Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2998#discussion_r19653172
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringOperations.scala
---
@@ -92,6 +92,29 @@ trait
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2998#discussion_r19653194
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringOperations.scala
---
@@ -92,6 +92,29 @@ trait
Github user anantasty commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2952#issuecomment-61222153
@davies @mengxr Just made the suggested changes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user anantasty commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2970#issuecomment-61222188
@marmbrus can we merge this now?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2919#issuecomment-61222170
[Test build #22597 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22597/consoleFull)
for PR 2919 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2919#issuecomment-6136
[Test build #22597 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22597/consoleFull)
for PR 2919 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2919#issuecomment-6139
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2685#issuecomment-6147
it is not possible to mutate them after the fact. Let's stick with 0.13.1a
- I will fully release it now. But don't remove the extra repository (we can
remove it later)
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2919#issuecomment-61222349
@marmbrus @mengxr I removed the Java UDT and made UDTs private for now.
I think it's good enough to work with MLlib Datasets, and we can take more time
to design
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2475#issuecomment-61222343
[Test build #22592 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22592/consoleFull)
for PR 2475 at commit
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2685#discussion_r19653250
--- Diff: dev/run-tests ---
@@ -142,17 +142,24 @@ CURRENT_BLOCK=$BLOCK_BUILD
# We always build with Hive because the PySpark Spark SQL tests need it.
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2970#issuecomment-61222322
Thanks! Merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2475#issuecomment-61222348
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3012#issuecomment-61222405
Thanks for working on it. Can it infer the type as DateType/TimestampType
from String in Json? It's common to have date/time in json, such as create time
of tweet, it
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2970
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2952#issuecomment-61222418
[Test build #22598 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22598/consoleFull)
for PR 2952 at commit
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2685#discussion_r19653264
--- Diff: dev/run-tests ---
@@ -142,17 +142,24 @@ CURRENT_BLOCK=$BLOCK_BUILD
# We always build with Hive because the PySpark Spark SQL tests need it.
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2952#discussion_r19653295
--- Diff: docs/mllib-feature-extraction.md ---
@@ -162,6 +162,24 @@ for((synonym, cosineSimilarity) - synonyms) {
}
{% endhighlight %}
/div
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2998#issuecomment-61222708
@OopsOutOfMemory thank you working on this, it will be nice if we have
those functions. I have some comments on it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2952#discussion_r19653338
--- Diff: examples/src/main/python/mllib/word2vec.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2919#issuecomment-61222747
[Test build #22599 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22599/consoleFull)
for PR 2919 at commit
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2607#issuecomment-61222744
True, it's a good point about LR. OK, let's keep them with caveats, but
hopefully run some tests to make sure they seem to be working. I'll make a
pass tomorrow
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3026#issuecomment-61222814
Hey @tdas I did a first pass on this. This makes sense to me overall and
seems like a straightforward next step in the design. I had a few comments
about naming. The
Github user zhzhan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2685#issuecomment-61222998
whew, finally.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3026#discussion_r19653425
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/scheduler/ReceivedBlockTracker.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,207 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2919#issuecomment-61223274
[Test build #22599 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22599/consoleFull)
for PR 2919 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2919#issuecomment-61223276
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3032#issuecomment-61223601
[Test build #22600 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22600/consoleFull)
for PR 3032 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/855#issuecomment-61223905
[Test build #22601 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22601/consoleFull)
for PR 855 at commit
Github user scwf commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2685#discussion_r19653726
--- Diff: dev/run-tests ---
@@ -142,17 +142,24 @@ CURRENT_BLOCK=$BLOCK_BUILD
# We always build with Hive because the PySpark Spark SQL tests need it.
Github user tnachen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2126#issuecomment-61224117
@jongyoul are you planning to rebase this or?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user scwf commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2685#discussion_r19653776
--- Diff: dev/run-tests ---
@@ -142,17 +142,24 @@ CURRENT_BLOCK=$BLOCK_BUILD
# We always build with Hive because the PySpark Spark SQL tests need it.
Github user scwf commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2685#discussion_r19653777
