On the devel list, we're talking about how to make the pitchbend dialog
clearer.
If you use the pitchbend dialog, if the Vibrato wavelength field changed
to cycles per quarter note or hertz, would that be easier or harder
for you to use?
Thanks,
Tom Breton (Tehom)
While I've never used the pitchbend dialog, just off the top of my head,
cycles per quarter note or hertz makes sense. Or even Vibrato
frequency?
On 05/30/2013 07:53 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
On the devel list, we're talking about how to make the pitchbend dialog
clearer.
If you use the
I would vote for the most precise and complete alternative, which, IMO,
is cycles per quarter note - as long as that's a correct description
of the feature, and I'm sure it is. (I've not used the feature, but it
sounds like something I would use if I ever start using Rosegarden
intensively.)
On
On Thu, 30 May 2013 18:23:38 -0500
Jim Cochrane m_l-...@business.jimcochrane.info wrote:
I would vote for the most precise and complete alternative, which,
IMO, is cycles per quarter note - as long as that's a correct
description of the feature, and I'm sure it is. (I've not used the
On Thu, 30 May 2013 18:23:38 -0500
Jim Cochrane m_l-...@business.jimcochrane.info wrote:
I would vote for the most precise and complete alternative, which,
IMO, is cycles per quarter note - as long as that's a correct
description of the feature, and I'm sure it is. (I've not used the
