rsync caching files on my local hard drive and not deleting

todays date) or with this version of OSX. The usual basic steps of restarting etc have not resolved the issue. I did notice that when I quit terminal when I first noticed the issue that my disk space seemed to be coming back at around 1mb/sec. Kind Regards, David -- Please use reply-all for most repl

Problem Solved

the disk wanted to dismount itself Kind Regards, David -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Incomplete sync

bwlimit=35 --dry-run --one-file-system 192.168.159.4::root / I would like to know if I am doing something wrong here or it if -- -- Best Regards - David -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/

make errors, rsync 2.6.9 with acls patch

ng: enumeration value 'ACL_EXTENDED_DENY' not handled in switch acls.c: In function 'next_ace_id': acls.c:1015: error: 'ACL_USER' undeclared (first use in this function) acls.c: In function 'next_acl_uid': acls.c:1050: error: 'ACL_USER' undeclared (first use in this function) acls.c: In function 'next_acl_gid': acls.c:1055: error: 'ACL_GROUP' undeclared (first use in this function) make: *** [acls.o] Error 1 -- TIA, David. -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Re: 2.6.9 , problem with acl patch

On Dec 4, 2006, at 4:25 PM, Wayne Davison wrote: On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 11:37:10AM +0400, Dmitry Melekhov wrote: Internal error: wrong write used in receiver. If you google for this string, the very first item in the search results is this thread that has my reply (which contains a patch

Re: make errors, rsync 2.6.9 with acls patch

On Dec 4, 2006, at 6:21 PM, Wayne Davison wrote: [Replying to the original thread, not the hijacked thread.] david wrote: Looks like my initial question is ignored in place of Dmitry's. Not ignored by me, but since I don't know OS X, I can't answer it. Hopefully someone fam

Re: make errors, rsync 2.6.9 with acls patch

On Dec 4, 2006, at 7:37 PM, snowcrash wrote: fwiw, i build v269 on OSX client (PPC). in earlier chat, i was instructed to patch -p1 Hi, thanks. Yes, I'm able to build it just fine without ACL support. Longer-term (next few/several weeks), yes, ACL support will be quite important and I

Re: 2.6.9 , problem with acl patch

On Dec 5, 2006, at 11:09 AM, Wayne Davison wrote: On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 01:16:34PM +0400, Dmitry Melekhov wrote: Sorry, but this patch can't be applied to 2.6.9 patched with acl patch: The patch applies fine without even a wimper. Make sure that your version doesn't have its white-space m

Re: 2.6.9 , problem with acl patch

On Dec 6, 2006, at 6:56 PM, snowcrash wrote: before being warned-off ACLs on osx, this had been part of my issue, addresed in an earlier thread here, http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2006-November/016788.html i'd found these symbols originate in libacl (e.g., cref

Re: 2.6.9 , problem with acl patch

On Dec 6, 2006, at 7:49 PM, snowcrash wrote: ACL support for OS X would be - well, - mighty fine, as ACLs for OS X Server (10.4) are quite useful and many are using them. Here's hoping for the best ! one would think that Apple would be working on the issue, but i've found that the discussion

RE: direct write patch

feeling that trying to reduce the disk space needs is going to be counter-productive since it goes against the fundamental tradeoffs inherent in rsync. -- David /---\ \ David Bolen\ E-mail: [EMAIL PROTE

RE: times difference causes write

hat purpose as well at the expense of some additional I/O and computation. Presumably you could modify your patch so that -c (or some new option) only invoked the checksum if the timestamp differed, since I don't think there's any su

RE: Block Size

t below 32K). Not sure how much that would help, although it'll reduce your block count by about a factor of 2. -- David /---\ \ David Bolen\ E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] / | FitLinxx

RE: Block Size

by using a larger value (16K for example). -- David /---\ \ David Bolen\ E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] / | FitLinxx, Inc.\ Phone: (203) 708-5192| / 860 Canal Street, Stamford,

RE: Rsync: Re: patch to enable faster mirroring of large filesyst ems

rly associated with its file) without re-checksumming the files? Are you just trusting size/timestamp? I know in my case I've got database files that don't change timestamp/size and yet have different contents. Thus I'd always have to do full checksums so I&#

