ffmpeg-4.x compat package

Hi All, I was wondering if there are any plans to provide a ffmpeg-4.x compat package given that 5.0 has seen a signficant API break? The reason is that I have been looking into updating vice and it will not build in rawhide due to the new ffmpeg. I filed a bug against vice upstream for this

Re: F34 Nonfree: Fail to build from source list.

Hi, On 2/4/21 5:12 PM, Leigh Scott wrote: > caja-dropbox > d1x I'm working on fixing d1x now. > dream > frobtads And I will also take care of frobtads. Regards, Hans ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: F33 FTBFS list

Hi, On 8/19/20 2:06 PM, Leigh Scott wrote: free FTBFS ProjectX deepin-movie deepin-screen-recorder deepin-voice-recorder dosemu freeguide game-data-packager kodi-inputstream-adaptive kodi-peripheral-joystick kodi-pvr-dvblink kodi-pvr-demo kodi-pvr-dvbviewer kodi-pvr-iptvsimple

Re: f32-free ftbfs list

Hi, On 3/10/20 4:24 PM, Leigh Scott wrote: On 10/03/2020 15:15, Hans de Goede wrote: But SheepShaver and xroar are free, so they should be on the list? They are both listed Sorry my bad, I got confused by the selective quoting further down the thread. Regards, Hans > SheepSha

Re: f32-free ftbfs list

Hi, On 3/10/20 4:12 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 3/10/20 5:06 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Wed, 2020-02-05 at 19:15 +0300, Vascom wrote: May be create google docs sheet as at last massrebuild? I like the idea , just found the stella still FTBFS ... I was about to reply that I've looking

Re: f32-free ftbfs list

Hi, On 3/10/20 5:06 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Wed, 2020-02-05 at 19:15 +0300, Vascom wrote: May be create google docs sheet as at last massrebuild? I like the idea , just found the stella still FTBFS ... I was about to reply that I've looking into this on my TODO list, but I see that you

Re: nonfree devel packages not signed?

Hi, On 19-08-19 22:20, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: Le lun. 19 août 2019 à 22:10, Hans de Goede a écrit : Hi, On 19-08-19 21:30, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: Le lun. 19 août 2019 à 21:15, Hans de Goede a écrit : Hi All, When I try to do an update on a rawhide/F31 install I get: Package d2x-1.43

Re: RPMFusion: F31 FTBFS

Hi, On 8/11/19 3:54 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: Le dim. 11 août 2019 à 14:09, Sérgio Basto a écrit : Hi, Here is the list of failed builds from last mass rebuild that is not fixed yet. 12079 dream-2.1.1-7.fc31 (we have new version 2.2) 12054 xvst-3.0-6.20171201git14dee45.fc31 11989

rawhide buildroots broken

Hi All, I've tried to build a new version of vice, but it is failing due to the rawhide buildroots being broken. If someone can take a look at this, that would be great. Regards, Hans ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list --

Re: VirtualBox back to testing in f28

Hi, On 24-04-18 17:59, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Tue, 2018-04-24 at 17:51 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: Hi FYI, Virtualbox is broken in f28 I will remove it from any stable repo (GA and updates) and leave it in updates-testing until someone unbreak it: We are not supposed to replace any fedora

Re: gstreamer maintainer needed for freeworld packages

Hi, On 15-03-18 17:56, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: 2018-03-01 11:13 GMT+01:00 Hans de Goede <j.w.r.dego...@gmail.com>: Hi, On 28-02-18 18:40, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: Hi there, There is a need to find a new maintainer(s) for the gstreamer packages provided by us. Leigh indicated tha

Re: gstreamer maintainer needed for freeworld packages

Hi, On 28-02-18 18:40, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: Hi there, There is a need to find a new maintainer(s) for the gstreamer packages provided by us. Leigh indicated that he's not willing to work on them anymore for a reason of its own. Please respond to this thread and/or ask for ACL on pkgdb:

