169,6 @@ object TypeCoercion {
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20035#discussion_r158082275
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/generators.scala
---
@@ -214,11 +213,12 @@ case class Stack(children:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20035
**[Test build #85198 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85198/testReport)**
for PR 20035 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20016
**[Test build #4018 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/4018/testReport)**
for PR 20016 at commit
Github user sujithjay commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20002
@tgravescs Thank you for keeping me informed. I look forward to receiving
your review. Happy holidays!
---
-
To unsubscribe,
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20018#discussion_r158100765
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/sql/hive/SparkHiveExample.scala
---
@@ -104,6 +103,60 @@ object SparkHiveExample {
//
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20008
**[Test build #85187 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85187/testReport)**
for PR 20008 at commit
201 - 300 of 659 matches
Mail list logo
