On Jan 13, 2008 6:56 AM, Ivo Dancet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all, I have a method calling Klass.create! two times with different
arguments (this happens in a class reponsable for reading in a csv file)
I want to test those like this:
in one test: Klass.should_receive(:create!).with(:name
On Jan 13, 2008 3:51 PM, Corey Haines [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I work with a .html.erb file, the autotest rspec on rails stuff doesn't
understand the file to map it to the right test. I wanted to submit a patch
for this, but I'm unsure where the specs would be to update. I found the
PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, thanks.
On Jan 13, 2008 4:54 PM, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 13, 2008 3:51 PM, Corey Haines [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I work with a .html.erb file, the autotest rspec on rails stuff
doesn't
understand the file
On Jan 14, 2008 6:46 PM, Kero van Gelder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The benefit of doing that is it spots files that you may not have
spec'd that you want spec'd. On the flip side you end up with a bunch
of noise but you can eliminate that w/ the :initialize hook:
Autotest.add_hook
On Jan 14, 2008 8:31 PM, Corey Haines [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, all!
I would love if someone could help me figure this out. I can't seem to see
why the following fails:
Here's the spec:
it should redirect back to the index page do
Coupon.should_receive
On Jan 15, 2008 8:27 AM, Cody P. Skidmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey folks. I was looking for the mailing list archive up on rspec.info.
I clicked on the community link and received the URL
http://ey01-s00414/community/;. This isn't correct, obviously. The hint
shows it as,
On Jan 17, 2008 11:33 AM, Giles Bowkett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Giles - I think you'll find more people with more experience in this
area on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list. That said, and
only having glanced at your mail, here's a thought or two:
The TDD line on this, as I understand it, is
On Jan 18, 2008 3:57 AM, Anton Komarov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello.
I install gems rspec and rspec_on_rails
For rails, don't use the gem. Install both as plugins:
http://rspec.info/documentation/rails/install.html
I have this Error when try to run Rspec tests on my RoR application:
On Jan 16, 2008 4:59 PM, Evan Short [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello there,
i have been trying my hand at this rbehave material, specifically in terms
of integration testing a rails application, and i am curious about the most
friendly way to deal with session data.
currently, the only way i
On Jan 18, 2008 10:47 PM, David James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
describe should_not == vs. should !=
it do
5.should_not == 6
end # passes
it do
5.should != 6
end # fails
end
# I'm running the rspec 1.1.2 gem with the corresponding Textmate bundle
# The second failure
so I'm not going to be able to help you debug that
- but why don't you try killing these for a moment and see if
everything works fine.
$VERBOSE=false
-Corey
On Jan 19, 2008 12:47 PM, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 19, 2008 11:41 AM, Corey Haines [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hello all,
Just a heads up that I made a change (in svn trunk - not yet released)
that may change what files get loaded when you run the rake or spec
commands. Not a big deal if you've been following convention, but for
those who haven't you may need to make a minor adjustment to your rake
file
On Jan 21, 2008 8:22 AM, Jim Lindley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm 99 44/100% sure that you have it right. The expression x != y is
syntactic sugar for !(x == y) much like x += y is syntactic sugar for
x = (x +y)
The parser turns these into an internal representation (abstract
syntax
On Jan 21, 2008 2:12 PM, Rick DeNatale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to write a story for a Rails app which involves using the
attachment_fu plugin to upload images.
After blunting my pick on this for a while, google found me this:
http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/134743#600831
So it
AM, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 23, 2008 8:41 AM, Corey Haines [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
I'm missing something simple, I think. I am writing a spec to say that
my
CouponController should create a new coupon from the form parameters,
then
set
. I'm going to write up a
blog entry on this pattern, and I'll send a link when I post it.
Thanks for your help.
