Ok, so does Hibernate from the Java World, or JPA from Jave EE 3.0
actually do what we want? I suspect it does...
DSL
-
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
from Novell. From the desktop
On Nov 27, 2007 11:21 PM, David Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ron Savage wrote:
> > You mean like SQL::Abstract?
> > http://search.cpan.org/~nwiger/SQL-Abstract-1.22/
>
> I was thinking the same thing...does that not do what the OP wishes it to?
SQL::Abstract is very limited. It doesn't even
Ron,
Ron Savage wrote:
> You mean like SQL::Abstract?
> http://search.cpan.org/~nwiger/SQL-Abstract-1.22/
I was thinking the same thing...does that not do what the OP wishes it to?
DSL
-
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The F
an Davis
> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 2:26 PM
> To: Rose::DB::Object list
> Subject: Re: [RDBO] suggestions for enchancement
>
> On Nov 27, 2007 3:19 PM, Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Nov 27, 2007 2:41 PM, maxim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
On Nov 27, 2007 3:19 PM, Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 27, 2007 2:41 PM, maxim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > its useful when you have XML based framework where your backend is
> > trying to reflect some XML schema and you dont what to remap XML on the DB
> > schema but just us
On Nov 27, 2007 2:41 PM, maxim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> its useful when you have XML based framework where your backend is
> trying to reflect some XML schema and you dont what to remap XML on the DB
> schema but just using it.
If you really want to use XML for your backend storage, I'd sugges
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Perrin Harkins
> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 12:19 PM
> To: rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [RDBO] suggestions for enchancement
>
> On
On Nov 26, 2007 11:39 PM, John Siracusa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I suppose you could simulate it by building
> up Perl data structures suitable for passing in a get_objects() query
> parameter (i.e., value/hashref pairs and so on) but that's not quite
> the same thing.
That's what I've done an
On Nov 27, 2007 9:29 AM, Peter Karman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> fwiw, the DBIC folks have been discussing this very topic lately:
>
> http://lists.scsys.co.uk/pipermail/dbix-class/2007-November/005320.html
I know. I'm on that list too :)
-John
On 11/27/2007 07:32 AM, John Siracusa wrote:
> On Nov 27, 2007, at 12:50 AM, Ron Savage wrote:
>> On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 00:15 -0500, John Siracusa wrote:
>>> I think we need a mutable object representation of SQL first, the the
>> You mean like SQL::Abstract?
>
> No, definitely not like SQL::Abs
On Nov 27, 2007, at 12:50 AM, Ron Savage wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 00:15 -0500, John Siracusa wrote:
>> I think we need a mutable object representation of SQL first, the the
>
> You mean like SQL::Abstract?
No, definitely not like SQL::Abstract :) SQLA provides a very limited
set of featur
On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 00:15 -0500, John Siracusa wrote:
Hi John
> I think we need a mutable object representation of SQL first, the the
You mean like SQL::Abstract?
http://search.cpan.org/~nwiger/SQL-Abstract-1.22/
--
Ron Savage
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://savage.net.au/index.html
-
On Nov 26, 2007, at 5:29 PM, maxim wrote:
It would be nice to have abstraction layer for SQL query itself.
Yeah, no kidding :) I've got ideas for one but so far not enough time to
dedicate to it.
Something like:
my $query = Rose::DB::TableName::Manager->getSelect();
$query->someField->setCond
On Nov 26, 2007, at 5:29 PM, maxim wrote:
> It would be nice to have abstraction layer for SQL query itself.
Yeah, no kidding :) I've got ideas for one but so far not enough time
to dedicate to it.
> Something like:
>
> my $query = Rose::DB::TableName::Manager->getSelect();
> $query->someField
Hi John,
It would be nice to have abstraction layer for SQL query itself.
I've seen that you have QueryBuilder class but its not really cohesive
with Rose::DB::Object paradigm. What I am looking for is row based object
which
knows about allowed fields and operations and therefore can be passed to
15 matches
Mail list logo
