Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4774#issuecomment-77434500
I think this change actually introduces binary incompatability even though
you have only added optional args. It may be source compatible.
---
If your project is set up
Github user leahmcguire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4087#issuecomment-77435497
I made all the inline fixes and integrated the model type fix. If you can
provide me with a bit more guidance on the save/load I am happy to do it.
---
If your
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4904#issuecomment-77436434
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4087#issuecomment-77439573
[Test build #28306 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28306/consoleFull)
for PR 4087 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4087#issuecomment-77439367
[Test build #28306 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28306/consoleFull)
for PR 4087 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4903#issuecomment-77439543
@nchammas It's not related; this is concerned with cases where links in the
web UI use internal addresses rather than the public addresses configured
through the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/731#issuecomment-77430389
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user codedeft closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/840
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4087#issuecomment-77439577
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4918#issuecomment-77443873
[Test build #28307 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28307/consoleFull)
for PR 4918 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4087#issuecomment-77435746
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4904#issuecomment-77437439
[Test build #28305 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28305/consoleFull)
for PR 4904 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4087#issuecomment-77438045
[Test build #28303 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28303/consoleFull)
for PR 4087 at commit
GitHub user marmbrus opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4918
[SPARK-6145][SQL] fix ORDER BY on nested fields
Based on #4904 with style errors fixed.
`LogicalPlan#resolve` will not only produce `Attribute`, but also
`GetField` chain.
So in
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4912
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4087#issuecomment-77435740
[Test build #28304 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28304/consoleFull)
for PR 4087 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4087#issuecomment-77435559
[Test build #28304 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28304/consoleFull)
for PR 4087 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4904#issuecomment-77437661
[Test build #28305 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28305/consoleFull)
for PR 4904 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4903
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user dwmclary commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4774#issuecomment-77436963
OK, thanks Sean, that was my reading of it too.
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Sean Owen notificati...@github.com wrote:
I think this change actually
Github user nchammas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4903#issuecomment-77438026
Does this PR relate at all to #4038, which tries to fix `spark-ec2`
clusters launched into a private VPC with no public IPs?
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4863
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4087#issuecomment-77438052
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4903#issuecomment-77439058
LGTM, feel free to merge
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4904#issuecomment-77437670
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4863#issuecomment-77437985
Merged into master:)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4904#issuecomment-77443846
Since I'd really like to include this in the next RC, I've opened #4918
with the style error fixed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user dwmclary commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4774#issuecomment-77433149
I'm not really sure what to do about this MiMa error. Suggestions?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4903#issuecomment-77440487
I ran some manual tests, too, using
```scala
SPARK_PUBLIC_DNS=helloworld ./bin/spark-shell --master
local-cluster[2,2,512]
```
and verified
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4920
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4688#discussion_r25914094
--- Diff: yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/Client.scala ---
@@ -540,6 +565,28 @@ private[spark] class Client(
amContainer
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4920#issuecomment-77468665
[Test build #28317 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28317/consoleFull)
for PR 4920 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4087#issuecomment-77468934
[Test build #28316 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28316/consoleFull)
for PR 4087 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4688#issuecomment-77468922
[Test build #28314 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28314/consoleFull)
for PR 4688 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4688#discussion_r25911554
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkHadoopUtil.scala
---
@@ -40,7 +40,8 @@ import scala.collection.JavaConversions._
*/
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4688#discussion_r25911695
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkHadoopUtil.scala
---
@@ -122,6 +126,14 @@ class SparkHadoopUtil extends Logging {
}
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4688#discussion_r25913541
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -234,9 +236,14 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4688#issuecomment-77477310
[Test build #28318 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28318/consoleFull)
for PR 4688 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4688#discussion_r25913696
--- Diff: yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/Client.scala ---
@@ -215,8 +223,10 @@ private[spark] class Client(
// and add them as local
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4688#discussion_r25914185
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnSparkHadoopUtil.scala ---
@@ -17,15 +17,23 @@
package org.apache.spark.deploy.yarn
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4688#discussion_r25914223
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnSparkHadoopUtil.scala ---
@@ -17,15 +17,23 @@
package org.apache.spark.deploy.yarn
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4688#discussion_r25914682
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnSparkHadoopUtil.scala ---
@@ -82,6 +102,180 @@ class YarnSparkHadoopUtil extends
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4688#discussion_r25914669
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnSparkHadoopUtil.scala ---
@@ -82,6 +102,180 @@ class YarnSparkHadoopUtil extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4920#issuecomment-77479829
[Test build #28317 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28317/consoleFull)
for PR 4920 at commit
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4915#issuecomment-77482210
@kazk1018 We try to avoid using static `train` methods, which are hard to
maintain. Please use setters and `run` instead. Do you mind closing this PR?
