OK, the reorganisation branch now compiles and runs for me. Thanks for
the big chunks of stuff done by Guillaume and Pedro over the last few
days and weeks. Nice of you to leave that one last link error in for
me to fix and give me a sense of accomplishment, Pedro!
Next things to do:
*
On Saturday 04 November 2006 11:18 am, Chris Cannam wrote:
FWIW it seems about the same on this machine -- if all I ask it to do is
relink, it actually does it quicker than in trunk, because of the time
scons spends sitting and thinking before it does any work.
Disregard that last comment.
On Saturday 04 November 2006 10:57 am, D. Michael McIntyre wrote:
Here it is. This is about double the old tree. Not as bad as I was thinking
though.
real13m19.087s
user11m18.548s
sys 0m46.968s
Sequencer does not start with this old problem:
rosegarden (sequence manager):
On Saturday 04 Nov 2006 15:57, D. Michael McIntyre wrote:
I'm more worried about what it's going to be like to work on the
code
So am I, and I agree that we don't know about that yet. Let's find out.
How am I supposed to run this when it's finished? It will complain
about the data files
On Saturday 04 Nov 2006 16:13, D. Michael McIntyre wrote:
Sequencer does not start with this old problem:
rosegarden (sequence manager): ControlBlockMmapper : Couldn't
open /tmp/kde-silvan//rosegarden_control_block
WARNING: Rosegarden::Exception: Couldn't
open
On Saturday 04 November 2006 1:24 pm, Chris Cannam wrote:
How am I supposed to run this when it's finished? It will complain
about the data files being the wrong version. I guess I copy them by
hand, but I can't remember what data files actually need copying.
./rosegardensequencer in
On Saturday 04 November 2006 16:54, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote:
I offer again to try CMake. It works with Qt3/KDE3; it is not necessary to
wait for KDE4.
I thought it was. If that's not the case, then cmake is the only logical
choice.
--
Guillaume.
http://www.telegraph-road.org
On Saturday 04 November 2006 19:24, Chris Cannam wrote:
On Saturday 04 Nov 2006 15:57, D. Michael McIntyre wrote:
I'm more worried about what it's going to be like to work on the
code
So am I, and I agree that we don't know about that yet. Let's find out.
At least from the point of view
On Saturday 04 November 2006 12:51 pm, Guillaume Laurent wrote:
I thought it was. If that's not the case, then cmake is the only logical
choice.
All the tutorials and whatnot are about KDE4, but it looks like there isn't
any reason why it shouldn't work with KDE3.
It looks like it would be
On Saturday 04 November 2006 4:05 pm, D. Michael McIntyre wrote:
we're going to have to do something entirely from scratch, which I haven't
found any good documentation for yet.
OK, I have now, but this looks like way more than I'm good for.
--
D. Michael McIntyre
Author of Rosegarden
On Saturday 04 Nov 2006 21:05, D. Michael McIntyre wrote:
On Saturday 04 November 2006 12:51 pm, Guillaume Laurent wrote:
I thought it was. If that's not the case, then cmake is the only
logical choice.
All the tutorials and whatnot are about KDE4, but it looks like there
isn't any reason
On Saturday 04 Nov 2006 15:07, D. Michael McIntyre wrote:
I have also found a number of broken things in the last release, and
have been trying to sit on them and fix them in the newly reorganized
tree, rather than figuring out how to port the fixes from the old
tree to the new one.
Well,
A few days ago I received a mail from the current maintainer of ktabedit,
which is the resurrection of kguitar
(http://ktabedit.sourceforge.net/wordpress/) offering to work together.
I've had some preliminary talks with him, in order to check what kind of
stuff we could do in common, my idea
On Saturday 04 Nov 2006 22:53, Guillaume Laurent wrote:
[...] that would mean turning it into a kpart
(and moving our editors into kparts as well - something which would
probably be worthwhile, if only for the decrease in resource usage).
Decrease in resource usage? Can you explain?
Aside
On Saturday 04 November 2006 6:28 pm, Chris Cannam wrote:
Well, pure fixes might be better made in both (with the old tree for any
1.4.1 bugfix release). But it doesn't have to be the same person who
ports the fixes across as who makes them in the first place.
Well, there is that. I should
On Sun, 2006-11-05 at 00:35 +0100, Guillaume Laurent wrote:
I don't know, not having yet looked at ktabedit, I have no idea on what we
can
seriously hope to do.
How far does ktabedit/kguitar go in score terms? I know it's got an
excellent GUI for chord management; how sophisticated is
16 matches
Mail list logo