--- Diff: dev/run-tests ---
@@ -142,17 +142,24 @@ CURRENT_BLOCK=$BLOCK_BUILD
# We always build with Hive because the PySpark Spark SQL tests need it.
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3026#discussion_r19653884
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/scheduler/ReceivedBlockTracker.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,207 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3026#discussion_r19653881
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/scheduler/ReceivedBlockTracker.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,207 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3026#discussion_r19653892
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/scheduler/ReceivedBlockTracker.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,207 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2991#issuecomment-61224754
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2991#issuecomment-61224748
[Test build #22595 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22595/consoleFull)
for PR 2991 at commit
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3026#discussion_r19653928
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/scheduler/ReceivedBlockTracker.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,207 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2685#issuecomment-61224765
[Test build #22602 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22602/consoleFull)
for PR 2685 at commit
Github user OopsOutOfMemory commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2998#discussion_r19653967
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringOperations.scala
---
@@ -92,6 +92,29 @@ trait
Github user OopsOutOfMemory commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2998#discussion_r19653994
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringOperations.scala
---
@@ -134,10 +157,51 @@ case class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3032#issuecomment-61225060
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3032#issuecomment-61225058
[Test build #22594 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22594/consoleFull)
for PR 3032 at commit
Github user scwf commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2475#discussion_r19654020
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/ddl.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user OopsOutOfMemory commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2998#discussion_r19654021
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringOperations.scala
---
@@ -134,10 +157,51 @@ case class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2607#issuecomment-61225506
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2607#issuecomment-61225502
[Test build #22596 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22596/consoleFull)
for PR 2607 at commit
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3007#issuecomment-61225734
Thanks, merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user OopsOutOfMemory commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2998#discussion_r19654215
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringOperations.scala
---
@@ -134,10 +157,51 @@ case class
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3031#issuecomment-61225803
Jenkins, this is ok to test.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3033
Display the executor ID in the Web UI when ExecutorLostFailure happens
Now when ExecutorLostFailure happens, it only displays `ExecutorLostFailure
(executor lost)`. Adding the executor id will help
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3007
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3031#issuecomment-61226262
[Test build #22604 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22604/consoleFull)
for PR 3031 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3033#issuecomment-61226259
[Test build #22603 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22603/consoleFull)
for PR 3033 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3031#issuecomment-61226351
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3031#issuecomment-61226349
[Test build #22604 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22604/consoleFull)
for PR 3031 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2983#issuecomment-61226735
[Test build #22605 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22605/consoleFull)
for PR 2983 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2685#discussion_r19654494
--- Diff: dev/run-tests ---
@@ -142,17 +142,24 @@ CURRENT_BLOCK=$BLOCK_BUILD
# We always build with Hive because the PySpark Spark SQL tests need it.
Github user scwf commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2475#discussion_r19654557
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/interfaces.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+/*
+* Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user scwf commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2475#discussion_r19654586
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/interfaces.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+/*
+* Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2998#issuecomment-61227165
[Test build #22606 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22606/consoleFull)
for PR 2998 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2685#issuecomment-61227318
@zhzhan Had a glance of the Kryo issue you pointed out should be related to
the POM inconsistency problem I mentioned above, but I'm not sure whether they
are
Github user scwf commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2475#discussion_r19654727
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/json/JSONRelation.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user OopsOutOfMemory commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2998#issuecomment-61227669
@chenghao-intel thanks for your review and comment :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3032#issuecomment-61227899
[Test build #22600 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22600/consoleFull)
for PR 3032 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3032#issuecomment-61227902
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/855#issuecomment-61228046
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/855#issuecomment-61228040
[Test build #22601 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22601/consoleFull)
for PR 855 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2475#issuecomment-61228389
Encountered compilation error while compiling locally (with a clean
checkout `./sbt/sbt -Phive,hadoop-2.3 compil`):
```
[error]
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2475#issuecomment-61228429
Oh, I see, the last Jenkins build success was actually for the commit right
before the last one.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2952#issuecomment-61228643
[Test build #22598 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22598/consoleFull)
for PR 2952 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2952#issuecomment-61228648
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2998#issuecomment-61230479
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2998#issuecomment-61230476
[Test build #22606 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22606/consoleFull)
for PR 2998 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3033#issuecomment-61230972
[Test build #22603 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22603/consoleFull)
for PR 3033 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3033#issuecomment-61230978
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2685#issuecomment-61231536
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2685#issuecomment-61231533
[Test build #22602 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22602/consoleFull)
for PR 2685 at commit
GitHub user jongyoul opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3034
SPARK-3223 runAsSparkUser cannot change HDFS write permission properly i...
...n mesos cluster mode
- change master newer
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2983#issuecomment-61232397
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2983#issuecomment-61232391
[Test build #22605 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22605/consoleFull)
for PR 2983 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3034#issuecomment-61232535
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user jongyoul commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3034#issuecomment-61232560
@mateiz @tgravescs @tnachen @andrewor14 @timothysc I fix the older master
issue from getting new forking sources. Test is again please.
---
If your project is set up
Github user jongyoul commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3034#issuecomment-61232627
This is a new version of PR #2126 .
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user jongyoul commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2126#issuecomment-61232689
@tnachen I fix this issue.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2814#issuecomment-61233478
Hm, that's weird since I thought I ran the test against the default Hadoop,
and that's 1.0.4. Which test failed? (I'll go look around jenkins too)
I can't find
Github user freeman-lab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2942#issuecomment-61234517
@mengxr I implemented the new parameterization (and tried to make the docs
on it more intuitive), see what you think!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2942#issuecomment-61234935
[Test build #22607 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22607/consoleFull)
for PR 2942 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2475#discussion_r19657566
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/ddl.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
GitHub user liyezhang556520 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3035
[SPARK-4168][WebUI] web statges number should show correctly when stages
are more than 1000
The number of completed stages and failed stages showed on webUI will
always be less than 1000.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3035#issuecomment-61238619
[Test build #22608 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22608/consoleFull)
for PR 3035 at commit
GitHub user numbnut opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3036
[Core] Locale dependent code
For me the core tests failed because there are two locale dependent parts
in the code.
Look at the Jira ticket for details.
Why is it necessary to check
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3036#issuecomment-61239351
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2475#discussion_r19658936
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/interfaces.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+/*
+* Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2475#discussion_r19659305
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/interfaces.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+/*
+* Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3036#discussion_r19659505
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -1683,7 +1683,7 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
def
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3036#discussion_r19659592
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/util/UtilsSuite.scala ---
@@ -103,14 +105,16 @@ class UtilsSuite extends FunSuite {
val hour = minute *
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2475#discussion_r19659626
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/interfaces.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+/*
+* Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2475#discussion_r19659690
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/interfaces.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+/*
+* Licensed to the Apache Software
1 - 100 of 578 matches
Mail list logo