Re: FTBFS for f27

Hi, On 19-09-17 04:50, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Mon, 2017-09-04 at 16:00 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: Here is a list of packages without a f27 tag currently in rawhide: It's pretty much possible that the package fails at the buildSRPMFromSCM step, in which case it's only a matter to resubmit. I

Re: Working on RetroArch and libretro cores

Hi, On 27-06-17 09:13, David Demelier wrote: Le 27/06/2017 à 08:53, Hans de Goede a écrit : Isn't retroarch itself available under a FOSS license ? If that is true then retroarch itself (as well as any FOSS cores like MAME) should really be packaged for Fedora proper, with only the non-free

Re: Working on RetroArch and libretro cores

Hi, On 27-06-17 08:48, demelier.da...@gmail.com wrote: Hello all, I'm currently porting RetroArch [0] and most of the common libretro [1] cores for RPM Fusion. Cool, as a former MAME contributor I'm glad to see this happen. I'm quite new so there are still probably guideline or style

Re: nVidia howto question or solution

Hi, On 23-01-17 10:31, Leigh Scott wrote: Maybe adding 'modprobe.blacklist=nouveau' to the kernel cmd options would help. I believe the right magic is adding "rd.driver.blacklist=nouveau" to the kernel commandline. Regards, Hans p.s. The reply-to for the list is wrong, it is set to

Re: Add DKMS support for nvidia packages.

Hi, On 23-01-17 09:43, Leigh Scott wrote: I would like to implement DKMS support for the nvidia driver. Adding the support would add much to the work load and would offer users the choice of what they use. The other benefit is I believe it will work better with offline updates as it builds

Re: Looking for new maintainer for the rpmfusion gstreamer* pkgs

Hi, On 16-11-16 17:49, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Qua, 2016-11-16 at 15:23 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 16-11-16 15:15, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: 2016-11-13 12:26 GMT+01:00 Hans de Goede <j.w.r.dego...@gmail.com>: Hi All, My plate wrt opensource projects I maintain / work on is g

Re: Looking for new maintainer for the rpmfusion gstreamer* pkgs

Hi, On 16-11-16 15:15, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: 2016-11-13 12:26 GMT+01:00 Hans de Goede <j.w.r.dego...@gmail.com>: Hi All, My plate wrt opensource projects I maintain / work on is getting a bit too full, so I'm trying to delegate various tasks. As such I'm looking for someone to tak

Builds failing again due to buildroot issues

Hi, Sorry to bring bad news again, but builds are failing again due to buildroot issues on both f25 and rawhide. Specificially populating the buildroot fails for building the SRPM. Regards, Hans

Looking for new maintainer for the rpmfusion gstreamer* pkgs

Hi All, My plate wrt opensource projects I maintain / work on is getting a bit too full, so I'm trying to delegate various tasks. As such I'm looking for someone to take over the rpmfusion gstreamer* pkgs from me. I welcome new maintainers for any other rpmfusion pkgs I maintain as well.

Re: mpg123 is in Fedora 25+ now, should be dropped from rpmfusion

Hi, On 13-11-16 11:33, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: 2016-11-13 10:54 GMT+01:00 Hans de Goede <j.w.r.dego...@gmail.com>: Hi, On 13-11-16 09:53, Andrea Musuruane wrote: Hi Hans, you have to retire it (not to orphan it). This procedure is up to date AFAIK: http://rpmfusion.org/Contri

Re: mpg123 is in Fedora 25+ now, should be dropped from rpmfusion

Hi, On 13-11-16 09:53, Andrea Musuruane wrote: Hi Hans, you have to retire it (not to orphan it). This procedure is up to date AFAIK: http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors#Retiring_a_package Bye, Andrea Thank you, I've added dead.package files to git and created:

Re: rpmfusion buildsystem network connectivity issues?

Hi, On 13-11-16 10:08, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: 2016-11-13 9:39 GMT+01:00 Hans de Goede <j.w.r.dego...@gmail.com>: Hi All, It seems that the buildsystem is having network connectivity issues? I see 3 problems: 1) If I do a git push, then it hangs in what I presume is a post-push hook

rpmfusion buildsystem network connectivity issues?

