On 11/26/19 4:45 PM, Ted Felix wrote:
On 11/26/19 5:46 AM, Lorenzo Sutton wrote:
I think it *is* also worth mentioning that different CPU 'monitoring'
tools provide different results:
Absolutely. Which is why I mentioned "top" specifically.
I prefer htop.
I do have a laptop with Intel's
On 11/26/19 5:46 AM, Lorenzo Sutton wrote:
I think it *is* also worth mentioning that different CPU 'monitoring'
tools provide different results:
Absolutely. Which is why I mentioned "top" specifically.
I do have a laptop with Intel's so-called 'hyperthreading' and was
reading that reading
On November 25, 2019 9:09:22 PM HST, "D. Michael McIntyre"
wrote:
>On 11/26/19 12:07 AM, Ted Felix wrote:
>
>> easier to see. This is how I was able to improve rg performance
>> significantly.
>
>Just to jump in here randomly... Ted, you really impressed me with how
>
>much you did improve p
I think it *is* also worth mentioning that different CPU 'monitoring'
tools provide different results: e.g. here I checked qjackctl's dsp
load, top (and variants, atop, htop), and included xfce task manager and
the difference especially what top and xfce task manager reported for
cpu usage is p
On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 00:07:50 -0500
Ted Felix wrote:
>On 11/22/19 6:39 PM, Will Godfrey wrote:
>> Exactly what setup have you got there if you don't mind me asking?
>
> 1st gen Core i3-370M. I'm using "top" to measure CPU usage.
>
> I go with low spec hardware to make performance issues lik
