Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16719
LGTM except one comment. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user lw-lin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16731
@rxin @hvanhovell could you take a look, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16719#discussion_r98347203
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Canonicalize.scala
---
@@ -78,14 +78,18 @@ object Canonicalize extends {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16719
**[Test build #72123 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72123/testReport)**
for PR 16719 at commit
Github user lw-lin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16719#discussion_r98346999
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ExpressionSetSuite.scala
---
@@ -32,6 +32,38 @@ class ExpressionSetSuite
Github user lw-lin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16719#discussion_r98346981
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ExpressionSetSuite.scala
---
@@ -32,6 +32,38 @@ class ExpressionSetSuite
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16719#discussion_r98346741
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ExpressionSetSuite.scala
---
@@ -32,6 +32,38 @@ class ExpressionSetSuite
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16719#discussion_r98346688
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ExpressionSetSuite.scala
---
@@ -32,6 +32,38 @@ class ExpressionSetSuite
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16575
**[Test build #72122 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72122/testReport)**
for PR 16575 at commit
Github user lw-lin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16719#discussion_r98346453
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ExpressionSetSuite.scala
---
@@ -32,6 +32,38 @@ class ExpressionSetSuite
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16575
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16710
**[Test build #72121 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72121/testReport)**
for PR 16710 at commit
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16710#discussion_r98346290
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/subquery/exists-subquery/exists-basic.sql
---
@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
+-- Tests EXISTS subquery
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16733
**[Test build #72120 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72120/testReport)**
for PR 16733 at commit
GitHub user maropu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16733
[SPARK-19392][SQL] Fix the bug that throws an exception when using numeric
types in Oracle JDBC
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In OracleDialect, if you use Numeric types in
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16719#discussion_r98346104
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Canonicalize.scala
---
@@ -78,14 +78,18 @@ object Canonicalize extends {
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16719#discussion_r98346062
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ExpressionSetSuite.scala
---
@@ -32,6 +32,38 @@ class ExpressionSetSuite
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16719#discussion_r98346066
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ExpressionSetSuite.scala
---
@@ -32,6 +32,38 @@ class ExpressionSetSuite
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16719#discussion_r98345869
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Canonicalize.scala
---
@@ -78,14 +78,18 @@ object Canonicalize extends {
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16719#discussion_r98345847
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Canonicalize.scala
---
@@ -78,14 +78,18 @@ object Canonicalize extends {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16732
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user uzadude opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16732
[SPARK-19368][MLlib] BlockMatrix.toIndexedRowMatrix() optimization for
sparse matrices
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Optimization [SPARK-12869] was made for dense
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16710#discussion_r98345474
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/subquery/exists-subquery/exists-basic.sql
---
@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
+-- Tests EXISTS subquery
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16724
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72119/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16724
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16724
**[Test build #72119 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72119/testReport)**
for PR 16724 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16710
Could you update the PR descriptions? Currently, it does not correctly
describe the cases you added.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16712
What is the part-2 for scalar subquery test cases?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16712#discussion_r98345077
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/subquery/scalar-subquery/scalar-subquery-select.sql
---
@@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
+-- A test suite
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16712#discussion_r98345076
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/subquery/scalar-subquery/scalar-subquery-select.sql
---
@@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
+-- A test suite
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16712#discussion_r98345044
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/subquery/scalar-subquery/scalar-subquery-select.sql
---
@@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
+-- A test suite
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16710
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16731
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72118/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16731
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16731
**[Test build #72118 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72118/testReport)**
for PR 16731 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16693
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16693
Thanks! Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16731
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16731
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72117/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16731
**[Test build #72117 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72117/testReport)**
for PR 16731 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16724
**[Test build #72119 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72119/testReport)**
for PR 16724 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16724
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16724
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72116/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16724
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16724
**[Test build #72116 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72116/testReport)**
for PR 16724 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16731
**[Test build #72118 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72118/testReport)**
for PR 16731 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16731
**[Test build #72117 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72117/testReport)**
for PR 16731 at commit
GitHub user lw-lin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16731
[WIP][SPARK-][SQL] Add `approx_percentile` Dataframe API
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
## How was this patch
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16724
**[Test build #72116 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72116/testReport)**
for PR 16724 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14702
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72115/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14702
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14702
**[Test build #72115 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72115/testReport)**
for PR 14702 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15279
@ethanluoyc this seems reasonable although I'm not 100% how this go yet.