-Corey
On Jan 23, 2008 10:03 AM, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 23, 2008 8:49 AM, Corey Haines [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course. Thanks, David! I still
On Jan 24, 2008 3:47 AM, Kamal Fariz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With 1.1.1 you can do this:
Given $n_users in the system do |num_users|
case num_users
when a user
# one user case
when /(\d*) users/
# multi user case using $1
end
end
With 1.1.2 you can do this:
On Jan 24, 2008 5:40 AM, Keith McDonnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
I have a *really* weird issue with rspec on rails:
Given a time meridian formatted using %p
When I run `rake spec` the time meridian is converted to lower case:
expected: Today 08:00 PM,
got: Today 08:00 pm
On Jan 24, 2008 8:56 AM, Nicolas Jacobeus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
I need to specify that a class should define a constant.
I couldn't find something such as should define_const('MY_CONST') in
the RSpec documentation, even though there are similar matchers such
as should
On Jan 23, 2008 5:25 AM, Rob Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to spec a controller method which renders some rjs as part
of a render :update block. The problem I'm having is that stub_render
or expect_render don't seem to allow and_return to work.
The controller method does:
On Jan 25, 2008 7:19 AM, Rob Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David,
Thanks for looking at the problem.
The trick here is that render :partial is NOT getting called on the
controller - it's getting called on the template that is yielded to
render :update.
I think I follow, still
On Jan 27, 2008 3:33 PM, Corey Haines [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, all,
This isn't about rspec, but this list has people whose opinions I respect.
So, I'm looking for a new version control system for my local development. I
was going to install subversion, but I've heard rumors of people
On Jan 27, 2008 6:27 PM, Matt Darby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Olsen wrote:
I can't figure out how to make the updates to allow for the route_form
method to return a url that matches the expected.
Sorry to bump such an old post, but the interweb doesn't really show
anything for
On Nov 21, 2007 3:10 PM, Chris Olsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't figure out how to make the updates to allow for the route_form
method to return a url that matches the expected.
Here is a sample
route_for(:controller = :task, :action = :new).should == /task/new
If a task has to be
- any ideas on how to make that happen?
On Jan 27, 2008, at 8:26 PM, Matt Darby wrote:
On Jan 27, 2008, at 8:05 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Nov 21, 2007 3:10 PM, Chris Olsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or do you just use:
new_user_task(1,1).should == /users/1/task/new
On Jan 29, 2008 6:55 PM, Andrew WC Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
try it, does the same thing ='(
Shouldn't be the exact same thing. What's the whole error?
Also - what version of rspec? If trunk, do you have the latest (3268)?
On Jan 29, 2008 7:49 PM, Shane Mingins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sep 25, 2007 4:16 AM, Shane Mingins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
We have a Rails project using an engine which I want to run autotest with
rspec against.
So the project specific specs are in the specs directory but the common
specs are in the specs directory of the engine plugin (e.g.
On Jan 30, 2008 4:16 PM, lfeistel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am also running into nearly this same issue. I am using NetBeans with
autotest as I am developing a new Engine Plugin. I would like the tests for
the Engine to live in the plugin's spec directory. But it seems that the
only way to
Hey all,
Just a heads up that the ZenTest-3.9.0 release is not compatible with
RSpec-1.1.2. I thought I had a release ready to go, but differences
between a preview release of ZenTest that I received and the actual
release seem to have broken compatibility.
We'll get this resolved soon, but in
On Jan 31, 2008 9:19 AM, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is resolved with the RSpece-1.1.3 release which went out early
this morning.
So early that I can't spell :)
On Jan 31, 2008 5:25 AM, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey all,
Just a heads up
This is resolved with the RSpece-1.1.3 release which went out early
this morning.
On Jan 31, 2008 5:25 AM, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey all,
Just a heads up that the ZenTest-3.9.0 release is not compatible with
RSpec-1.1.2. I thought I had a release ready to go
On Feb 4, 2008 1:20 AM, Pat Maddox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For some info on why BDD kicks TDD's butt ...
Woah!
