Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19811#discussion_r156874375
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -154,6 +154,44 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19892
**[Test build #84898 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84898/testReport)**
for PR 19892 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19811#discussion_r156874146
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -154,6 +154,44 @@ class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19811#discussion_r156874184
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -154,6 +154,44 @@ class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19811#discussion_r156874096
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -154,6 +154,44 @@ class
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19892
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19925
shall we move these new interfaces to
`org.apache.spark.sql.sources.v2.reader/write.streaming` package?
---
-
To unsubscribe,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19811
**[Test build #84897 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84897/testReport)**
for PR 19811 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19925#discussion_r156872558
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/v2/writer/ContinuousWriter.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19925#discussion_r156872002
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/v2/reader/MicroBatchReader.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19925#discussion_r156871819
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/v2/reader/MicroBatchReader.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19925#discussion_r156871677
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/v2/reader/ContinuousReader.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19925#discussion_r156871374
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/v2/reader/ContinuousDataReader.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19925#discussion_r156870726
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/v2/MicroBatchWriteSupport.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19811
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19811
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84895/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19811
**[Test build #84895 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84895/testReport)**
for PR 19811 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19975
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19975
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84893/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19975
**[Test build #84893 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84893/testReport)**
for PR 19975 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19972
LGTM
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19865#discussion_r156868316
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -217,6 +217,18 @@ class CodegenContext {
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19970
retest this pease
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19975
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19975
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84892/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19975
**[Test build #84892 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84892/testReport)**
for PR 19975 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19865#discussion_r156866988
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -842,7 +856,10 @@ class CodegenContext {
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19865#discussion_r156866827
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -217,6 +217,18 @@ class CodegenContext {
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19865#discussion_r156866697
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -217,6 +217,18 @@ class CodegenContext {
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19813
> Probably, we'd better to move this discussion to the jira?
I summary it and also post the design doc link to the jira.
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19974
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19974
Thanks! Merged to master.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19974
LGTM
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19813
> can we have a google doc so that we can leave comments inline? thanks!
Sure. The google doc is at
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14151
**[Test build #84896 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84896/testReport)**
for PR 14151 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19925
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19974#discussion_r156863889
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConfSuite.scala ---
@@ -280,4 +280,34 @@ class SQLConfSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19925
Thanks! Merging to master to unblock #19926. If there are more comments, we
can address them in #19926.
---
-
To unsubscribe,
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19865#discussion_r156863124
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -217,6 +217,18 @@ class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19974
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84890/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19974
**[Test build #84890 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84890/testReport)**
for PR 19974 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19974
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19865#discussion_r156862608
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -217,6 +217,18 @@ class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19970
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84891/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19970
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19970
**[Test build #84891 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84891/testReport)**
for PR 19970 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19971#discussion_r156861190
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/TPCDSQuerySuite.scala ---
@@ -348,13 +351,38 @@ class TPCDSQuerySuite extends QueryTest with
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19971#discussion_r156860978
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/TPCDSQuerySuite.scala ---
@@ -348,13 +351,38 @@ class TPCDSQuerySuite extends QueryTest with
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19594#discussion_r156861642
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/JoinEstimation.scala
---
@@ -191,8 +191,16 @@ case
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19811#discussion_r156860058
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -179,11 +209,64 @@ class CodegenContext {
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19813
Probably, we'd better to move this discussion to the jira?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19813
can we have a google doc so that we can leave comments inline? thanks!
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19971
**[Test build #84894 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84894/testReport)**
for PR 19971 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19811
**[Test build #84895 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84895/testReport)**
for PR 19811 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19811
Just resolved conflicts. Next commit will address review comments.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user gczsjdy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19862
cc @cloud-fan @hvanhovell @viirya
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19813
I wrote a design doc at
https://paper.dropbox.com/doc/Split-deeply-nested-expressions-under-wholestage-codegen-WXkQ9iIlN3zkGdn8MHgiW
The design is based on what did in this PR.
Github user sitalkedia commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19955
@ericvandenbergfb - In the testing section, let's put the benchmark numbers
for large shuffle heavy jobs we ran internally.
---
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19955
and also what's the behavior if the memory is used up but
`spark.shuffle.async.num.sorter` is not hit yet?
---
-
To
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19955
shall we do it for all the external sorters?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19955
cc @JoshRosen @jiangxb1987
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17619
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19020
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19020
Merged into master, thanks for all your reviewing.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19020#discussion_r156856635
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/LinearRegression.scala ---
@@ -480,10 +640,14 @@ object LinearRegression extends
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19811#discussion_r156855675
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -179,11 +209,64 @@ class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19811#discussion_r156853851
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -205,18 +287,35 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19975
**[Test build #84893 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84893/testReport)**
for PR 19975 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19811#discussion_r156853203
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -179,11 +209,64 @@ class CodegenContext {
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19811#discussion_r156852077
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -179,11 +209,64 @@ class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19811#discussion_r156851936
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -179,11 +209,64 @@ class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19811#discussion_r156851771
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -179,11 +209,64 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19975
**[Test build #84892 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84892/testReport)**
for PR 19975 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19811#discussion_r156851696
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -179,11 +209,64 @@ class
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19975
[SPARK-22781][SS] Support creating streaming dataset with ORC files
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR supports creating streaming dataset with ORC file
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19970
**[Test build #84891 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84891/testReport)**
for PR 19970 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19972
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84888/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19972
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19972
**[Test build #84888 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84888/testReport)**
for PR 19972 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19813
I'm not sure, it depends on how many places we already doing it and what's
the drawback if we forbid it. Let's have a design doc and gather more feedbacks.
Thanks for your understanding!
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19864#discussion_r156847927
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/CacheManager.scala ---
@@ -80,6 +80,14 @@ class CacheManager extends Logging {
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19594#discussion_r156847785
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/JoinEstimation.scala
---
@@ -191,8 +191,16 @@ case class
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19813
@cloud-fan Do you think we should still allow something like `a + 1` as the
output of codegen?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19594#discussion_r156847046
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/EstimationUtils.scala
---
@@ -114,4 +115,183 @@ object
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19594#discussion_r156846872
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/EstimationUtils.scala
---
@@ -114,4 +115,183 @@ object
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19813
Also needs to revert #19969 which is based on this.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19813
@cloud-fan Ok. Thanks.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19813
After some more thoughts, this PR makes a new contract that Spark doesn't
promise before: `Expression.genCode` must output something that can be used as
parameter name or literal.
I do
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19955
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84889/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19955
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19955
**[Test build #84889 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84889/testReport)**
for PR 19955 at commit
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19970#discussion_r156843445
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/ColumnVector.java
---
@@ -145,39 +135,39 @@
public abstract double[]
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19974
**[Test build #84890 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84890/testReport)**
for PR 19974 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19751
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84885/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19751
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19751
**[Test build #84885 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84885/testReport)**
for PR 19751 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19974
@rxin I believe this is what you were trying to do?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
GitHub user vanzin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19974
[SPARK-22779][sql] Resolve default values for fallback configs.
SQLConf allows some callers to define a custom default value for
configs, and that complicates a little bit the handling of
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19971
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19971
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84886/
Test PASSed.
---
1 - 100 of 597 matches
Mail list logo
