Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14625
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64174/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14625
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14625
**[Test build #64174 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64174/consoleFull)**
for PR 14625 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14155
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14744
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14744
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64172/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14737
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14737
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64173/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14744
**[Test build #64172 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64172/consoleFull)**
for PR 14744 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14737
**[Test build #64173 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64173/consoleFull)**
for PR 14737 at commit
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14744
@vanzin Could you help review this ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14155
LGTM. There are two things that we need to address in follow-up prs. The
first one is if we can consolidate location in CatalogStorageFormat and `path`
in options. The second one is to read the conf
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14744
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14744
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64171/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14744
**[Test build #64171 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64171/consoleFull)**
for PR 14744 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14743
@shivaram Thanks for cc me. I will verify it within today.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14745
**[Test build #64178 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64178/consoleFull)**
for PR 14745 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14155#discussion_r75617761
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveExternalCatalog.scala ---
@@ -200,22 +375,77 @@ private[spark] class
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14745
[SPARK-16896][SQL] Handle duplicated field names in header consistently
with null or empty strings in CSV
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, CSV datasource
Github user gatorsmile closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13837
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user gatorsmile closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13142
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user gatorsmile closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13128
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user gatorsmile closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13122
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user gatorsmile closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11298
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14521
**[Test build #64177 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64177/consoleFull)**
for PR 14521 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14531
**[Test build #64176 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64176/consoleFull)**
for PR 14531 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14572
**[Test build #64175 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64175/consoleFull)**
for PR 14572 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14521
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14572
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14531
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14692#discussion_r75615959
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -584,15 +584,18 @@ class CodegenContext {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14625
**[Test build #64174 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64174/consoleFull)**
for PR 14625 at commit
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14547
TBH, I'm not certain after having read many of those papers exactly what
constitutes "TreeBoost". From the following excerpt, it seems to me like
TreeBoost is simply defined by making terminal node
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14743
@HyukjinKwon can you test this on Windows ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user sprite311 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7927
i have this problem in spark1.3.0, is there any other solutions? i can't
update spark to 1.6
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14743
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64170/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14743
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14737
**[Test build #64173 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64173/consoleFull)**
for PR 14737 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14743
**[Test build #64170 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64170/consoleFull)**
for PR 14743 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14723#discussion_r75613875
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/AggregateWithObjectAggregateBufferSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14723#discussion_r75613743
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/SortBasedAggregationIterator.scala
---
@@ -90,6 +98,21 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14744
**[Test build #64172 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64172/consoleFull)**
for PR 14744 at commit
Github user mpjlu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14597#discussion_r75613576
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/ChiSqSelector.scala ---
@@ -189,11 +228,35 @@ class ChiSqSelector @Since("1.3.0") (
*/
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14723#discussion_r75613492
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/interfaces.scala
---
@@ -389,3 +389,89 @@ abstract class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14723#discussion_r75613439
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/interfaces.scala
---
@@ -389,3 +389,89 @@ abstract class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14723#discussion_r75613381
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/interfaces.scala
---
@@ -389,3 +389,89 @@ abstract class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14744
**[Test build #64171 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64171/consoleFull)**
for PR 14744 at commit
GitHub user zjffdu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14744
[SPARKR][SPARKSUBMIT] Allow to set sparkr shell command through --conf
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Allow user to set sparkr shell command through --conf
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14743
**[Test build #64170 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64170/consoleFull)**
for PR 14743 at commit
Github user clockfly commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14723#discussion_r75612665
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/interfaces.scala
---
@@ -389,3 +389,89 @@ abstract class
GitHub user junyangq opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14743
[SparkR][Minor] Fix Cache Folder Path in Windows
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR tries to fix the scheme of local cache folder in Windows. The name
of the
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14723#discussion_r75612644
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/interfaces.scala
---
@@ -389,3 +389,89 @@ abstract class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14723#discussion_r75612521
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/interfaces.scala
---
@@ -389,3 +389,89 @@ abstract class
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14712
Great! Will review the new changes when it is ready. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user NarineK commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14431
Made a pull request for grouping columns: #14742
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user NarineK commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14742
cc: @shivaram, @liancheng
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user hqzizania commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14738
Thanks for sethan's comments :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14712
@gatorsmile yes, we will support it in this pr
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user mpjlu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14597#discussion_r75610472
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/ChiSqSelector.scala ---
@@ -189,11 +228,35 @@ class ChiSqSelector @Since("1.3.0") (
*/
Github user watermen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14426
Do this PR support multiple JOINs(`SELECT * FROM t1 JOIN t2 ON t1.key =
t2.key JOIN t3 ON t1.key = t3.key`)?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14712
What is our CBO plan for data source tables? Is it implemented in the
prototype? It is not mentioned in the design doc. If we want to support
`InMemoryCatalog`, we need to provide the support
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14729
@hvanhovell In the current master branch, if we want to support In-Memory
cataloged tables, we need to support data source tables. You know,
`SimpleCatalogRelation` is converted to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14742
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14742
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64169/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14742
**[Test build #64169 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64169/consoleFull)**
for PR 14742 at commit
Github user eyalfa commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1
@hvanhovell, are you suggesting a complete removal of CreateStruct?
