Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14634
If users want to use the `DataFrameWriter`'s `insertInto` API for
partitioned Hive table, they have to set `hive.exec.dynamic.partition` to
`true` and `hive.exec.dynamic.partition.mode` to
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14613
**[Test build #63775 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63775/consoleFull)**
for PR 14613 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14634
Sorry, let me rephrase the potential issue.
- `insertInto` API forces users to set `hive.exec.dynamic.partition` to
`true` and `hive.exec.dynamic.partition.mode` to `nonstrict`. This
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14643
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63774/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14643
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14643
**[Test build #63774 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63774/consoleFull)**
for PR 14643 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14613
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63775/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14644
**[Test build #63777 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63777/consoleFull)**
for PR 14644 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14613
**[Test build #63775 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63775/consoleFull)**
for PR 14613 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14613
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14520#discussion_r74725756
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -932,11 +935,15 @@ class BinaryLogisticRegressionSummary
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14645
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14520
@WeichenXu123 would you mind updating the title of the JIRA and PR, as well
as the description, to reflect the fact that this is not actually affecting
serialization, but more to update the approach
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14620#discussion_r74725943
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/ParserUtilsSuite.scala
---
@@ -61,5 +88,39 @@ class ParserUtilsSuite extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14644
**[Test build #63776 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63776/consoleFull)**
for PR 14644 at commit
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14520#discussion_r74726107
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -1071,24 +1074,23 @@ private class LogisticCostFun(
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13796#discussion_r74726485
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -930,10 +942,8 @@ class BinaryLogisticRegressionSummary
Github user junyangq commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14558#discussion_r74727208
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -602,14 +599,14 @@ setMethod("spark.survreg", signature(data =
"SparkDataFrame", formula = "formula
# Returns a
Github user junyangq commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14558#discussion_r74728822
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/generics.R ---
@@ -1277,8 +1384,11 @@ setGeneric("spark.naiveBayes", function(data,
formula, ...) { standardGeneric("s
#'
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14520
**[Test build #63778 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63778/consoleFull)**
for PR 14520 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14520
**[Test build #63778 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63778/consoleFull)**
for PR 14520 at commit
Github user junyangq commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14558#discussion_r74729028
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/generics.R ---
@@ -1251,10 +1311,57 @@ setGeneric("year", function(x) {
standardGeneric("year") })
#' @export
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14520
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11956
@davies could you please review this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14520
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63778/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14520
**[Test build #63779 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63779/consoleFull)**
for PR 14520 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14634
1. `hadoopConf` contains all the confs from SQL conf, see
`SessionState.newHadoopConf`
2. users can change `hadoopConf` at runtime.
3. the default value is from hive, I'm ok to not follow
Github user junyangq commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14558#discussion_r74728351
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -142,15 +143,6 @@ setMethod("spark.glm", signature(data =
"SparkDataFrame", formula = "formula"),
#' Generalized
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14645#discussion_r74730995
--- Diff: docs/quick-start.md ---
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ RDDs have _[actions](programming-guide.html#actions)_,
which return values, and
{% highlight
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14643#discussion_r74732778
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/ProbabilisticClassifier.scala
---
@@ -201,11 +201,18 @@ abstract class
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14633#discussion_r74732910
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -303,7 +303,7 @@ class LogisticRegression @Since("1.2.0")
Github user linbojin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14645#discussion_r74733368
--- Diff: docs/quick-start.md ---
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ RDDs have _[actions](programming-guide.html#actions)_,
which return values, and
{% highlight
Github user skonto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157
@srowen could you merge this pls?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14520
**[Test build #63779 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63779/consoleFull)**
for PR 14520 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157
Merged to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14633
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user linbojin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14645#discussion_r74737989
--- Diff: docs/quick-start.md ---
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ RDDs have _[actions](programming-guide.html#actions)_,
which return values, and
{% highlight
GitHub user tnachen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14644
Enable GPU support with Mesos
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Enable GPU resources to be used when running coarse grain mode with Mesos.