Hi All, It seems that the buildsystem is having network connectivity issues? I see 3 problems: 1) If I do a git push, then it hangs in what I presume is a post-push hook, if I then ctrl+c and do a git remote update then everything did get pushed 2) F25 builds have been failing for the last 2

mpg123 is in Fedora 25+ now, should be dropped from rpmfusion

Hi Nicolas, $subject says it all, not sure what the orphan process for rpmfusion is, hence this direct mail. Regards, Hans

Re: [ANNOUNCE] pkgdb is live at rpmfusion.org !

Hi, On 17-10-16 15:24, Richard Shaw wrote: Thanks Nicolas for all the hard work! +1 Many many thanks to Nicolas for all his hardwork to make rpmfusion great again! Regards, Hans

Re: About chromium packaging

Hi, On 07-08-16 14:03, Kevin Kofler wrote: Nicolas Chauvet wrote: libffmpeg.so is not provided anymore in the approved fedora build. So I think there is nothing much to replace, but instead to provide the shared library as a complement. If it's not build as a shared library, then it's

Re: avidemux and gcc6

Hi, On 11-07-16 14:16, Dan Horák wrote: On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 06:32:48 -0500 Richard Shaw wrote: On Monday, July 11, 2016, Dan Horák wrote: Hi, because I wanted avidemux on F-24 I've spend some time to find the missing gcc6 fixes, see the result in

Re: RPM Fusion new infra

Hi, On 07/10/2016 07:55 PM, Andrew Schultz wrote: On 07/10/2016 09:00 AM, Andrea Musuruane wrote: Now it seems builders have problems: [andrea@panoramix zboy]$ rfpkg build Building zboy-0.60-2.fc25 for rawhide-free Created task: 7991 Task info:

Re: Various pkgs missing from f24 repos

Hi, On 07/10/2016 04:33 PM, Andrea Musuruane wrote: On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 8:16 PM, Hans de Goede <j.w.r.dego...@gmail.com <mailto:j.w.r.dego...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi All, First of all many thanks to all who have been involved in getting the f24 repos in place. The

Re: RPM Fusion new infra

Hi, On 07/10/2016 01:47 PM, Andrea Musuruane wrote: Hi, I'm trying to import zboy. I followed this guide: http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors#Import_your_package But I get: [andrea@panoramix zboy]$ rfpkg import /home/andrea/rpmbuild/SRPMS/zboy-0.60-2.fc23.src.rpm Could not execute

Re: rfpkg build fixed, you can build on koji !

Hi, On 04-07-16 22:01, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: Hi, rfpkg build has been fixed, it's now possible to submit build request with rfpkg-1.23-4 http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=851 Please build your packages for f23 to f25 (devel), Awesome! Unfortunately it seems something is

Re: Various pkgs missing from f24 repos

Hi, On 28-06-16 13:19, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Ter, 2016-06-28 at 12:43 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: On 28-06-16 03:52, Sérgio Basto wrote: Hello ! On Seg, 2016-06-27 at 20:16 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi All, First of all many thanks to all who have been involved in getting the f24

Re: Various pkgs missing from f24 repos

On 28-06-16 03:52, Sérgio Basto wrote: Hello ! On Seg, 2016-06-27 at 20:16 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi All, First of all many thanks to all who have been involved in getting the f24 repos in place. They look great and all the important pkgs are there. I accidentally found out that some

Various pkgs missing from f24 repos

Hi All, First of all many thanks to all who have been involved in getting the f24 repos in place. They look great and all the important pkgs are there. I accidentally found out that some not so important pkgs are missing though when running dnf repoquery --extras on my main workstation which

Where to push f23 rpmfusion pkg updates ?

