Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9120#issuecomment-149651576
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9120#issuecomment-149651536
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9120#issuecomment-149659771
**[Test build #1932 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1932/consoleFull)**
for PR 9120 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9120#issuecomment-149657290
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9120#discussion_r42531738
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/planning/patterns.scala
---
@@ -171,17 +171,25 @@ object ExtractEquiJoinKeys extends
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9120#discussion_r42531676
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -850,6 +851,15 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends QueryTest with
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9120#issuecomment-149657293
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9120
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9120#issuecomment-149691519
**[Test build #1932 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1932/consoleFull)**
for PR 9120 at commit
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9120#discussion_r42433852
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/planning/patterns.scala
---
@@ -171,17 +171,25 @@ object ExtractEquiJoinKeys extends
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9120#discussion_r42434348
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/InnerJoinSuite.scala
---
@@ -212,4 +212,20 @@ class InnerJoinSuite extends
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9120#discussion_r42435364
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -850,6 +851,15 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends QueryTest with
SharedSQLContext
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9120#issuecomment-149365386
Two small comments, otherwise LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9120#issuecomment-148825207
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9120#issuecomment-148825286
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9120#issuecomment-148826611
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9120#issuecomment-148827457
[Test build #43853 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43853/consoleFull)
for PR 9120 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9120#issuecomment-148830759
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9120#issuecomment-148830754
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9120#issuecomment-148826592
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9120#issuecomment-148857675
[Test build #43853 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43853/console)
for PR 9120 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9120#issuecomment-148857832
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9120#issuecomment-148857830
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9120#issuecomment-148184825
[Test build #43732 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43732/consoleFull)
for PR 9120 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9120#issuecomment-148185559
Can we add a test that tests the query plan explicitly?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9120#discussion_r42049885
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/planning/patterns.scala
---
@@ -171,17 +172,24 @@ object ExtractEquiJoinKeys extends
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9120#discussion_r42048273
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/planning/patterns.scala
---
@@ -171,17 +172,24 @@ object ExtractEquiJoinKeys extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9120#issuecomment-148194950
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9120#issuecomment-148194787
[Test build #43732 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43732/console)
for PR 9120 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9120#issuecomment-148182961
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9120#issuecomment-148182936
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9120#issuecomment-148194947
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user davies opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9120
[SPARK-1] [SQL] fast null-safe join
Currently, we use CartesianProduct for join with null-safe-equal condition.
```
scala> sqlContext.sql("select * from t a join t b on (a.i <=>
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9120#issuecomment-148218151
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9120#issuecomment-148218181
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9120#issuecomment-148219916
[Test build #43745 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43745/consoleFull)
for PR 9120 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9120#issuecomment-148242727
[Test build #43745 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43745/console)
for PR 9120 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9120#issuecomment-148242828
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9120#issuecomment-148242827
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
39 matches
Mail list logo