I find this deeply disturbing. I believe your heart is in the right
place here, so please don't take this as a personal attack, but this
statement reflects a view that I see expressed
On Feb 4, 2008 12:57 PM, Lance Ball [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there
I've run into a bit of a problem that I can't seem to figure out. I
have a model class User which includes our acts_as_role_context
library. This lib acts like most other
On Feb 4, 2008 5:24 AM, David Currin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having trouble working out how to test a method that contains a
loop. I'm new to rspec so not sure what the best way is to tackle
this.
class Company ActiveRecord::Base
def self.sync_with_basecamp
companies =
On Feb 4, 2008 1:52 PM, Lance Ball [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Feb 4, 2008, at 2:34 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Feb 4, 2008 12:57 PM, Lance Ball
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When #add_user_to_role is called in the controller during my spec
On Feb 4, 2008 2:51 PM, Nate Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having a frustrating experience with a mock object in one example (a
Rails controller test) interfering with an actual model test in a subsequent
model example. More specifically, I have
spec/controllers/section_controller_spec.rb
On Feb 4, 2008 9:44 PM, Brian Rowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm looking for a working example of a put :update on a controller. The
documentation online avoids the update function.
Any help pointing to this example would be great. Trying to get to 100%
coverage...can't make it without
On Feb 4, 2008 11:15 PM, Steve Hayes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In RSpec 1.1.3 this method is invoked from
Spec::Example::ExampleGroupMethods.inherited, but it no longer exists.
It most certainly does. In fact, it's new in 1.1.3, so neither the
method nor the call existed prior. Any chance you
want this level of coverage and
isolation.
FWIW,
David
On Feb 5, 2008 2:02 AM, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it should replace foo with bar partial do
page = mock(page)
page.should_receive(:replace_html).with('foo', :partial = 'bar')
controller.expect_render(:update
On Feb 7, 2008 2:27 PM, Rick DeNatale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got a controller which produces an RSS feed, pretty much based on
Ryan Bates recent RailsCast.
I'm having a heck of a time getting the spec to successfully fetch the
feed though. I gave up got it working without a spec, and
On Feb 7, 2008 9:39 AM, Charles Grindel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am currently running RSpec 1.1.3 with ZenTest 3.9.1 on Windows XP. I have
noticed that shared examples are not being reloaded by spec_server when they
have been updated. Below is a simple example that reproduces the problem.
On Feb 7, 2008 5:26 PM, Pito Salas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am experimenting with the restful-authentication plug in and I see
that it has generated an rspec encantation which I had not seen
before:
it 'allows signup' do
lambda do
create_user
response.should be_redirect
On Feb 11, 2008 6:41 AM, Neil M. Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
aslak hellesoy wrote:
On Feb 8, 2008 9:50 PM, Neil M. Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sorry if this is documented somewhere, but do stories support colored
output?
neither -c nor --color are working for me.
It works
On Feb 13, 2008 12:26 PM, Max Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm testing a controller action that redirects to a different action/view,
sending through some params. In my test, i'm only specifying the controller
and action that it should redirect to, but the additional params are making
On Feb 13, 2008 6:03 PM, Wes Shaddix [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jarkko Laine wrote:
On 13.2.2008, at 5.12, Wes Shaddix wrote:
I have a GroupController class that inherits from a SecuredController
which have a before filter (before_filter :login_required). This is
using the restul
On Feb 13, 2008 6:24 PM, Wes Shaddix [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Chelimsky wrote:
On Feb 13, 2008 6:03 PM, Wes Shaddix [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jarkko Laine wrote:
On 13.2.2008, at 5.12, Wes Shaddix wrote:
I have a GroupController class that inherits from a SecuredController
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Rick DeNatale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/14/08, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 8:22 AM, Rick DeNatale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/14/08, Max Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been looking
data in the object but it's private.
thanks
max
On 13/02/2008, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 13, 2008 12:26 PM, Max Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm testing a controller action that redirects to a different
action/view,
sending through some params. In my test
I found the source of the problem and I'm working on a fix.