Hi All, I'm working on updating the gstreamer1* pkgs for f23 to 1.6.4, should I push the resulting changes to pkgs.kwizart.net as before (and send a mail to request a build), or should I send a github pull-req as done for f24? Regards, Hans

Re: Not sure what license tag to use

Hi, On 11-04-16 15:27, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 11.4.2016 09:19, Hans de Goede wrote: On 11-04-16 00:17, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hi, given the following terms: * MAY be used for commercial applications * MAY be shared freely * MUST NOT be reverse engineered What kind of license tag

Re: Not sure what license tag to use

Hi, On 11-04-16 00:17, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hi, given the following terms: * MAY be used for commercial applications * MAY be shared freely * MUST NOT be reverse engineered What kind of license tag is supposed to be used? The ideas are: * Redistributable, no modification permitted *

Re: Self-introduction: Neal Gompa

Hi Neal, On 25-01-16 00:22, Neal Gompa wrote: Hello all, I've been a part of the Fedora community for many years, and a user of RPM Fusion and its predecessors for equally as long. As a long-time Fedora contributor, I never really had a reason to jump into the RPM Fusion fray until a friend of

Re: port of game-data-packager to Fedora

Hi, On 09-01-16 21:57, Alexandre Detiste wrote: I've just sponsored you in rpmfusion fas now, so you have all the same rights as in Fedora now. Ok thanks, will wait on CVSsync then Yes that may take a while though due to the infra wip. Regards, Hans

Re: port of game-data-packager to Fedora

Hi, On 03-01-16 22:15, Alexandre Detiste wrote: I still believe that innoextract belongs in Fedora proper, so a first step at getting g-d-p in rpmfusion would be to get innoextract into Fedora, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers I can act as a sponsor

Re: Dealing with new approved packages for rpmfusion

Hi, On 30-12-15 05:01, Sérgio Basto wrote: Hello, On Ter, 2015-12-29 at 13:12 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi all, Looking at: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33 you have confused me, 33 is RF_CVSsync Right, so 33 is the packages for which a CVS admin request was done

Dealing with new approved packages for rpmfusion

Hi all, Looking at: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33 There are quite a few new packages which are waiting to have CVS / git repos created for them and for them to be imported / added to the repos. I know that with the new infra this process is currently on hold, but we are

Re: Bug triage for f23

Hi, On 21-11-15 13:40, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: 2015-11-19 12:59 GMT+01:00 Hans de Goede <j.w.r.dego...@gmail.com>: rpmfusion-nonfree pipelight rpmfusion-nonfree pipelight-common The problem with pipelight is that it depends on pipelight-selinux which was imported into

Re: Bug triage for f23

Hi, On 15-11-15 08:12, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Sáb, 2015-11-14 at 16:34 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: Hello, I'm still trying to focus on rfpkg/distgit infra tasks. But there are others tasks that can be worked on. Many packages are not recent enought for f23 and might fail at runtime for any

Re: port of game-data-packager to Fedora

Hi, On 07-11-15 18:23, Alexandre Detiste wrote: Le mercredi 4 novembre 2015, 13:01:51 Hans de Goede a écrit : So for now I'll just use/suggest the innoextract package provided by upstream. I do not think this is a good idea, we really want to do this properly. Ok I'll start with this one

Re: port of game-data-packager to Fedora

Hi, On 20-11-15 01:09, Alexandre Detiste wrote: Le jeudi 19 novembre 2015, 13:23:48 Hans de Goede a écrit : [htmlcxx] Ok my bad, if it uses autoconf and a straight-forward build, then by all means do package it for Fedora. Is it ok for Fedora that the current only reverse dependency

Re: Introducing myself

Hi Stephen, On 11-11-15 16:22, Stephen Herr wrote: Hi everyone, I'm new to contributing to RPMFusion. I am behind the package review request for pianobar, a terminal Pandora client. https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3833 I'm not new to

Re: What is missing for f23 readyness ?

Hi, On 08-11-15 16:34, Sérgio Basto wrote: Hi, On Dom, 2015-11-08 at 15:17 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 07-11-15 18:20, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Sáb, 2015-11-07 at 15:05 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Sáb, 2015-11-07 at 08:12 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 5:07 AM

Re: What is missing for f23 readyness ?

