Are you willing to provide a simple example?
Andy
Matt Wynne wrote:
We do something similar to this, though we use a convention to set
@klass to the class being spec'd in the top-level example group,
rather than deriving it as they do in that sample.
In view specs we also use a convention
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 8:41 AM, Andy Freeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you willing to provide a simple example?
I'm using the same example as the articled you linked to originally as
the base. This way you should be able to clearly see the differences.
http://gist.github.com/13804
Zach
Also, a nice thing about RSpec is that when you do describe an actual
object, ie: describe Foo, you can determine this by asking the
example group what it's described type is.
This makes things a lot simpler and cleaner than having to hack away
strings, or guess based on the name of your test.
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 8:02 AM, Ashley Moran
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Begin forwarded message:
Use either the installed autospec (not autotest) or script/autospec
commands (for rails apps).
http://rspec.info/rdoc/files/History_txt.html
Cheers,
David
Hmmm, when I run autospec, all I
On 29 Sep 2008, at 13:28, David Chelimsky wrote:
In theory it should be fine, but when you're running a suite of
examples you're going to eventually want to load up everything in the
app, no?
True! But I've had a lot of loading issues lately, when autotest runs
a single file and
On 30 Sep 2008, at 14:06, David Chelimsky wrote:
I just noticed that too on a new project. It's the spec_helper that's
causing the trouble, so it needs to be ignored. Put this in a
.autotest file at the root of your project:
Autotest.add_hook :initialize do |at|
at.add_exception
Hi,
We are receiving an ArityMismatchError when we feel we have a valid RegEx
error
C:/svnprojects/olc_stories/lib/framework/common_steps/verification_steps.rb:48:in
`/verify the email with the subject of '[\w\x2E\-\s]*'/'
create_staff_user.feature:15:in `And verify the email with the
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 3:59 PM, aidy lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
We are receiving an ArityMismatchError when we feel we have a valid RegEx
error
C:/svnprojects/olc_stories/lib/framework/common_steps/verification_steps.rb:48:in
`/verify the email with the subject of '[\w\x2E\-\s]*'/'
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 8:15 AM, Ashley Moran
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30 Sep 2008, at 14:06, David Chelimsky wrote:
I just noticed that too on a new project. It's the spec_helper that's
causing the trouble, so it needs to be ignored. Put this in a
.autotest file at the root of your
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 8:59 AM, aidy lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
We are receiving an ArityMismatchError when we feel we have a valid RegEx
error
C:/svnprojects/olc_stories/lib/framework/common_steps/verification_steps.rb:48:in
`/verify the email with the subject of '[\w\x2E\-\s]*'/'
Aslak
2008/9/30 aslak hellesoy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
There are no groups in your regexp. You probably want this:
/verify the email with the subject of '([\w\x2E\-\s]*)'/
Aslak
Apologies. Thank You.
Aidy
___
rspec-users mailing list
I have this statement in the layout of my application (using haml)
- if request.env[HTTP_USER_AGENT].include?(MSIE)
= stylesheet_link_tag 'blueprint/ie.css'
= stylesheet_link_tag 'confirm_ie.css'
The problem is that request.env[HTTP_USER_AGENT] is nil when I go to
some page in the features I
David Chelimsky wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 7:59 AM, Zach Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, a nice thing about RSpec is that when you do describe an actual
object, ie: describe Foo, you can determine this by asking the
example group what it's described type is.
This makes things a
Hi
I'm, being thick, right?:
describe RssReader do
before(:each) do
@uri = mock(URI)
::RSS::Parser.stub!(:parse).and_return(:parsed_rss)
@rss_reader = RssReader.new(@uri)
end
describe when the RSS content loads do
# ...
end
describe when there is an HTTP
On Sep 15, 2008, at 4:35 PM, Pat Maddox wrote:
I don't think you're really supposed to mock or stub when using
cucumber.
We need to stub time in some of our scenarios, which exist to to
verify behavior over time. We're looking into a before/after to
support mocking/stubbing for this
On 30 Sep 2008, at 15:51, Ashley Moran wrote:
it should not attempt to parse the RSS do
Or,
it should attempt to parse the RSS do
Please excuse the typo...
Ashley
--
http://www.patchspace.co.uk/
http://aviewfromafar.net/
___
rspec-users
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Luke Melia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 15, 2008, at 4:35 PM, Pat Maddox wrote:
I don't think you're really supposed to mock or stub when using cucumber.
We need to stub time in some of our scenarios, which exist to to verify
behavior over time. We're
I like them much better than the gremlins.