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 11:16 PM, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 08:57:32 +0800, Kamal Fariz wrote:
I got this too, but didn't bother to find out where and how script/ spec
would sneak into the list of files
The source of the bug was a patch that we applied a while back. This
was after the 1.1.3 release, so if you're using 1.1.3 you're fine. If
you're using trunk, go ahead and update and you should be fine now.
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:31 AM, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I found
to believe such a thing?
Op 16-feb-08, om 14:59 heeft David Chelimsky het volgende geschreven:
On Feb 16, 2008 8:51 AM, Ivo Dancet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I can't seem to get rspec and autotest to work in a small test
project. The spec command doesn't load the implementation file
On Feb 16, 2008 1:21 PM, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 18:13:51 +, Steve wrote:
What was the nature of the changes. I just updated to r3312, and when I
run autotest I get:
loading autotest/rails_rspec
/usr/bin/ruby1.8 -S script/spec -O spec/spec.opts all the
On Feb 16, 2008 1:56 PM, Ivo Dancet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Op 16-feb-08, om 19:26 heeft Steve het volgende geschreven:
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 13:06:00 -0500, David Chelimsky wrote:
The rspec/rails plugin works because there are generators which
create
the files for you, not because
On Feb 16, 2008 5:19 PM, Gary Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Consider:
module X
def initialize(a)
super()
end
end
describe X do
it is a module do
X.should be_instance_of(Module)
end
end
This generates an error because #describe tries to include X into the
On Feb 17, 2008 12:59 AM, Gary Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 16, 2008, at 6:10 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
That was done initially to support Rails helper specs. As it turns
out, I usually wrap add a #helper method that returns self in those
cases to make it explicit. So I'm
On Feb 17, 2008 10:30 PM, Phlip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
s/pdi/pid
Funny that the typo should lead you to PDI :)
Oh kewt, but that's copied live out of a passing Beast test. (You know -
always
clone a working test when branching in a new direction..):
/beast/stable-1.0/test/fixtures$
On Feb 17, 2008 9:49 PM, Phlip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RSpec-ers:
I'm aware this is quite the FAQ. I have probably asked it myself, but I just
can't Google up anything but others asking it.
I grabbed the source to Beast, to use as a Rails project uninfluenced by me,
or
RSpec. Then I
On Feb 18, 2008 8:43 AM, Max Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ah yes of course :)
So, now, should_not be_success passes ok, but should i be more specific
and require a particular error code? If so, which would i get from a get
call that's failed because of a RuntimeError exception?
You
On Feb 18, 2008 8:46 AM, Corey Haines [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
500? That's internal server error. You could set up an expectation for the
return, using a code you know isn't right (200?), then see what the actual
value is after you get the failing test.
What he said :)
On Feb 18, 2008
On Feb 18, 2008 4:59 PM, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not sure if this is rspec or autotest. When autotest is running, and I
add new files in my rails project, it doesn't notice. I have to restart
autotest for it to start seeing them. Not the end of the world, just a
small inconvenience.
On Feb 18, 2008 8:10 PM, EAW [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I know that in general, view and controller tests should be isolated,
such that controller specs don't test views etc. However, I think
I've run into a situation that might be an exception.
My controller uses render_to_string to
On Feb 19, 2008 10:42 AM, Jarkko Laine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
rspec and rspec_on_rails rev 3316, ZenTest 3.9.1
When run through spec_server, running spec fails if the spec file is
not specified with an absolute path:
Probutanol:koulutusweb jarkko$ script/spec --options spec/spec.opts
On Feb 19, 2008 12:08 PM, Jarkko Laine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19.2.2008, at 17.57, David Chelimsky wrote:
Did this just start happening for you? If so, it could be the patch I
applied in r3310. Would you mind checking out 3309 and seeing if you
still have this problem?
Ok, found out
On Feb 19, 2008 1:18 PM, James Deville [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 19, 2008, at 3:42 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Feb 18, 2008 8:10 PM, EAW [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I know that in general, view and controller tests should be isolated,
such that controller specs don't
On Feb 20, 2008 12:06 AM, Zach Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was working on a past project tonight to trunk which is using the
old story format. IE:
Given desc do / end
When someting do /end
etc..