Hi, On 07-11-15 18:20, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Sáb, 2015-11-07 at 15:05 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Sáb, 2015-11-07 at 08:12 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: There is a number of packages that need to be rebuilt as

Re: port of game-data-packager to Fedora

Hi, On 03-11-15 17:07, Alexandre Detiste wrote: Le mardi 3 novembre 2015, 14:49:47 Hans de Goede a écrit : I'm now running it thourgh virtualbox, maintenance will be more bearable when I manage to run it in a thin container with full X/OpenGl support. (systemd-nspawn ?) Ok, so you do plan

Re: port of game-data-packager to Fedora

Hi, On 03-11-15 16:17, Tom Callaway wrote: On 11/03/2015 02:49 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: lgogdownloader is more interesting. Which also makes me wonder about game-data-packager itself. I really do not see any reason for them not to be in Fedora proper, but I must admit it sort of a gray area

Re: port of game-data-packager to Fedora

f you look at id-shr-extract.c it is a copy of the extract.c from the rpmfusion sources, and it is: Copyright (C) 2007 Hans de Goede <j.w.r.dego...@hhs.nl> :) I do notice that they've stripped the rest of the copyright header though, which said: This program is free software; you can redist

Re: port of game-data-packager to Fedora

://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-games/game-data-packager.git $ make "Then the `./run` command can be used instead of the system-installed `game-data-packager` command." Le mardi 3 novembre 2015, 09:54:35 Hans de Goede a écrit : Cool! Do you plan to maintain this for Fedora/rpmfusion in th

Re: rpmfusion Fedora-23 plans ?

Hi, On 23-10-15 13:57, Sérgio Basto wrote: Hello mates On Qui, 2015-10-22 at 22:27 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: 2015-10-12 8:30 GMT+02:00 Hans de Goede <j.w.r.dego...@gmail.com>: Hi All, I'm getting requests to update the gstreamer packages to 1.6.x for Fed

rpmfusion Fedora-23 plans ?

Hi All, I'm getting requests to update the gstreamer packages to 1.6.x for Fedora-23: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3794 https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3795 https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3796 But AFAIK we are not building any packages for F-23

Re: Review Swap

Hi, On 08/23/2015 08:39 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: Gotten any takers? Yes, it has been reviewed by Leigh Scott already, thanks Leigh. Let me create the cvs admin request right away. Regards, Hans

Review Swap

Hi All, I would like to swap a review of: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3740 (easy review). For a review of one of your Fedora or rpmfusion packages. Regards, Hans

Re: Distribute systemd preset file for services enabled by default?

Hi, On 15-07-15 01:59, Richard Shaw wrote: One of the issues with akmods as of late is that systemd seems to be ignoring commands in the %post scripts to enable a service and only paying attention to the preset file distributed by Fedora. I don't intend to file a FESCO ticket to get akmods

x265 in F-22 at 1.2 instead of 1.6 ?

Hi All, While updating my system to the new F-22 rpmfusion repos (good job kwizart!), I had some problems because at one time my system picked up x266-libs-1.6 from one of the rpmfusion branches I had my .repo files pointing at. Where as the current F-22 repo (and koji) has 1.2 . 1.2 works

Re: F21 remaining tasks and tracker for issue before RPM Fusion GA

Hi, On 10/19/2014 01:15 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3387 Erm: You are not authorized to access bug #3387. Anyways nothing pending from my side AFAIK. Regards, Hans

Re: [F21] VLC: dlopen: cannot load any more object with static TLS [Was: VLC does not support the audio or video format h264]

Hi, On 08/26/2014 04:56 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote: On Tue, 2014-08-26 at 11:55 +1000, Ankur Sinha wrote: Something is off here. I can't play webM either. Even totem plays the file just fine: This is what I get when I run it with -vvv: 0x7fd4c0008ac8] main input debug: Buffering 0%

Re: ffmpeg-2.3.1 released

Hi, On 08/07/2014 01:44 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Ter, 2014-08-05 at 07:52 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: - audacious-plugins-freeworld: fails due to missing glib.h - looks like it is not related to ffmpeg bug opened https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3327 , I add Hans de