RE: Rsync: Re: patch to enable faster mirroring of large filesyst ems

ll say that the whole behavior (the transaction log always has an appropriate timestamp, it's just the raw database file itself that doesn't) sure caught me by surprise in the beginning after finding what I thought was a valid backup wouldn

ssh->rsync->newbie

ompress --rsh=/usr/bin/ssh \   --recursive --times --perms --links --delete \   /www/htdocs/* 10.10.10.10:www thanks in advance! David Dahl --

RE: Why does one of there work and the other doesn't

le. It doesn't matter who initiates the contact, but the direction that the files are flowing. This is due to the algorithm (the sender is the component that has to construct the mapping from the new file using portions of the old file as transmitted by

using rsync with Mac OS X

Rsync looks like a good tool for keeping files synchronized between two computers, such as a desktop and laptop. However, Mac OS uses a forked file system, with the second fork storing data critical to some files (such as applications) as well as type and creator information matching files up

RE: move rsync development tree to BitKeeper?

if only daily snapshots), since at least for me rsync would be the only BK project I'd care about - it's not clear I'd want to bother with the client. -- David /---\ \ David Bolen

RE: efficient file appends

minimizes the meta data transmitted for the common portion of the file. It works pretty well for me with database transaction log files which get pretty big. You can probably find some past e-mail on the subject in the list by looking for t

RE: efficient file appends

27;ve never tried _really_ large block sizes (I thought I had problems if I got close to 64K, but I may be mis-remembering). The one drawback to the larger block sizes is that if you do encounter any differences, you'll retransmit more information than necessary,

RE: definite data corruption in 2.5.0 with -z option

e read ahead - this is probably the problem I was recalling in my last reply. There was some reason I tended to keep my variable block sizes that my scripts were picking <= 32K or so. If that's it, then I doubt it's the "bit length overflow" issue since I was running into this ba

Re: using rsync with Mac OS X

I'm not familiar with netatalk, but along a similar line, Mac OS X stores resource forks and metadata differently on HFS+ and single-fork volumes (such as UFS or NFS). If you copy a file from an HFS+ volume over to a single-fork volume using the Finder it'll split the pieces apart and save the

Solaris 2.8/2.5.2 build issues

Folks, Just downloaded 2.5.2 to play with...builds with a raft of warnings, and the symlink test fails. Transcript below for anyone with the knowledge and energy to repair. This is done with gcc-3.0.3. David. - BUILD: corona 2.5.2 7 $ make gcc -I. -I. -g -O2 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -Wall -W -I

Read Error : Connection reset by peer

Hi list, I've a problem with rsync. Server and client are running red hat 6.2. I've got a server running rsync 2.4.6 as a daemon ( rsync --daemon ) For security i use IP checking. ( NB perhaps it's not the better way to do what i want ) I try 2.4.6 on the server and on my client. on the client

unexpected EOF in read_timeout

like this : read error: Connection reset by peer unexpected EOF in read_timeout I try rsync 2.4.5, 2.4.6 and 2.5.1 and always the same thing. Both client and server are running linux redhat. I don't know what to do now :( Thanks David

Re: unexpected EOF in read_timeout

r in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(139) >> and happen when reading a folder on the server which contain such as 70 000 différent files !! I also try to remove the -z but seems not to solve anything ... :( - Original Message - From: "David Bordas" <[EMAIL PR

SIGUSR1 or SIGINT error

se signals, but nothing is that we can find. Does anyone know what this might be from? Is it the server or the client that's complaining about the signal? Thanks, David.

Re: SIGUSR1 or SIGINT error

:41 hite rsyncd[9279]: [ID 702911 daemon.warning] rsync error: received SIGUSR1 or SIGINT (code 20) at rsync.c(229) Any clues? Thanks, David. - On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Dave Dykstra wrote: > On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 12:24:02PM -0500, David Birnbaum wrote: > > Howdy, > > > >

RE: rsync dir in _both_ directions?

