Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9529#issuecomment-154564660
**[Test build #45261 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45261/consoleFull)**
for PR 9529 at commit
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9256#discussion_r44197538
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/StateSpec.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,181 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9480#issuecomment-154570059
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9530#issuecomment-154574543
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9409#discussion_r44198806
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/conditionalExpressions.scala
---
@@ -419,3 +419,30 @@ case class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9409#issuecomment-154574551
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9409#discussion_r44198887
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/conditionalExpressions.scala
---
@@ -419,3 +419,30 @@ case class
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9530#issuecomment-154575961
/cc @rxin @zsxwing
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9480#discussion_r44201615
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Expression.scala
---
@@ -151,6 +164,30 @@ abstract class Expression extends
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9480#discussion_r44201576
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Expression.scala
---
@@ -151,6 +164,30 @@ abstract class Expression extends
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9480#discussion_r44202414
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Expression.scala
---
@@ -135,6 +147,7 @@ abstract class Expression extends
Github user yu-iskw commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8643#issuecomment-154585403
@jkbradley @davies could you review it? I modified the type conversion
using `SerDe.dumps`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9488#issuecomment-154585601
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9532#issuecomment-154585515
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9532#issuecomment-154585547
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user nilmeier commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8563#issuecomment-154591819
I'll look through this, thank you. I usually follow the style guide
conventions while running the scripts, but I have missed some of the other
conventions.â
GitHub user marmbrus opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9533
[HOTFIX] Fix python tests after #9527
#9527 missed updating the python tests.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/marmbrus/spark
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9385#issuecomment-154594596
Thanks for your contribution, but I'm tempted to not make this change
unless there is actually a bug. We are eliminating the subqueries because they
will impact
Github user gliptak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9532#issuecomment-154594465
The error message displayed seems to have no relation to the pull request
change ...
The compile does fail with:
[error]
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9534#issuecomment-154597554
**[Test build #45276 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45276/consoleFull)**
for PR 9534 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9531#issuecomment-154597482
**[Test build #45269 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45269/consoleFull)**
for PR 9531 at commit
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9480#discussion_r44205755
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Expression.scala
---
@@ -151,6 +164,30 @@ abstract class Expression
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9531#issuecomment-154597511
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9529#issuecomment-154564850
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9454#issuecomment-154567630
Spark merge script not happy. Maybe a conflict was just introduced?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154567482
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9344#discussion_r44196614
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/memory/MemoryPool.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9523#issuecomment-154575019
LGTM. One day I'd like to see this duplication of command-line arguments
vs. SparkConf entries go away...
Merging to the 3 branches.
---
If your project is set
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9480#discussion_r44200916
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/namedExpressions.scala
---
@@ -203,6 +203,10 @@ case class
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9513#discussion_r44202059
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/LDA.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,740 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9513#discussion_r44202038
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/LDA.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,740 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9480#discussion_r44202061
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/GenerateUnsafeProjection.scala
---
@@ -275,8 +275,9 @@ object
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9406#discussion_r44203475
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/Utils.scala
---
@@ -213,3 +216,178 @@ object Utils {
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9513#discussion_r44203476
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/LDA.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,740 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9513#discussion_r44203542
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/LDA.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,740 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9533
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9256#discussion_r44205619
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/util/StateMap.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,304 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9256#discussion_r44205625
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/util/StateMap.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,304 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154564354
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154564403
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9454#issuecomment-154567840
Nevermind, second time's the charm
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9406#discussion_r44198936
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/Utils.scala
---
@@ -213,3 +216,178 @@ object Utils {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9530#issuecomment-154574561
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9409#issuecomment-154574766
This is great. Only minor comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9409#issuecomment-154574581
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9480#discussion_r44201792
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/EquivalentExpressions.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9344#issuecomment-154583398
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9488#issuecomment-154583314
Build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9513#discussion_r44202262
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/LDA.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,740 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
GitHub user gliptak opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9532
