Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13378
**[Test build #61364 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61364/consoleFull)**
for PR 13378 at commit
[`5472fb9`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13906
**[Test build #61363 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61363/consoleFull)**
for PR 13906 at commit
[`c06ae60`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13931
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13931
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61360/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13931
**[Test build #61360 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61360/consoleFull)**
for PR 13931 at commit
[`793afb9`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
**[Test build #61362 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61362/consoleFull)**
for PR 13680 at commit
[`9c113aa`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13758
**[Test build #61361 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61361/consoleFull)**
for PR 13758 at commit
[`280d97e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user hhbyyh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13940
LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feat
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13906#discussion_r68703430
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/CollapseEmptyPlanSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
+/*
+ * Licen
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13858
I had an outstanding comment from the previous PR too:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13857#discussion_r68134544
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13930#discussion_r68702737
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveSessionCatalog.scala ---
@@ -174,6 +175,18 @@ private[sql] class HiveSessionCatalog(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13940
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
GitHub user zlpmichelle opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13940
[SPARK-16241] [ML] model loading backward compatibility for ml NaiveBayes
#16241
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
model loading backward compatibility for ml NaiveBa
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13903
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13903
Merging in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13930#discussion_r68702096
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveSessionCatalog.scala ---
@@ -174,6 +175,18 @@ private[sql] class HiveSessionCatalog(
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13906
Anyway, thank you for review again, @rxin !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13938
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13938
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61355/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13938
**[Test build #61355 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61355/consoleFull)**
for PR 13938 at commit
[`7455a49`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13906#discussion_r68701978
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -1053,6 +1055,41 @@ object PruneFilters extends R
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13906#discussion_r68701768
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -1053,6 +1055,41 @@ object PruneFilters extends Rule[Logic
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13906#discussion_r68701793
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/CollapseEmptyPlanSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
+/*
+ * Licen
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13931
**[Test build #61360 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61360/consoleFull)**
for PR 13931 at commit
[`793afb9`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13906#discussion_r68701620
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/CollapseEmptyPlanSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to th
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13906
Hi, @rxin .
I just remembered this PR while looking your whitelist PR. :)
Any advice for this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13806
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61356/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13939
**[Test build #61358 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61358/consoleFull)**
for PR 13939 at commit
[`ef5db42`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11863
**[Test build #61359 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61359/consoleFull)**
for PR 11863 at commit
[`db95290`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13939#discussion_r68701105
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveSessionCatalog.scala ---
@@ -221,4 +214,18 @@ private[sql] class HiveSessionCatalog(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13806
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user mengxr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13921
I think the error was because this PR left `predict`, `write.ml`, etc
documented without title. So this PR has to be combined with SPARK-16144.
Basically, let us add some doc to the function declarat
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13806
**[Test build #61356 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61356/consoleFull)**
for PR 13806 at commit
[`5ade5a2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13930#discussion_r68700984
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveSessionCatalog.scala ---
@@ -174,6 +175,18 @@ private[sql] class HiveSessionCatalog(
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13939#discussion_r68700956
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveSessionCatalog.scala ---
@@ -162,17 +162,6 @@ private[sql] class HiveSessionCatalog(
}
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13939
[SPARK-16248][SQL] Whitelist the list of Hive fallback functions - WIP
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
## How wa
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13937
**[Test build #61351 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61351/consoleFull)**
for PR 13937 at commit
[`ce04e08`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13806
**[Test build #61357 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61357/consoleFull)**
for PR 13806 at commit
[`5ade5a2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13937
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61351/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13937
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13930#discussion_r68700695
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveSessionCatalog.scala ---
@@ -174,6 +175,18 @@ private[sql] class HiveSessionCatalog(
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13930#discussion_r68700636
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveSessionCatalog.scala ---
@@ -174,6 +175,18 @@ private[sql] class HiveSessionCatalog(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13806
**[Test build #61356 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61356/consoleFull)**
for PR 13806 at commit
[`5ade5a2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13806
Again, I think the error message is not related with this change. I will
retest this and meanwhile try to build in my local.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email an
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13806
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes s
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13938
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13938
LGTM - merging in master/2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wis
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13938
**[Test build #61355 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61355/consoleFull)**
for PR 13938 at commit
[`7455a49`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9183
I think @yanboliang just need to push this forward and get people to review
it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13930#discussion_r68700193
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveSessionCatalog.scala ---
@@ -174,6 +175,18 @@ private[sql] class HiveSessionCatalog(
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13839
LGTM pending tests.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13930#discussion_r68700137
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveSessionCatalog.scala ---
@@ -174,6 +175,18 @@ private[sql] class HiveSessionCatalog(
// x
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13930#discussion_r68700034
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveSessionCatalog.scala ---
@@ -174,6 +175,18 @@ private[sql] class HiveSessionCatalog(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13937
**[Test build #61349 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61349/consoleFull)**
for PR 13937 at commit
[`5246bcf`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13839
**[Test build #61354 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61354/consoleFull)**
for PR 13839 at commit
[`b170741`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13930#discussion_r68699881
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveSessionCatalog.scala ---
@@ -174,6 +175,18 @@ private[sql] class HiveSessionCatalog(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13937
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61349/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user pkch commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9183
What needs to happen to move this forward? This was a PR that would have
been the first iteration of a significant improvement in handling of wide
datasets.