It should take virtually no time for the second (sans the initial checksum computation and transmission, which to be fair for large files and small block sizes can be quite significant). -- David /---\ \ David Bolen

Re: SIGUSR1 or SIGINT error

I'm running 2.5.2. However, we had the same type of problem with 2.4.6, which is what we were running before. If I had to guess, I would say that we're seeing this error a little more often in 2.5.2. David. - On Thu, 7 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Currently 2.5.1pre

Re: SIGUSR1 or SIGINT error

PIPE. Solaris bug? Unlikely, but certainly possible (wouldn't be the first time, but it's a helloflot harder to track down). Suggestions? David. - On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Dave Dykstra wrote: > > The fix that went into 2.5.0 was for timeouts that were happening even when > -

Re: SIGUSR1 or SIGINT error

d > many TCP bugs in the past. What version of Solaris is running on each > side, and are they up to date on their patches? If netstat shows data > in a send queue that is not being sent, that points to a TCP problem. We have the latest patches of Solaris 2.8; at least, within a month or so. Thanks for the help thus far, hopefully the next batch of truss's will shed more light on the situation. David.

RE: File over 2GB using Cygwin

enerally ends up at the point where if someone is asking for it, the suggestion is that they implement it :-) So I don't think there's any practical workaround with Cygwin. -- David /---\ \ David Bo

Re: SIGUSR1 or SIGINT error

On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Dave Dykstra wrote: > [adding the mailing list to the Cc after David sent me trusses and other > info about his hang. I have trimmed down the tracing info to the relevant > pieces.] > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 11:51:27PM -0500, David Birnbaum wrote: > >

RE: File over 2GB using Cygwin

to handle the same fork emulation and Unix semantics that Cygwin is doing, it's unlikely to be a weekend project :-) In theory a native port might use threads and overlapping I/O very effectively, but I think it would be fairly tough to do without some significant changes to

Re: SIGUSR1 or SIGINT error

use the occassional lapse like this? We > > certainly haven't seen any other networking problems that would explain > > this. > > It still looks like a disk problem and not a network problem, so I don't > think a snoop is going to help you. Agreed. As soon as it st

RE: [rsync-announce] Graphical rsync!

David Starks-Browning [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] writes: > Are you also distributing the source to cygwin1.dll? It is illegal > not to. Well, if it's an unmodified version, I expect a simple pointer to the Cygwin site and/or CVS tree would be sufficient. Physical distribution is not nece

RE: is it a bug or a feature? re:time zone differences, laptops, and suggestion for a new option

, but the FAT* variants use local time. -- David /---\ \ David Bolen\ E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] / | FitLinxx, Inc.\ Phone: (203) 708-5192| / 860 Canal Street, Sta

similar file names..

to be very similar) I had a quick search on google, and found a few articles, namely : http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/rsync/1998-August/000676.html and http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/rsync/2000-June/002421.html Has anything changed since then ? thanks in advance, David. -- David Go

Connection Reset by peer

d (code 11) at main.c(295) 2002/04/10 04:56:59 [26821] transfer interrupted (code 30) at io.c(65) >> The backup process is launched from a shell script calling rsync one after the other. This script is in root crontab. Thanks David -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba

Re: Connection Reset by peer

- Original Message - From: "Martin Pool" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "David BORDAS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 11:35 AM Subject: Re: Connection Reset by peer > On 10 Apr 2002, David BORDAS <[E

RE: how to take least risk on rsync dir

want to update the whole directory, a simple copy may be as effective as rsync, since you're not benefitting from the selection of a subset of files. -- David /---\ \ David Bolen\ E-mail: [EMAIL P

RE: Non-determinism

eed, I believe). Thus, it's fairly accurate to compare rsync to performing an ftp or cp and then doing a full checksum on the file, so one could argue it's actually more reliable than a straight ftp/cp without the checksum. -- David /---

RE: Non-determinism

ly intensive to compute, so I think MD4 is more than sufficient for rsync. -- David /-------\ \ David Bolen\ E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] / | FitLinxx, Inc.\ Phone: (203) 708-5192

RE: mixed case file systems.

id this). I also didn't bump the protocol in this patch (wasn't quite sure it was appropriate just for an incompatible command line option) since since it was for local use. The patch is based on a 2.4.x series rsync, but if it doesn't apply cleanly to 2.5.x, it's should b

RE: mixed case file systems.