Is this officially supported, or is this just something that hasn't
been ripped out
On Feb 20, 2008 12:35 AM, Peter Recore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I checked out the CURRENT release of rspec and rails_spec as outlined on
the rubyforge page. I am having trouble with models that use the
:references column type. I get tests with syntax errors after
generating a new class from
On Feb 20, 2008 2:02 AM, Jarkko Laine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19.2.2008, at 20.45, James Deville wrote:
I set RAILS_ENV in my stories/helper.rb file. That might be a good
solution.
On Feb 19, 2008, at 10:32 AM, Ed Howland wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to get Webrat integrated
this:
http://rspec.lighthouseapp.com/projects/5645/how-to-file-a-ticket.
Then post back here if you have any questions.
Cheers,
David
Michael
On Feb 20, 2008, at 10:50 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Feb 20, 2008 1:30 PM, Michael Latta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the story framework I
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 6:17 AM, Max Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a fixture for one of my tables that i use in some model tests. The
data in it is messing up some other tests for a different model, that
doesn't ask for the fixture - isn't the fixture data supposed to be cleared
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 9:07 PM, Zach Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 11:21 PM, Kero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was working on a past project tonight to trunk which is using the
old story format. IE:
Given desc do / end
When someting do /end
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 10:26 PM, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 9:07 PM, Zach Dennis As you mentioned David,
Plain text is great for some situations, but
so is writing in Ruby. This begs the question now that we have plain
text stories. Can we
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 7:46 AM, Zach Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 11:40 PM, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 10:26 PM, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 9:07 PM, Zach Dennis As you
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 7:50 AM, Maurício Linhares
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello guys,
I have the following spec:
describe 'With successful save' do
it 'Should redirect to the new page' do
do_post
response.should be_redirect
response.should
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 7:58 AM, Max Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
doh...dammit, i thought i'd tried that. I'm losing it...
thanks!
You're welcome.
Cheers,
David
On 22/02/2008, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 7:26 AM, Max Williams
[EMAIL
://alinhavado.wordpress.com/ (pt-br) |
http://codeshooter.wordpress.com/ (en)
João Pessoa, PB, +55 83 8867-7208
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 11:25 AM, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 8:10 AM, Maurício Linhares
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Using the path method the spec
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Paul Dowman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I'm mostly quite happy using autotest with rspec, but there's one
thing that's been bothering me, and as my test suite grows larger it'd
becoming more painful.
Autotest re-runs the entire suite whenever a spec that
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Paul Dowman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sometimes I need a spec that tests something which can't work inside a
transaction. Is it possible to disable transactional fixtures for one
spec?
I tried:
describe MyClass without transactional fixtures do
On Feb 23, 2008, at 12:16 PM, Joe Van Dyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any reason why there isn't a rake task for stories yet? (I'm
looking in trunk)
There is one for rspec_on_rails but it is nothing special. It just
calls stories/ all.rb which is up to you to maintain.
I know of at least
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 5:29 AM, Joe Ocampo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Background just started programming in Ruby literally 12 hours ago and have
a question regarding context and describe methods. Reading the RDoc it
indicated that context is an alias for describe. So I decided to try to
the
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 5:54 PM, Alex Satrapa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a story, I have the following happening:
post(/resources/, 'resource' = request_attrs)
response.should render_template('resource/new')
response.should have_tag('*', /must have one or more X defined/)
In
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 6:29 PM, Alex Satrapa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 25/02/2008, at 10:58 , David Chelimsky wrote:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 5:54 PM, Alex Satrapa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the ResourceController spec, I have the following happening:
post( :create
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 6:35 PM, s.ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 24, 2008, at 4:29 PM, Alex Satrapa wrote:
Okay, this is weird. The result seems to indicate that the body of
the response is the literal text, resource/new:
My autotest results show (I've changed the name of the
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 6:23 AM, Chuck Remes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for asking this question. This is exactly what I was going to write,
but you beat me to it!
