Re: [Rosegarden-user] Rosegarden and qsynth

2019-11-26 Thread david
On 11/26/19 4:45 PM, Ted Felix wrote: On 11/26/19 5:46 AM, Lorenzo Sutton wrote: I think it *is* also worth mentioning that different CPU 'monitoring' tools provide different results:   Absolutely.  Which is why I mentioned "top" specifically. I prefer htop. I do have a laptop with

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Rosegarden and qsynth

2019-11-26 Thread Ted Felix
On 11/26/19 5:46 AM, Lorenzo Sutton wrote: I think it *is* also worth mentioning that different CPU 'monitoring' tools provide different results: Absolutely. Which is why I mentioned "top" specifically. I do have a laptop with Intel's so-called 'hyperthreading' and was reading that

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Rosegarden and qsynth

2019-11-26 Thread David W. Jones
On November 25, 2019 9:09:22 PM HST, "D. Michael McIntyre" wrote: >On 11/26/19 12:07 AM, Ted Felix wrote: > >> easier to see.  This is how I was able to improve rg performance >> significantly. > >Just to jump in here randomly... Ted, you really impressed me with how > >much you did improve

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Rosegarden and qsynth

2019-11-26 Thread Lorenzo Sutton
I think it *is* also worth mentioning that different CPU 'monitoring' tools provide different results: e.g. here I checked qjackctl's dsp load, top (and variants, atop, htop), and included xfce task manager and the difference especially what top and xfce task manager reported for cpu usage is

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Rosegarden and qsynth

2019-11-26 Thread Will Godfrey
On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 00:07:50 -0500 Ted Felix wrote: >On 11/22/19 6:39 PM, Will Godfrey wrote: >> Exactly what setup have you got there if you don't mind me asking? > > 1st gen Core i3-370M. I'm using "top" to measure CPU usage. > > I go with low spec hardware to make performance issues