Re: [rt-users] 2 questions about RT 3.8

2008-07-22 Thread Emmanuel Lacour
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 08:27:46AM -0400, Jesse Vincent wrote: > > >>> 2) It seems that the search feature used to (maybe I am wrong > >>> here, or > > maybe I customized something and didn't re-add it in) used to search > > the > >>> requestors field and the subject line, but now only searche

Re: [rt-users] 2 questions about RT 3.8

2008-07-21 Thread Greg Evans
Jesse wrote: Subject: Re: [rt-users] 2 questions about RT 3.8 On Jul 19, 2008, at 4:37 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>>> 1) Is email completion supposed to work out of the box? >> >>> Are you talking about when adding people via the 'People' section of >&

Re: [rt-users] 2 questions about RT 3.8

2008-07-20 Thread Jesse Vincent
On Jul 19, 2008, at 4:37 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> 1) Is email completion supposed to work out of the box? > >> Are you talking about when adding people via the 'People' section of >> the ticket? If so, I've noticed that I used to be able to put >> usernames in the "Email" field, but now t

Re: [rt-users] 2 questions about RT 3.8

2008-07-19 Thread jmoseley
>>1) Is email completion supposed to work out of the box? >Are you talking about when adding people via the 'People' section of >the ticket? If so, I've noticed that I used to be able to put >usernames in the "Email" field, but now that doesn't work. You are correct. I'd love for this missing sh

Re: [rt-users] 2 questions about RT 3.8

2008-07-19 Thread Scott Hebert
> 1) Is email completion supposed to work out of the box? Are you talking about when adding people via the 'People' section of the ticket? If so, I've noticed that I used to be able to put usernames in the "Email" field, but now that doesn't work. > 2) It seems that the search feature used to (ma

[rt-users] 2 questions about RT 3.8

2008-07-18 Thread Greg Evans
Just did the 3.8 upgrade today and it seems to have worked great ☺ though I have 2 questions. 1) Is email completion supposed to work out of the box? 2) It seems that the search feature used to (maybe I am wrong here, or maybe I customized something and didn't re-add it in) used to search the re