Martin Pool [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] writes: > On 18 Apr 2002, David Bolen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > A few caveats - both ends have to support the option - I couldn't make > > it backwards compatible because both ends exchange information about a > > sorted fil

RE: Future RSYNC enhancement/improvement suggestions

t; any partial file with data from the original file on the destination system during an error. No guarantees it would work as well, since I just took data from the original file past the size point of the partial copy, but in many cases (growing files) its a big win. If anyone is interested, I could

RE: out of memory in build_hash_table

a "ulimit -a" show for a server process? I think under Linux the default settings are in /etc/security/limits.conf, maybe by default processes on the server are limited to 32MB of memory or something? -- David /----

RE: mixed case file systems.

nd we've used it plenty of times successfully. (The interoperability between versions is only true if you use the new option, and that's the same as any of the other options that have been added over time - it's a generic problem for

RE: out of memory in build_hash_table

g. Beyond that though, I suppose perhaps a linux-oriented group would offer further suggestions, under the assumption that something must be leading to the malloc() failing. -- David /-------\ \ David Bo

RE: On Windows OS, is there any advantage for completing rsync using MSVC instead of gcc/cygwin ?

ystem calls and facilities (being able to fork() a child process for example). The native Windows environment isn't compatible with the Unix system API. That's what cygwin brings to the table, the entire Unix emulation layer, and it's crucial to the ability of rsyn

RE: Future RSYNC enhancement/improvement suggestions

a flow within rsync at some point. I can't remember just how major the surgery looked to get the transmission to occur at the point of computation though. -- David /---\ \ David Bolen\

RE: memory requirements was RE: out of memory in build_hash_table

if you're using <2.4.6, you might try a later version to see if it improves things. Or if you're using a later version you might try rebuilding with ARENA_SIZE set to 0 to disable this code to see if your native platform handles it better somehow. -- David /

RE: Future RSYNC enhancement/improvement suggestions

se in our checksum time - although this particular discussion has sort of started me thinking about it again. I may review our current logs to see how much time is being wasted. -- David /---\ \ David Bolen

RE: Future RSYNC enhancement/improvement suggestions

ode that it be done that way - the sequence was pretty much generate/send/free. -- David /---\ \ David Bolen\ E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] / | FitLinxx, Inc.\ Phone: (203) 7

RE: Future RSYNC enhancement/improvement suggestions

e "wasted" time with our current network/filesystem looks to be in aggregate only about 7.5 hours of phone time, which in turn is only about 1.6% of the ~480 hours used each month. So it's hard to worry extensively ab

RE: memory requirements was RE: out of memory in build_hash_table

t definition in favor of one defining it to 0 - e.g.: /* #define ARENA_SIZE (32 * 1024) */ #define ARENA_SIZE 0 The arena handling seems to be reasonably tight, so it's probably a long shot in any event. -- David /----

RE: Patch to avoid 'Connection reset by peer' error for rsync on cygwin

ut I do think it should be safe. -- David /---\ \ David Bolen\ E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] / | FitLinxx, Inc.\ Phone: (203) 708-5192| / 860 Canal Street, Stamford, CT 0690

Synchronization in Mac OS X

with it and your data! Thanks. --Dave ------ David A. Feldman User Interface Designer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://designtheworld.com -- -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.o

Re: Connection reset by peer under Linux ( Add )

pted (code 11) at main.c(295) Or : 2002/05/06 05:35:14 [15646] reverse name lookup failed 2002/05/06 05:35:14 [15646] forward name lookup failed This is stange because i'm backuping from a cron shell script like this rynsc -a ... date rsync -a And some rsync work well without name lookup failed and some not :( I also try to add Ram to client 256 => 384 Mo and also the same thing. Thanks in advance David -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

RE: Compressed backup

changes in output. That's the traditional problem of trying to use an algorithm like rsync's with compressed file formats. You really need to apply the rsync algorithm to the uncompressed files if you hope to gain any real efficiencies in terms of reduction of tra

General speed question

tape backups over the private network (ssh/dd) causes both to slow to a crawl - even though the tape backups can only do about 2M a second (DLT IV). Any suggestions/help appreciated. -- David Arnold[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe or change options:

Compiling a static version of rsync

xecutable 80386 Version 1, dynamically linked, not stripped Any assistance appreciated. -- David Arnold[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

RE: Rsync recursion

rname@hostname:/src/$directory/ /dst/$directory/ Good luck, David -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

not syncing problem

i read the archived post at: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/rsync/2001-October/004986.html and was wondering whether this is documented/discussed elsewhere. i have had two such occurences myself recently, where rsync completed successfully, but the files don't get sync-ed (the target file

