I have [at least one
example](https://github.com/ascherer/sgb/blob/local/sgb.spec#L53) where the
conditional macro `%{?with_patches:-p1}` does _not_ produce the expected `-p1`
option correctly.
This occurs with **rpmbuild 4.12** on **Kubuntu 16.04**.
--
You are receiving this because you are
@Conan-Kudo
No. It doesn't work. Same error.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/125#issuecomment-272600896___
Rp
Does doing the following work?
```python
rpm.expandMacro('%define _sourcedir "/home/cqi/my\ package/systemd/"')
```
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/125#is
As the multithreaded (de)compression support for pigz isn't implemented in the
binary, the benefits from aren't really there as it won't be possible to
implement multithreaded (de)compression for using in the rpmio library.
Same goes for pbzip2.
For xz, multithreaded compression support has been
Closed #117.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/117#event-922142667___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.or
I have being enabled the pigz|pbzip2 in foo.spec files (approximately 800+
packages) to decompress .tar.gz|.tar.bz2 files in parallel as following:
**1st step)** for decompressing ./SOURCES/*.tar.gz|bz2 files in parallel (with
alias or with symbolic)
alias tar='tar --use-compress-program=pbzip2
Closed #126.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/126#event-922126663___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.or
@pmatilai , Sorry for the inconvenience caused to you. I will propose the a PR
after finding the complete solution to support xz as well as gzip/bzip2. This
WIP will be closed.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitH
pmatilai commented on this pull request.
rpmlog(RPMLOG_ERR, ...) does not stop the build any more than the
rpmlog(RPMLO_WARNING, ...) does a few lines below. As you should've noticed
when testing it.
Another possible (not saying it's good or what I want, just enumerating)
approach would be add
ldv-alt requested changes on this pull request.
The idea is wrong: you cannot *replace* gzip, bzip2, and xz because they are
much more widespread. The implementation is wrong: it does not achieve the
declared goal.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply t
After wasting time looking at the obviously completely untested patch against
an imaginary library in PR #117 ... to put it really really politely, I'm not
in a very positive mood towards this work.
I'm not going to look at a single patch until you show me some numbers to back
up the change, fo
…nment
This PR is to fix issue #113. And It can be used as an alternative of PR #117.
In modern generation, most of the developers are using a machine based on
multi-core architecture. From now on, Let's prepare to support parallelism.
pigz is compatible with the existing gzip. It means that pigz
12 matches
Mail list logo