---
If your
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4920#issuecomment-77469474
lgtm
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4688#discussion_r25911853
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmit.scala ---
@@ -372,6 +372,8 @@ object SparkSubmit {
OptionAssigner(args.files,
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4688#discussion_r25911813
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmitArguments.scala ---
@@ -410,6 +412,14 @@ private[spark] class SparkSubmitArguments(args:
Github user harishreedharan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4688#discussion_r25913763
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmit.scala ---
@@ -372,6 +372,8 @@ object SparkSubmit {
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4688#discussion_r25914375
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnSparkHadoopUtil.scala ---
@@ -43,6 +51,18 @@ import org.apache.spark.util.Utils
*/
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4688#discussion_r25914285
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnSparkHadoopUtil.scala ---
@@ -43,6 +51,18 @@ import org.apache.spark.util.Utils
*/
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4688#discussion_r25914519
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnSparkHadoopUtil.scala ---
@@ -82,6 +102,180 @@ class YarnSparkHadoopUtil extends
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4688#discussion_r25914836
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnSparkHadoopUtil.scala ---
@@ -82,6 +102,180 @@ class YarnSparkHadoopUtil extends
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4688#discussion_r25914874
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnSparkHadoopUtil.scala ---
@@ -82,6 +102,180 @@ class YarnSparkHadoopUtil extends
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4688#discussion_r25914735
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnSparkHadoopUtil.scala ---
@@ -82,6 +102,180 @@ class YarnSparkHadoopUtil extends
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4688#discussion_r25915171
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnSparkHadoopUtil.scala ---
@@ -82,6 +102,180 @@ class YarnSparkHadoopUtil extends
GitHub user marmbrus opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4920
[SQL] Make Strategies a public developer API
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/marmbrus/spark openStrategies
Alternatively you
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4896
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4918
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4688#discussion_r25913566
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ApplicationMaster.scala ---
@@ -256,6 +256,7 @@ private[spark] class ApplicationMaster(
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4688#discussion_r25913622
--- Diff: yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/Client.scala ---
@@ -61,12 +64,15 @@ private[spark] class Client(
private val
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4688#discussion_r25913605
--- Diff: yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/Client.scala ---
@@ -17,12 +17,15 @@
package org.apache.spark.deploy.yarn
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4688#discussion_r25914473
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnSparkHadoopUtil.scala ---
@@ -82,6 +102,180 @@ class YarnSparkHadoopUtil extends
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4688#discussion_r25914706
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnSparkHadoopUtil.scala ---
@@ -82,6 +102,180 @@ class YarnSparkHadoopUtil extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4920#issuecomment-77479836
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4688#discussion_r25915081
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnSparkHadoopUtil.scala ---
@@ -82,6 +102,180 @@ class YarnSparkHadoopUtil extends
Github user jackylk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4917#discussion_r25915980
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/graphx/LiveJournalPageRank.scala
---
@@ -17,11 +17,6 @@
package
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4911#issuecomment-77482527
@yanboliang The model import/export is designed to cross languages. If we
save a model in Scala, it should be loadable in Python. This help us lower the
maintenance cost.
GitHub user vanzin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4921
[core] [minor] Don't pollute source directory when running UtilsSuite.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/vanzin/spark utils-suite
GitHub user nchammas opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4922
[SPARK-6193] [EC2] Push group filter up to EC2
When looking for a cluster, spark-ec2 currently pulls down [info for all
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4918#discussion_r25918626
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -1049,4 +1049,14 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends QueryTest with
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4588#discussion_r25919873
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rpc/RpcEnv.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,378 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
Github user hhbyyh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4899#issuecomment-77491892
@srowen @jkbradley Thanks for review.
I'm not sure about that `coalesce` always introduce shuffle, given its
signature is
`def coalesce(numPartitions: Int,
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4588#discussion_r25920703
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rpc/RpcEnv.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,378 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
Github user haoyuan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4867#issuecomment-77493071
Ok to test.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user CodingCat commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4588#discussion_r25922492
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/rpc/akka/AkkaRpcEnvSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4692#issuecomment-77513338
@marmbrus, @liancheng May you take a look of this pr? It should be
straightforward. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4588#issuecomment-77514027
[Test build #28329 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28329/consoleFull)
for PR 4588 at commit
Github user uncleGen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4135#issuecomment-77514182
@pwendell Could you please take a look again, thank you!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4588#discussion_r25928143
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rpc/RpcEnv.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,378 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under
GitHub user trystanleftwich opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4928
[SPARK-6196][build]Add MAPR 4.0.2 support to the build
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/AtScaleInc/spark master
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4928#issuecomment-77515114
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4588#issuecomment-77515162
[Test build #28330 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28330/consoleFull)
for PR 4588 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4688#issuecomment-77468930
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4087#issuecomment-77468944
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4688#discussion_r25911896
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/CoarseGrainedExecutorBackend.scala
---
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
package org.apache.spark.executor
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4688#discussion_r25913894
--- Diff: yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/Client.scala ---
@@ -540,6 +565,28 @@ private[spark] class Client(
amContainer
}
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4688#discussion_r25913913
--- Diff: yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/Client.scala ---
@@ -540,6 +565,28 @@ private[spark] class Client(
amContainer
}
Github user harishreedharan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4688#discussion_r25916219
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnSparkHadoopUtil.scala ---
@@ -82,6 +102,180 @@ class YarnSparkHadoopUtil extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4917#issuecomment-77482300
[Test build #28319 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28319/consoleFull)
for PR 4917 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4921#issuecomment-77485707
[Test build #28320 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28320/consoleFull)
for PR 4921 at commit
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4918#discussion_r25918187
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -1049,4 +1049,14 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends QueryTest with
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4922#issuecomment-77486987
[Test build #28321 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28321/consoleFull)
for PR 4922 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4688#issuecomment-77486982
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4688#issuecomment-77486977
[Test build #28318 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28318/consoleFull)
for PR 4688 at commit
Github user nchammas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4922#issuecomment-77487835
cc @shivaram
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4917#issuecomment-77491411
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user kazk1018 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4915#issuecomment-77492665
@mengxr OK, thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4892#discussion_r25920561
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/LogicalPlan.scala
---
@@ -192,14 +193,17 @@ abstract class LogicalPlan
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4588#discussion_r25920586
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rpc/RpcEnv.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,378 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under
1 - 100 of 384 matches
Mail list logo