## How was this
GitHub user linbojin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14645
[MINOR] [DOC] Correct code snippet results in quick start documentation
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
As README.md file is updated over time. Some code snippet
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14642
**[Test build #63773 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63773/consoleFull)**
for PR 14642 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14642
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63773/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14642
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14642
Actually I think it might be able to remove this assert...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13758
@hvanhovell , @cloud-fan , @davies could you please review this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13704
@liancheng would it be possible to review this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
@davies could you please review this again since I addressed comments?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user junyangq commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14558#discussion_r74729338
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -510,9 +510,7 @@ setMethod("registerTempTable",
#'
#' Insert the contents of a SparkDataFrame into a table
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14644
Does Mesos have a general node labeling mechanism like YARN that one could
use to choose machines with a certain property? It seems OK to also support a
Mesos-specific property under spark.mesos.*
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14644
**[Test build #63776 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63776/consoleFull)**
for PR 14644 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14644
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14644
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63776/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14644
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14644
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63777/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14644
**[Test build #63777 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63777/consoleFull)**
for PR 14644 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14520
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14520
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63779/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10808
@skonto you can close this PR now
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14645#discussion_r74735625
--- Diff: docs/quick-start.md ---
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ RDDs have _[actions](programming-guide.html#actions)_,
which return values, and
{% highlight
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14520
@yanboliang are you OK with this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14633
Merged to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user linbojin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14645#discussion_r74737117
--- Diff: docs/quick-start.md ---
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ RDDs have _[actions](programming-guide.html#actions)_,
which return values, and
{% highlight
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14637
Directionally this is looking spot on, thank you. Ping when you want a
review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14645#discussion_r74737211
--- Diff: docs/quick-start.md ---
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ RDDs have _[actions](programming-guide.html#actions)_,
which return values, and
{% highlight
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14279
OK, I'd like to merge this for master if there are no other comments. I'm
waiting more than usual to make sure
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14597#discussion_r74738464
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/ChiSqSelector.scala ---
@@ -197,3 +197,28 @@ class ChiSqSelector @Since("1.3.0") (
new
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14645
Jenkins test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14645#discussion_r74738593
--- Diff: docs/quick-start.md ---
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ RDDs have _[actions](programming-guide.html#actions)_,
which return values, and
{% highlight
Github user mpjlu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14597#discussion_r74740698
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/ChiSqSelector.scala ---
@@ -197,3 +197,28 @@ class ChiSqSelector @Since("1.3.0") (
new
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14551
If we can get that last test failure patched in any reasonable form, I'll
merge
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14597#discussion_r74741127
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/ChiSqSelector.scala ---
@@ -197,3 +197,28 @@ class ChiSqSelector @Since("1.3.0") (
new
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14597#discussion_r74742606
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/ChiSqSelector.scala ---
@@ -197,3 +197,28 @@ class ChiSqSelector @Since("1.3.0") (
new
Github user mpjlu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14597#discussion_r74742525
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/ChiSqSelector.scala ---
@@ -197,3 +197,28 @@ class ChiSqSelector @Since("1.3.0") (
new
Github user mpjlu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14597#discussion_r74743026
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/ChiSqSelector.scala ---
@@ -197,3 +197,28 @@ class ChiSqSelector @Since("1.3.0") (
new
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13758
@kiszk I have the feeling this is not that useful anymore since we are
getting close to committing your work on the UnsafeArrayData. This seems like
it is addressing an edge case. What are the
GitHub user steveloughran opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14646
[SPARK-17058] [build] Add maven snapshots-and-staging profile to build/test
against staging artifacts
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Adds a
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14645
**[Test build #63780 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63780/consoleFull)**
for PR 14645 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14524
**[Test build #63781 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63781/consoleFull)**
for PR 14524 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14646
**[Test build #63782 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63782/consoleFull)**
for PR 14646 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14645
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63780/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14645
**[Test build #63780 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63780/consoleFull)**
for PR 14645 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14645
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14524
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63781/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14524
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14524
**[Test build #63781 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63781/consoleFull)**
for PR 14524 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14520
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14634
uh, I see. Thank you! No more question. : )
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14520
LGTM, merged into master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14647
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user steveloughran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14646
Note that Jenkins, being SBT-based, isn't going to explore the codepath here
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14647
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63783/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14647
**[Test build #63783 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63783/consoleFull)**
for PR 14647 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14643#discussion_r74774476
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/ProbabilisticClassifier.scala
---
@@ -201,11 +201,18 @@ abstract class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14646
**[Test build #63782 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63782/consoleFull)**
for PR 14646 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14646
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14647
**[Test build #63783 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63783/consoleFull)**
for PR 14647 at commit
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14643#discussion_r74767763
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/ProbabilisticClassifier.scala
---
@@ -201,11 +201,18 @@ abstract class
GitHub user witgo opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14647
[WIP][Test only][SPARK-6235]Address various 2G limits
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The main changes.
1. Replace DiskStore method `def getBytes (blockId: BlockId):
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14646
How about adding this to the default set of repos rather than putting it
behind a profile -- does that cause a problem?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14647
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
1 - 100 of 502 matches
Mail list logo