Re: Volunteering to help out as a sysadmin

Hi, On 08/04/2014 07:11 AM, Jonathan Dieter wrote: So, as a result of the earlier problems we had with wiki defacement, I'm volunteering to help out as an RPM Fusion sysadmin. I'm happy to do whatever work needs to be done, whether it's simple, like setting up SSL for the config page in

Re: New rpmfusion-developers list member introduction - attempt #2

Hi Bob, On 07/23/2014 08:25 PM, Bob Lightfoot wrote: Dear RPM Fusion Developers: I am a fedora user since F8 and a participant in their QA process since about F13. I use mostly centos on my workstations and server, but still run several vm to test Fedora. I recently began playing

Infrastructure issue: Cannot upload new sources ?

Hi All, I was just trying to upgrade gstreamer1-plugins-ugly to the latest upstream and I hit this: [hans@shalem devel]$ make new-sources FILES=gst-plugins-ugly-1.2.3.tar.xz Checking : gst-plugins-ugly-1.2.3.tar.xz on https://cvs.rpmfusion.org/repo/pkgs/upload.cgi... Uploading:

Re: Packaging 3-rd party repositories in rpmfusion

Hi, On 02/03/2014 02:14 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: [2nd attempt to answer to this. My initial response from quite a while age seems to have gone lost.] On 01/29/2014 12:12 PM, Alec Leamas wrote: Formally, this is about review request 3152 for dropbox-repo [1]. From a more practical POV, it's

Re: Packaging 3-rd party repositories in rpmfusion

Hi, On 02/03/2014 10:03 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: Hi! On 03.02.2014 10:52, Hans de Goede wrote: On 02/03/2014 02:14 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: [...] In other words, I'd recommend not doing so, because you guys are likely to be facing very tough times in cases something goes wrong

repoview not being updated

Hi all, Can one of the admins please fix repoview updating, currently it is not being updated, ie: http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/development/rawhide/x86_64/os/repoview/gstreamer1-libav.html Points to the quite old 1.1.3, rather then the less old 1.2.0, or the recent 1.2.1

Re: BuildSys restored re-submit/verify your build

Hi, On 10/02/2013 10:54 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: Hi Since the buildsys is now functional again Awesome, many thanks for all your work on rpmfusion, and for getting the buildsys back up again! Regards, Hans

Re: BuildSys restored re-submit/verify your build

Hi, On 10/02/2013 11:00 AM, Peter Lemenkov wrote: 2013/10/2 Hans de Goede j.w.r.dego...@gmail.com: Hi, On 10/02/2013 10:54 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: Hi Since the buildsys is now functional again Awesome, many thanks for all your work on rpmfusion, and for getting the buildsys back up

Re: Request of bundling exception

Hi, On 09/28/2013 03:56 PM, Alec Leamas wrote: On 09/28/2013 12:48 PM, Alexandre Moine wrote: Le 27/09/2013 22:16, Alec Leamas a écrit : On 09/27/2013 10:02 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Alexandre Moine nobra...@fedoraproject.org mailto:nobra...@fedoraproject.org

Re: Late branching for F-20 because of FFmpeg deps needfix

Hi, On 08/26/2013 12:41 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: Hi, Given that FFmpeg was updated without all dependencies fixed to work with it, I will try to make our devel repository to point to branched/F-20 instead of rawhide. (which should point to F-21 packages already) Please remind that I'm not

Re: OpenSSL with Elliptic Curve

Hi, On 05/12/2013 08:46 AM, Jeff Mendoza wrote: Hi, I have worked a bit on: Request: OpenSSL with Elliptic Curve, IDEA, MDC-2, RC5 crypto algorithms Summary: The OpenSSL toolkit provides support for secure communications between machines. URL: http://www.openssl.org/ Why not in

Re: FTBFS for F-19 free section

Hoi, On 05/08/2013 12:31 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: resuming some fails: lightspark fails due a cannot find LLVMLinker , is not just add BuildRequires: llvm-devel ? No, it needs some fixes to build with the (new) llvm-3.3, I've fixed this now, and upgraded it from 0.7.1 to 0.7.2 while at it. It

Re: Opencv-nonfree in rpmfusion?

