On 9 Aug 2010, at 17:37, Rick DeNatale wrote:
Well, I'd still use a different file name suffix which I could set
textmate to recognize as a spec
_sspec.rb or _sgroup.rb
something like that.
Hi Rick,
I think that was what David was saying? (If I understood you both correctly,
that
On 8 Aug 2010, at 21:53, Phillip Koebbe wrote:
I don't think you are alone in your quest to achieve greater organization. I
am guessing that in your suggested RSpec folder structure, the current
folders of controllers|helpers|models|views would all live under examples? I
might go for
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Ashley Moran
ashley.mo...@patchspace.co.uk wrote:
On 9 Aug 2010, at 17:37, Rick DeNatale wrote:
Well, I'd still use a different file name suffix which I could set
textmate to recognize as a spec
_sspec.rb or _sgroup.rb
something like that.
Hi Rick,
I
On 10 Aug 2010, at 15:03, Rick DeNatale wrote:
And easy to add yourself by just editing the bundle.
I've tried this before. Unfortunately, it just leads to pain when you try to
update the bundle via Git
Or... how about an actual dot-suffix, .rspec, eg,
active_record_associations.rspec,
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Elliot Winkler
elliot.wink...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Phillip Koebbe phillipkoe...@gmail.com
wrote:
Here's another idea that's not so great, but maybe it will spur some
thinking in someone else. What about a custom generator (or a flag
On Aug 9, 2010, at 9:56 AM, Rick DeNatale wrote:
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Elliot Winkler
elliot.wink...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Phillip Koebbe phillipkoe...@gmail.com
wrote:
Here's another idea that's not so great, but maybe it will spur some
thinking in
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 11:23 AM, David Chelimsky dchelim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 9, 2010, at 9:56 AM, Rick DeNatale wrote:
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Elliot Winkler
elliot.wink...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Phillip Koebbe phillipkoe...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Aug 08, 2010, at 2:17 am, Phillip Koebbe wrote:
I have developed a system in which I require model_helper.rb in model specs,
controller_helper.rb in controllers, and (you guessed it!) view_helper.rb in
view specs. Each of those then require spec_helper.rb. I did this because I
wanted
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 7:11 AM, Ashley Moran
ashley.mo...@patchspace.co.uk wrote:
I just double checked, and spec_helper.rb isn't considered an RSpec file -
and actually, I don't think it should be. Also, I have a spec/support folder
in most projects, with matchers etc. They aren't RSpec
On 2010-08-08 6:11 AM, Ashley Moran wrote:
On Aug 08, 2010, at 2:17 am, Phillip Koebbe wrote:
I have developed a system in which I require model_helper.rb in model specs,
controller_helper.rb in controllers, and (you guessed it!) view_helper.rb in
view specs. Each of those then require
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Phillip Koebbe phillipkoe...@gmail.comwrote:
Here's another idea that's not so great, but maybe it will spur some
thinking in someone else. What about a custom generator (or a flag on the
official one) that added something like a shebang line at the beginning of
Hi
Did the RSpec TMBundle ever have multiple ways of recognising RSpec files? I'm
convinced it user to look for spec_helper on the first line. The Ruby bundle
does something similar, as it looks for firstLineMatch = '^#!/.*\bruby';
The reason I ask is because I now have several files that
On Aug 7, 2010, at 5:28 PM, Ashley Moran wrote:
Hi
Did the RSpec TMBundle ever have multiple ways of recognising RSpec files?
I'm convinced it user to look for spec_helper on the first line.
I'm pretty sure it never did that.
The Ruby bundle does something similar, as it looks for
On 2010-08-07 5:44 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Aug 7, 2010, at 5:28 PM, Ashley Moran wrote:
Hi
Did the RSpec TMBundle ever have multiple ways of recognising RSpec files? I'm convinced
it user to look for spec_helper on the first line.
I'm pretty sure it never did that.
The Ruby bundle
14 matches
Mail list logo