SPARK-11565 Replace deprecated DigestUtils.shaHex call
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/gliptak/spark SPARK-11565
Alternatively
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9531#discussion_r44202704
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrame.scala ---
@@ -1478,18 +1478,54 @@ class DataFrame private[sql](
/**
*
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9480#issuecomment-154586827
**[Test build #45263 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45263/consoleFull)**
for PR 9480 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9480#issuecomment-154586930
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9513#discussion_r44203245
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/LDA.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,740 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9409#discussion_r44203342
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/conditionalExpressions.scala
---
@@ -419,3 +419,30 @@ case class
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9409#discussion_r44203267
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/conditionalExpressions.scala
---
@@ -419,3 +419,30 @@ case class
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9513#discussion_r44203695
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/LDA.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,740 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user feynmanliang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9513#issuecomment-154590891
Made a pass
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9060#issuecomment-154597634
@liancheng I assume you missed this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9488#issuecomment-15459
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9488#issuecomment-154597740
**[Test build #45272 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45272/consoleFull)**
for PR 9488 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9344#issuecomment-154599114
Alright, going to merge this now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7410#issuecomment-154563459
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9454#issuecomment-154567294
I'll merge this with branch-1.6 and master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9527
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9480#issuecomment-154567189
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-154567471
**[Test build #45264 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45264/consoleFull)**
for PR 9524 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9256#discussion_r44198001
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/StateSpec.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,181 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9344#issuecomment-154571410
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9531#issuecomment-154578494
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9380#issuecomment-154579413
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9528#issuecomment-154579447
**[Test build #45253 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45253/consoleFull)**
for PR 9528 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9531#issuecomment-154579300
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9504#issuecomment-154579437
Since the last commit only updated the doc, I will merge this into master
and 1.6 branch, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9531#issuecomment-154579345
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9256#discussion_r44200358
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/util/StateMap.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,304 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9409#issuecomment-154579232
add to whitelist
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9409#issuecomment-154579253
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9531#issuecomment-154579148
**[Test build #45269 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45269/consoleFull)**
for PR 9531 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9488#issuecomment-154583982
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9488#issuecomment-154584002
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7888#discussion_r44201943
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -88,7 +88,8 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
val
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7888#discussion_r44201957
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -88,7 +88,8 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
val
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9513#discussion_r44202348
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/LDA.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,740 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9513#discussion_r44202796
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/LDA.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,740 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9531#discussion_r44202818
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrame.scala ---
@@ -1478,18 +1478,54 @@ class DataFrame private[sql](
/**
*
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9531#discussion_r44202846
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrame.scala ---
@@ -1478,18 +1478,54 @@ class DataFrame private[sql](
/**
*
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9513#discussion_r44203600
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/LDA.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,740 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9406#discussion_r44203629
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/Utils.scala
---
@@ -213,3 +216,178 @@ object Utils {
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9406#discussion_r44203639
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/Utils.scala
---
@@ -213,3 +216,178 @@ object Utils {
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9480#issuecomment-154590257
**[Test build #1999 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1999/consoleFull)**
for PR 9480 at commit
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9380#issuecomment-154593369
Even though its simple, I think this implementation is boxing the result,
which could result in slower performance on real workloads (but is harder to
see in micro
Github user jerryshao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9523#issuecomment-154598834
@tgravescs , sorry for missing this parameter `--num-workers`. I suppose
user will not directly invoke yarn client through `spark-class`. Also from
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9535#issuecomment-154602302
**[Test build #45277 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45277/consoleFull)**
for PR 9535 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9344#issuecomment-154568105
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9344#issuecomment-154568133
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9344#issuecomment-154568018
LGTM, pending on tests.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9454
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9256#discussion_r44197569
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/StateSpec.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,181 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9480#issuecomment-154570265
**[Test build #1999 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1999/consoleFull)**
for PR 9480 at commit
1 - 100 of 727 matches
Mail list logo