Rsync help

Title: Rsync help I get the following transering a large file use rsync over ssh. root@pbodb bin$ ./ausbk.sh building file list ... 10 files to consider ERROR: out of memory in generate_sums rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (8 bytes read so far) rsync error: error in rsync protocol dat

RE: Rsync help

/dir1 systemname:/storage Kindest Regards, Dave -Original Message- From: jw schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 1:17 PM To: Green, Paul Cc: 'Walgamotte, David'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: Rsync help On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 01:13:19PM

Binary Request

Folks, Anyone out there who could compile or otherwise provide an rsync binary suitable for running on Redhat 5.1 (Linux 2.0.31/486) would make me quite grateful; I have a set of six machines I can't upgrade, but I really want to get them into my backup rotation. Thanks in advance,

My first rsync experience

#x27; it produces the following out put: rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (0 bytes read so far) rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(150) Can anyone help? ----- David Flood Systems Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: +44 (0)

Suggestion: rsync and direct IO

We have some cases when copying indexes that we'd like rsync to avoid the system cache when copying a chunk of data from some other machine. I am probably going to modify our own copy of rsync to do this, but if we could write directly to the disk using direct-io (or from for that matter)

Automatically Striping Created Files on advfs Filesystems (Code Provided)

Here is a modification that calls the advfs stripe command (available via Digital Unix) to set a file to be striped across X drives when created. It can only be specified on the command line, but a proper implementation would support rsyncd.conf configuration as well. This should be useful if

directories that change into symlinks

our daily backup is done using the rdiff-backup tool, which in turn utilizes rsync/librsync to do the actual mirroring work. a few days ago we did a refactoring and renamed a bunch of directories. for backward compatibility we maintain the old names by symlinking it to the new names. so, for ex

Re: directories that change into symlinks

nope, --delete-after didn't seem to resolve the problem. what's needed is apparently for rsync to do an "rm -r oldname1" instead of "rmdir oldname1". Eric Whiting wrote: I have observed this same problem. Are you running --delete-after? I assumed it might be relat

Re: directories that change into symlinks

just to correct myself: this has nothing to do with rdiff-backup (which uses *rdiff*, not rsync). local backups with the rdiff-backup tool are fine. the problem is with rsync, when we are trying to mirror the local backups to another machine using rsync. David Garamond wrote: our daily backup

Re: directories that change into symlinks

John Van Essen wrote: Dave, What you need is the --force option. It's not obvious from the all-too-generic name, but that will do the trick. To the rsync maintainers - this is somewhat of an FAQ. Perhaps the error message could also say '(see the --force option)' to help users discover the sol

Re: directories that change into symlinks

Dave Dykstra wrote: Could you please post your full command line and say where in the directory structure the directories were replaced by symlinks? I have not yet been able to come up with an example where --force makes a difference when using --delete and -r (or -a). Refer to http://lists.

Help with CVS related include pattern

27; src src_cvs It does recursively copy all directories (including CVS directories), but it doesn't copy the files within the CVS directories. What am I missing? I'm using rsync 2.5.5, and I see the behavior on both Solaris and Cygwin. Thanks! -David -- To unsubscribe or change option

Bad .sig for rsync tarball?

Hi. I'm trying to get the .sig file (MD5 checksum, I'm assuming) from http://samba.anu.edu.au/ftp/rsync/rsync-2.5.4-2.5.5.diff.gz.sig However, the file seems to be 72 bytes of random data. Where can I get the checksum? Thank

Rsyncing of block devices to a remote file

get the size of partition in this datastructure ? Or more generique, how would I handle this for /dev/fd0, since you can insert 1.44MB disks or 720kB disks ? Anybody else tried to read blockdevices over rsync already ? After all, sending the data of a block device doesn't seem to be as trivial as the archived mail sugested :-) David

reconnect ssh connection?

has someone come up with a trick to let disconnected ssh connections be recovered without terminating and having to restart rsync (perhaps by wrapping ssh or something)? i have a very large (but pretty stable/unchanging) tree of files that i need to sync daily, at night, between two geographica

reconnect ssh connection?

has someone come up with a trick to let disconnected ssh connections be recovered without terminating and having to restart rsync (perhaps by wrapping ssh or something)? i have a very large (but pretty stable/unchanging) tree of files that i need to sync daily, at night, between two geographically

Re: reconnect ssh connection?