---
If your project is set up for it, you c
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13937
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
GitHub user yhuai opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13938
[SPARK-15863][SQL][DOC][FOLLOW-UP] Update SQL programming guide.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR makes several updates to SQL programming guide.
You can merge this pul
Github user hhbyyh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13937
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the featur
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13933
LGTM -- cc @tdas to take a look since he wrote the original patch.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does n
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13806
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61353/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13806
**[Test build #61353 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61353/consoleFull)**
for PR 13806 at commit
[`5ade5a2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13806
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13517#discussion_r68699390
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -435,6 +434,37 @@ class SparkSqlAstBuilder(conf: SQLConf) ext
Github user hhbyyh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13936
Just saw @yanboliang opened a jira for this too. I'll close the PR and
resolve the jira.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as wel
Github user hhbyyh closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13936
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13517#discussion_r68699131
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/antlr4/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/SqlBase.g4 ---
@@ -45,11 +45,11 @@ statement
| ALTER DATABASE identif
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13806
**[Test build #61353 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61353/consoleFull)**
for PR 13806 at commit
[`5ade5a2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13806
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes s
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13933
cc @rxin The code is ready for review. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13806
Hm... am I doing something wrong here?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13517#discussion_r68698738
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/antlr4/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/SqlBase.g4 ---
@@ -252,6 +252,21 @@ tablePropertyKey
| STRING
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13806
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61352/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13806
**[Test build #61352 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61352/consoleFull)**
for PR 13806 at commit
[`5ade5a2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13806
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13918
Yea it's good to have this in branch-2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enab
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13806
**[Test build #61352 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61352/consoleFull)**
for PR 13806 at commit
[`5ade5a2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13806
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes s
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13918
Thank you for merging, @liancheng ! :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featur
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13914
Thank you for merging, @rxin .
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enable
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13918
Thanks, merged to master.
@rxin Shall we have this in branch-2.0 at this stage?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as w
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13915
@mengxr 's idea sounds good to me, too.
May I update this PR, @rxin ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If you
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13918
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13937
**[Test build #61351 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61351/consoleFull)**
for PR 13937 at commit
[`ce04e08`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13914
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13517
cc @hvanhovell for this one
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13806
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61337/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13806
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13806
**[Test build #61337 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61337/consoleFull)**
for PR 13806 at commit
[`5ade5a2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13937
**[Test build #61350 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61350/consoleFull)**
for PR 13937 at commit
[`8be63d5`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13930#discussion_r68697699
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveSessionCatalog.scala ---
@@ -174,6 +175,18 @@ private[sql] class HiveSessionCatalog(
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13914
Merging in master/2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13915
yea I think you can argue this should be discouraged but not necessarily
justify banning.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as wel
Github user hqzizania commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13891
@mengxr this is a simple imitation of the loop in `computeFactors[ID]()`
ALS using. It runs on a bare-metal node with 4 cores. All tests use all cores
by RDD multi-partitions.
---
If your proje
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13806
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13806
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61336/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13937#discussion_r68697383
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/PCA.scala ---
@@ -206,24 +206,21 @@ object PCAModel extends MLReadable[PCAModel] {
over
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13806
**[Test build #61336 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61336/consoleFull)**
for PR 13806 at commit
[`2a55091`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
1 - 100 of 625 matches
Mail list logo