On 30 Sep 2008, at 14:09, Dan North wrote:
We do have pixies! They do all the magic stuff.
How else do you think it happens?
;)
2008/9/27 aslak hellesoy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 10:32 PM, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Scott Taylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 30, 2008, at 11:06 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Luke Melia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 15, 2008, at 4:35 PM, Pat Maddox wrote:
I don't think you're really supposed to mock or
I'm sure it's possible, but sorry I don't know how offhand. I'll tell
you what I know and see if it's enough to help you figure it out for
yourself.
The code you write in cucumber steps (which calls webrat) runs inside
the context of a rails ActionController::Integration::Session. Have a
Scott Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sep 30, 2008, at 11:06 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Luke Melia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sep 15, 2008, at 4:35 PM, Pat Maddox wrote:
I don't think you're really supposed to mock or stub when using
cucumber.
We
On Sep 30, 2008, at 12:04 PM, Pat Maddox wrote:
Scott Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sep 30, 2008, at 11:06 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Luke Melia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sep 15, 2008, at 4:35 PM, Pat Maddox wrote:
I don't think you're really
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Ben Mabey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Chelimsky wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 7:59 AM, Zach Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Also, a nice thing about RSpec is that when you do describe an actual
object, ie: describe Foo, you can determine this by asking
Thanks Matt.
I have check the rails api and see that I can pass a hash with the
headers as a parameter with the post command.
post /session,
{:username = 'matt', :password = 'secret'},
{:HTTP_USER_AGENT = MSIE}
and this works for me, by now, I don't know if I will have some
Cool.
Be aware that you're by-passing webrat by using the post method -
that's one of the 'raw' rails calls that webrat wraps up in its
elegant set of methods.
It may be that you can pass this same hash to clicks_button but I
don't know - you'd have to check the webrat source.
On 30
Does anyone know how I can write a spec along the lines of this (but a
working implementation);
it should not include inactive users do
do_get
assigns[:results].should_not include(users(:inactive_user))
end
I'm a newbie so I'm not capable of explaining why it doesn't work, but
Neil Cauldwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does anyone know how I can write a spec along the lines of this (but a
working implementation);
it should not include inactive users do
do_get
assigns[:results].should_not include(users(:inactive_user))
end
I'm a newbie so I'm not
Pat Maddox wrote:
Neil Cauldwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does anyone know how I can write a spec along the lines of this (but a
working implementation);
it should not include inactive users do
do_get
assigns[:results].should_not include(users(:inactive_user))
end
I'm a
Subject says most of it. I'd love to use Cucumber in my project but I
need to be able to install it in a Rails app and by a particular
version number.
I forked it and struggled with getting GitHub gems deployer to behave
itself.
Maybe a canonical version can be kept and updated in
On Sep 30, 2008, at 10:55 AM, Luke Melia wrote:
We need to stub time in some of our scenarios, which exist to to
verify behavior over time. We're looking into a before/after to
support mocking/stubbing for this scenario.
Thanks for everyone's thoughts. I understand that mocks are
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 9:02 PM, Evan David Light
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subject says most of it. I'd love to use Cucumber in my project but I need
to be able to install it in a Rails app and by a particular version number.
You can do that with git pull and git checkout. Would it help if
On Sep 30, 2008, at 5:20 PM, aslak hellesoy wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 9:02 PM, Evan David Light
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subject says most of it. I'd love to use Cucumber in my project
but I need
to be able to install it in a Rails app and by a particular version
number.
You can
What's not to like?! Despite the fact that a new RSpec version was just
released, it would be nice to see a new version released right away with
this concept built in so that a RSpec version of Shoulda could start
rolling. :)
David Chelimsky wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 7:59 AM, Zach
I released 1.1.5 yesterday, including rspec-1.1.5 and rspec-
rails-1.1.5 gems.
It works fantastic. Thanks for a quality release. I've freed up
about 100 of megs on my hard drive already.
Cheers,
David
___
rspec-users mailing list
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 10:18 PM, Andy Freeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Chelimsky wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 7:59 AM, Zach Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 8:41 AM, Andy Freeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you willing to provide a simple example?
I'm using
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 9:38 AM, Ben Mabey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Chelimsky wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 7:59 AM, Zach Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Also, a nice thing about RSpec is that when you do describe an actual
object, ie: describe Foo, you can determine this by asking
I was actually teasing... :)
As far as writing one... already on it!
David Chelimsky wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 10:18 PM, Andy Freeman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Here's a variation on that with a helper for defining macros that I'm
thinking of adding to rspec. Lemme know what you think:
37 matches
Mail list logo
