Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7412#issuecomment-121852061
[Test build #37466 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37466/consoleFull)
for PR 7412 at commit
[`b07e20c`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7432#issuecomment-121852055
[Test build #37465 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37465/consoleFull)
for PR 7432 at commit
[`222a10b`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7432#issuecomment-121851930
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7412#issuecomment-121851944
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7412#issuecomment-121851933
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7432#issuecomment-121851939
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user MechCoder commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6948#discussion_r34759954
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDAModel.scala ---
@@ -184,6 +199,82 @@ class LocalLDAModel private[clustering] (
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7434#discussion_r34759969
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/generators.scala
---
@@ -40,13 +40,14 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.types._
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7434#discussion_r34759923
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregates.scala
---
@@ -20,17 +20,21 @@ package org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.e
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7434#discussion_r34759850
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/LogicalPlan.scala
---
@@ -277,15 +276,21 @@ abstract class LogicalPlan extends
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7434#discussion_r34759860
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/LogicalPlan.scala
---
@@ -277,15 +276,21 @@ abstract class LogicalPlan extends
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7434#discussion_r34759808
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/unresolved.scala
---
@@ -96,7 +95,7 @@ case class UnresolvedFunction(name: String,
Github user MechCoder commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6948#discussion_r34759686
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDAModel.scala ---
@@ -184,6 +199,82 @@ class LocalLDAModel private[clustering] (
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6112#issuecomment-121849815
@GeorgeDittmar I will try to fix it and send you a PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user sun-rui commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7356#issuecomment-121848726
@viirya,
1. Why pass the lower bound and upper bound in a vector instead of pass
separately? They are passed separately in Scala API. and A vector can not hold
compl
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7356
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7343
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7418#issuecomment-121846610
[Test build #37464 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37464/consoleFull)
for PR 7418 at commit
[`b8e274e`](https://gith
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7353#issuecomment-121846456
LGTM, just some minor comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7343#issuecomment-121846486
LGTM. I am merging it to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7353#discussion_r34759205
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtils.scala
---
@@ -180,4 +182,202 @@ object DateTimeUtils {
val nan
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7418#issuecomment-121846231
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7353#discussion_r34759109
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtils.scala
---
@@ -180,4 +182,202 @@ object DateTimeUtils {
val nan
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7418#issuecomment-121846213
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7353#discussion_r34758993
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtils.scala
---
@@ -180,4 +182,202 @@ object DateTimeUtils {
val nan
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7353#discussion_r34758673
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtilsSuite.scala
---
@@ -86,4 +88,198 @@ class DateTimeUtilsSuite extends Spa
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7356#issuecomment-121844789
Thanks @viirya -- LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6394#discussion_r34758587
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -872,6 +872,25 @@ class DAGScheduler(
// will be posted, which s
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7356#issuecomment-121844520
[Test build #37463 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37463/console)
for PR 7356 at commit
[`7f51b44`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7356#issuecomment-121844558
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7115#issuecomment-121844421
@HuJiayin you need to rebase the code.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7418#issuecomment-121843409
[Test build #37461 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37461/console)
for PR 7418 at commit
[`12d3794`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7418#issuecomment-121843429
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7356#issuecomment-121843303
[Test build #37463 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37463/consoleFull)
for PR 7356 at commit
[`7f51b44`](https://gith
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7294#issuecomment-121842954
@jkbradley I made one pass:
1. Some of my comments also apply to the old implementation. So I don't
think it is necessary to address them in this PR.
2. It is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7356#issuecomment-121842704
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7356#issuecomment-121842697
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7294#discussion_r34757704
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/impl/RandomForest.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,1131 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundati
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7294#discussion_r34757701
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/impl/RandomForest.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,1131 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundati
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7294#discussion_r34757708
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/impl/RandomForest.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,1131 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundati
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7294#discussion_r34757721
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/impl/RandomForest.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,1131 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundati
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7279#issuecomment-121840805
[Test build #1081 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1081/consoleFull)
for PR 7279 at commit
[`a92657d`](https://git
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6394#discussion_r34757572
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ExecutorAllocationClient.scala ---
@@ -24,11 +24,15 @@ package org.apache.spark
private[spark] trait Exe
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7279#issuecomment-121840800
[Test build #1080 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1080/consoleFull)
for PR 7279 at commit
[`a92657d`](https://git
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7279#issuecomment-121840775
[Test build #1079 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1079/consoleFull)
for PR 7279 at commit
[`a92657d`](https://git
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7434#discussion_r34757444
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/LogicalPlan.scala
---
@@ -277,15 +276,21 @@ abstract class LogicalPlan ex
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7434#discussion_r34757450
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/LogicalPlan.scala
---
@@ -277,15 +276,21 @@ abstract class LogicalPlan ex
Github user manishamde commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7294#issuecomment-121840575
@jkbradley It looks good to me. It might be a good idea to run the
spark.mllib and spark.ml models on a couple of datasets to ensure there are no
regressions (in accu
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7434#discussion_r34757416
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/unresolved.scala
---
@@ -96,7 +95,7 @@ case class UnresolvedFunction(name: Str
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6394#discussion_r34757342
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -872,6 +872,25 @@ class DAGScheduler(
// will be posted, whi
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7434#discussion_r34757289
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ object ConstantFolding extends Rule[L
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7434#issuecomment-121840217
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7434#discussion_r34757259
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/generators.scala
---
@@ -40,13 +40,14 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.types.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7434#issuecomment-121840141
[Test build #37458 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37458/console)
for PR 7434 at commit
[`9e8a4de`](https://github.
