[rt-users] [PATCH] RT::Users-WhoBelongToGroups applies LimitToPrivileged filter

2013-03-13 Thread Craig Ringer
Hi all I've noticed that the WhoBelongToGroups method of user search class RT::Users unconditionally calls LimitToPrivileged, making it useless for when you want to find both privileged and unprivileged users, or when you want to find only unprivileged users where you've already called

Re: [rt-users] Initial version of SMS alerting

2013-03-13 Thread Craig Ringer
On 02/28/2013 01:49 PM, Craig Ringer wrote: Hi all Here's a simple action module to send SMS alerts to the user's PagerPhone. I've found the time to package this as RT::Extension::SMSNotify and document it. It's released under the Perl license on CPAN:

Re: [rt-users] [PATCH] RT::Users-WhoBelongToGroups applies LimitToPrivileged filter

2013-03-13 Thread Craig Ringer
On 03/13/2013 04:40 PM, Craig Ringer wrote: Hi all I've noticed that the WhoBelongToGroups method of user search class RT::Users unconditionally calls LimitToPrivileged, making it useless for when you want to find both privileged and unprivileged users, or when you want to find only

[rt-users] datetime custom fields displaying in utc. Sometimes.

2013-03-13 Thread Iain Georgeson
Hello, I'm running rt 4.0.9. In one of our queues we use a couple of datetime custom fields to record events. In the custom fields box on Ticket/Display.html and Ticket/Modify.html, the time is shown in local time. However in the transaction history, and in searches, they display in utc. I would

[rt-users] unprivileged user to see a queue and everything in it

2013-03-13 Thread Martin Petersson
Hello, We want a specific customer to be able to see all tickets in a queue. They have their own mail address supp...@clab.semailto:supp...@clab.se that they use to mail in their requests. I created a group called clab-users and gave the group view queue rights, that didn't work so i created a

Re: [rt-users] unprivileged user to see a queue and everything in it

2013-03-13 Thread Kevin Falcone
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 01:43:00PM +, Martin Petersson wrote: We want a specific customer to be able to see all tickets in a queue. They have their own mail address [1]supp...@clab.se that they use to mail in their requests. I created a group called clab-users and gave the group

Re: [rt-users] datetime custom fields displaying in utc. Sometimes.

2013-03-13 Thread Kevin Falcone
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 01:47:08PM +0300, Iain Georgeson wrote: In one of our queues we use a couple of datetime custom fields to record events. In the custom fields box on Ticket/Display.html and Ticket/Modify.html, the time is shown in local time. However in the transaction history, and in

[rt-users] Consistant Error when Using Reminders

2013-03-13 Thread Raymond Corbett
Having admin rights I don't have any problem with creating reminders. However, everyone else does. Example: Ticket #32 exists. User selects the Ticket and has the metadata page displayed. Using the Reminder portal they create a reminder. On their home page they consistently get the error

Re: [rt-users] unprivileged user to see a queue and everything in it

2013-03-13 Thread Martin Petersson
/pipermail/rt-users/attachments/20130313/9f575a78/attachment-0001.pgp -- Message: 2 Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 11:07:22 -0400 From: Kevin Falcone falc...@bestpractical.com To: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com Subject: Re: [rt-users] datetime custom fields displaying in utc

[rt-users] Messages with HTML not showing in UI

2013-03-13 Thread Jay V
Hello there - For some reason the HTML messages that people are sending it (because of email sig) are being truncated in the ticket view and only the LOGO for the company is showing up. Is there a setting that can be set to increase the size of the message allowed for display on the

[rt-users] Dev mode question

2013-03-13 Thread Raymond Corbett
Quick question on Dev mode in RT. Now that we are rolling out RT in the facility. Does Dev mode allow me to work on RT doing tweaks, adding new fields, making changes to users right etc. without upsetting or disturbing things on the release that people are interacting with? And if so, how