Hi, On 05/08/2013 09:54 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote: Hi folks, I recently realized that the opencv module in Fedora doesn't contain the nonfree parts, which are the SURF and SIFT feature detectors. I was wondering if it's OK to make them available via RPMFusion? Both SIFT and SURF are widely used

Re: FTBFS for F-19 free and nonfree section and broken deps

Hi, On 05/08/2013 12:51 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Ter, 2013-05-07 at 23:31 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Sáb, 2013-05-04 at 22:04 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 04/24/2013 09:56 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: Hi, Just a quick note, that from my list, theses package still aren't rebuilt

Re: FTBFS for F-19 free section

Hi, On 05/01/2013 02:28 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Qua, 2013-05-01 at 09:14 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 04/29/2013 03:36 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: 2013/4/29 Hans de Goede j.w.r.dego...@gmail.com mailto:j.w.r.dego...@gmail.com Hi, On 04/27/2013 04:07 AM, Sérgio Basto

Re: FTBFS for F-19 free section

Hi, On 04/24/2013 09:56 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: Hi, Just a quick note, that from my list, theses package still aren't rebuilt for F-19 on the free section. 16340 lxdream lxdream-0_9_1-7_fc19 16324 k9copy k9copy-2_3_8-3_fc19 ffmpeg/API 16300 audacity-freeworld

Re: FTBFS for F-19 free section

Hi, On 04/29/2013 03:36 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: 2013/4/29 Hans de Goede j.w.r.dego...@gmail.com mailto:j.w.r.dego...@gmail.com Hi, On 04/27/2013 04:07 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: ... sidplay-2.0.9-13.fc17.x86_64 While working on sidplay, I found out

Re: FTBFS for F-19 free section

Hi, On 04/27/2013 04:07 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Qua, 2013-04-24 at 21:56 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: Hi, Just a quick note, that from my list, theses package still aren't rebuilt for F-19 on the free section. 16340 lxdream lxdream-0_9_1-7_fc19 16324 k9copy k9copy-2_3_8-3_fc19

abrt wants a mirrorlist-debug

Hi, While looking at abrt bug-filing logs I noticed: Could not retrieve mirrorlist http://rpm.livna.org/mirrorlist-debug error was 14: HTTP Error 404 - Not Found I think we should fix this ... Regards, Hans

Re: Mass rebuilt for F-19 on RPM Fusion - next week

Hi, On 03/19/2013 11:59 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: better late than never , the fails are: 16390 zsnes zsnes-1_51-13_fc19 16371 terminatorX terminatorX-3_84-3_fc19 16367 SheepShaver SheepShaver-2_3-0_11_20060514_fc19 16357 normalize normalize-0_7_7-8_fc19 I've fixed

Re: Mass rebuilt for F-19 on RPM Fusion - next week

Hi, On 03/24/2013 07:46 PM, Andrea Musuruane wrote: On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com mailto:musur...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com mailto:ser...@serjux.com wrote: better late then never , the

Re: Mass rebuilt for F-19 on RPM Fusion - next week

Hi, On 03/24/2013 10:25 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Ter, 2013-03-05 at 22:00 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: Build failing were from jobs 16386 to 16390 as seen in:

Re: Mass rebuilt for F-19 on RPM Fusion - next week

Hi, On 03/19/2013 11:59 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: Hi, On Ter, 2013-03-12 at 17:15 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Ter, 2013-03-05 at 22:00 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: 2013/3/4 Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com On Sáb, 2013-02-23 at 15:51 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: Hi,