Paul Haas wrote: On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, David Garamond wrote [twice!]: i'm really sorry about that. i didn't receive my own post today so i admit i acted in haste. -- dave -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting,

rsync not transferring files

Hi there, I am running rsync-3.0.6-12.el6.x86_64 on a centos 6.6 box. Am trying to get files from a remote server (centos 6.5) to my local machine. It appears to connect fine, but does not transfer any file. this is what I am seeing [youcantoo@testbox home]# rsync -avvvzh -P --stats --delete serve

Re: rsync not transferring files

ine belong > in the main section not the module section. > > > Second, it seems to indicate there is only 1 file and it doesn't need > transferring. --itemize-changes would help. Possibly list it twice. > On 11/22/2014 03:12 PM, David M. wrote: >> Hi there, I am runnin

Re: rsync not transferring files [SOLVED]

.rfx.x86_64 Now everything is working as expected. Perhaps there is something between the two different versions. Anyway, Thank you for the help On 11/24/2014 10:48 AM Kevin Korb wrote: >It looks to me like everything is up to date. On 11/24/2014 12:26 AM, David M. wrote: >> >> I reall

Differing behaviour on consecutive runs

Hi all. I have a strange issue with sync'ing from a USB-attached ext4 file system on one machine, to a USB-attached ext3 file system on another. The sync works fine (a few thousand files). If I run it again straight away, or a few minutes later, rsync reports no action required. But if I wait

switch the light off and shut the door when leaving

think ? Anyway, thanks alot for making/maintaining this efficient piece of software so that it is available everywhere. I hope nobody was hurt with the mail subject, I did not intend to :) david -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change op

which rsync command?

All the files and directories I want to talk about are on the same machine (a Mac). I have a directory that I will call SOURCE. This contains a a number of files, some of which are directories containing further files. I want to copy these files to another directory, which I will call TARGET. P

Re: which rsync command?

/ that should not be deleted or changed, and put these into a file “somewhere". Then I could give an rsync command with the option —delete, but how do I protect the entries in my “somewhere” file from deletion? thanks for any help David > On 23 Feb 2017, at 01:25, Joe wrote: > >

Re: which rsync command?

ai or -avi? And why do you prefer one over the other? I don’t understand the line of rsync output that reads .d..t.. ./ David > On 23 Feb 2017, at 17:02, > wrote: > > > Hi. > > On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 11:07:16 -0500 Kevin Korb wrote: > >> I hate to say it beca

Problems with rsync -e ssh

ified the files are truly the same. Am I missing something? - David. -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Bug when using cygwin version of rsync (forwarded to rsync list)

I've been recommended to forward this to the rsync list for possible incorporation into the main code. Both the problem and solution are described. Please Cc me with any replies since I'm not subscribed to this list. Thanks. Original message I'm using the cygwin

Problems with ! -p

rsync 0 Mar 12 13:14 foo The group is lost, however the permissions are preserved. How can I prevent this happening? Thanks in advance! regards, David. -- David Leach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Professional Services [phone:61-4-1333-5528] SecureNet Ltd

Announcing rsync release 2.5.6

help. -- = David May Senior UNIX System Administrator Albuquerque TVI 505-224-3015 -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Announcing rsync release 2.5.6

About the previous request for the public key...I found a reference that the public key was on a public key server and was able to pull it down from pgp.mit.edu. Thanks anyway. -- = David May Senior UNIX System Administrator Albuquerque TVI 505-224-3015 -- To

Rsync over ssh

rotocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(165)" I get this error if I run it as root or as the rsyncd user on ServerB. Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks David Nickel Network Specialist II Augusta State University -- To unsub

Rsync and SSH syslog problem

. Thanks David -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Request for option for use on an unreliable connection

misbehaviour on the link. This appears to abort the whole transfer. One solution would appear to be an option to log the error then attempt the next file in the set. Is there a patch to allow this? Has anyone had similar problems? TIA David Lambert -- To unsubscribe or change options: http

  1   2   3   4   5   >