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7434#discussion_r34757251
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/generators.scala
---
@@ -40,13 +40,14 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.types.
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7434#discussion_r34757208
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregates.scala
---
@@ -20,17 +20,21 @@ package org.apache.spark.sql.catal
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6394#discussion_r34757199
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -872,6 +872,25 @@ class DAGScheduler(
// will be posted, which s
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6638#issuecomment-121839582
[Test build #37462 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37462/consoleFull)
for PR 6638 at commit
[`4ab11b7`](https://gith
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7189#issuecomment-121839736
Thank you all for reviewing the code for me, but I think there would be
more general way to solve this, closing it for now.
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user chenghao-intel closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7189
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6638#issuecomment-121838429
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6638#issuecomment-121838423
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7385#issuecomment-121838283
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7385#issuecomment-121838243
**[Test build #37442 timed
out](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37442/console)**
for PR 7385 at commit
[`c6fdc21`](https://github
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7334#issuecomment-121838166
@JoshRosen ,seems `execution.CollectLimit` will eventually invoke the code
like (in SparkPlan.executeTake):
```scala
sc.runJob(childRDD, (it: Iterator[Inte
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7420
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7420#issuecomment-121834153
LGTM - @marmbrus and I can't really think of why anymore we needed it -
maybe we don't need it anymore. Going to merge this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you c
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7412#issuecomment-121834064
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does n
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7336#issuecomment-121834098
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7336#issuecomment-121834028
[Test build #37459 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37459/console)
for PR 7336 at commit
[`b5ada0a`](https://github.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7412#issuecomment-121833931
[Test build #37452 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37452/console)
for PR 7412 at commit
[`095aa3a`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7379#issuecomment-121833017
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7379#issuecomment-121832849
[Test build #37456 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37456/console)
for PR 7379 at commit
[`8204eae`](https://github.
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7420#discussion_r34756205
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/HiveTypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -747,15 +742,9 @@ object HiveTypeCoercion {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7353#issuecomment-121830731
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6394#discussion_r34756031
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -872,6 +872,25 @@ class DAGScheduler(
// will be posted, which s
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7353#issuecomment-121830665
[Test build #37454 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37454/console)
for PR 7353 at commit
[`ca1ae69`](https://github.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6638#issuecomment-121827741
[Test build #25 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SlowSparkPullRequestBuilder/25/console)
for PR 6638 at commit
[`2ee0488`](https://github.co
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6638#issuecomment-121827751
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7418#issuecomment-121827685
[Test build #37461 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37461/consoleFull)
for PR 7418 at commit
[`12d3794`](https://gith
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7034
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7418#issuecomment-121827618
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7418#issuecomment-121827606
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7034#issuecomment-121827562
Thanks - merging this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7396#issuecomment-121827555
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7396#issuecomment-121827505
[Test build #37441 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37441/console)
for PR 7396 at commit
[`f122f10`](https://github.
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7415#discussion_r34755425
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/util/StopwatchSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundatio
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6948#issuecomment-121827311
@MechCoder If you want to manually inspect the Parquet files, reading them
back in using Spark SQL is probably the easiest way. You could also save them
instead as JS
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6638#issuecomment-121827335
[Test build #37451 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37451/console)
for PR 6638 at commit
[`2ee0488`](https://github.
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6948#discussion_r34755380
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDASuite.scala ---
@@ -213,6 +214,46 @@ class LDASuite extends SparkFunSuite with
MLlibTes
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6638#issuecomment-121827344
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6948#discussion_r34755377
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDAModel.scala ---
@@ -354,4 +445,140 @@ class DistributedLDAModel private (
// TODO
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6948#discussion_r34755357
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDAModel.scala ---
@@ -184,6 +199,82 @@ class LocalLDAModel private[clustering] (
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6948#discussion_r34755364
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDAModel.scala ---
@@ -184,6 +199,82 @@ class LocalLDAModel private[clustering] (
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6948#discussion_r34755378
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDAModel.scala ---
@@ -354,4 +445,140 @@ class DistributedLDAModel private (
// TODO
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6948#discussion_r34755376
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDAModel.scala ---
@@ -354,4 +445,140 @@ class DistributedLDAModel private (
// TODO
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6948#discussion_r34755369
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDAModel.scala ---
@@ -184,6 +199,82 @@ class LocalLDAModel private[clustering] (
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6948#discussion_r34755375
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDAModel.scala ---
@@ -354,4 +445,140 @@ class DistributedLDAModel private (
// TODO
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6948#discussion_r34755379
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDAModel.scala ---
@@ -354,4 +445,140 @@ class DistributedLDAModel private (
// TODO
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6948#discussion_r34755372
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDAModel.scala ---
@@ -354,4 +445,140 @@ class DistributedLDAModel private (
// TODO
1 - 100 of 1255 matches
Mail list logo