this can definitely simplify this PR, but it'd still leave the issue I've
described at the end of my previous comment, one can
Github user eyalfa commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1
@cloud-fan , I know this has been idle for few weeks now but I'd like to
push it forward.
I've merged master into it, which eliminated the discussion about
ast-builder and inline-tables (thanks
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10896#discussion_r75604121
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/AggUtils.scala
---
@@ -27,26 +27,87 @@ import
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10896#discussion_r75603963
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/AggUtils.scala
---
@@ -27,26 +27,87 @@ import
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10896#discussion_r75603936
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/AggUtils.scala
---
@@ -27,26 +27,87 @@ import
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1
@eyalfa we don't need to maintain backwards compatibility for
`CreateStruct`, and we can create a factory function for row creator. So I
would just remove both `Create*Struct` classes.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14742
**[Test build #64169 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64169/consoleFull)**
for PR 14742 at commit
GitHub user NarineK opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14742
[SPARK-17177][SQL] Make grouping columns accessible from
`RelationalGroupedDataset`
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, once we create
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10896#discussion_r75603826
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/PlannerSuite.scala ---
@@ -37,36 +37,58 @@ class PlannerSuite extends SharedSQLContext {
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10896#discussion_r75603771
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/exchange/EnsureRequirements.scala
---
@@ -151,18 +152,39 @@ case class
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10896#discussion_r75603363
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/SortAggregateExec.scala
---
@@ -121,3 +121,6 @@ case class SortAggregateExec(
Github user krishnakalyan3 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14741
@shivaram I am not sure on how to go about the retry method. Could you
please share some example that I could refer to?.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14741
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user krishnakalyan3 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14741
[SPARK-6832][SPARKR][WIP]Handle partial reads in SparkR
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Handle partial reads in SparkR by implementing a retry method in R that
will
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14712#discussion_r75603123
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/LogicalRelation.scala
---
@@ -72,9 +72,12 @@ case class LogicalRelation(
Github user markhamstra commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14737#discussion_r75602737
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/SparkUI.scala ---
@@ -141,6 +141,7 @@ private[spark] object SparkUI {
val DEFAULT_POOL_NAME =
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14689
Thank you for review and merging, @hvanhovell !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user markhamstra commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14737#discussion_r75602575
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/scope/RDDOperationGraph.scala ---
@@ -119,18 +119,47 @@ private[ui] object RDDOperationGraph extends
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14689
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14689
LGTM - merging this master/2.0. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14712#discussion_r75602017
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/LogicalRelation.scala
---
@@ -72,9 +72,12 @@ case class LogicalRelation(
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14712#discussion_r75601984
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/MetastoreRelation.scala ---
@@ -141,7 +142,16 @@ private[hive] case class MetastoreRelation(
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14722
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14720#discussion_r75601795
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -865,6 +865,16 @@ class HiveQuerySuite extends
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14720#discussion_r75601779
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/HiveClientImpl.scala
---
@@ -87,6 +88,9 @@ private[hive] class HiveClientImpl(
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14738
@srowen https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14717 Implemented a change to
add a parameter to linear/logistic regression which allows users to control the
aggregation depth on `treeAggregate` when
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14705
I cherry-picked this PR into `branch-2.0` in
https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0297896119e11f23da4b14f62f50ec72b5fac57f
-- The merge was a little awkward and but I think I got it to work
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14700
LGTM. @srowen how do you feel about this one?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14729
@gatorsmile shouldn't we do this the other way around? And enable `Analyze
Table` for any table? That is the only way CBO can be used anywhere.
Temporary tables might be a bit more
Github user junyangq commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14735#discussion_r75599753
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_mllib.R ---
@@ -95,6 +95,10 @@ test_that("spark.glm summary", {
expect_equal(stats$df.residual,
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14740
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user mengxr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14740
Merged into branch-2.0 and master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user junyangq commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14740
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14740
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64168/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14740
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
1 - 100 of 185 matches
Mail list logo
