Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22184
ok to test
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22234#discussion_r212825429
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/readwriter.py ---
@@ -345,11 +345,11 @@ def text(self, paths, wholetext=False, lineSep=None):
@since(2.0)
def
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22184
**[Test build #95262 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95262/testReport)**
for PR 22184 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22184
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95262/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22184
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22184
**[Test build #95262 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95262/testReport)**
for PR 22184 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22234
**[Test build #95259 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95259/testReport)**
for PR 22234 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22234
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22234
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95259/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20901
Merged to master
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
GitHub user mgaido91 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22236
[SPARK-10697][ML] Add lift to Association rules
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR adds the lift measure to Association rules.
## How was this patch
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22236
**[Test build #95263 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95263/testReport)**
for PR 22236 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20901
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22236
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22236
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2
**[Test build #95261 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95261/testReport)**
for PR 2 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95261/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22236
**[Test build #95263 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95263/testReport)**
for PR 22236 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22236
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22236
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95263/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22235
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95260/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22235
**[Test build #95260 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95260/testReport)**
for PR 22235 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22235
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user MaxGekk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18447
@HyukjinKwon I also neutral since I don't have potential use cases for the
function.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18447
@MaxGekk, I was thinking we could use this instead of `schema_of` somehow
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18447
@mmolimar, let's leave this closed if there's no explicit positive feedback
within few days.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user xuanyuanking commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22198#discussion_r212822215
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameJoinSuite.scala ---
@@ -191,6 +195,48 @@ class DataFrameJoinSuite extends QueryTest
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17745#discussion_r212822877
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/dstream/FileInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -196,29 +191,29 @@ class FileInputDStream[K, V,
Github user steveloughran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22186
my local maven build *did* work, so maybe its a javac/JVM version thing.
Will move back to a java class callback.
---
-
Github user MaxGekk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22233#discussion_r212834324
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -671,7 +674,7 @@ case class AlterTableRecoverPartitionsCommand(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22238
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22237
**[Test build #95269 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95269/testReport)**
for PR 22237 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22234
**[Test build #95271 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95271/testReport)**
for PR 22234 at commit
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22198#discussion_r212844578
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/ResolveHints.scala
---
@@ -47,20 +49,39 @@ object ResolveHints {
*
GitHub user MaxGekk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22237
[SPARK-25243][SQL] Use FailureSafeParser in from_json
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to switch `from_json` on `FailureSafeParser`, and to
make
Github user mgaido91 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20637#discussion_r212832680
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ExpressionEvalHelper.scala
---
@@ -223,8 +223,9 @@ trait
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22218#discussion_r212833235
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/ExecutorSource.scala ---
@@ -17,11 +17,13 @@
package org.apache.spark.executor
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22239
> @viirya did you try to run TakeOrderedAndProjectSuite? I am pretty sure
that will fail now ;)...
Not yet. Let me try.
---
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22162#discussion_r212832846
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DatasetSuite.scala
---
@@ -969,6 +969,22 @@ class DatasetSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22162#discussion_r212832850
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DatasetSuite.scala
---
@@ -969,6 +969,22 @@ class DatasetSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user bsikander commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21816
Sorry for dropping message again, but could someone please have a look at
this change. This is a problem that I am having constantly and a validation
from senior committers will be really
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22237
**[Test build #95267 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95267/testReport)**
for PR 22237 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22236
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22236
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95265/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22236
**[Test build #95265 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95265/testReport)**
for PR 22236 at commit
GitHub user HeartSaVioR opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22238
[SPARK-25245][DOCS][SS] Explain regarding limiting modification on
"spark.sql.shuffle.partitions" for structured streaming
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22237
**[Test build #95267 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95267/testReport)**
for PR 22237 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22237
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95267/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22237
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22237
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22184#discussion_r212834477
--- Diff: docs/sql-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -1895,6 +1895,10 @@ working with timestamps in `pandas_udf`s to get the
best performance, see
-
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22233#discussion_r212831774
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -671,7 +674,7 @@ case class AlterTableRecoverPartitionsCommand(
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22162#discussion_r212832734
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -815,6 +815,24 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1#discussion_r212833953
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -465,7 +465,7 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
var
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1
We would appreciate it if you would describe some detail on `further
analysis` for removing lock on the whole object.