[rt-users] Custom Condition - On Correspond or Comment

2013-03-13 Thread Billington, James
Hello All, I am running RT 4.0.10 on CentOS 6.3. I was trying to create a user defined condition from the create scrip ui based on a code snippit I found here (http://requesttracker.wikia.com/wiki/CustomConditionSnippets). On Correspond to Unowned Ticket return 0 unless

Re: [rt-users] Custom Condition - On Correspond or Comment

2013-03-13 Thread Thomas Sibley
On 03/13/2013 09:59 AM, Billington, James wrote: I was wondering if I can add an *or* in the first statement to make it apply to correspond or comment? Like this: return 0 unless $self-TransactionObj-Type eq Correspond or “Comment”; No, that's not valid Perl. You'd need (line break is

Re: [rt-users] Messages with HTML not showing in UI

2013-03-13 Thread Kevin Falcone
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 09:35:40AM -0700, Jay V wrote: For some reason the HTML messages that people are sending it (because of email sig) are being truncated in the ticket view and only the LOGO for the company is showing up. Is there a setting that can be set to increase the

Re: [rt-users] Corrupted customfieldvalue error in Apache error_log with migrated RT4

2013-03-13 Thread Kevin Falcone
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 08:53:51AM +, Guadagnino Cristiano wrote: I think I have found out where the problem lies. On our production system (RT 3.8.10) attachments that have no value assigned show as (no value). On our test system (RT 4.0.8) attachments that have no value

Re: [rt-users] [PATCH] RT::Users-WhoBelongToGroups applies LimitToPrivileged filter

2013-03-13 Thread Thomas Sibley
On 03/13/2013 03:06 AM, Craig Ringer wrote: I think I could hot-insert the method into RT::Users with something like: { package RT::Users; sub WhoBelongToGroupsIncludingPrivileged { # } } in my module. It doesn't have to be visible to other modules, so it'd essentially

Re: [rt-users] unprivileged user to see a queue and everything in it

2013-03-13 Thread Kevin Falcone
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 04:23:37PM +, Martin Petersson wrote: From Kevin Falcone On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 01:43:00PM +, Martin Petersson wrote: We want a specific customer to be able to see all tickets in a queue. They have their own mail address supp...@clab.se that they use to

Re: [rt-users] Custom Condition - On Correspond or Comment

2013-03-13 Thread Billington, James
Thanks for the quick response and you answered my question perfectly. I'm definitely going to check out the extension as a replacement or more complete solution for this, though it's not showing up yet from the link you sent. I suppose it'll take some time. Thanks again, James Billington

Re: [rt-users] Custom Condition - On Correspond or Comment

2013-03-13 Thread Asif Iqbal
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Billington, James jbilling...@itsfac.com wrote: Thanks for the quick response and you answered my question perfectly. I'm definitely going to check out the extension as a replacement or more complete solution for this, though it's not showing up yet from the

Re: [rt-users] Custom Condition - On Correspond or Comment

2013-03-13 Thread Thomas Sibley
On 03/13/2013 10:58 AM, Billington, James wrote: Thanks for the quick response and you answered my question perfectly. I'm definitely going to check out the extension as a replacement or more complete solution for this, though it's not showing up yet from the link you sent. I suppose it'll

Re: [rt-users] [PATCH] RT::Users-WhoBelongToGroups applies LimitToPrivileged filter

2013-03-13 Thread Craig Ringer
On 03/14/2013 01:50 AM, Thomas Sibley wrote: That injects the method into RT::Users. It will override the existing method and all code will use it once your extension is loaded. It is not private, as you describe. Yes, but the name isn't referenced anywhere else so the additional method

Re: [rt-users] [PATCH] RT::Users-WhoBelongToGroups applies LimitToPrivileged filter

2013-03-13 Thread Thomas Sibley
On 03/13/2013 02:15 PM, Craig Ringer wrote: On 03/14/2013 01:50 AM, Thomas Sibley wrote: That injects the method into RT::Users. It will override the existing method and all code will use it once your extension is loaded. It is not private, as you describe. Yes, but the name isn't