Re: list of packages from repo rpmfusion-free that doesn't install on F18

Hi, On 10/22/2012 12:44 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: Updated list: autopano-sift-C-2.5.1-6.fc17.x86_64 from rpmfusion-free bombono-dvd-1.2.0-4.20120616gitcdab110.fc18.2.x86_64 from rpmfusion-free cmus-2.4.2-4.fc18.x86_64 from rpmfusion-free kmediafactory-0.8.1-1.fc18.x86_64 from rpmfusion-free

Re: list of packages from repo rpmfusion-free that doesn't install on F18

Hi, On 11/02/2012 02:26 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Qui, 2012-11-01 at 20:23 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: 2012/10/27 Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com I suggest rebuild this ones for resolve dependencies. cmus-2.4.2-4.fc18.x86_64 from rpmfusion-free

Re: list of packages from repo rpmfusion-free that doesn't install on F18

Hi, On 11/01/2012 08:23 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: pangzero-1.3-4.fc17.noarch from rpmfusion-free perl(SDL::Font) If the package have been dropped, same is to expect with this one. Unless a new maintainer can sort out a better solution. I've been working on fixing this up, and

New gstreamer-1.0 plugin packages need reviews for F-18

Hi, In F-18+ most apps are moving to gstreamer-1.0, this needs new packages for the rpmfusion hosted gstreamer plugins, this reason this needs new packages is that the old 0.10 gstreamer will stay around for a while, so the new packages will need to be parallel installable like their Fedora

Vacation hansg July 13th - July 20th

Hi All, I'm going on vacation for a week starting tomorrow, and I will *not* be reading email, etc. during that time. Regards, Hans

Re: rpms/mpg123/EL-6 .cvsignore, 1.5, 1.6 mpg123.spec, 1.5, 1.6 sources, 1.5, 1.6

Hi, On 07/02/2012 07:34 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com wrote: 2012/7/2 Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com: Maybe we need to update this guidelines in there area... How do I know who also maintainers this package? Also, are we not

Re: FFmepg rebuild Schedule ?

Hi, On 06/24/2012 05:41 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Dom, 2012-06-24 at 16:22 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, Just a quick note, while doing a local build of all deps to work on my ffmpeg dependent packages, I noticed the following in x264's config.log file: checking for gf_malloc(1); gf_free

Re: FFmepg rebuild Schedule ?

Hi, I've done a local rebuild of the ffmpeg stack to prepare and test my packages for the ffmpeg bump. audacious-plugins-freeworld is committed and ready to build as soon as the new ffmpeg is in place gstreamer-ffmpeg is a problem, as upstream is using/supporting only libav and not ffmpeg,

Re: FFmepg rebuild Schedule ?

Hi, Just a quick note, while doing a local build of all deps to work on my ffmpeg dependent packages, I noticed the following in x264's config.log file: checking for gf_malloc(1); gf_free(NULL); in gpac/isomedia.h... no Failed commandline was: --

Re: Qtractor alternatives revisited

On 06/11/2012 06:06 AM, Rex Dieter wrote: Brendan Jones wrote: Hi all I'm returning to implementing alternatives rather than providing an upstream patch at this stage. There is only one binary in this package. The only other files are an icon, desktop file and a Qt translation. Is it

Re: qtractor moved to Fedora

Hi, On 05/18/2012 11:38 AM, Brendan Jones wrote: On 05/18/2012 03:14 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 05/17/2012 06:13 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: 2012/5/16 Orcan Ogetbiloget.fed...@gmail.com: qtractor is now in Fedora, of course

Re: qtractor moved to Fedora

Hi, On 05/17/2012 06:13 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: 2012/5/16 Orcan Ogetbiloget.fed...@gmail.com: qtractor is now in Fedora, of course without the libmad support. Brendan Jones prepared a libmad-freeworld package with the libmad support. This package is analogous to audacity-freeworld as it

Re: Bundled libs found in sox-plugins-freeworld (and therefor sox in Fedora)

Hi, On 03/22/2012 03:05 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: While getting my package reviewed[1] it was discovered that sox is bundling two libraries, libgsm and lpc10. libgsm is already available so we're using the configure option to use the system installed library and patching around configure still

  1   2   3   >