> On further analysis of the heartbeat receiver method, it turns out
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22219#discussion_r212834287
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -3237,6 +3237,20 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
files.toSet.toArray
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22197
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22197
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95264/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22236#discussion_r212833449
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/fpm/FPGrowth.scala ---
@@ -338,7 +355,16 @@ object FPGrowthModel extends MLReadable[FPGrowthModel]
{
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22236#discussion_r212833419
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/fpm/FPGrowth.scala ---
@@ -217,9 +217,13 @@ object FPGrowth extends
DefaultParamsReadable[FPGrowth] {
Github user MaxGekk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22237
jenkins, retest this, please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22238
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22238
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22238
**[Test build #95268 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95268/testReport)**
for PR 22238 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22162#discussion_r212832804
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -815,6 +815,24 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22162#discussion_r212832795
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DatasetSuite.scala
---
@@ -969,6 +969,22 @@ class DatasetSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22197
**[Test build #95264 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95264/testReport)**
for PR 22197 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22237
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16677#discussion_r212844439
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/limit.scala ---
@@ -93,25 +96,93 @@ trait BaseLimitExec extends UnaryExecNode with
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22198#discussion_r212844390
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ class Analyzer(
lazy val
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22239
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22239
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22239
**[Test build #95272 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95272/testReport)**
for PR 22239 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22239
cc @cloud-fan for a sanity check.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22239
@viirya did you try to run `TakeOrderedAndProjectSuite`? I am pretty sure
that will fail now ;)...
---
-
To unsubscribe,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22198
**[Test build #95275 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95275/testReport)**
for PR 22198 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22198
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22198
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95275/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user mgaido91 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22236
cc @holdenk @srowen @yanboliang
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22237
**[Test build #95266 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95266/testReport)**
for PR 22237 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22048
Ping @xuejianbest
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22238
**[Test build #95268 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95268/testReport)**
for PR 22238 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22238
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95268/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user mmolimar commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22234
@MaxGekk I added what you suggested as well.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user mmolimar commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22234#discussion_r212842706
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/readwriter.py ---
@@ -345,11 +345,11 @@ def text(self, paths, wholetext=False, lineSep=None):
@since(2.0)
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22239
[SPARK-19355][SQL][Followup] Remove the child.outputPartitioning check
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is based on the discussion
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22239
cc @hvanhovell
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22239
@hvanhovell I can set `spark.sql.limit.flatGlobalLimit` to false to match
`TakeOrderedAndProjectExec` semantics at the beginning of
`TakeOrderedAndProjectSuite`. Or you prefer to add an explicit
Github user ConeyLiu closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20844
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user ConeyLiu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20844
thanks for all. Closes it.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22063
**[Test build #4293 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/4293/testReport)**
for PR 22063 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22237#discussion_r212847031
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/jsonExpressions.scala
---
@@ -554,18 +554,22 @@ case class JsonToStructs(
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22197#discussion_r212848096
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetFilters.scala
---
@@ -350,25 +356,38 @@ private[parquet]
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22239
Setting `spark.sql.limit.flatGlobalLimit` to `false` works for me.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22184#discussion_r212849852
--- Diff: docs/sql-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -1895,6 +1895,10 @@ working with timestamps in `pandas_udf`s to get the
best performance, see
-
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22237#discussion_r212849989
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/JsonFunctionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -469,4 +470,23 @@ class JsonFunctionsSuite extends QueryTest
Github user wangyum commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20020#discussion_r212850054
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/DataWritingCommand.scala
---
@@ -20,30 +20,32 @@ package
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22239
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22239
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
1 - 100 of 249 matches
Mail list logo