(Sorry for the top-post; just following the last responder.)
cr
On Feb 25, 2008, at 3:30 AM, Matthijs Langenberg wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 9:01 AM, Rupert Voelcker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have been having some probs getting the pre-commit to run so help
would be appreciated (then I can add some specs to my patch) - thanks
for the suggestion to post here Dave :)
I'm on OS X and have checked out the
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 9:14 AM, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 9:01 AM, Rupert Voelcker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have been having some probs getting the pre-commit to run so help
would be appreciated (then I can add some specs to my patch) - thanks
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Rupert Voelcker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 25/02/2008, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 9:01 AM, Rupert Voelcker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have been having some probs getting the pre-commit to run so help
would
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Giles Bowkett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi - I've got a bunch of people using specs at a company. Everybody is
writing specs, but people are not really practicing BDD. As in, the
specs are there, but it doesn't go, write spec, write code, repeat. I
recently
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 5:41 AM, Edvard Majakari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My problems seem to be arising from the fact that when i run the test, the
objects i created last time are still in the database. Shouldn't they be
cleared out automatically? This in turn is preventing me from
and incorrectly think that that's the data every
example is using. It is much, much safer (and more sane) to use
before(:each) even though it may slow things down a bit.
HTH,
David
On 26/02/2008, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 5:41 AM, Edvard Majakari [EMAIL
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 10:53 PM, Bei [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I'm using story runner of RSpec now. What I'm trying to do is
initializing the @selenium before any steps of one story is executing,
and stop @selenium after any story is finished. just as @BeforeClass
and @AfterClass
Hey all,
A while back I mentioned that we were going to move to git or hg. We
decided that we'd experiment with each for a month and see how it
goes.
We're going to start with git. Obviously if all goes well we'll have
to reassess whether or not to also give hg a try.
We have a repo set up at
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 12:00 AM, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey all,
A while back I mentioned that we were going to move to git or hg. We
decided that we'd experiment with each for a month and see how it
goes.
We're going to start with git. Obviously if all goes well
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 12:49 AM, Korny Sietsma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Totally agree with this - I'm happy to work with specs that just define a
single bit of the system's behaviour (i.e. unit tests) and specs that
define behaviour across several different parts of the system (i.e.
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 3:54 AM, Namrata Tiwari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This action will list all the articles according to city. Please, can
some one guide me through this spec.
def list
@articles = find_city.articles.paginate :all, :page = params[:page]
This line has what we call a
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 7:22 AM, Glenn Ford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a similar perspective from my own personal experience. I am
still quite the novice, but I'm as much of a novice in RSpec as I am
in Ruby / RoR. Honestly, a lot of my specs in new sections end up
having great
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Bryan Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using rSpec 1.1.3 and ZenTest 3.9.1 and every time I run a test I get
All Tests Passed ... perhaps I should just leave it that way? :p
Anyways, I've attempted to construct my own ~/.autotest file and it's
extremely basic,
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 1:08 PM, Jed Hurt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 6:21 AM, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:52 AM, Jed Hurt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ahh, I see. Is Spec::Runner::QuietBacktraceTweaker configurable for more
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 5:33 PM, David Beckwith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
In the spirit of outside-in are given-when-then scenarios supposed to be
integration tests of views?
Do you mean through views? - i.e. view down to the db? If so, that
is one part of the picture.
Or should we be
On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Giles Bowkett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I appear to have written code which travels backwards through time:
http://www.vimeo.com/742590
This disturbs me immensely. If anyone can explain it, that would be cool.
I think it's an illusion brought about by how
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 5:04 AM, Namrata Tiwari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matthias Hennemeyer wrote:
Am 03.03.2008 um 04:38 schrieb Namrata Tiwari:
The method find_city is in application controller. I think the method
'find_city' is being called but its expecting some args.
The
401 - 500 of 2985 matches
Mail list logo