`wordcount.py` in the yml file - does it mean 1 yml for all examples? I think
perhaps we need a way for the example to
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729#discussion_r98341289
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/r/GeneralizedLinearRegressionWrapper.scala
---
@@ -143,7 +150,12 @@ private[r] object
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14702
**[Test build #72115 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72115/testReport)**
for PR 14702 at commit
Github user tejasapatil commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14702
Jenkins retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729#discussion_r98341193
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_mllib_regression.R ---
@@ -77,6 +77,18 @@ test_that("spark.glm and predict", {
out <-
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16730
thanks, i'd be great if you could add some tests for this - perhaps just to
check the correct type and/or a subset of values
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16730
@actuaryzhang since this changes the output, could you open a JIRA for this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729#discussion_r98341050
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/r/GeneralizedLinearRegressionWrapper.scala
---
@@ -81,15 +83,20 @@ private[r] object
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729#discussion_r98341028
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_mllib_regression.R ---
@@ -77,6 +77,18 @@ test_that("spark.glm and predict", {
out <-
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729#discussion_r98341000
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib_regression.R ---
@@ -109,7 +125,8 @@ setMethod("spark.glm", signature(data =
"SparkDataFrame", formula = "formula"),
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729#discussion_r98340946
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib_regression.R ---
@@ -84,6 +84,12 @@ setClass("IsotonicRegressionModel", representation(jobj
= "jobj"))
#' # can also read
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729
I did look into this... I think it's great if `statmod` is there and we
support it, but I'm concerned that we can't enable this `tweedie` family
without an external dependency and the fact that
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729#discussion_r98340892
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_mllib_regression.R ---
@@ -77,6 +77,18 @@ test_that("spark.glm and predict", {
out <-
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729#discussion_r98340879
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib_regression.R ---
@@ -84,6 +84,12 @@ setClass("IsotonicRegressionModel", representation(jobj
= "jobj"))
#' # can also read
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729#discussion_r98340835
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_mllib_regression.R ---
@@ -77,6 +77,18 @@ test_that("spark.glm and predict", {
out <-
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72114/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729
**[Test build #72114 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72114/testReport)**
for PR 16729 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16730
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72113/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16730
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16730
**[Test build #72113 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72113/testReport)**
for PR 16730 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16700
Just revert it. Let us wait for the decision how we plan to deal with the
file renaming. My major concern is the errors in file renaming could cause the
data loss, unless we can introduce a
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16728
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16728
Mergint to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729
**[Test build #72114 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72114/testReport)**
for PR 16729 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16730
**[Test build #72113 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72113/testReport)**
for PR 16730 at commit
GitHub user actuaryzhang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16730
[Minor][SparkR]Convert coefficients in summary to matrix
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The `coefficients` component in model summary should be 'matrix' but the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16728
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72110/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16728
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16728
**[Test build #72110 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72110/testReport)**
for PR 16728 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72112/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729
**[Test build #72112 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72112/testReport)**
for PR 16729 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729
**[Test build #72112 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72112/testReport)**
for PR 16729 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729
**[Test build #72111 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72111/testReport)**
for PR 16729 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72111/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729
**[Test build #72111 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72111/testReport)**
for PR 16729 at commit
GitHub user actuaryzhang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729
[SPARK-19391][SparkR][ML] Tweedie GLM API for SparkR
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Port Tweedie GLM #16344 to SparkR
@felixcheung @yanboliang
##
Github user mortada commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15053
@HyukjinKwon my apologies for not having been able to follow up on this. I
still think this doc improvement would be very helpful to pyspark users. Would
you like to take over the PR?
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16728
**[Test build #72110 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72110/testReport)**
for PR 16728 at commit
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16728
[SPARK-19359][SQL] Revert Clear useless path after rename a partition with
upper-case by HiveExternalCatalog
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is to revert
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16726
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72108/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16726
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16726
**[Test build #72108 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72108/testReport)**
for PR 16726 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16693
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16693
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72109/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16693
**[Test build #72109 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72109/testReport)**
for PR 16693 at commit
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
