Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22039
**[Test build #94440 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94440/testReport)**
for PR 22039 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22013
**[Test build #94457 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94457/testReport)**
for PR 22013 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22047
**[Test build #94456 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94456/testReport)**
for PR 22047 at commit
Github user shaneknapp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21939
@dongjoon-hyun i would hold off until we are certain that spark is
buildable in our environment w/python 3.5.
---
-
To
Github user shaneknapp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21939
i'm going to wait for my PRB to finish on the ubuntu node (it
passed/skipped that test that's hanging), so we can see how the python tests go.
after that i'll merge in any upstream
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22040
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94438/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22047
**[Test build #94459 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94459/testReport)**
for PR 22047 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22040
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22046
**[Test build #94453 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94453/testReport)**
for PR 22046 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21847
**[Test build #94460 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94460/testReport)**
for PR 21847 at commit
Github user habren commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22018
Hi Takeshi Yamamuro Hyukjin Kwonâ and @viirya Can you take a look at this
patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22040
**[Test build #94447 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94447/testReport)**
for PR 22040 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22040
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22040
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94447/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16677
**[Test build #94452 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94452/testReport)**
for PR 16677 at commit
Github user viirya closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22046
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22017
**[Test build #94458 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94458/testReport)**
for PR 22017 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22017
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94458/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22045
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22039
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22046
[JUST_TEST][NOT_MERGE] Test for VersionsSuite
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Few test cases in `VersionsSuite` continue to fail in my one PR. But it
isn't reproducible
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22039
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94440/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22046
retest this please.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20636
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20636
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94436/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22043
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94449/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22043
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22043
**[Test build #94449 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94449/testReport)**
for PR 22043 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22013
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22013
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94455/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22017
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21859#discussion_r208774474
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -2799,6 +2799,26 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends QueryTest with
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21859#discussion_r208775584
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/Partitioner.scala ---
@@ -166,7 +169,16 @@ class RangePartitioner[K : Ordering : ClassTag, V](
//
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21859#discussion_r208775191
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/exchange/ShuffleExchangeExec.scala
---
@@ -294,7 +296,12 @@ object ShuffleExchangeExec {
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21859#discussion_r208775694
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/exchange/ShuffleExchangeExec.scala
---
@@ -294,7 +296,12 @@ object ShuffleExchangeExec {
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22039
Yes, I agree about the future-proofing problem. However, at the moment, new
future cases will also not cause any compile problem, but will just also
trigger a MatchError. This is, simply, always a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22045
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user codeatri opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22045
[SPARK-23939][SQL] Add transform_values SQL function
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr adds `transform_values` function which applies the function to each
entry of
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22045
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22046
**[Test build #94453 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94453/testReport)**
for PR 22046 at commit
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21977
> We've found that python requires a lot less memory than it actually uses
because it doesn't know when to GC
yes, totally agree, sorry I wasn't clear in my initial comment -- overall I
Github user rdblue commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21977
> So if users don't set this conf, the behavior is the same as before,
right?
Yes.
> My concern is that meaning of the overhead parameter becomes pretty
confusing.
I think
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22039
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21919#discussion_r208751032
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/progress.scala ---
@@ -213,6 +216,12 @@ class SinkProgress protected[sql](
override
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21919#discussion_r208750925
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/progress.scala ---
@@ -198,11 +198,14 @@ class SourceProgress protected[sql](
*
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21939
Thanks @shaneknapp ! Sorry, I didn't realize that requirement changed..
I'm keeping my fingers crossed those builds run smoothly!!
---
Github user shaneknapp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21939
@BryanCutler still seeing the error popping up on
`org.apache.spark.unsafe.map.BytesToBytesMapOnHeapSuite.randomizedStressTest`.
Github user habren commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21868
Hi @maropu and @viirya Do you agree with the basic idea that we should take
column pruning in to consideration during splitting the input files?
---
Github user shaneknapp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21939
fack. this will be harder than just upgrading python on the workers:
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user shaneknapp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21939
ok, i'll need to hack `python/run-tests.py` to support 3.5. doing that now
on my personal fork and relaunching a test.
---
Github user ajacques commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21889
@mallman, while we wait for the go-no-go, do you have the changes for the
next PR ready? Is there anything you need help with?
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22009
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22009
**[Test build #94448 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94448/testReport)**
for PR 22009 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22009
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22009
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94448/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16677
I set up a test PR for `VersionsSuite` at #22046.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22009
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94443/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22009
**[Test build #9 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/9/testReport)**
for PR 22009 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22009
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/9/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22009
**[Test build #94443 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94443/testReport)**
for PR 22009 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20637
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94445/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20637
**[Test build #94445 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94445/testReport)**
for PR 20637 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22029#discussion_r208717728
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -1476,6 +1476,16 @@ object SQLConf {
"are
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22047
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22047
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22044
**[Test build #94450 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94450/testReport)**
for PR 22044 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21939
@BryanCutler . Shall we update the doc together in this PR?
- https://github.com/apache/spark/blame/master/docs/index.md#L29
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22041
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user shaneknapp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21939
btw: yes. i am staring at build logs today.
does a watched build build faster? :\
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user shaneknapp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21939
@BryanCutler BULLET DODGED. my new build made it past that weird mesos
bug! non-deterministic crap ftw!
```
the master-test-sbt-hadoop build got wedged in a concerning (but
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22046
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22046
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94453/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21847
**[Test build #94460 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94460/testReport)**
for PR 21847 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21847
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21847
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94460/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16677
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94452/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16677
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22038
**[Test build #94432 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94432/testReport)**
for PR 22038 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22038
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94432/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22046
**[Test build #94454 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94454/testReport)**
for PR 22046 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22042
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22042
**[Test build #94446 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94446/testReport)**
for PR 22042 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22042
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22013
**[Test build #94455 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94455/testReport)**
for PR 22013 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22042
**[Test build #94441 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94441/testReport)**
for PR 22042 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22042
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94441/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22042
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94446/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user dilipbiswal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22047
@gatorsmile I tried to implement the rewrites suggested in the original PR.
It does not seem very straightforward to me. The basic issue is, we are unable
to replace the aggregate expression
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22044
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94450/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22044
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22013
**[Test build #94451 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94451/testReport)**
for PR 22013 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22013
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22041
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94437/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22039
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94435/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22039
**[Test build #94435 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94435/testReport)**
for PR 22039 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22039
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22040
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22044
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22009
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22046
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
1 - 100 of 680 matches
Mail list logo